American Potato Journal

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 43–52 | Cite as

Horizontal (polygenic) and vertical (oligogenic) resistance against blight

  • J. E. Van Der Plank


Horizontal resistance is polygenic, and acts against all races of blight. Vertical resistance, conferred by the R-genes, is oligogenic, and can be overcome by a change of race.

Horizontal resistance slows down the rate at which disease increases in the field. Vertical resistance reduces the initial amount of inoculum from which the epidemic begins. A slow rate of disease increase in the field greatly enhances the benefit from reducing the initial inoculum. Therefore, horizontal resistance greatly enhances vertical resistance: horizontal resistance activates the R-genes. The R-genes have fallen into disrepute because they were used wrongly: they were used to replace horizontal resistance, whereas they should be used only to supplement it.

This same conclusion is arrived at independently from the fact of stabilizing selection in favor of simple races of blight on potato varieties without R-genes; and all the evidence indicates that R-genes have a useful future in the potato industry only if breeders are prepared to couple them with high horizontal resistance.


AMERICAN Potato Journal Potato Variety Cual Phytophthora Infestans Field Resistance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


La resistencia horizontal es poligénica y actúa contra todas las razas de tizón. La resistencia vertical conferida por los genes-R, es poligogénica y puede ser superada por un cambio de raza.

La resistencia horizontal disminuye el grado en el cual la enfermedad aumenta en el campo. La resistencia vertical reduce la cantidad inicial de inóculum, en la cual empieza la epidemia. Un lento grado de aumento de la enfermedad en el campo, activa grandemente el beneficio de la reducción del inóculum inicial. Por lo tanto, la resistencia horizontal activa grandemente la resistencia vertical: la resistencia horizontal activa los genes-R. Los genes-R han caído en descrédito, porque fueron usados equivocadamente: Se usaron para sustituir la resistencia horizontal, siendo que debieron haber sido usados sólo para suplementarla.

Esta misma conclusión ha sido derivada independientemente del hecho de la selección estabilizada, en favor de las razas simples de tizón, en variedades de papa sin genes-R; y toda la evidencia indica que los genes-R tienen un futuro útil en la industria de la papa, solamente si los genetistas están preparados para unirlas con la alta resistencia horizontal.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Clarke, A. E., H. A. Jones and T. M. Little. 1944. Inheritance of bulb color in the onion. Genetics 29: 569–575.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Graham, K. M. and W. A. Hodgson. 1965. The effect of major and minor gene interaction on adaptive parasitism inPhytophthora infestans. Phytopathology 55: 73–75.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hodgson, W. A. 1963. The eradicant effect of some fungicides on potato late blight. Am. Potato J. 40: 143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kammermann, N. 1950. Undersökninger rörande Potatisbladmöglet,Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de By. I. Metodologisk undersökning angaende prövningen av potatisblastens resistens mot bladmöglet. Medd. Vaxtsdyddsanst. 57: 41pp.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knutson, K. W. and C. J. Eide. 1961. Parasitic aggressiveness inPhytophthora infestans. Phytopathology 51: 286–290.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lapwood, D. H. 1961. Potato haulm resistance toPhytophthora infestans. II. Lesion production and sporulation. Ann. Appl. Biol. 49: 316–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Müller, K. O. 1953. The nature of resistance of the potato plant to blight—Phytophthora infestans. J. Natl. Inst. Agr. Botany 6: 346–360.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Paxman, G. J. 1963. Variation inPhytophthora infestans. Europ. Potato J. 6: 14–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rudorf, W. and P. Schaper. 1951. Grundlagen und Ergebnisse der Züchtung krautfäuleresistenter Kartoffelsorten. Z. Pflanzenzücht. 30: 29–88.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schaper, P. 1951. Die Bedeutung der Inkubationzeit für die Züchtung krautfäuleresistenter Kartoffelsorten. Z. Pflanzenzücht. 30: 292–299.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simmonds, N. W. 1962. Variability in crop plants, its use and conservation. Biol. Rev. 37: 422–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Van der Plank, J. E. 1963. “Plant Diseases: Epidemics and Control,” p. 191–193. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Van der Plank, J. E. 1966. Epidemiology of fungicidal action.In Torgeson D. C., [ed.] “Fungicides”, Academic Press, New York (in press).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Van der Zaag, D. E. 1959. Some observations on breeding for resistance toPhytophthora infestans. Europ. Potato J. 2: 278–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vowinckel, O. 1926. Die Anfälligkeit deutscher Kartoffelsorten gegenüberPhytophthora infestans (Mont.) de By, unter besonderer Berüchsichtigung der Untersuchungsmethoden. Arb. biol. Reichsanstalt Land-u. Forstwirtsch. Berlin-Dahlem 14: 588–641.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1966

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. E. Van Der Plank
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Protection Research InstitutePretoriaRepublic of South Africa

Personalised recommendations