Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The present status of seed treatment, with special reference to cereals

  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  1. Alexander, L. J., Young, H. C., andKiger, C. M. The causes and control of damping-off of tomato seedlings. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 496: 38 pp. 1931.

  2. Anderson, Dean A., andWalker, R. H. Residual effects of some germicides used in sterilizing legume seeds. Iowa Acad. Sci. Proc.38: 321–325. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Arndt, C. H. A résumé of cotton seed treatments in South Carolina. Phytopath. (Abstract)25: 970. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Becker, K. E. Das Wichtigste zur Herbstbeizung. Deut. Landw. Presse.42: 437–438. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  5. —. Das Wichtigste zur Herbstbeizung. Deut. Landw. Presse.41: 421–422. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bolley, H. L. New studies upon the smuts of wheat, oats, and barley, with a résumé of the treatment experiments for the last three years. N. D. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.27: 109–164. 1897.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brentzel, W. E. Seed treatments. Seed disinfectants for wheat, oats, barley, emmer and millet diseases. N. D. Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 56: 16 pp. 1935.

  8. Brown, J. G., andStreets, R. B. Diseases of field crops in Arizona. Ariz. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 148: 228 pp. 1934.

  9. Buckholtz, Walter F. Seed treatment as a control for damping-off of alfalfa and other legumes. Phytopath. (Abstract)26: 88. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burnett, L. C., andReddy, C. S. Seed treatment and date of sowing experiments with six varieties of flax. Phytopath.21: 985–989. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clayton, E. E. Increasing stands from vegetable seeds by seed treatment. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 554: 16 pp. 1928.

  12. -. Vegetable seed treatment with special reference to the use of hot water and organic mercurials. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 183: 43 pp. 1931.

  13. Conners, I. L. Smut experiments. Rep. Canada Exp. Farms1927 (Rep. Dom. Bot.): 91–97. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cook, H. T. andCallenbach, T. A. Spinach seed treatment. Bull. Va. Truck Exp. Sta.87: 1213–1233. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  15. —, andCallenbach, J. A. Comparison of the effectiveness of seed-treatment materials for the prevention of seed and seedling decays in eastern Virginia. Phytopath. (Abstract)26: 90. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Coulson, J. G. Some notes on seed treatments. Ann. Rep. Quebec Soc. Prot. Plants21(1928/29): 17–27. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Crosby, C. R., andChupp, C. The control of diseases and insects affecting vegetable crops on Long Island. N. Y. (Cornell) Agr. Exp. Sta. Ext. Bull. 278: 87 pp. 1934.

  18. Darnell-Smith, G. P. The use of copper carbonate as a fungicide. Agr. Gaz. N. S. Wales26: 242–243. 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  19. —. The prevention of smut. Agr. Gaz. N. S. Wales28: 185–189. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dawson, G. T. Seed-borne flag smut infection effectively controlled by copper carbonate treatment. Agr. Gaz. N. S. Wales45: 431–432. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Finnell, H. H. Improving stands of grain sorghum by seed treatment. Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 159: 15 pp. 1926.

  22. —. Control of common sorghum diseases. Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Panhandle Bull.5: 10–12. 1929.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Flor, H. H. Flax seed-treatment tests. Phytopath.26: 429–538. 1936.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. —,Gaines, E. F., andSmith, W. K. The effect of bunt on yield of wheat. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.24: 778–784. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Friedrichs, G. Untersuchungen über Trockenbeizung. I. Einwirkung von Trockenbeiz mittein auf Eisengeräte. Pflanzenbau4: 145–149. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fromme, F. D., andWingard, S. A. Blackfire or angular leaf spot of tobacco. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 25: 43 pp. 1922.

  27. Gage, George Raymond. Studies of the life history ofUstilago avenae (Pers.) Jensen and ofUstilago levis (Kell. and Swing.). Magn. N. Y. (Cornell) Agr. Exp. Sta. Mem. 109: 35 pp. 1927.

  28. Gassner, G. Die Verwendung von Quecksilberbeizmitteln in der wiederholten Tauchbeize Kettenbeize. Ztschr. Pflanzenkrankh.35: 1–15. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  29. —, andKirchhoff, H. Versuche zur Bekämpfung des Gerstenflugbrandes. Phytopath. Ztschr.7: 303–314. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. —, andKirchhoff, H. Versuche zur Bekämpfung des Weizenflugbrandes mittels Benetzungsbeize. Phytopath. Ztschr.7: 271–284. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. —, andRabien, H. Untersuchungen über die Bedeutung von Beiztemperatur und Beizdauer für die Wirkung verschiedener Beizmittel. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst. Land u. Forstw.14: 367–410. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Geuther, Th. Ueber die Einwirkung von Formaldehydlösungen auf Getreidebrand. Ber. Pharm. Gesell. Jahrg.5, Heft 12: 325–329. 1895.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gilbert, W. W., andPopenoe, C. H. Diseases and insects of garden vegetables. U. S. Dept. Agr. Farmers’ Bull. 1371: 46 pp. 1934.

  34. Güssow, H. T., andConners, I. L. Studies in cereal diseases and their control. I. Smut diseases of cultivated plants and their control. Canada Dept. Agr. Bull. 81: n. s. 79 pp. 1927.

  35. Hanna, W. F. andPopp, W. Experiments on the control of cereal smuts by seed treatment. Sci. Agr.15: 745–753. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. —, andPopp, W. Experiments on the control of loose smut of wheat by seed treatment. Proc. World’s Grain Exh. and Conf. Regina, Canada, 1933,2: 243–248. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Haskell, R. J. The spray method of applying concentrated formaldehyde solution in the control of oat smut. Phytopath.7: 381–383. 1917.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Haskell, R. J., Leukel, R. W., andBoerner, E. G. Stinking smut (bunt) in wheat and how to prevent it. U. S. Dept. Agr. Circ. 182:20 pp. 1931.

  39. Henry, A. W. Root-rots of wheat. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 22: 71 pp. 1924.

  40. -. Diseases of small grain crops. Alberta Univ. Bul. 18: 78 pp. 1928.

  41. -. Relative value of chemical dusts and formaldehyde for the treatment of seed grain. Alberta Univ. Ext. Leaflet 13: 2 pp. 1934.

  42. Hewlett, C. H., andHewlett, J. H. Hot-water treatment of seed of barley and wheat. New Zeal. Jour. Agr.49: 37–41. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Holbert, J. R., andKoehler, B. Results of seed treatment experiments with yellow dent corn. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull.260: 1–64. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  44. -,Reddy, C. S., andKoehler, B. Chemical-dust seed treatments for dent corn. U. S. Dept. Agric. Circ. 34: 6 p. 1928.

  45. Horsfall, J. G. A study of meadow-crop diseases in New York. N. Y. (Cornell) Agr. Exp. Sta. Mem. 130: 139 pp. 1930.

  46. -. Zinc oxide as a seed and soil treatment for damping-off. N. Y. (Cornell) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 650: 25 pp. 1934.

  47. -,Newhall, A. G., andGuterman, C. E. F. Dusting miscellaneous seeds with red copper oxide to combat damping-off. N. Y. (Cornell) Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 643: 39 pp. 1934.

  48. Hubbard, V. C., andStanton, T. R. Influence of smut infection on plant vigor and other characters in smut-resistant oat varieties. Jour. Agr. Res.49: 903–908. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hurd, A. M. Injury to seed wheat resulting from drying after disinfection with formaldehyde. Jour. Agr. Res.20: 209–244. 1920.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hurst, W. M., Fulton, F. D., Humphries, W. R., andLeukel, R. W. Equipment for applying dust fungicides to seed grain. U. S. Dept. Agr. Circ. (In press.)

  51. Jensen, Jens Ludwig. The propagation and prevention of smut in oats and barley. Jour. Roy. Agr. Soc. England S. 2,24: 397–415. 1888.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Johnson, A. G., Haskell, R. J., andLeukel, R. W. Treat seed grain. U. S. Dept. Agr. Misc. Pub. 219:4 pp. 1934.

  53. Johnson, J. Tobacco diseases and their control. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bull. 1256: 56 pp. 1924.

  54. -. Experiments on the control of wildfire of tobacco. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 62: 35 pp. 1925.

  55. Johnston, C. O., andMelchers, L. E. Control of sorghum kernel smut and the effect of seed treatments on vitality of sorghum seed. Kans. Agr. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull.22: 1–37. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Jones, G. H. Control of barley diseases. I. Closed smut. Bull. Tech. and Sci. Serv. Min. Agr. Egypt 142: 19 pp. 1934.

  57. Jordan, E. Zur Gemüsesamenbeizung. Obst.-u. Gemüsebau.80: 54–55. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Kiesselbach, T. A. Field experiments with seed corn treatments and crop stimulants. Nebr. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 218: 15 pp. 1927.

  59. — Field tests with treated seed corn. Jour. Agr. Res.40: 169–189. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Kirby, R. S. Diseases of small grains. N. Y. (Cornell) Ext. Bull. 157:71 pp. 1927.

  61. Koehler, Benj. Seed treatments for farm crops. Ill. Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 444: 19 pp. 1936.

  62. —. Seed treatments for the control of certain diseases of wheat, oats and barley. Ill. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.420: 499–575. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Koehler, B., andHolbert, J. R. Corn diseases in Illinois. Their extent, nature and control. Ill. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.354. 164 pp. 1930.

  64. Krause, J. Nachdosierung von quecksilberhaltigen Beizmitteln für Getreide. Ztschr. Angew. Chem.48: 1088–1091. 1925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Kühn, Julius G. Die Anwendung des Kupfervitrioles als Schutzmittel gegen den Steinbrand des Weizens. Bot. Ztg. Jahrg.31: 502–505. 1873.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Lang, W. Die Bedeutung der Temperatur beim Beizen. Nachrichtenblatt für den deutschen Pflanzenschutzdienst5: 29–30. 1925.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Lee, H. A., andMartin, J. P. The development of more effective dust fungicides by adding oxidizing agents to sulphur. Sci.66: 178. 1927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Leukel, R. W. Further experiments on the control of bunt of wheat and the smuts of barley and oats. Phytopath.26: 347–351. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  69. -. Seed treatment for controlling covered smut of barley. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 207: 23 pp. 1930.

  70. -. Further experiments on the control of barley smuts. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull.513. 12 pp.

  71. —,Dickson, J. G., andJohnson, A. G. Seed treatment experiments for controlling stripe disease of barley. Phytopath.16: 565–576. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  72. ———. Experiments with dusts for controlling stripe disease of barley. Phytopath.17: 175–179. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  73. -. Effects of certain environmental factors on stripe disease of barley and the control of the disease by seed treatment. U. S. Dept. Agr. Tech. Bull. 341: 39 pp. 1933.

  74. Leukel, R. W., andStanton, T. R. Effect of seed treatments on yield of oats. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.26: 851–857. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Loh, T. C. An improved method for the control of seed-borne diseases of rice. Lingnan Sci. Jour., Canton, China13: 603–605. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Machacek, J. E., andGreaney, F. J. Studies on the control of root-rot diseases of cereals caused byFusarium culmorum (W. G. Sm.) Sacc. andHelminthosporium sativum P., K., and B. III. Effect of seed treatment on the control of root rot and on the yield of wheat. Sci. Agr.15: 607–620. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Mackie, W. W. Diseases of grain and their control. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 511:87 pp. 1931.

  78. —. Aeroplane dusting with sulfur to combat stem rust of wheat. Phytopath. (Abstract)25: 892–893. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  79. -. Prevention of insect attack on small grain. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 282:8 pp. 1925.

  80. —, andBriggs, F. N. Fungicidal dusts for the control of bunt. Calif. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.364: 533–571. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  81. McClelland, C. K., andYoung, V. H. Seed-corn treatments in Arkansas. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.24: 189–195. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Melchers, L. E., andBrunson, A. M. Effect of chemical treatments of seed corn on stand and yield in Kansas. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.26: 909–917. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. —, andJohnston, C. O. Sulphur and copper carbonate dusts as efficient fungicides for control of sorghum kernel smut and millet smut. Phytopath. (Abstract)17: 52. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  84. Melhus, I. E., Reddy, C. S., Raleigh, W. P., andBurnett, L. C. Seed treatment for corn diseases. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Circ. 108: 16 pp. 1928.

  85. Muncie, J. H. Common diseases of cereals in Michigan. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 142: 54 pp. 1932.

  86. —, andFrutchey, C. W. Field trials on control of wheat stinking smut by dust fungicides. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta. Quart. Bull.17: 189–192. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Nattrass, R. M. Diseases of cereals. III. The covered smut of barley. Cyprus Agr. Jour.29: 76–78. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  88. Neal, David C. Cotton diseases and methods of control. U. S. Dept. Agr. Farmers Bull. 1745:34 pp. 1935.

  89. Neill, J. C. Seed treatments for wheat, barley and oats. New Zeal. Jour. Agr.49: 43–45. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  90. O’Brien, D. G., andDennis, R. W. G. The dry disinfection of oat seed. Highland and Agr. Soc. Scot. Trans. V.46: 91–112. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  91. Oort, A. J. P. Een nieuwe méthode ter bestrijding van tarwestuifbrand (Ustilago tritici). Tijdschr. Plantenziekten40: 185–197. 1934.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Orton, C. R. Seed-borne parasites. A bibliography. W. Va. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 245:47 pp. 1931.

  93. Peterson, P. D. The safe use of sulphur as a fungicide. Proc. Md. State Hort. Soc.37: 60–67. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Petit, A. Valeur de différents composés cupriques essayés au point de vue de l’action anticryptogamique vis-à-vis de la spore de la carie. Compt. Rend. Acad. Agr. France16: 529–533. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Pipal, F. J. Hot-water treatment for seed wheat. Purdue Agr. Ext. Bull. 100: 16 pp. 1921.

  96. Pittman, H. A., andNewman, L. J. Fungicidal and insecticidal dusts for use in market gardens. Jour. Dept. Agr. West. Aust. II,12: 203–205. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Plaut, M. Über die Entwicklung von Beizverfahren, über Beizmittel und ihre Anwendung in Saatzuchtbetrieb. Ztschr. f. Züchtung, A,17: 304–340. 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  98. Porter, R. H., andLayton, D. V. Dust treatments for seed corn diseases. Iowa Agr. Col. Ext. Serv. Circ. 221: 12 pp. 1936.

  99. Reinmuth, E. Beiträge zur Frage des Gemüsesamenbeizung und zur laboratoriumsmässigen Prüfung der Beizmittelwirkung bei Gemüsesamen. Angew. Bot.16: 441–504. 1934.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Reddy, C. S.. Effects of seed treatment on disease free and diseased seed corn. Phytopath. (Abstract)26: 105–106. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  101. —. Flax seed treatment. Phytopath. (Abstract)26: 106. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  102. —, andHolbert, J. R. Further experiments with seed treatments for sweet corn diseases. Jour. Agr. Res.36: 237–247. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  103. —,Holbert, J. R., andErwin, A. T. Seed treatments for sweet corn diseases. Jour. Agr. Res.33: 769–779. 1926.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Riehm, E. Prüfung einiger Mittel zur Bekämpfung des Steinbrandes. Mitt. K. Biol. Anst. Land u. Forstw.14: 8–9. 1913.

    Google Scholar 

  105. —. Prüfung einiger neuerer Beizmittel. Mitt. K. Biol. Anst. Land u. Forstw.15: 7–8. 1914.

    Google Scholar 

  106. —. Prüfung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln in den Jahren 1921/ 22. Mitt. Biol. Reichsanst. Land u. Forstw.24: 1–104. 1923.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Roark, R. C. Insecticides and fungicides. Indus. and Engin. Chem.27: 530–532. 1935.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Robinson, Joe L., andBryan, A. A. Iowa corn yield test. Results for 1933. Iowa corn and small grain growers Assoc. Report14: 28. 1934.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Robinson, Joe L. andBryan, A. A. Iowa corn yield test. Results for 1934. Iowa Corn and Small Grain Growers Assoc. Report15: 26–30. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  110. —, andRhoades, M. M. The 1935 Iowa corn yield test. Iowa Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull.343: 195–197. 1936.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Sayre, J. D. andThomas, R. C. New dust treatments for oat smuts. Phytopath. (Abstracts)18: 139. 1928.

    Google Scholar 

  112. —, andThomas, R. C. Formaldehyde and iodine dusts for control of oat smut. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bimonth. Bull.13: 19–21. 1928.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Schulthess, Heinrich. Vorschlag einiger durch die Erfahrung bewahrter Hilfsmittel gegen den Brand im Korn. Abhandl. Naturf. Gesell. Zurich. Bd.I, 498–506. 1761.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Schwaebel, F. X. Kupferhaltige Trockenbeizen. Ztschr. f. Pflanzenkrank. u. Pflanzenschutz40: 113–117. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Southern, B. L. Copper bunticides. Jour. Roy. Soc. West. Aust.18: 85–103. 1933.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. —, andLimbourn, E. J. Copper powder for the prevention of bunt in wheat. Jour. Dept. Agr. West. Aust. 2nd Ser.6: 162–165. 1929.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Swanson, A. F., andGetty, R. E. Chemical seed treatments for sorghums. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.22: 472–475. 1930.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  118. Tapke, V. F. Single-bath hot-water and steam treatments of seed wheat for the control of loose smut. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bull. 1383: 28 pp. 1926.

  119. —. Seed treatments with chemical dusts and formaldehyde for smut control in oats. Phytopath.22: 429–441. 1932.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  120. Taubenhaus, J. J. Diseases of grains, sorghums and millets, and their control in Texas. Texas Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 261:34 pp. 1920.

  121. —, andDecker, Phares. Laboratory and field studies on sulfur as a fungicide. Phytopath. (Abstract)25: 35–36. 1935.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Taylor, J. W., andZehner, Marion Griffiths. The effect of a seed disinfectant on grain and straw yields and smut control in winter barley. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron.22: 113–123. 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Thomas, R. C., Stover, W. G. andRunnels, H. A. Dust treatments for the control of stinking smut of wheat. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bimonth. Bull.12: 115–117. 1927.

    Google Scholar 

  124. Tilford, Paul E. Diseases of ornamental plants. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 511: 82 pp. 1932.

  125. Tisdale, W. H. Seedling blight and stack burn of rice and the hotwater seed treatment. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bull. 1116:11 pp. 1922.

  126. —,Taylor, J. W., Leukel, R. W., andGriffiths, Marion A. New seed disinfectants for che control of bunt of wheat and the smuts of oats and barley. Phytopath.15: 651–676. 1925.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  127. Traaen, A. E., andJørstad, L. Kornavsopningsforsøk med kjemikalier i arene 1930–33. Meld. Statens frøkontroll i År 1932–33. 24 pp. 1934.

  128. Twentyman, R. L. Experiments on the control of “sstinking” smut of bunt. II. Tests on the dry copper powders. Jour. Dept. Agr. Victoria29: 235–248. 1931.

    Google Scholar 

  129. Uppal, B. N., andDesai, M. K. The effectiveness of dust fungicides in controlling grain smut of sorghum. Agr. and Live-Stock, India1: 396–413. 1931.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  130. Vanderwalle, R. Contribution à l’étude de la désinfection des céréales par l’eau chaude. I. L’action de la chaleur sur la germination des semences. Bull. Inst. Agron. Stat. Rech. Gembloux4: 3–21. 1935.

    Google Scholar 

  131. Volk, A. Trockenbeizen in Abhängigkeit von Bodenreaktion und Bodenart. Landw. Jahrb.70: 583–592. 1929.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  132. Weston, W. A. R. D., andBooer, J. R. Seed disinfection. I. An outline of an investigation on disinfectant dusts containing mercury. Jour. Agr. Sci.25: 628–649. 1935.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  133. Wilson, J. D., andTilford, P. E. The use of formaldehyde dust in growing seedlings. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 520: 40 pp. 1933.

  134. Winkelmann, A. Erprobte Mittel gegen Pilzkrankheiten. Biol. Reichsanst. Land u. Forstw. Flugbl. 74: 11 pp. 1934.

  135. Woodroof, N. C. Treating cotton seed by the dusting method. Ga. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 70: 16 pp. 1931.

  136. Woolman, H. M., andHumphrey, H. B. Summary of literature on bunt, or stinking smut of wheat. U. S. Dept. Agr. Bull. 1210: 44 pp. 1924.

  137. Young, V. H., andMcClelland, C. K. Control of oat smut. Phytopath.23: 825–830. 1933.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Zade, A. Der latente Pilzbefall und seine Folgeerscheinungen mit Bezug auf Sortenimmunität und Beizwirkung. Fortschr. Landw.6: 388–391.

  139. -. Neue Untersuchungen über den latenten Pilzbefall und seinen Einfluss auf die Kulturpflanzen. Fortschr. Landw. 7: 529–532.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Cereal Crops and Diseases, Bureau of Plant Industry, United States Department of Agriculture, USA

    R. W. Leukel

Authors
  1. R. W. Leukel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leukel, R.W. The present status of seed treatment, with special reference to cereals. Bot. Rev 2, 498–527 (1936). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02869920

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02869920

Keywords

Search

Navigation