American Potato Journal

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 152–161 | Cite as

Studies on the nature of field resistance of the potato to late blight

  • Kenneth W. Knutson


The relative resistance to late blight in the field of potato varieties Pontiac, Sebago, and Ostbote was asssociated, in most greenhouse tests, with numbers of infections, size of lesions, and abundance of sporulation. This was not true of the variety Cobbler which in the greenhouse appeared to be resistant, although actually the most susceptible of the four in the field.

Abundance of sporulation was not correlated with size of lesions.

Plants of Pontiac, Sebago, and Cobbler grown in the field and transplanted to pots in the greenhouse were much more susceptible to blight than those planted at the same time but grown continuously in the greenhouse. The field-grown plants had more and larger lesions under standard conditions of inoculation and incubation.


Late Blight AMERICAN Potato Journal Potato Variety Phytophthora Infestans Infected Leaf 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Black, W., C. Mastenbroek, W. R. Mills, and L. C. Peterson. 1953. A proposal for an international nomenclature of races ofP. infestans and of genes controlling immunity of Solanum demissum derivatives. Euphytica 2: 173–178.…CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Deshmukh, M. J., and H. W. Howard. 1956. Field resistance to potato blight (Phytophthora infestans) Nature 177: 194–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guzman, J., H. D. Thurston, and L. E. Heidrick 1960. Naturaleza de la resistencia parcial de tres clones de papa allPhytophthora infestans. Agricultura Tropical 16: 88–99.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kammerman, N. 1951. Undersökninger rörande Potatisbladmöglet,Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary II. Sanbaneet mellan Potatisbladsaftens peroxidasaktivitet och Phytophthora resisten. Medd. Vaxskyddsanst, Stockholm 58, 32p. Rev. Appl. Mycol. 31: 78.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Muller, K. O. and J. C. Haigh. 1953. Nature of ◂field resistance” of the potato toPhytophthora infestans deBary. nature 171: 781–783.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Niederhauser, J. S., J. Cervantes, and L. Servin. 1954. Late Blight in Mexico and its implications. Phytopathology 44: 406–408.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schaper, P. 1951 Die Bedeutung der Inkubationzeit für die Zuchtung krautfäuleresistenter Kartoffelsorten. Z. Pflanzenzucht. 30: 292–299. Rev. Appl. Mycol. 31: 139.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thurston, H. D. 1957. The culture ofPhytophtora infestans Phytopathology 47: 186.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van der Zaag, D. E. 1956. Overwintering en epidemiologie vanPhytophtora infestans, tevens enige nieuwe bestrijdingsmogelijkheden. Tijdschr. PIZiekt. 62: 89–156. Rev. Apl. Mycol. 36: 118–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1962

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth W. Knutson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations