Advertisement

Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 111–114 | Cite as

Assessment of three methods for estimating abundance of ungulate populations

  • Chen Huapeng
  • Li Feng
  • Wang Huai
  • Ma Jianzhang
  • Jia Xibo
  • Lan Chunmei
  • Xiu Kelan
Article

Abstract

The accuracy of three methods (pellet group count, inverse line transect method and track count) for estimating the density of ungulate population was assessed, based on a wapiti population with the known size in the enclosure of 500 hm2 on Tonghe Hunting Farm, Heilongjiang province, China, during 1992–1993. The estimation of population density using the pellet group count method was the closest to the actual value, whereas the density of the wapiti population was underestimated by the inverse line transect method and overestimated by the track count method. No significant difference existed between the estimated and actual values for the pellet group method and the inverse line transect method, but the significant difference was found for the track count method. Therefore, it is suggested that the pellet group method should be given the priority in the survey of ungulate population abundance in practice.

Key words

Ungulate Pellet group count Inverse line transect method Track count 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cairns, A.L. 1980. Habitat use by 4 sympatric ungulates in boreal mixed wood forest. J. Wildl. Manage. 44: 849–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Caughley, G. 1974. Bias in aerial survey. J. Wildl. Manage. 38: 921–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Caughley, G. 1976. Experiments in aerial survey. J. Wildl. Manage. 40: 290–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, H. H. and Chang, H. 1987. The line transect sampling method and inverse line transect method of wildlife population survey. Acta theriol. Sin. 7: 58–68.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eberhardt, L.L. 1978. Transect methods for population studies. J. Wildl. Manage. 42: 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gates, C.E. 1968. Line transect method of estimating grouse population densities. Biometrics 25: 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ma J.Z. and Jia, J.B. 1990. Wildlife Management. Northeast Forestry University Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Neff, D.J. 1968. The pellet-group count technique for big game trend, census, and distribution: a review. J. Wildl. Manage. 32: 597–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robel, R.J. 1960. Determining elk movement through periodic aerial counts. J. Wildl. Manage. 24: 103–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chen Huapeng
    • 1
  • Li Feng
    • 1
  • Wang Huai
    • 1
  • Ma Jianzhang
    • 1
  • Jia Xibo
    • 1
  • Lan Chunmei
    • 1
  • Xiu Kelan
    • 2
  1. 1.College of Wildlife ResourcesNortheast Forestry UniversityHarbinP.R. China
  2. 2.The Weapon University of HarbinHarbinP.R. China

Personalised recommendations