Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 55, Issue 1, pp 63–71 | Cite as

Mapping palm extractivism in Ecuador using pair-wise comparisons and bioclimatic modeling

  • Henrik Borgtoft Pedersen
  • Flemming Skov
Research

Abstract

The native palm flora of Ecuador consists of 129 taxa, including at least 69 species used by rural people, 19 of which are exploited commercially. This paper integrates bioclimatic modeling of palm distribution and quantitative ranking through pair-wise comparisons of species as a tool to evaluate and map the importance of 14 taxa of commercially exploited palms in Ecuador based on criteria of harvest values, sustainability, vegetation cover and population density. The ranking procedure could find broad application within ethnobotany and economic botany. Results show that extraction of palm products, economically speaking, is most important in the heavily deforested and populated coastal lowland.

Key Words

palms Ecuador extractivism pair-wise comparisons bioclimatic modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Anselin, A., P. M. Meire, and L. Anselin. 1989. Multicriteria techniques in ecological evaluation: an example using the analytical hierarchy process. Biological Conservation 49:215–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Borchsenius, F., H. B. Pedersen, and H. Balslev. 1998. Manual to the palms of Ecuador. AAU Reports 37:1–217.Google Scholar
  3. Eastman, J. R., W. Jin, P. A. K. Kyem, and J. Toledano. 1995. Raster procedures for multi-criteria/ multi-objective decisions. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 61(5):539–547.Google Scholar
  4. Henderson, A., G. Galeano, and R. Bernal. 1995. Field guide to the palms of the Americas. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  5. Holdridge, L. R. 1967. Life zone ecology. Tropical Science Centre, San Jose, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  6. Mardesic, V. D. 1988. Estadísticas del Ecuador. Institute Latinoamericano de Investigaciones Sociales, Quito.Google Scholar
  7. Pedersen, H. B. 1994. Mocora Palm-fibers: use and management ofAstrocaryum standleyanum (Arecaceae) in Ecuador. Economic Botany 48(3):310–325.Google Scholar
  8. Saaty, T. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical Structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15:234–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. —. 1980. The Analytical Hierarchy Process. McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Skov, F.,and F. Borchsenius. 1997. Predicting plant species distribution patterns using simple climatic parameters: a case study of Ecuadorian palms. Ecography 20(l):347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden Press 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Environmental Research Institute, Dept. of Landscape EcologyRøndeDenmark

Personalised recommendations