American Potato Journal

, Volume 22, Issue 9, pp 275–288 | Cite as

The influence of fertilizers on the specific gravity of potatoes grown in Minnesota

  • L. E. Dunn
  • R. E. Nylund


Specific gravity measurments were obtained for samples of potatoes from 37 fertilizer experiments in the Red River Valley of Minnesota and on sandy soils near St. Paul, Minnesota in 1943 and 1944.

The greatest differences in specific gravity were found between locations. Nitrogen fertilizer had no apparent influence on specific gravity. The phosphate fertilizer caused a small but significant increase in specific gravity, particularly when used at the higher rates of application.

The potash fertilizers containing chlorides caused a marked reduction in specific gravity, and the higher the application the greater the depression. Sulfate of potash did not reduce the specific gravity of the potatoes, indicating that it is the chloride anion which is responsible for increasing the water content of potatoes.

Fertilizer treatment did not appear to influence the occurrence of hollow heart in potatoes.

A correlation coefficient of r=0.8686 between specific gravity and dry matter was found for 260 smaples of potatoes from the Red River Valley.


Specific Gravity AMERICAN Potato Journal Potash Starch Content Hollow Heart 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Berkner, F. and Schlimm, W. 1932. Der Einfluss der verschiedenen Kaligaben und Formen Auf Mange und Güte des Kartoffelertrages. Landw. Jahrb. 76: 783–808.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bewell, E. R. 1937. The determination of the cooking quality of potatoes. Amer. Potato Jour. 14: 235–242.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Blood, P. T. and Haddock, J. L. 1939. Variations in cooking quality of potatoes as influenced by fertilizers. Amer. Potato Jour. 16: 329–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clark, C. F., Lombard, P. M. and Whiteman, E. F. 1940. Cooking quality of the potato as measured by specific gravity. Amer Potato Jour 17: 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cowie, G. A. 1943. The relative responses of the potato crop to different potash fertilizers. Empire Jour. Expl. Agr. 11: 23–34.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drew, J. P. and Deasy, D. 1939. Potato growing in Ireland with particular reference to production for industrial purposes. Jour. Eire Dept. Agr. 36: 205–229.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    — 1941. Potato growing in Ireland with particular reference to production for industrial purposes. Jour. Eire Dept. Agr. 38: 220–238.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    — 1942. The influence of manures on the percentage of starch of potatoes and on the total yield of starch. Jour. Eire Dept. Agr. 39: 35–45.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gericke, S. 1940. The phosphate fertilization of potatoes. Pflanzenbau 16: 302–322, 342–359. Ch. Abs. 35: 2263.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Houghland, G. V. C. and Schricker, J. A. 1933. The effect of potash on starch in potatoes. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron. 25: 334–340.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kraft, A. 1920. The influence of nutrients on the quality of potatoes, Arb. Forschungsinst. Kartoffelbau, No. 3: 73. Abs. Exp. Sta. Rec 46: 440.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Metzger, C. H. 1938. Commercial fertilizers in Colorado in 1937. Amer. Potato Jour. 15: 252–261.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Radley, J. A. 1943. Starch and its derivatives. 2nd Ed. p. 46, 382–383. Chapman and Hall, LTD.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Scheele, C. Von, Svensson, G. und Rasmusson, J. 1936. Die Bestimmung die Stärkegehaltz und der Trockensubstanz der Kartoffel mit Hilfe des spezifischen Gewichts. Landw. Ver. Sta. 127: 67–96.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Smith, Ora and Nash, L. B. 1940. Potato quality. I. Relation of fertilizers and rotation systems to specific gravity and cooking quality. Amer. Potato Jour. 17: 163–169.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    — 1941. Potato quality. III. Relation of soil reaction, irrigation and mineral nutrition to cooking quality. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 38: 507–512.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    — 1942. Potato quality. V. Relation of time of planting, time of harvest, and fertilizer treatment on composition and cooking quality. Jour. Amer. Soc. Agron. 34: 437–451.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sweetman, M. D. 1936. Factors affecting the cooking quality of potatoes. Maine Agr. Exp. Sta. Bul. 383Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1945

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. E. Dunn
    • 1
  • R. E. Nylund
    • 1
  1. 1.Minnesota Agricultural Experiment StationSt. Paul

Personalised recommendations