Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 381–388 | Cite as

Qualitative evaluation of fuelwood in Florida —A summary report

  • Shih-chi Wang
  • J. B. Huffman
  • D. L. Rockwood
Article

Abstract

This report summarizes qualitative information on 5 potential Florida fuelwood species: slash pine, sand pine, melaleuca, eucalypt, and casuarina. The important factors affecting the quality of fuelwood for industrial applications are briefly discussed. Fundamental properties relating to the fuel quality of these 5 potential fuelwoods are synthesized from several published and unpublished reports. Based on the qualitative data shown in this report, it appears that the fuel characteristics of these 5 species are comparable or superior to those of many other woods evaluated in the literature.

Keywords

Biomass Bark Economic Botany Fuel Quality Forest Prod 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. American Society of Testing and Materials, 1980a. Standard classification of coals by rank. ASTM D 388-77. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  2. —. 1980b. Standard definitions of terms relating to wood. ASTM D 9-76. Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, H. P., A. J. Panshin, and C. C. Forsaith. 1970. Textbook of Wood Technology. Vol. II. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Conde, L. F., and D. L. Rockwood. 1979. Energy plantation potential in Florida. Proc. Alternative Energy Sources for Florida. Univ. Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  5. Frampton, L. J. 1980. Genetic variation of traits important for energy utilization in sand and slash pines. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  6. Harder, M. L., and D. W. Einspahr. 1976. Bark fuel value of important pulpwood species. Tappi 59: 132–133.Google Scholar
  7. Hillis, W. E., and A. G. Brown. 1978. Eucalypts for wood production. Commonwealth Scientific Industrial Research Organization, Australia.Google Scholar
  8. Hough, W. A. 1969. Caloric value of some forest fuels of the Southern United States. USDA Forest Serv. Res. Note SE-120.Google Scholar
  9. Howard, E. T. 1971. Some observations on southern pine needles as related to utilization. Final Rept. FS-SO-3201-1.36 USDA Forest Serv. S. Forest Exp. Sta., Alexandria, LA.Google Scholar
  10. —. 1973. Heat of combustion of various southern pine materials. Wood Sci. 5: 194–197.Google Scholar
  11. Huffman, J. B., and S. Wang. 1980. Heat of combustion of melaleuca biomass. Forest Prod. Res. Soc. Abstr. 34: 24.Google Scholar
  12. Ince, P. J. 1977. Estimating effective heating value of wood or bark fuels at various moisture contents. USDA Forest Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL 13.Google Scholar
  13. Ince, P. J.. 1979. How to estimate recoverable heat energy in wood or bark fuels. USDA Forest Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. FPL 29.Google Scholar
  14. Karchesy, J., and P. Koch. 1979. Energy production from hardwoods growing on southern pine sites. USDA Forest Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-24.Google Scholar
  15. Koch, P. 1972a. Utilization of the southern pine. Vol. I. USDA Forest Serv. Agric. Handbook No. 420.Google Scholar
  16. Koch, P.. 1972b. Utilization of the southern pines. Vol. II. USDA Forest Serv. Agric. Handbook No. 420.Google Scholar
  17. Kossuth, S. V., D. R. Roberts, J. B. Huffman, and S. Wang. 1980. Caloric content of oleoresin soaked pine. Paper presented at 6th N. Amer. Forest Biology Workshop. Aug. 11-13, 1980, in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.Google Scholar
  18. Martin, R. E. 1963. Thermal and other properties of bark and their relation to fire injury of tree stems. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  19. — 1969. Characterization of southern pine barks. Forest Prod. J. 19: 23–30.Google Scholar
  20. Murphey, W. K., and B. E. Cutter. 1974. Gross heat of combustion of five hardwood species at differing moisture contents. Forest Prod. J. 24: 44–45.Google Scholar
  21. Neenan, M., and K. Steinbeck. 1979. Caloric values for young sprouts of nine hardwood species. Forest Sci. 25:455–161.Google Scholar
  22. Roberts, D. R. 1973. Inducing lightwood in pine trees by paraquat treatment. USDA Forest Serv. Res. Note SE-191.Google Scholar
  23. Rockwood, D. L., and L. J. Frampton. 1979. Genetic variation in sand pine and slash pine for energy production in silvicultural biomass plantations. Proc. 15th S. Forest Tree Improv. Conf.Google Scholar
  24. Roeder, K. R. 1981. Variation in energy related traits of eucalyptus in south Florida. M.S. Thesis, Univ. Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
  25. Saucier, J. R. 1979. Eucalypt and melaleuca—a fuel source for Florida. Paper presented in Forest Prod. Res. Soc. Southeastern Fall Meeting Oct. 10-12, 1979. Panama City Beach, FL.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, M. L., and K. W. Stinson. 1952. Fuels and Combustion. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, W. H., and M. L. Dowd. 1981. Biomass production in Florida. J. Forest. 79: 508–511.Google Scholar
  28. Swain, E. H. F. 1928. The Timbers and Forest Products of Queensland. Queensland Forest Serv., Government Printer, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
  29. Wang, S., and J. B. Huffman. 1982. Effect of extractives on heat content of melaleuca and eucalyptus. Wood Sci. 15: (in press).Google Scholar
  30. —. 1981. Characterization of melaleuca biomass as a fuel for direct combustion. Wood Sci. 13: 216–219.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© New York Botanical Garden 1982

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shih-chi Wang
  • J. B. Huffman
  • D. L. Rockwood
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Forest Resources and ConservationUniversity of FloridaGainesville

Personalised recommendations