American Potato Journal

, Volume 48, Issue 12, pp 450–456 | Cite as

Cell size in Russet Burbank potato tubers with various levels of nitrogen and soil moisture tensions

  • R. M. Reeve
  • Herman Timm
  • M. L. Weaver


Russet Burbank potatoes were grown at levels of added nitrogen of 0, 135, and 270 kg/ha and soil moisture tensions (SMT) of 0.5 and 1.0 atm. With all combinations, there was a consistent gradient of larger to smaller starch-storage parenchyma cells from stem end to bud end of mature tubers.

Stem and bud ends of tubers grown at a SMT of 0.5 atm with N had smaller cortical and pith (innermost medullary or water-core) cells than did ends of tubers grown without N. Perimedullary tissues of bud ends of tubers receiving N likewise contained smaller cells than did corresponding tissues of tubers grown without N. No pronounced differences in cell size were found in tissues from the midsections.

In bud-end tissue of tubers grown at a SMT of 1.0 atm, there were no consistent differences in cell size with respect to N levels. However, pith, perimedullary, and cortical tissues of the midsections and stem ends of tubers receiving N had smaller cells than did corresponding tissues from tubers without N. The different patterns of cell size in tubers grown at different SMT indicate that the effects of N may be influenced by soil moisure.


Cell Size Potato Tuber AMERICAN Potato Journal Starch Granule Cortical Tissue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Arney, S. E. 1952. Some effects of nitrogen nutrition on the morphology and anatomy of narrow-stem kale. Ann. Appl. Biol. 39: 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Artschwager, E. 1924. Studies on the potato tuber. J. Agr. Res. 27: 809–835.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradbury, D. 1953. Division of starch containing cells. Amer. J. Botany 40: 286–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Morton, A. G. and D. J. Dawson. 1948. A physiological study of leaf growth. Ann. Botany, New Ser. 12: 281–310.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Reeve, R. M. 1967. Suggested improvements for microscopic measurement of cells and starch granules in fresh potatoes. Amer. Potato J. 44: 41–50.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Reeve, R. M., E. Hautala and M. L. Weaver. 1969. Anatomy and compositional variation within potatoes. I. Developmental histology of the tuber. Amer. Potato J. 46: 361–373.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reeve, R. M., E. Hautala and M. L. Weaver. 1970. Anatomy and compositional variation within potatoes. III. Gross compositional gradients. Amer. Potato J. 47: 148–162.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reeve, R. M. and C. H. H. Neufeld. 1959. Observations on the histology and texture of Elberta peaches from trees of high and low levels of nitrogen nutrition. Food Res. 24: 552–563.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Smith, O. 1968.In “Potatoes: Production, Storing, Processing.” Chap. 10, Mineral Nutrition of the Potato. Avi Publishing Company, Inc., Westport, Conn.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Timm, H., J. C. Bishop, and V. H. Schweers. 1963. Growth, yield and quality of White Rose potatoes as affected by plant population and levels of nitrogen. Amer. Potato J. 40: 182–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. M. Reeve
    • 1
  • Herman Timm
    • 2
  • M. L. Weaver
    • 1
  1. 1.Western Regional Research Laboratory, Agricultural Research ServiceU. S. Department of AgricultureBerkeley
  2. 2.Department of Vegetable CropsUniversity of CaliforniaDavis

Personalised recommendations