The Botanical Review

, Volume 14, Issue 9, pp 588–601 | Cite as

Vegetable seed treatment

  • J. C. Walker


Botanical Review Seed Treatment None None Cuprous Oxide Sweet Corn 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    American Phytopathological Society. Studies on vegetable seed treat-ments in 1943. Pl. Dis. Rep., Suppl. 145. 1944.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    -. Studies on vegetable seed treatments in 1944.Ibid. Suppl. 161. 1946.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ark, P. A. andL. D. Leach. Seed transmission of bacterial blight of sugar beet. Phytopath.36: 549–553. 1946.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arthur, J. C. Formalin for prevention of potato scab. Ind. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 65. 1897.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aucante, Schreiben, von schädlicher Zubereitung der Getraidesaat. Hannoversche Anz., 1755. Nützliche Saml. Stück75: 1194–1198. 1756.Google Scholar
  6. 5a.
    Baker, K. F. Seed transmission ofRhisoctonia solani in relation to control of seedling damping-off. Phytopath.37: 912–924. 1947.Google Scholar
  7. 6.
    Blood, H. L. The control of tomato bacterial canker (Aplanobacter michiganense E. F. S.) by fruit-pulp fermentation in the seed-ex-traction process. Proc. Utah Acad. Sci.10: 19–23. 1933.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    —. A possible acid seed soak for the control of bacterial canker of the tomato. Science86: 199–200. 1937.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8.
    Bolley, H. L. Grain smuts. N. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta, Bul.1. 1891.Google Scholar
  10. 9.
    -. Potato scab and possibilities of prevention.Ibid.4. 1891.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    -. Prevention of potato scab.Ibid.9. 1895.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    -. New studies upon smut of wheat, oats and barley, with a resumé of treatment experiments for the last three years.Ibid.27. 1897.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Bollman, L. The wheat plant.In First Ann. Rep., U. S. Dept Agr., 1862: 65–95. 1863.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    Bryan, Mary K. Studies on bacterial canker of tomato. Jour. Agr. Res.41: 825–851. 1930.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    Buchholtz, W. F. The sequence of infection of a seedling stand of sugar beets byPythium debaryanum andAphanomyces cochlioides. Phytopath.34: 490–496. 1944.Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    Carsner, E. Angular-leafspot of cucumber: dissemination, overwinter-ing, and control. Jour. Agr. Res.15: 201–220. 1918.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    Clayton, E. E. Investigations of cauliflower diseases on Long Island. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 506. 1924.Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    -. Increasing stands from vegetable seeds by seed treatment.Ibid. 554. 1928.Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    -. Seed treatment for black-leg disease of crucifers.Ibid. Tech. Bul. 137. 1928.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    -. Vegetable seed treatment with special reference to the use of hot water and organic mercurials.Ibid. Tech. Bul. 183. 1931.Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    Cook, H. T. Spinach and cabbage seed treatment Va. Truck Exp. Sta, Bul. 96. 1937.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    - andJ. A. Callenbach. Spinach seed treatmentIbid. 87. 1935.Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    Coons, G. H. andD. Stewart. Prevention of seedling disease of sugar beets. Phytopath.17: 259–296. 1927.Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    Cunningham, H. S. andE. G. Sharvelle. Organic seed protectants for lima beans. Phytopath.30: 4–5. 1940.Google Scholar
  25. 24.
    Davis, B. H. andC. M. Haenseler. Tomato seed treatment with New Improved Ceresan dust.Phytopath.34: 847–848. 1944.Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    ——. Tests with some vegetable seed protectants. Pl. Dis. Rep.27: 170–173. 1943.Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    Felix, E. L. Tetrachloro-para-benzoquinone, an effective organic seed protectant. Phytopath.32: 4. 1942.Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    Foster, A. A. Acceleration and retardation of germination of some vegetable seeds resulting from treatment with copper fungicides. Phytopath.37: 390–398. 1947.Google Scholar
  29. 28.
    Gardner, M. W. Anthracnose of cucurbits. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bul. 727. 1918.Google Scholar
  30. 29.
    — andW. W. Gilbert. Field tests with cucumber angular leaf-spot and anthracnose. Phytopath,11: 298–299. 1921.Google Scholar
  31. 30.
    — andJ. B. Kendrick. Bacterial spot of tomato. Jour. Agr. Res.21: 123–156. 1921.Google Scholar
  32. 31.
    Gilbert, W.W. andM. W. Gardner. Seed treatment control and over-wintering of cucumber angular leaf-spot. Phytopath.8: 229–233. 1918.Google Scholar
  33. 32.
    Gould, C. J. Vegetable seed-treatment tests in Western Washington, 1943. Pl. Dis. Rep.27: 594–601. 1943.Google Scholar
  34. 33.
    Guether, T. Ueber die Einwirkung von Formaldehydelösungen auf Getreidebrand. Ber. Pharm. Ges. Jahrg. 5, Heft12: 325–329. (Diskussion p. 329–330.) 1895.Google Scholar
  35. 34.
    Haenseler, C. M. Effect of organic mercury seed treatments on germination and yield of peas. N. J. Agr. Exp. Sta, Ann. Rep.48: 232–238. 1928.Google Scholar
  36. 35.
    Harding, H. A., F. C. Stewart andM. J. Prucha. Vitality of the cabbage black rot germ on cabbage seed. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 251. 1904.Google Scholar
  37. 36.
    Henderson, M. P. The black-leg disease of cabbage caused byPhomo lingam (Tode) Desmaz. Phytopath.8: 379–431. 1918.Google Scholar
  38. 37.
    Horsfall, J. G. Combating damping-off of tomatoes by seed treatment. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 586. 1930.Google Scholar
  39. 38.
    -. Ousting tomato seed with copper sulfate monohydrate for combatting damping-off.Ibid. Tech. Bul. 198. 1932.Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    -. Red oxide of copper as a dust fungicide for combatting damping-off by seed treatment.Ibid. Bul. 615. 1932.Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    Horsfall, J. G. Zinc oxide as a seed and soil treatment for damping-off.Ibid. Bul. 650. 1934.Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    -,A. G. Newhall andC. E. F. Guterman. Dusting mis-cellaneous seeds with red copper oxide to combat damping-off.Ibid. 643. 1934.Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    Jensen, J. L.The propagation and prevention of smut in oats and barley. Jour. Royal Agr. Soc. England. Sec. 2,24: 397–415 1888.Google Scholar
  44. 43.
    Jones, L. K. Factors influencing the effectiveness of organic mercury dusts in pea-seed treatment. Jour. Agr. Res.42: 25–33. 1931.Google Scholar
  45. 44.
    Kellerman, W. A. Preliminary report on smut in oats. Kan. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 8. 1889.Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    -. Second report on fungicides for stinking smut of wheat.Ibid.21. 1891.Google Scholar
  47. 46.
    -. Smut of oats in 1891. II. Tests of fungicides to prevent loose smut of wheat. III. Spraying to prevent wheat rust.Ibid.22. 1891.Google Scholar
  48. 47.
    Kellerman, W. A., andW. T. Swingle. Preliminary experiments with fungicides for stinking smut of wheat.Kan. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 12: 27–51. 1890.Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    Krout, W. S. Treatment of celery seed for the control of celery blight Jour. Agr. Res.21: 369–372. 1921.Google Scholar
  50. 49.
    Leach, L. D. Incidence ofPhoma infection on sugar-beet seeds and the efficiency of seed treatments. Phytopath.34: 935. 1944.Google Scholar
  51. 50.
    —, andP. G. Smith. Effect of seed treatment on protection, rate of emergence, and growth of garden peas. Phytopath.35: 191–206. 1945.Google Scholar
  52. 51.
    —, andW. C. Snyder. Effectiveness of seed treatments against surface-borneAscochyta on pea seeds. Phytopath.34: 1007. 1944.Google Scholar
  53. 52.
    Manns, T. F. Blackleg orPhoma wilt of cabbage: A new trouble to the United States caused byPhoma oleracea Sacc. Science32: 726–727. 1910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 53.
    McNew, G. L. Relative effectiveness of organic and inorganic fungi-cides as seed protectants. Phytopath.33: 9. 1943.Google Scholar
  55. 54.
    McWhorter, F. P. andP. W. Miller. The application of vapor heat as a practical means of disinfecting seeds. Phytopath.34: 935–936. 1944.Google Scholar
  56. 55.
    Muncie, J. H. Experiments on the control of bean anthracnose and bean blight. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 38. 1917.Google Scholar
  57. 56.
    Norton, J. B. S. Hot water seed treatment for black leg of cabbage. Phytopath.9: 50–51. 1919.Google Scholar
  58. 57.
    Orton, C. R. Seeds as carriers of disease. Jour. N. Y. Bot. Garden27: 54–63. 1926.Google Scholar
  59. 58.
    Plowright, C. B. A monograph of the British Uredineae and Ustila-gineae. 373 p. 1889.Google Scholar
  60. 59.
    Pirone, P. P. et al. Copper seed treatments for the control of damping-off of spinach. N. Y. (Cornell) Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 556. 1933.Google Scholar
  61. 60.
    Porter, R. P. “Arasan” (Thiosan) as a spinach seed treatment. Pl. Dis. Rep.27: 262–263. 1943.Google Scholar
  62. 61.
    Prevost, I. B. Mémoire sur la cause immédiate de la carie ou charbon des blés et de plusieurs autres maladies des plantes. 80 pp. 1807. [Eng. trans. by G. W. Keitt. Phytopath. Classics 6, 1939.]Google Scholar
  63. 62.
    Selby, A. D. Onion smut—preliminary experiments. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 122. 1900.Google Scholar
  64. 63.
    Schulthess, Heinrich. Vorschlag einiger durch die Erfahrung be-währter Hilfsmittel gegen den Brand im Korn. Abh. Naturf. Ges. Zurich1: 498–506. 1761.Google Scholar
  65. 64.
    Taylor, C. F. andJ. A. Rupert. A study of vegetable seed protectants. Phytopath.36: 726–749. 1946.Google Scholar
  66. 65.
    —— andJ. G. Leach. Tetramethyl thiuramdisulphide and ferric dimethyl dithiocarbamate as seed protectants on vegetables. Phytopath.33: 14. 1943.Google Scholar
  67. 66.
    Thaxter, R. The “Smut” of onions, (Urocystis cepulae Frost).In Rep. of Roland Thaxter, Mycologist. Ann. Rep. Conn. (New Haven) Agr. Exp. Sta.1889: 129–153. 1890.Google Scholar
  68. 67.
    Tillet, M. Dissertation sur la cause qui corrompt et noircit les grains de blé dans les épis, et sur les moyens de prévinir ces accidents. 1755. [Eng. trans. by H. B. Humphrey. Phytopath. Classics. 5, 1937.]Google Scholar
  69. 68.
    Vaughan, E. K. The use of ethyl mercury phosphate for treating tomato seed in New Jersey. Phytopath.34: 175–184. 1944.Google Scholar
  70. 69.
    Walker, J. C. Seed treatment and rainfall in relation to the control of cabbage black leg. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bul. 1029. 1922.Google Scholar
  71. 70.
    —. The hot water treatment of cabbage seed. Phytopath.13: 251–253. 1923.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1948

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. Walker
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WisconsinUSA

Personalised recommendations