The Botanical Review

, Volume 10, Issue 5, pp 279–326 | Cite as

Control of noxious plants

  • H. K. Wilson


Botanical Review Weed Control Weed Seed Leafy Spurge Sodium Chlorate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aamodt, O. S. Control of wild oats. Univ. Alberta, Ext. Lft. 14. 1935.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aamodt, O. S. andPlatt, A. W. Resistance of wild oats and some common cereal varieties to freezing temperatures. Sci. Agr.14: 645–650. 1934.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aldous, A. E. The eradication of brush and weeds from pasture Iands. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.21: 660–66. 1929.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    —. ReIation of organic food reserves to the growth of some Kansas pasture pIants. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 385–92. 1930.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andrew, H. W. Weeds on the East-West Railway. Jour. Agr. S. Australia20: 982–3. 1917.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anonymous. Zinc treatment to kill weed seeds. Science (Suppl.)71: XII. 1930.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    -. Weed destruction by chemicals. Nature132: 122–3. 1933.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    -. Bindweed eradication. Publ. by Kan. St. Bd. Agr. Dec. 1940.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arny, A. C. Quack-grass eradication. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 151. 1915.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    -. Eradicating perennial weeds in Minnesota. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Spec. Bul. 140. 1931.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    -. Variations in the organic reserves in underground parts of five perennial weeds from April to November. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 84. 1932.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    -et al. Eradicating perennial weed with chlorates. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext. Circ. 32. 1931 (Revised).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Arthur, J. C. A new weed exterminator. Science37: 19. 1913.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    AsIander, A. Utspädd Svorvelsyra som Besprulninsmedal mot Ogras. Nord. Jordbrugsforsk.3–4: 126–46. 1925.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    —. Chlorates as pIant poisons. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.18: 1101–02. 1926.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    —. Experiments on the eradication of Canada Thistle,Cirsium arvense, with chlorates and other herbicides. Jour. Agr. Res.36: 915–34. 1928.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Atkeson, F. al. Effect of bovine digestion and of manure storage on the viability of weed seeds. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.26: 309–7. 1934.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bakke, A. L. Leafy spurge,Euphorbia esuIa L. Ia. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul. 198. 1936.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    -. Control of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esuIa L.). Ia. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul. 222. 1937.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    —. The soil moisture reIationship of European bindweed growing in corn. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.31: 352–57. 1939.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    —. Experiments on the control of European bindweed. (Convolulus arvensis L.) Ia. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul. 259: 367–440. 1939.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    —. The use of tetrachlorethane in the eradication of the European bindweed. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.33: 759–61. 1941.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    -et al. ReIation of root reserves to control of European bindweed.Convolulus arvensis L. Ia. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul. 254. 1939.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ball, W. E. and French, O. C. Sulphuric acid for control of weeds. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 596. 1935.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ball, W. al. Weed control. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta, Ext Circ.97. 1940 (Revised).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Barnett, H. L. and Hanson, H. C. Control of leafy spurge and review of literature on chemical weed control. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.277. 1934.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Barnum, Clyde C. The control of wild morning glory. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ.256. 1923.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barr, C. G. Preliminary studies on the carbohydrates in the roots of bindweed. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.28: 787–98. 1936.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    —. Organic reserves in the roots of bindweed. Jour. Agr. Res.60: 391–413. 1940.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    —. Reserve foods in the roots of whiteweed (Cardaria draba var.repens). Jour. Agr. Res.64: 725–40. 1942.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bates, G. H. Vanadium pentoxide as a catalyst for sodium chlorate in weed destruction. Nature148: 753. 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Batho, G. Field bindweed. Manitoba Dept. Agr., Circ. 138. 1939.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bibbey, R. O. The influence of environment upon the germination of weed seeds. Sci. Agr.16: 141–150. 1935.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bioletti, F. T. The extermination of morning glory. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 69. 1911.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Bissey, R. andButler, O. Experiments on the control of mustard. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 124–35. 1930.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Blackman, G. E. The relative toxicity of chemical weedkillers. Ann. App. Biol.25: 652–53. 1938.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    — andTempleman, W. G. Eradication of weeds in cereal crops by sulphuric acid and other compounds. Jour. Agr. Sci.26: 368–90. 1936.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    ——. The nature of the competition between cereal crops and annual weeds. Jour. Agr. Sci.28: 247–71. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Bolley, H. L. The destruction of weeds in cereal grains by means of chemical solutions sprayed upon the foliage. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., 10th Ann. Rep. 25–6. 1900.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    -.Weeds and methods of eradication. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 80. 1908.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bonnet, M. Destruction de la cuscute. Jour. d’Agr. Prat.61 (2): 916. 1897.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bowser, W. E. andNewton, J. D. Decomposition and movement of herbicides in soils and effects on soil microbiological activity and subsequent crop growth. Canad. Jour. Res.8: 73–100. 1933.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Boyd, G. R. Clearing land of brush and stumps. U. S. Dept. Agr., Farm. Bul. 1526. 1929 (Revised).Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Boyd, G. W. and Corkins, C. L. Wyoming weeds and their control. Wy. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 33. 1940 (Revised).Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Brenchley, W. E. Weeds on arable land and their suppression. Jour. Roy. Agr. Soc. England76: 14–37. 1915.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    -. Weeds of farm land. 1920.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    —. Spraying for weed eradication. Jour. Bath & West & So. Counties Soc. V.19: 1–20. 1925.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    — andWarington, Katherine. Fallowing for weed suppression. Jour. Min. Agr., Gt. Brit.40: 32–41. 1933.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    ——. The weed seed population of arable soil I. Numerical estimation of viable seeds and observations on their natural dormancy. Jour. Ecol.18: 235–72. 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    ——. The weed seed population of arable soil. IL Influence of crop, soil, and methods of cultivation upon the relative abundance of viable seeds. Jour. Ecol.21: 103–127. 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    ——. The weed seed population of arable soil. III. The reestablishment of weed species after reduction by fallowing. Jour. Ecol.24: 479–501. 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Britton, N. L. and Brown, A. An illustrated flora of the northern United States, Canada, and the British Possessions. 1923.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Brown, B. A. Effect of time of cutting on the elimination of bushes in pastures. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 603–05. 1930.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Brown, C. W. Johnson grass troublesome on lucerne flats. Agr. Gaz. New So. Wales50: 595–8. 1939.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Brown, Wm. J. N. Some soil moisture relationships in field bindweed (Convolulus arvensis L.) control. Thesis, Univ. Minn. 1942.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Brown, E. O. andPorter, R. H. The viability and germination of seeds ofConvolulus arvensis L. and other perennial weeds. Ia. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul. 294: 475–504. 1942.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Brown, J. G. and Streets, R. B. Sulphuric acid spray a practical means for the control of weeds. Ariz. Agr. Exp. Sta, Bul. 128. 1928.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Buckardt, H. L. Effectiveness of furfural petroleum combination in eradicating certain noxious weeds. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.28: 437–42. 1936.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bull, C. P. Corn. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 149. 1915.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    -. Weeds in the fields, gardens, and lawns. Minn. State Dept. Agr., Bul. 43. 1925.Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    -. The weed control program. Proc. Assoc. Off. Seed Anal. No. Am. 117–20. 1936.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Burcalow, F. al. The duration of the effects of renovation in the control of weeds and white grubs (Phyllophaga sp.) in permanent bluegrass pastures. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.32: 15–22. 1940.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Butler, O. The use of Kainite for the control of poison ivy. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.24: 979–81. 1932.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Call, L. E. andSewell, M. C. The relation of weed growth to nitric nitrogen accumulation in the soil. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.10: 35–44. 1918.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    -and Getty, R. E. The eradication of bindweed. Kan. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 101. 1923.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Carn, K. G. Arsenic compounds. Their use as weed killers. Agr. Gaz. New So. Wales50: 195, 226. 1939.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Cates, J. S. and Cox, H. R. The weed factor in the cultivation of corn. U. S. Dept Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Bul. 257. 1912.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Chepil, W. S. The eradication of perennial weeds with sodium chlorate. Proc. World’s Grain Exh. Conf.2: 201–6. 1933.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Clarke, G. H. The eradication of weeds. Jour. Dept Agr. So. Australia41: 860–5. 1938.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Clawson, A. B. and Moran, E. A. Toxicity of arrowgrass for sheep and remedial treatment. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. 580. 1937.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Cole, H. E. andHolch, A. E. The root habits of certain weeds of southeastern Nebraska. Ecology22: 141–7. 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Cook, W. H. Chemical weed killers. I. Relative toxicity of various chemicals to four annual weeds. Canad. Jour. Res.15: C. 299–323. 1937.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    —. Chemical weed killers.IV. Relative toxicities and loci of absorption of selected chemicals applied to perennials. Canad. Jour. Res.15: C. 451–60. 1937.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    —. Chemical weed killers. V. Relative toxicity of selected chemicals to plants grown in culture solution, and the use of relative growth rate as a criterion of toxicity. Canad. Jour. Res.15: C. 520–37. 1937.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    —. Chemical weed killers. II. Factors affecting estimation of toxicity of leaf sprays. Canad. Jour. Res.15: 380–90. 1938.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    et al. Chemical weed killers. III. Relative toxicity of several chemicals to perennials under field conditions. Canad. Jour. Res.15: 442–49. 1937.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Cooley, C. L. Wild bramble eradication. N. Y. (Geneva) St. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 674. 1936.Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Corkins, C. L. Methods of noxious weed control. Reclam. Era30: 21–24. 1940.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Corkins, C. L. andElledge, A. B. Continuous burning to eradicate noxious weeds. Reclam. Era30: 140–42. 1940.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Cox, H. R. Eradication of ferns from pasture lands in the eastern United States. U. S. Dept Agr., Farm. Bul. 687. 1936 (Revised).Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    -. Weeds: How to Control Them. U. S. Dept. Agr., Farm. Bul. 660. 1939 (Revised).Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Crafts, A. S. The use of arsenical compounds in the control of deeprooted perennial weeds. Hilgardia7: 361–72. 1933.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    —. Sulphuric acid as a penetrating agent in arsenical sprays for weed control. Hilgardia8: 125–47. 1933.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    —. Factors influencing the effectiveness of sodium chlorate as a herbicide. Hilgardia9: 437–57. 1935.Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    —. The toxicity of sodium arsenite and sodium chlorate in four California soils. Hilgardia9: 461–98. 1935.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    —. Physiological problems connected with the use of sodium chlorate in weed control. Pl. Physiol.10: 699–711. 1935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    —. Plot tests with sodium arsenite and sodium chlorate as soil sterilants in California. Cal. State Dept. Agr., Bul.24: 247–259. 1935.Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    —. Some effects of thallium sulfate upon soils. Hilgardia10: 377–97. 1936.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    —. The acid arsenical method in weed control. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.29: 934–43. 1937.Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    —. Toxicity studies with sodium chlorate in eighty California soils. Hilgardia12: 233–47. 1939.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    —. The relation of nutrients to toxicity of arsenic, borax, and chlorate in soils. Jour. Agr. Res.58: 637–71. 1939.Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    — andKennedy, P. B. The physiology ofConvolvulus arvensis (morning glory or bindweed) in relation to its control by chemical sprays. Pl. Physiol.5: 329–344. 1930.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    — andRaynor, R. N. The herbicidal properties of boron compounds. Hilgardia10: 343–74. 1936.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    — andCleary, C. W. Toxicity of arsenic, borax, chlorate, and their combinations in three California soils. Hilgardia10: 401–13. 1936.Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    — andRosenfels, R. S. Toxicity studies with arsenic in eighty California soils. Hilgardia12: 177–200. 1939.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    — andRaynor, R. N. Principles of chemical weed control. The control of weeds. Imp. Bur. Past. & For. Crops, Herb. Pub. Ser., Bul.27: 38–54. 1940.Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    -et al. Plot tests with chemical soil sterilants in California. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 648. 1941.Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Cupery, M. E. andCupery, H. Preliminary tests conducted to evaluate action of sulfamates as weed killers. DuPont Agr. News Letter8: 23–24. 1940.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Currie, G. A. Some Australian weed problems. The control of weeds. Imp. Bur. Past. & For. Crops, Herb. Pub. Ser., Bul.27: 113–30. 1940.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Dahl, A. S. Control of weeds and brush in pastures by mowing. U. S. Dept. Agr., Soil Cons. Serv., Mim. Lft. 1688. 1937.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Dancaster, E. A. Catalysts for sodium chlorate in weed destruction. Nature150: 737–38. 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Darlington, H. al. Some important Michigan weeds. Mich. Agr. Exp. Sta., Spec. Bul. 304. 1940.Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Dawson, R. B. The control of weeds in lawns and fine turf. Ann. App. Biol.25: 653–59. 1938.Google Scholar
  104. 104.
    Deatrick, E. P. The spotting method of weed eradication. Science71: 487–88. 1930.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Deem, J. W. Control of weeds with chlorates. New Zealand Jour. Agr.43: 105–10. 1931.Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Delwiche, E. J. Weeds menace some northern areas. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 449: 79–80. 1940.Google Scholar
  107. 107.
    Detmers, Freda. Canada thistle,Cirsium arvense. Tourn. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 414: 1–45. 1927.Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Dexter, S. T. Response of quack grass to defoliation and fertilization. Pl. Physiol.11: 843–51. 1936.Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    —. The winterhardiness of weeds. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.29: 512–17. 1937.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    —. The drouth resistance of quack grass under various degrees of fertilization with nitrogen. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.29: 568–76. 1937.Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    —. Seasonal variations in drought resistance of exposed rhizomes of quack grass. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.34: 1125–36. 1942.Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Dieffenbach, E. M. Weed control machinery and control methods in Utah and Idaho. Agr. Eng.21: 437–8. 1940.Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Djurle, O. Svenska Vall-och Mosskulturfören [The weed problem. 3. Combatting weeds during the summer on muck land]. Kvartalsskr3: 219–224. 1941. [Biol. Abst. 20920. Nov., 1942].Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Dorman, al. The effect of calcium arsenate upon the productivity of several important soils of the cotton belt. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.31: 1020–28. 1939.Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Drew, W. B. and Helm, C. A. Representative Missouri weeds and their control. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 433. 1941.Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Drottij, S. Harrowing to control weeds in cereals. U. S. Dept. Agr., Exp. Sta. Rec.62: 227. 1930. [Meddel. Centralanst. Försöksv. Jordbruksområdet (Sweden) No. 348. 1929].Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Dunham, R. S. Perennial sow thistle. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext Circ. 26. 1928.Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Durrell, L. W. and Newsom, I. E. Colorado’s poisonous and injurious plants. Col. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 455. 1939.Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Dykstra, T. P. Weeds as possible carriers of leaf roll and rugose mosaic of potato. Jour. Agr. Res.47: 17–32. 1933.Google Scholar
  120. 120.
    Engledow, F. L. andWoodman, R. M. The use of a wetter in weed spraying. Jour. Min. Agr., Gt. Brit.42: 663–66. 1935.Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Essary, S. H. Control of dodder in lespedeza. Tenn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 22. 1928.Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Evans, L. S. Bindweed control methods. Neb. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext. Circ. 145. 1940.Google Scholar
  123. 123.
    Fitch, C. al. Toxicity of sodium chlorate (NaClO3) for cattle. Cornell Vet.19: 373–75. 1929.Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    Fleetwood, J. R. Field bindweed and methods of control. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext. Circ. 387. 1938.Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Fleming, C. E. andBrennen, C. A. White Top-Holding it under control by cultivation, followed by the establishment of a sod of pasture grasses and clovers. Nev. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 149. 1938.Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Franzke, C. J. andHume, A. N. Field bindweed. So. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 305. 1936.Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    Frazier, J. C. Advantages of a fourteen-day interval of cultivation for the control of field bindweed,Convolvulus arvensis L. Am. Jour. Bot28(10): 12s. 1941.Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    —. Amount, distribution, and seasonal trend of certain organic reserves in the root system of field bindweed,Convolvulus arvensis L. Pl. Physiol.18: 167–184. 1943.Google Scholar
  129. 129.
    French, O. C. Application of sulphuric acid for weed control. Agr. Eng.17: 339–40. 1936.Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    —. Equipment for chemical weed control. Agr. Eng.21: 487–8. 1940.Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    — andBall, W. E. A study of suitable equipment for applying sulphuric acid for weed control. Agr. Eng.15: 411–13. 1934.Google Scholar
  132. 132.
    Fromm, F. The eradication of nut grass. Science96: 337–38. 1942.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Fron, G. etBertrand, R. Contribution à l’étude de l’influence des chlorates sur la végétation. Ann. Agron.4: 1–25. 1934.Google Scholar
  134. 134.
    Fuelleman, R. F. andGraber, L. F. Renovation and its effect on the populations of weeds in pastures. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.30: 616–23. 1938.Google Scholar
  135. 135.
    Garman, H. Some Kentucky weeds and poisonous plants. Ky. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 183. 1914.Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Gates, F. C. Weeds in Kansas. Rep. Kan. State Bd. Agr.60: 243. 1941.Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    Georgia, Ada. Manual of weeds. 1914.Google Scholar
  138. 138.
    Gerlach, H. W. Bindweed control by clean cultivation. Agr. Eng.19: 219. 1938.Google Scholar
  139. 139.
    Gimingham, C. T. andTattersfield, F. Laboratory and field experiments on the use of 3: 5-dinitro-o-cresol and the sodium salt for winter spraying. Jour. Agr. Sci.17: 162–80. 1927.Google Scholar
  140. 140.
    Godel, G. L. Some considerations in regard to experiments with chemical herbicides. Canad. Jour. Res.7: 499–519. 1932.Google Scholar
  141. 141.
    —. The chemical control of annual weeds in growing crops. Proc. World’s Grain Exh. & Conf. Regina, Canada. Vol.2: 207–13. 1933.Google Scholar
  142. 142.
    —. Relation between rate of seeding and yield of cereal crops in competition with weeds. Sci. Agr.16: 165–68. 1935.Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    —. Cereal growing on weedy land in northeastern Saskatchewan. Effects of heavy seeding with the use of fertilizer on the development of weeds and crops. Sci. Agr.19: 21–32. 1938.Google Scholar
  144. 144.
    Godfrey, G. H. The control of nut grass with chloropicrin. Soil Sci.47: 391–96. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Graham, R. and Michael, V. M. White snakeroot poisoning. 111. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 436. 1935.Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Grandfield, C. O. The relation of organic food reserves to the effect of cutting pasture weeds at different stages of growth. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 709–13. 1930.Google Scholar
  147. 147.
    Grand, C. V. and Hansen, A. A. Poison ivy and poison sumac and their eradication. U. S. Dept Agr., Farm. Bul. 1166. 1929 (Revised).Google Scholar
  148. 148.
    Grau, F. V. Use of sodium chlorate and other chemicals in controlling turf weeds. U. S. Golf Assoc., Bul. Green Sect.13: 154–79. 1933.Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Gray, A. Gray’s new manual of botany. 1908.Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Gray, G. P. Spraying for the control of wild morning glory within the fog belt. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 168. 1917.Google Scholar
  151. 151.
    Gress, E. M. Pennsylvania weeds. Pa. Dept Agr., Bul. 558. 1938.Google Scholar
  152. 152.
    Haines, W. E. The effect of seed inoculation and of a nitrogen fertilizer on the survival of red clover plants growing in soil previously treated with sodium chlorate. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.25: 181–3. 1933.Google Scholar
  153. 153.
    Hanley, J. H. andWeinard, F. F. The chemical eradication of lawn weeds. Proc. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.35: 845–9. 1937.Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Hansen, A. A. Eradicating quack grass with sodium chlorate. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.20: 1120–23. 1928.Google Scholar
  155. 155.
    -. Nineteen noxious weeds of Indiana. Purdue Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 106. 1922.Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Hanson, H. C. and Rudd, Velva E. Leafy spurge. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 266. 1933.Google Scholar
  157. 157.
    -. Leafy spurge. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 55. 1934.Google Scholar
  158. 158.
    -and Kluender, W. Leafy spurge. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 141. 1936.Google Scholar
  159. 159.
    -and Dice, J. R. Milk tainting weeds and their control. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 143. 1936.Google Scholar
  160. 160.
    Hardy, E. A. Tillage in relation to weed root systems. Agr. Eng.19: 435–8. 1938.Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    —. Weed control in western Canada. Agr. Eng.21: 476. 1940.Google Scholar
  162. 162.
    Harmon, G. W. andKeim, F. D. The percentage and viability of weed seeds recovered in the feces of farm animals and their longevity when buried in manure. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.26: 762–67. 1934.Google Scholar
  163. 163.
    Harper, H. J. The use of sodium chlorate in the control of Johnson grass. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 417–22. 1930.Google Scholar
  164. 164.
    Harris, L. E. and Hyslop, G. R. Selective sprays for weed control in crops. Ore. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 403. 1942.Google Scholar
  165. 165.
    Harvey, R. B. The action of toxic agents used in the eradication of noxious plants. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.23: 481–89. 1931.Google Scholar
  166. 166.
    —. Ammonium thiocyanate as a weed eradicant. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.23: 944–946. 1931.Google Scholar
  167. 167.
    —. Use of ethylene oxide for the eradication of pests. Science73: 100–01. 1931.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    -and Larson, A. H. Common weeds of lawns. Seed Trade Buyers Guide. Pub. by Seed World. 70–87. 1940.Google Scholar
  169. 169.
    et al. Sodium ethyl xanthate as a plant poison. Science84: 356. 1936.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Hayden, A. Distribution and reproduction of Canada thistle in Iowa. Am. Jour. Bot.21: 355–73. 1934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Helgeson, E. A. Perennial peppergrass in North Dakota. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bi. Bul.1(3): 9–12. 1939.Google Scholar
  172. 172.
    -. Russian knapweed and perennial peppergrass. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 292. 1940.Google Scholar
  173. 173.
    —. Control of field bindweed by dry chlorates. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bi. Bul.4(1): 7–8. 1941.Google Scholar
  174. 174.
    —. Bindweed control by sodium arsenate, borax, and sodium chlorate. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bi. Bul.4(3): 14–15. 1942.Google Scholar
  175. 175.
    — andThompson, E. J. Grazing in relation to the control of leafy spurge. Science88: 57. 1938.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    — andGerbracht, Dorothea. Chemical control of annual weeds in flax and grain fields. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bi. Bul.3(2): 7–10. 1940.Google Scholar
  177. 177.
    Helm, C. A. Corn in Missouri.II. Field methods that increase the corn crop. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 185. 1921.Google Scholar
  178. 178.
    -. Johnson grass. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext. Lft.45. 1936.Google Scholar
  179. 179.
    Henze, G. La cuscute et sa destruction. Jour. d’ Agr. Prat.61 (2): 815–816. 1897.Google Scholar
  180. 180.
    Hessenland, al. Die Wirkung von Chlorat, Bromat, und Jodat auf Pflanzenwuchs. Ang. Chemie46: 577–79. 1933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  181. 181.
    Hill, A. Trials of weed killers on garden paths at Craibstone. Scot. Jour. Agr.11: 203–9. 1928.Google Scholar
  182. 182.
    Hirsch, A. A. Toxic effects of sodium pentachlorphenate and other chemicals on water hyacinth. Bot. Gaz.103: 620–1. 1942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Hopper, W. C. The eradication of weeds by chemical agents: A brief review of literature. Sci. Agr.10: 128–35. 1929.Google Scholar
  184. 184.
    Howard, F. L. andStark, F. L. Chemical soil fumigation for more luxurious growth and weed control. Seed World44: 12–13. 1938.Google Scholar
  185. 185.
    Hulbert, H. al. Controlling perennial weeds with chlorates. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 423–33. 1930.Google Scholar
  186. 186.
    -et al. Methods affecting the efficiency of chlorate weed killers. Id. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 189. 1931.Google Scholar
  187. 187.
    et al. The eradication ofLepidium draba. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.26: 858–64. 1934.Google Scholar
  188. 188.
    — andBenjamin, L. V. Dry application of chlorates. Id. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 74: 1–8. 1935.Google Scholar
  189. 189.
    Hume, A. N. and Sloan, S. L. Quack grass and western wheat grass. So. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 170. 1916.Google Scholar
  190. 190.
    Hurd-Karrer, Annie M. Comparative susceptibility of crop plants to sodium chlorate injury. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech Bul. 648. 1940.Google Scholar
  191. 191.
    —. Chlorate toxicity and persistence in relation to soil reaction. Jour. Agr. Res.63: 481–94. 1941.Google Scholar
  192. 192.
    -. Soil conditions affecting herbicidal action of chlorates: A literature review. U. S. Dept. Agr., Bur. Pl. Ind., Agr. Res. Adm., [Mim.] 1942.Google Scholar
  193. 193.
    Hurst, Evelyn. The poison plants of New South Wales. 1942.Google Scholar
  194. 194.
    Jackman, E. al. Control of perennial weeds in Oregon. Ore. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext. Bul. 510. 1938.Google Scholar
  195. 195.
    Johnson, A. A. andDexter, S. T. The response of quack grass to variations in height of cutting and rates of application of nitrogen. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.31: 67–76. 1939.Google Scholar
  196. 196.
    Johnson, E. Recent developments in use of herbicides in California. Cal. Dept. Agr., Bul. 17: 7–16. 1928.Google Scholar
  197. 197.
    -. The puncture vine in California. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 528. 1932.Google Scholar
  198. 198.
    Jones, T. al. Weed control and cotton tillage on blackbelt (prairie) soils. Miss. Agr. Exp. Sta., Tech. Bul. 29. 1941.Google Scholar
  199. 199.
    Keim, F. al. Bindweed eradication. Nebr. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ.50. 1938.Google Scholar
  200. 200.
    Kennedy, P. B. andCrafts, A. S. The application of physiological methods to weed control. Pl. Physiol.2: 503–06. 1927.Google Scholar
  201. 201.
    ——. The anatomy ofConvolvulus arvensis, wild morning glory or field bindweed. Hilgardia5: 591–622. 1931.Google Scholar
  202. 202.
    Kephart, L. W. Quack grass. U. S. Dept. Agr., Farm. Bul. 1307. 1931 (Revised).Google Scholar
  203. 203.
    —. The farm weed problem in America. The control of weeds. Imp. Bur. Past. & For. Crops, Herb. Pub. Ser., Bul. 27: 28–37. 1940.Google Scholar
  204. 204.
    Kiesselbach, T. al. Tillage practices in relation to corn production. Neb. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 232. 1928.Google Scholar
  205. 205.
    -et al. Bindweeds and their control. Neb. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 287. 1934.Google Scholar
  206. 206.
    Kiltz, B. F. Perennial weeds which spread vegetatively. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 216–34. 1930.Google Scholar
  207. 207.
    Kinch, R. C. Nebraska weeds. Neb. Dept. Agr. & Insp. Rev., Bul. 101. 1939.Google Scholar
  208. 208.
    — andKeim, F. D. Eradication of bindweed in bluegrass lawns. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.29: 30–39. 1937.Google Scholar
  209. 209.
    Kirk, L. E. andPavylchenko, T. K. Vegetative propagation of wild oats,Avena fatua, and other economically important species ofAveneae andHordeae. Canad. Jour. Res.7: 204–20. 1932.Google Scholar
  210. 210.
    Konurov, I. G. The system of cuttingConvolvulus arvensis L. on fallows. Dokl. Vsesojuz. Akad. Seljskohoz. Nauk.19: 3–9. 1939. [Herbage Abs.10: No. 1875. 1940.]Google Scholar
  211. 211.
    Korsmo, E. The viability of weed seeds after passing through the digestive tract of farm animals. U. S. Dept. Agr., Exp. Sta. Rec.26: 839–000. 1912. [Trans. from Tidsskr. Norske Landbr.18: 223–30. 1911].Google Scholar
  212. 212.
    -. Oni Bekjaenpelse au. Ugraes I. Appen Aker [Control of weeds on arable land]. (Norway) Landbr. Dept. Smaaskr. No.4: 1–16. 1917.Google Scholar
  213. 213.
    —. Natrium klorat (NaClO3) some Ugraes draepende middel [Sodium chlorate as a remedy against weeds]. Norsk Landmandsblad46: 146–48. 1927.Google Scholar
  214. 214.
    -. Unkräuter in Ackerbau der Neuzeit [Weeds in modern farming]. 580 pages. 1930.Google Scholar
  215. 215.
    —. Underskelser a årene 1916–23 over ugressets skadevirkninger og dets bekjempelse i åkerbrukeh. Meld. Norg. Lanbr. Hoisk.12: 305–716. 1932.Google Scholar
  216. 216.
    -. Weed seeds. Gyldendal Norsk Forlag. 175 pp. 1935.Google Scholar
  217. 217.
    Korr, S. A. On application of chlorates for weed control. Himiz. Soc. Zemled. No.5, 112. 1938. [Trans. in Herb. Abs.9: No. 440. 1939.]Google Scholar
  218. 218.
    Kuhn, J. Biologischer Daseinskampf zwischen Unkraut und Kulturpflanze. Mitt. Deut. Landw.47: 7–8. 1932.Google Scholar
  219. 219.
    —. Daseinskampf zwischen Blattfrucht und Unkraut. Mitt. Deut Landw.47: 40–2. 1932.Google Scholar
  220. 220.
    Larson, A. al. Farmstead weeds. Seed Trade Buyers Guide. Pub. by Seed World. 65–82. 1941.Google Scholar
  221. 221.
    -and Harvey, R. B. Common weeds. Seed Trade Buyers Guide. Pub. by Seed World. 109–24. 1938.Google Scholar
  222. 222.
    -et al. Poisonous plants. Seed Trade Buyers Guide. Pub. by Seed World. 105–22. 1939.Google Scholar
  223. 223.
    Latshaw, W. L. andZahnley, J. W. Experiments with sodium chlorate and other chemicals as herbicides for field bindweed. Jour. Agr. Res.35: 757–67. 1927.Google Scholar
  224. 224.
    -,-. Killing field bindweed with sodium chlorate. Kans. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 136. 1928.Google Scholar
  225. 225.
    —,—. Magnesium and calcium chlorate as substitutes for sodium chlorate for killing field bindweed. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.20: 1329. 1928.Google Scholar
  226. 226.
    Lee, O. C. Johnson grass and its control in Indiana. Purdue Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext. Lft 201. 1936.Google Scholar
  227. 227.
    -. European bindweed and its control in Indiana. Purdue Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext. Lft. 206. 1937.Google Scholar
  228. 228.
    Leith, B. D. Weed killing more important than mulching in corn cultivation. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.449. 7. 1940.Google Scholar
  229. 229.
    Levy, E. B. Pasture weeds. The control of weeds. Imp. Bur. Past. & For. Crops, Herb. Pub. Ser., Bul.27: 144–52. 1940.Google Scholar
  230. 230.
    Litzenberger, S. C. and Post, A. H. Selective sprays for the control of weeds in Kentucky blue grass lawns. Mont. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 411. 1943.Google Scholar
  231. 231.
    Long, H. C. Suppression of weeds by fertilizers and chemicals. 57 pp. 1934.Google Scholar
  232. 232.
    — andMacDowall, R. K. Some chemical methods of weed destruction. Jour. Roy. Agr. Soc. Eng.96: 22–44. 1935.Google Scholar
  233. 233.
    Loomis, W. E. The control of dandelions in lawns. Jour. Agr. Res.56: 855–68. 1938.Google Scholar
  234. 234.
    et al. Chlorates as herbicides. Science74: 485. 1931.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  235. 235.
    et al. The absorption and movement of sodium chlorate when used as an herbicide. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.25: 724–39. 1933.Google Scholar
  236. 236.
    Loyer, M. Emploi des chlorates pour la destruction des herbes dans les céréals de printemps. Compt. Rend. Acad. Agr. France9: 957–60. 1923.Google Scholar
  237. 237.
    Lunn, W. al. Tobacco following bare and natural weed fallow and pure stands of certain weeds. Jour. Agr. Res.59: 829–45. 1939.Google Scholar
  238. 238.
    Lynes, F. F. Statistical analyses applied to research in weed eradication. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.27: 980–87. 1935.Google Scholar
  239. 239.
    Manske, R. H. F. Chemical analyses as an aid to classification of poisonous plants. The control of weeds. Imp. Bur. Past. & For. Crops, Herb. Pub. Ser., Bul. 27. 27. 1940.Google Scholar
  240. 240.
    Marcovitch, S. Sodium fluoride as an herbicide. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.33: 367. 1941.Google Scholar
  241. 241.
    Marsh, C. al. The locoweed disease. U. S. Dept Agr., Farm. Bul. 1054. 1936 (Revised).Google Scholar
  242. 242.
    McDonald, A. C. Arsenite of soda for destroying prickly pear. Agr. Jour. Dept. Agr. Cape Colony5: 112. 1892.Google Scholar
  243. 243.
    MacDowall, R. K. Some factors influencing the agricultural use of chemical weed killers. Ann. App. Biol.25: 648–52. 1938.Google Scholar
  244. 244.
    McGeorge, W. T. The effect of arsenite of soda on the soil. Hawaii Agr. Exp. Sta., Press Bul. 50: 1–16. 1915.Google Scholar
  245. 245.
    Meyer-Hermann, K. Unkrautbekämpfung mit natriumchlorathaltigen Mitteln. Mitt. Deut. Landw.54: 408–10. 1939.Google Scholar
  246. 246.
    Miller, D. Biological control of noxious weeds of New Zealand. The control of weeds. Imp. Bur. Past. & For. Crops, Herb. Pub. Ser., Bul.27: 153–7. 1940.Google Scholar
  247. 247.
    Monteith, J. J. Weed control in turf. The control of weeds. Imp. Bur. Past. & For. Crops, Herb. Pub. Ser., Bul.27: 55–67. 1940.Google Scholar
  248. 248.
    — andRabbitt, A. E. Killing weed seeds in soil with chloropicrin (tear gas). Turf Culture1: 63–79. 1939.Google Scholar
  249. 249.
    Morettini, A. L’impiego dell acide solforice per combattere le erbe infeste nel frumento. Staz. Sper. Agr. Ital.48: 693–716. 1915.Google Scholar
  250. 250.
    Morgan, A. Experiments in hoary cress control. No.1. Field trials. Jour. Dept. Agr., Victoria, Australia29: 406–16. 1931.Google Scholar
  251. 251.
    —. Experiments in control of hoary cress. No. 2. Pot experiments. Jour. Dept. Agr., Victoria, Australia29: 504–15. 1931.Google Scholar
  252. 252.
    —. Hoary cress control. Jour. Dept. Agr., Victoria, Australia32: 1–6,40. 1934.Google Scholar
  253. 253.
    —. The absorption and translocation of herbicides. Jour. Dept. Agr., Victoria, Australia33: 200–8. 1935.Google Scholar
  254. 254.
    Moore, G. R. Sodium chlorate poisoning in cattle. Jour. Am. Vet. Med. Assn.99: 50–2. 1941.Google Scholar
  255. 255.
    Muenscher, W. C. Leafy spurge and related weeds. Cornell Ext. Bul. 192. 1930.Google Scholar
  256. 256.
    -. Perennial sow thistle and related weeds. Cornell Ext. Bul. 195. 1930.Google Scholar
  257. 257.
    -. Killing perennial weeds with chlorates during winter. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 542. 1932.Google Scholar
  258. 258.
    -. Weeds of New York. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 635. 1935.Google Scholar
  259. 259.
    -. Controlling weeds with chlorates. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 432. 1940.Google Scholar
  260. 260.
    -. Weeds. 1941 (Revised).Google Scholar
  261. 261.
    -and Justice, O. L. The control of weeds in lawns. Cornell Ext Bul. 431. 1940.Google Scholar
  262. 262.
    Murphy, H. F. The control of Bermuda grass through the use of chlorates. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.25: 700–4. 1933.Google Scholar
  263. 263.
    Neller, J. R. Effect of chlorates upon the catalase activity of the roots of bindweed. Jour. Agr. Res.43: 183–89. 1931.Google Scholar
  264. 264.
    Nelson, R. T. Studies of microorganisms and chlorate persistence in soils treated with sodium chlorate. Thesis, Univ. Minn. 1942.Google Scholar
  265. 265.
    Neuweiler, E. Unkrautvertilgung im Getreide mit chemischen Mitteln. Landw. Jahrb., Schweiz.53: 1–13. 1939.Google Scholar
  266. 266.
    Newton, J. D. andPaul, A. D. Decomposition and movement of herbicides in soils, and effects on soil microbiological activity and subsequent crop growth. Canad. Jour. Res.13: 101–14. 1935.Google Scholar
  267. 267.
    Nilson, W. al. Studies of the toxicity of ammonium thiocyanate for cattle. Cornell Vet.22: 347–53. 1932.Google Scholar
  268. 268.
    Nilsson-Leissner, G. Paraffin oil for dandelion control. Svenska Vall. Mossk. Fören. Kvartalsskr.2: 66–70. 1940. [Herb. Rev.8: 99–100. 1940; Herb. Abs.10: No. 1399. 1940.]Google Scholar
  269. 269.
    Norris, Elva B. L. Ecological study of the weed population of eastern Nebraska. Neb. Univ., Studies39: No. 2. 1939.Google Scholar
  270. 270.
    North, H. F. al. Lawn grasses and their management. R. I. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 264. 1938.Google Scholar
  271. 271.
    Offord, H. R. The chemical eradication ofRibes. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. 240. 1931.Google Scholar
  272. 272.
    — andD’urbal, R. P. Toxic action of aqueous sodium chlorate onNitella. Jour. Agr. Res.43: 791–810. 1931.Google Scholar
  273. 273.
    -et al. Chemical and mechanical methods ofRibes eradication in the white pines areas of the western states. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. 692. 1940.Google Scholar
  274. 274.
    Oswald, E. I. The effect of animal digestion and fermentation of manure on the vitality of seeds. Md. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 128. 1908.Google Scholar
  275. 275.
    Oswald, W. L. andBoss, A. Minnesota weeds. I. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 129. 1913.Google Scholar
  276. 276.
    -,-. Minnesota weeds. II. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 139. 1914.Google Scholar
  277. 277.
    -,-. Minnesota weeds. III. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 176. 1918.Google Scholar
  278. 278.
    Overpeck, J. C. Johnson grass eradication. N. M. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 146. 1925.Google Scholar
  279. 279.
    Owen, O. Chlorate weed killers. Ann. App. Biol.25: 659–60. 1938.Google Scholar
  280. 280.
    Pammel, L. H. A manual of poisonous plants. 1911.Google Scholar
  281. 281.
    -. Weeds of the farm and garden. 1911.Google Scholar
  282. 282.
    -. Some weedy grasses injurious to livestock, especially sheep. Ia. Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 116. 1929.Google Scholar
  283. 283.
    -and King, C. M. Weed flora of Iowa: Ia. Geol. Survey, Bul. 4. 1926 (Revised).Google Scholar
  284. 284.
    ——. A weed survey of Iowa. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 587–94. 1930.Google Scholar
  285. 285.
    Pavlychonko, T. K. Investigations relating to weed control in western Canada. The control of weeds. Imp. Bur. Past. & For. Crops, Herb. Pub. Ser., Bul. 27: 9–26. 1940.Google Scholar
  286. 286.
    —. The place of crested wheat grass,Agropyron cristatum L. in controlling perennial weeds. Sci. Agr.22: 459–60. 1942.Google Scholar
  287. 287.
    —. Quantitative study of the entire root systems of weed and crop plants under field conditions. Ecology18: 62–79. 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  288. 288.
    — andHarrington, J. B. Competitive efficiency of weeds and cereal crops. Canad. Jour. Res.10: 77–94. 1934.Google Scholar
  289. 289.
    ——. Root development of weeds and crops in competition under dry farming. Sci. Agr.16: 151–60. 1935.Google Scholar
  290. 290.
    -etal. Eradication of perennial weeds by the shallow cultivation methods. Univ. Sask., Agr. Ext. Bul. 100. 1940.Google Scholar
  291. 291.
    Pereira, H. C. Crop response to inter-row tillage. Emp. Jour. Exp. Agr.9: 29–42. 1941.Google Scholar
  292. 292.
    Pfeil, E. Untersuchungen über Zusammenhänge zwischen Natriumchloratwirkung und physikalischen Bodeneigenschaften. Landw. Jahrb.87: 647. 1939.Google Scholar
  293. 293.
    Piemeisel, R. L. Changes in weedy plant cover on cleared sagebrush land and their probable causes. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. 654. 1938.Google Scholar
  294. 294.
    Pieters, A. J. What is a weed? Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.27: 781–83. 1935.Google Scholar
  295. 295.
    Porter, D. R. Canada thistle and quack grass eradication. Ia. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext. Bul. 113. 1924 (Revised).Google Scholar
  296. 296.
    Porter, R. H. and Sylvester, E. P. Noxious and other bad weeds in Iowa. Ia. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext. Corc. 201. 1939 (Revised).Google Scholar
  297. 297.
    Rabaté, E. La destruction des ravenelles par l’acide sulfurique. Jour. d’Agr. Prat.26: 607. 1911.Google Scholar
  298. 298.
    —. Nettoyage des champs de cereales par l’acide sulfurique. Jour. d’Agr. Prat.35: 110–12. 1921.Google Scholar
  299. 299.
    —. Action de l’acide sulfurique contre la rouille du ble’. Compt. Rend. Acad. Agr. France9: 403–04. 1923.Google Scholar
  300. 300.
    —. Action de l’acide sulfurique diluée dans les champs de céréales. Compt. Rend.179: 1285–87. 1924.Google Scholar
  301. 301.
    —. L’emploi de l’acide sulfurique pour le contrôle des mauvaises herbes et des parasites. Int. Rev. Sci. Prac. Agr.4: 535–45. 1926.Google Scholar
  302. 302.
    —. Action de l’acide sulfurique sur la terre cultivee. Jour. d’Agr. Prat.47: 215–17. 1927.Google Scholar
  303. 303.
    Rademacher, B. Die Stickstoffdüngung als spezifisches Mittel zur Bekäampfung der Unkrautwicken im Getreide. Pflanzenbau16: 182–201. 1939.Google Scholar
  304. 304.
    —. Über den Lichteinfall bei Wintergetreide und Winterölfrüchten und seine Bedeutung für die Verunkrautung. Pflanzenbau15: 241–65. 1939.Google Scholar
  305. 305.
    —. Über den antagonistischen Einfluss von Rogen und Weizen auf Keimung und Entwicklung mancher Unkräuter. Pflanzenbau17(5): 131–143. 1940. [Biol. Abs. 5217. Feb. 1942].Google Scholar
  306. 306.
    —. The control of weeds in Germany. Imp. Bur. Past. & For. Crops, Herb. Pub. Ser., Bul.27: 68–112. 1940.Google Scholar
  307. 307.
    Rather, H. C. Weed problems in relation to the production and marketing of farm seeds. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 409–16. 1930.Google Scholar
  308. 308.
    Raynor, R. N. The chemical control of St Johnswort. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 615. 1937.Google Scholar
  309. 309.
    Remy, T. andVasters, J. Beobachtung über die Unkrautbekämpfung durch Kainit. Landw. Jahrb.46: 627–57. 1914.Google Scholar
  310. 310.
    Rees, J. The use of sodium chlorate for destroying some perennial weeds. Welsh Jour. Agr.14: 277–80. 1938.Google Scholar
  311. 311.
    Robbins, W. W. Weed control in central Europe. Cal. Dept. Agr., Mo. Bul.23 (2, 3, 4, 5, 6): 124–26. 1934.Google Scholar
  312. 312.
    —. Weeds in orchards. Reclam. Era31: 147–50. 1941.Google Scholar
  313. 313.
    -et al. Weed control. 1942.Google Scholar
  314. 314.
    Robertson, J. M. andStewart, A. B. Weed eradication in lawns by chemical treatment. Jour. Bd. Greenkeep. Res.5: 213–5. 1938.Google Scholar
  315. 315.
    Rogers, C. F. Carbohydrate metabolism in the roots of Canada thistle,Cirsium arvense (L). Thesis, Iowa State College.Google Scholar
  316. 316.
    —. Winter activity of the roots of perennial weeds. Science69: 299–300. 1929.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  317. 317.
    -and Hatfield, I. Carbon disulfide for the eradication of perennial weeds. Col. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 347. 1929.Google Scholar
  318. 318.
    Rogers, C. H. Cotton root-rot and weeds in native hay meadows of central Texas. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.28: 820–23. 1936.Google Scholar
  319. 319.
    Rosenfels, R. S. Whitetop control on the Newlands project in Nevada. Reclam. Era31: 47–50. 1941.Google Scholar
  320. 320.
    — andCrafts, A. S. Arsenic fixation in relation to the sterilization of soils with sodium arsenite. Hilgardia12: 201–29. 1939.Google Scholar
  321. 321.
    ——. Chlorate distribution and the effect of nitrate concentration on chlorate toxicity in soil columns. Hilgardia14: 71–79. 1941.Google Scholar
  322. 322.
    Rowley, H. K. When to treat quack grass most effectively with chlorates. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.23: 41–2. 1931.Google Scholar
  323. 323.
    Runnels, H. A. and Schaffner, J. H. Manual of Ohio weeds. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 475. 1931.Google Scholar
  324. 324.
    Sallans, B. J. The relationship of weeds to losses caused by common root rot in wheat. Sci. Agr.20: 632–7. 1940.Google Scholar
  325. 325.
    Sampson, A. W. and Parker, K. W. St. Johnswort on range lands of California. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 503. 1930.Google Scholar
  326. 326.
    -and Malmatin, A. E. Stock-poisoning plants of America. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 593. 1935.Google Scholar
  327. 327.
    Sandhoff, A. G. andSkinner, C. E. The nitrification of ammonium thiocyanate (a weed eradicant) and effect of this compound upon the soil population. Soil Sci.48: 287–94. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  328. 328.
    Schafer, E. G. The bindweed. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta., Pop. Bul. 137. 1927.Google Scholar
  329. 329.
    —. Eradicating the bindweed with sodium chlorate. Wash. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 235: 1–16. 1929.Google Scholar
  330. 330.
    Schwendiman, A. The toxicity and decomposition of sodium chlorate in soils. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.33: 522–37. 1941.Google Scholar
  331. 331.
    et al. Chemicals control field bindweed and leafy spurge. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 449, pp. 80, 81. 1940.Google Scholar
  332. 332.
    et al. New chemical kills weeds but not grain. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 451, pp. 18, 19. 1941.Google Scholar
  333. 333.
    Seddon, H. R. andMcGrath, T. T. Toxicity of sodium chlorate. Agr. Gaz. New So. Wales41: 765–66. 1930.Google Scholar
  334. 334.
    Sevelev, I. N. and Dobrohleb, I. F. Couch grass (Agropyrum repens P. B.) and its control. Dokl. Vsesojuz. Akad. S. H. Nauk. No. 9. 11–14. 1940. (Ukraine Inst. Grain Husb., Kiev). [Herb. Abs.11: No. 667. 1941].Google Scholar
  335. 335.
    Shedd, C. al. Weed control in growing corn. La. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.44: 439–67. 1942.Google Scholar
  336. 336.
    Silversides, W. H. The rate and mode of penetration of herbicides. I. Copper nitrate solutions. Sci. Agr.20: 419–23. 1940.Google Scholar
  337. 337.
    Simonds, A. O. Theanatomical development ofLepidium draba. Jour. Agr. Res.57: 917–28. 1938.Google Scholar
  338. 338.
    Singh, B. N. andDas, K. Effectiveness of spraying with fertilizers for control of weeds on arable land. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.30: 465–74. 1938.Google Scholar
  339. 339.
    ——. Effectiveness of contact sprays in the control of annual weeds in cereal crops. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.31: 200–208. 1939.Google Scholar
  340. 340.
    Sirri, A. Come vincere la cuscuta [Dodder control]. Gior. Agr. Domen47: 233. 1937. [Herb. Abs.7: No.4. 1937].Google Scholar
  341. 341.
    Sjögren, E. Kan maskrosens spridning förhindras? [Can the spreading of the dandelion be prevented?]Svensk Frötidn.3: 149. 1934. Herb. Abs.5: 295. 1935].Google Scholar
  342. 342.
    Skilbeck, D. andColes, H. G. Weed control by sulfuric acid spraying in France. Scot. Jour. Agr.15: 410–4. 1932.Google Scholar
  343. 343.
    Skiver, C. E. Wild garlic and its control in Indiana. Purdue Agr. Ext Sta., Lft. 167. 1933.Google Scholar
  344. 344.
    Smith, C. A. Neal. A preliminary investigation of the relative effectiveness of various chemicals in the control of some common weeds. Jour. Dept Agr. So. Australia41: 921–31. 1938.Google Scholar
  345. 345.
    Smith, C. W. Machinery to control the field bindweed. Agr. Eng.16: 142–8. 1935.Google Scholar
  346. 346.
    —. Cultural control of bindweed. Agr. Eng.21: 468. 1940.Google Scholar
  347. 347.
    Smith, E. V. andFick, Geo. L. Nut grass eradication studies: I. Relation of the life history of nut grass,Cyperus rotundus L. to possible methods of control. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.29: 1007–13. 1937.Google Scholar
  348. 348.
    — andMayton, E. L. Nut grass eradication studies: II. The eradication of nut grass,Cyperus rotundus L., by certain tillage experiments. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.30: 18–21. 1938.Google Scholar
  349. 349.
    ——. Nut grass eradication studies. III. The control of nut grass,Cyperus rotundus L., on several soil types by tillage. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.34: 151–9. 1942.Google Scholar
  350. 350.
    Smith, Wm. G. Common weeds. Scot Jour. Agr.4: 382–94. 1921.Google Scholar
  351. 351.
    Snidor, H. J. Probable effects of weeds on the fertility of soils. I11. State Acad. Sci., Trans.33: 34–35. 1940.Google Scholar
  352. 352.
    Sourdille, P. Le traitement des blés à l’acide sulfurique et le sulfate d’ammoniaque. Compt. Rend. 6me réunion annuelle et 7me réunion du comptoir francais de l’azote. 21–25. 1926.Google Scholar
  353. 353.
    Spencer, E. R. Just weeds. 1940.Google Scholar
  354. 354.
    Srb, J. al. Cost of bindweed eradication by the tillage method. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.30: 425–29. 1938.Google Scholar
  355. 355.
    Stahler, L. M. Some ecological aspects of competition between crop plants and field bindweed. Thesis, Univ. Minn. 1941.Google Scholar
  356. 356.
    Stapp, C. andBucksteeg, W. Biologischer Nachweis von Chlorat im Boden. Arb. Biol. Reichsanst.22: 363–77. 1938.Google Scholar
  357. 357.
    Stark, F. L., al. Effect of chloropicrin fumigation on nitrification and ammonification in soil. Soil Sci.48: 433–42. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  358. 358.
    Stevens, O. A. North Dakota weeds. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 162. 1922.Google Scholar
  359. 359.
    -. Poisonous plants and plant products. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 265. 1933.Google Scholar
  360. 360.
    Stewart, G. and Pittman, D. W. Ridding the land of wild morning glory. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 189. 1924.Google Scholar
  361. 361.
    ——. Studies in the eradication of wild morning glory. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.16: 506–18. 1924.Google Scholar
  362. 362.
    Stewart, R. T.,et al. The spurge nettle. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.28: 907–13. 1936.Google Scholar
  363. 363.
    Steyn, D. G. The most important poisonous plants of South Africa. Imp. Bur. Past. & For. Crops, Herb. Pub. Ser., Bul. 27: 158–62. 1940.Google Scholar
  364. 364.
    Stitt, R. E. Dodder control in annual lespedezas. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.31: 338–43. 1939.Google Scholar
  365. 365.
    Stoa, T. al. The control of quack-grass by tillage. No. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 244: 1930.Google Scholar
  366. 366.
    Stoker, G. al. The effect of different methods of storing chicken manure on the viability of certain weed seeds. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.26: 600–09. 1934.Google Scholar
  367. 367.
    Sturkie, D. G. The influence of various top-cutting treatments on rootstocks of Johnson grass (Sorghum halepense). Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.22: 82–93. 1930.Google Scholar
  368. 368.
    —. Control of weeds in lawns with calcium cyanamid. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.25: 82–4. 1933.Google Scholar
  369. 369.
    —. Control of weeds in lawns with calcium cyanamide. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.29: 803–8. 1937.Google Scholar
  370. 370.
    Sturtevant, E. L. Weeds in corn. N. Y. (Geneva) Agr. Exp. Sta., Ann. Rep. 5. 46. 1886.Google Scholar
  371. 371.
    Tehon, L. R. Rout the weeds. I11. Nat. Hist. Survey, Circ. 28. 1937.Google Scholar
  372. 372.
    Templeton, W. C., Jr. andRitcher, P. O. Dandelion control with dichloroethyl ether. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.34: 283–4. 1942.Google Scholar
  373. 373.
    Thompson, H. C. Experimental studies of cultivation of certain vegetable crops New York. Cornell Agr. Exp. Sta., Mem. 107: 1–73. 1927.Google Scholar
  374. 374.
    Thornton, B. J. andDurrell, L. W. Colorado weeds. Col. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 403. 1933.Google Scholar
  375. 375.
    Tildesley, W. T. A study of some ingredients found in ensilage juice and its effect on the vitality of certain weed seeds. Sci. Agr.17: 492–501. 1937.Google Scholar
  376. 376.
    Timmons, F. L. Methods of eradicating bindweed. Kan. St. Bd. Agr. 57: No. 226. 102–12. 1938.Google Scholar
  377. 377.
    -. Results of bindweed control experiments at the Fort Hays Branch Station. Kan. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 296. 1941.Google Scholar
  378. 378.
    Tincker, M. A. H. Chemical weedkillers in relation to horticulture. Ann. App. Biol.25: 644–8. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  379. 379.
    Tingey, D. C. The comparative cost and effectiveness of tillage and of chlorates in the control of morning glory, Canada thistle, and perennial sow thistle. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.26: 864–76. 1934.Google Scholar
  380. 380.
    -and Maguire, B. Lawn weeds and their control. Utah Agr. Exp. Sta., Circ. 117. 1941.Google Scholar
  381. 381.
    Tinline, M. J. Eradication of leafy spurge (Euphorbia Esula). Dept. Agr. Dom. Canada, Farm. Bul. 99. 1940.Google Scholar
  382. 382.
    Trowbridge, P. al. Studies of the timothy plant. II. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul. 20. 1915.Google Scholar
  383. 383.
    Tucker, R. H. Control of noxious perennial weeds in Colorado. Col. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext. Bul. 340-A. 1936.Google Scholar
  384. 384.
    Verchère, P. La destruction des chiendents [The destruction of couch grass]. Jour. Agr. Prat.96: 456–8. 1932.Google Scholar
  385. 385.
    Vigor, S. H. Chemical weedkillers. Sci. Agr.9: 587–93. 1929.Google Scholar
  386. 386.
    Walker, C. Watch quality in your dairy produce. New Zealand Jour. Agr.62: 235–8. 1941.Google Scholar
  387. 387.
    Wallace, J. M. and Murphy, A. M. Studies on the epidemiology of curly top in southern Idaho, with special reference to sugar beets and weed hosts of the nectorEutettix tenellus. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul. 624. 1938.Google Scholar
  388. 388.
    Warington, Katherine. The influence of manuring on the weed flora of arable land. Jour. Ecol.12: 111–26. 1924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  389. 389.
    —. The effect of constant and fluctuating temperature on the germination of the weed seeds in arable soil. Jour. Ecol.24: 185–204. 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  390. 390.
    Weaver, G. H. Getting dandelions out of the lawn. Flower Grower24: 214–215. 1937.Google Scholar
  391. 391.
    Welton, F. A. Sodium chlorate as a lawn weed killer. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Bi. Bul. 141. 1929.Google Scholar
  392. 392.
    -et al. Organic food reserves in relation to the eradication of Canada thistle. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 441. 1929.Google Scholar
  393. 393.
    — andCarroll, J. C. Renovation of an old lawn. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.26: 486–91. 1934.Google Scholar
  394. 394.
    ——. Crabgrass in relation to arsenicals. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.30: 816–826. 1938.Google Scholar
  395. 395.
    -,-. Control of lawn weeds and the renovation of lawns. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 619. 1941.Google Scholar
  396. 396.
    Westgate, W. A. and Raynor, R. N. A new selective spray for the control of certain weeds. Cal. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 634. 1940.Google Scholar
  397. 397.
    Wiant, D. E. and Patty, R. L. The two-row cultivator converted into a weed control machine. So. Dak. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 303. 1936.Google Scholar
  398. 398.
    Willard, C. J. Killing field weeds with chlorates. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Bi. Bul. 146: 158–168. 1930.Google Scholar
  399. 399.
    -and Lewis, R. D. Eradicating Canada thistle. Ohio Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext. Bul. 146. 1939.Google Scholar
  400. 400.
    Wilson, H. al. Weeds and their control. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Ext. Spec. Bul. 183. 1938.Google Scholar
  401. 401.
    -et al. Identification and judging crops-weeds-diseases. 1940.Google Scholar
  402. 402.
    -et al. Battling weeds on Minnesota farms. Minn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 363. 1942.Google Scholar
  403. 403.
    Wimer, D. C. and Harland, M. B. The cultivation of corn. I11. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 259. 1925.Google Scholar
  404. 404.
    Woods, J. J. Chemical weed control in lawns. Sci. Agr.22: 356–65. 1942.Google Scholar
  405. 405.
    Woodward, T. E. The viability of seeds as affected by the siloing process. Jour. Dairy Sci.23: 267–71. 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  406. 406.
    Yeager, A. F. andCalahan, C. L. Control of poison ivy (Rhus toxicodendron) by spraying. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., Proc.41: 234–36. 1942.Google Scholar
  407. 407.
    Yost, T. F. Homemade bindweed tools. Kan. State Bd. Agr., 1939.Google Scholar
  408. 408.
    Zahnley, J. W. and Picket, W. F. Field bindweed and methods of control. Kan. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 269. 1934.Google Scholar
  409. 409.
    — andFitch, J. B. Effect of ensiling on the viability of weed seeds. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.33: 816–22. 1941.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1944

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. K. Wilson
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Agronomy and Plant GeneticsMinnesota Agricultural Experiment StationUSA

Personalised recommendations