The Botanical Review

, Volume 12, Issue 9, pp 515–520 | Cite as

Cytoplasmic inclusions of the plant-like flagellates. II

  • R. P. Hall


Golgi Apparatus Botanical Review Cytoplasmic Inclusion Golgi Body Contractile Vacuole 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Baker, C. L. Studies on the cytoplasmic components ofEuglena gracilis Klebs. Arch. Protistenk.80: 434–468. 1933.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown, V. E. Cytoplasmic inclusions inEuglena gracilis. Zeits. Zellf.11: 244–254. 1930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chadefaud, M. Les corps mucifères et les trichocystes des eugléniens et des Chloromonadines. Bull. Soc. Bot. France81: 106–110. 1934.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    —. Sur l’organisation et les trichocystes deGonyostomum semen (Ehr.) Diesing. Comp. Rend. Acad. Sci.204: 1688–1690. 1937.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    —. Recherches sur l’anatomie comparée des eugléniens. Le Botaniste28: 85–185. 1937.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    —. Nouvelles recherches sur l’anatomie comparée des eugléniens: les Péranémines. Rev. Algol.11: 189–220. 1938.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    —. Sur l’organisation d’Euglenastellata Mainx et sur la discrimination des euglènes viridioïdes. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén.80: 49–54. 1939.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chadefaud, M. And Provasoli, L. Une nouvelle eugléne graciloïde:Euglena gracilis Klebs var.urophora n. var. Arch. Zool. Exp. Gén.80: 55–60. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gatenby, J. B. And Singh, B. N. The Golgi apparatus ofCopromonas subtilis andEuglena sp. Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci.80: 567–591. 1938.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gatenby, J. B. et al. Further note on the association between Golgi apparatus material and the vacuole system inEuglena andCopromonas. La Cellule47: 227–236. 1938.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gatenby, J. B. And Smyth, J. D. The Golgi apparatus and pyrenoids ofChilomonas paramecium, with remarks on the identification ofCopromonas. Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci.81: 595–617. 1940.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Grassé, P. P. And Poisson, R. Nouvelles observations sur la cytologie des euglènes. Comp. Rend. Soc. Biol.114: 662–666. 1933.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hall, R. P. Cytoplasmic inclusions of Phytomastigoda. Bot. Rev.2: 85–94. 1936.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hollande, A. Quelques données nouvelles sur la cytologie d’une astasiacée peu connue:Distigma proteus Ehrenberg. Bull. Soc. Zool. France62: 236–241. 1937.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    —. Les dictyosomes des eugléniens. Comp. Rend. Soc. Biol.127: 517–518. 1938.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hovasse, R. Constituants cytoplasmiques et en particulier appareil de Golgi chez quelques Volvocinées. Comp. Rend. Soc. Biol.123: 253–256. 1936.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krüger, F. Bemerkungen über Flagellatentrichocysten. Arch. Protistenk.83: 321–333. 1934.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Patten, R. And Beams, H. W. Observations on the effect of the ultracentrifuge on some free-living flagellates. Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci.78: 615–635. 1936.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Worley, L. G. The relation between the Golgi apparatus and “droplets” in the cell stainable vitally with methylene blue. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.29: 228–231. 1943.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1946

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. P. Hall
    • 1
  1. 1.New York UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations