Advertisement

The Botanical Review

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 270–318 | Cite as

Somatic mitosis in the root tip ofAllium cepa—A review and a reorientation

  • Leon Vanderlyn
Article

Keywords

Botanical Review Nuclear Membrane Sister Chromatid Mitotic Cycle Allium CEPA 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. 1.
    Bonnevie, K. 1908. Chromosomenstudien. I. Arch. Zellf.1: 450–514.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    —. 1911. Chromosomenstudien. III. Arch. Zellf.6: 191–253.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bělar, K. 1928. Die cytologischen Grundlagen der Vererbung. Handb. Vererbungswiss.1: 412 pp.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    —. 1929. Untersuchungen an den Staubfaden Haarzellen und Blattmeristemzellen vonTradescantia virginica. Zeits. Zellf. u. Mikr. Art. Allg. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat.10: 73–134.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Broderson, J. 1928. Differenzierung der Nucleolarmasse in Zellkernen der Maus. Zeits. Zellf. u. Mikr. Art. Allg. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat.7: 98–108.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carleton, H. M. 1920. Observations on an intra-nucleolar body in columnar epithelium cells of the intestine. Quart. Jour. Micr. Sci.64: 329–343.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Casperson, T. andJ. Schultz. 1940. Ribonucleic acids in both nucleus and cytoplasm and the function of the nucleolus. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.26: 507–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 7a.
    Cleveland, I. R.et al. 1934. The wood-feeding roach Cryptocercus, its Protozoa, and the symbiosis between Protozoa and roach. Mem. Acad. Arts & Sci.17(2): 187–342.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Conklin, E. G. 1912. Cell size and nuclear size. Jour. Exp. Zool.12: 1–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 9.
    -. 1912. Karyokinesis and cytokinesis in the maturation, fertilization and cleavage ofCrepidula. Jour. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila. V. 12; Pt. I.Google Scholar
  11. 10.
    Cowdry, E. V. andF. X. Paletta. 1941. Changes in cellular, nuclear and nucleolar sizes during methylcholanthrene epidermal carcinogenesis. Jour. Nat. Cancer Inst.1: 745–759.Google Scholar
  12. 11.
    Dangeard, P. 1935. Sur la structure de quelques noyaux quiescents. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. [Paris]200: 771–773.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    Darlington, C. D. 1937. Recent advances in cytology. 2d ed.Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    —. 1942. Chromosome chemistry and gene action. Nature149: 66–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 14.
    — andL. La Cour. 1940. Nucleic acid starvation of chromosomes inTrillium. Jour. Genet.40: 185–213.Google Scholar
  16. 14a.
    Dobzhansky, T. 1944. Distribution of heterochromatin in the chromosomes ofDrosophila pallidipennis. Am. Nat.78: 193–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 15.
    Doutreligne, J. 1933. Chromosomes et nucléoles dans les noyaux du type euchromocentrique. Cellule42: 31–100.Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    Eichhorn, A. 1931. Recherches caryologiques comparées chez les Angiospermes et les Gymnospermes. Arch. Bot.5: 1–100.Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    —. 1932. Chromocentres et prochromosomes. Leurs relations reciproques avec les chromosomes. Rev. Gen. Bot.44: 260–264.Google Scholar
  20. 18.
    —. 1934. Types définis et types intermediarires dans la mitose des végètaux. Cytologia5: 253–268.Google Scholar
  21. 19.
    Fernandes, A. 1936. Les satellites chez les Narcisses. II. Les satellites pendant la mitose. Bol. Soc. Broteriana11: 87–146.Google Scholar
  22. 20.
    — andJ. A. Serra. 1944. Euchromatine et hétérochromatine dans leurs rapports avec le noyau et les nucléoles. Bol. Soc. Broteriana19: 67–124.Google Scholar
  23. 21.
    Fischer, H. 1934. Grossenveranderung von Kern und Nucleolus im Blattgewebe. Planta22: 767–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 22.
    Frugoni, P. 1941. Cytologic studies on hypophyseal adenomas. Trans. Am. Micr. Soc.60: 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 23.
    Gates, R. R. 1937. The discovery of the relations between the nucleolus and chromosomes. Cytologia, Fujii Jubilee Vol.: 977–986.Google Scholar
  26. 24.
    Gates, R. R.. 1942. Nucleoli and related nuclear structures. Bot. Rev.8: 337–109.Google Scholar
  27. 25.
    Geitler, L. 1938. Chromosomenbau. Protoplasma Monogr. Berich. 190 pp.Google Scholar
  28. 26.
    —. 1930. Über die Kernteilung vonSpirogyra. Arch. Protistenk.71: 79–100.Google Scholar
  29. 27.
    Gregoire, V. 1906. La structure de l’élément chromosomique au repos et en division dans les cellules végétales (racines d’Allium). Cellule23: 311–353.Google Scholar
  30. 28.
    Heitz, E. 1925. Das Verhalten von Kern und Chloroplastern bei der Regeneration. Zeits. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat. Art. Allg. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat.2: 69–86.Google Scholar
  31. 29.
    —. 1928. Das Heterochromatin der Moose. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.69: 762–818.Google Scholar
  32. 30.
    —. 1929. Heterochromatin, Chromozentren, Chromosomen. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.47: 274–284.Google Scholar
  33. 31.
    —. 1931. Die Ursache der gesetzmässigen Zahl, Lage, Form und Grösse pflanzlicher Nukleolen. Planta12: 775–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 32.
    —. 1931. Nukleolen und Chromosomen in der GattungVicia. Planta15: 495–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 33.
    —. 1932. Die Herkunft der Chromozentren. Planta28: 571–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 34.
    —. 1933. Über totale und partielle somatische Heteropyknose sowie strukturelle Geschlecht Chromosomen beiDrosophila funebris. Zeits. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat. Art. Allg. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat.19: 720–742.Google Scholar
  37. 35.
    —. 1933. Die somatische Heteropyknose beiDrosophila melanogaster und ihre genetische Bedeutung. Zeits. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat. Art. Allg. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat.20: 237–287.Google Scholar
  38. 36.
    —. 1935. Chromosomenstruktur und Gene. Zeits. Ind. Abst. u. Vererb.70: 402–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 37.
    Horning, E. S. andK. C. Richardson. 1930. Cytological observations of a Lumsden rat sarcoma. Med. Jour. Australia1: 46–47.Google Scholar
  40. 38.
    Hughes-Schrader, S. 1946. A new type of spermiogenesis in iceryine coccids: with linear alignment of chromosomes in the sperm. Jour. Morph.78: 43–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 39.
    Kaufmann, B. P. 1934. Somatic mitoses ofDrosophila melanogaster. Jour. Morph.56: 125–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 40.
    Koerperich, J. 1930. Étude comparée du noyau des chromosomes et de leur relations avec le cytoplasma. Cellule39: 367–399.Google Scholar
  43. 41.
    Koller, P. C. 1943. Origin of malignant tumour cells. Nature151: 244–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 42.
    Koshy, T. K. 1933. Chromosome studies inAllium. I. The somatic chromosomes. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.53: 299–318.Google Scholar
  45. 43.
    —. 1934.Ibid. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.54: 104–120.Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    Levan, A. 1931. Cytological studies inAllium. A preliminary note. Hereditas15: 347–356.Google Scholar
  47. 46.
    —. 1932. Cytological studies inAllium. II. Chromosome morphological contributions. Hereditas16: 257–294.Google Scholar
  48. 47.
    —. 1933. Cytological studies inAllium. III.Allium carinatum andAllium oleraceum. Hereditas18: 101–114.Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    —. 1933. Cytological studies inAllium. IV.Allium fistulosum. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr.27: 211–232.Google Scholar
  50. 49.
    —. 1934. Cytological studies inAllium. V.Allium macranthrum. Hereditas18: 349–359.Google Scholar
  51. 50.
    —. 1935. Cytological studies inAllium. VI. Hereditas20: 289–330.Google Scholar
  52. 51.
    —. 1936. Die Zytologie vonAllium cepa × fistulosum. Hereditas21: 195–214.Google Scholar
  53. 52.
    —. 1937. Zytologische Studien inAllium schoenoprasum. Hereditas22: 1–128.Google Scholar
  54. 52a.
    —. 1945. Cytological reactions induced by inorganic salt solutions. Nature156: 750–751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 53.
    —. 1946. Heterochromaticity in chromosomes during their contraction stage. Hereditas32: 449–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 54.
    Lesley, M. N. 1938. The relation between satellite size and nucleolus size in three races ofSolatium lycopersicum. Genetics23: 485–493.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 55.
    Lorbeer, G. 1934. Die Zytologie der Lebermoose mit besonderer Berücksichtigung allgemeiner chromosomenfragen. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot.80: 567–818.Google Scholar
  58. 56.
    Ludford, R. J. 1928. The chromatin content of normal and malignant cells, as demonstrated by Feulgen’s nucleal reaction. Proc. Royal Soc. B: Biol. Sci.102: 397–406.Google Scholar
  59. 57.
    Lundegårdh, H. 1910. Ueber Kernteilung in den Wurzenspitzen vonAllium undVicia. Svensk. Bot. Tidskr.4: 174–196.Google Scholar
  60. 58.
    MacCarty, W. C. 1936. The value of the macronucleolus in the cancer problem. Am. Jour. Cancer26: 529–532.Google Scholar
  61. 59.
    McClintock, B. 1934. The relation of a particular chromosomal element to the development of the nucleoli inZea mays. Zeits. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat. Art. Allg. Zellf. u. Mikr. Anat.21: 294–328.Google Scholar
  62. 59a.
    —. 1945.Neurospora. I. Preliminary observations of the chromosomes ofNeurospora crassa. Am. Jour. Bot.32: 671–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 60.
    Matsuura, H. 1938. Chromosome studies onTrillium kamtschaticum. VI. On the nucleolus-chromosome relationship. Cytologia9: 55–77.Google Scholar
  64. 61.
    Mensinkai, S. W. 1939. The structure and behavior of chromosomes in somatic mitosis. Jour. Royal Micr. Soc.59: 82–112.Google Scholar
  65. 62.
    Merriman, M. L. 1904. Vegetative cell division inAllium. Bot. Gaz.37: 178–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 63.
    Milovidov, P. F. 1936. Über den Gehalt der hyperchromatischen somatischen Zellkerne an Thymonukleinsäure. Planta25: 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 64.
    de Mol, W. E. 1927. On chromosome constrictions, satellites and nucleoli inHyacinthus orientalis. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen15: 93–115.Google Scholar
  68. 65.
    —. 1927b. Nucleolar number and size in diploid, triploid and aneuploid hyacinths. Cellule38: 7–64.Google Scholar
  69. 66.
    Montgomery, T. H. 1899. Comparative cytological studies with especial regard to the morphology of the nucleolus. Tour. Morph.15: 265–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 67.
    Morgan, P. T., Jr. 1943. Formation of chromocenters in interkinetic nuclei of maize. Jour. Hered.34: 195–198.Google Scholar
  71. 68.
    Parmenter, C. L. 1926. Nucleoli in diploid and haploid tadpoles. Anat. Rec.34: 150.Google Scholar
  72. 69.
    Pianase, G. 1896. Beitrage zur Histologie und Aetiologie des Carcinoms Histologische und experimentelle Untersuchungen. Ziegl. Beitr. Path. Anat. (Suppl. 1): 1–193.Google Scholar
  73. 70.
    Pollister, A. W. andA. E. Mirsky. 1944. Distribution of nucleic acids. Nature153: 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 71.
    Resende, F. 1936. Die Sat-Chromosomen bei den Aloinae. Ber. Deut. Bot. Ges.54: 124–126.Google Scholar
  75. 71a.
    Ribbands, C. R. 1941. Meiosis in Diptera. Prophase associations of nonhomologous chromosomes and their relation to mutual attraction between centromeres, centrosomes and chromosme ends. Jour. Genet.61: 411–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 72.
    Sato, K. 1928. On the staining capacity of the nucleolus and its physiological significance. Folia. Anat. Jap.6: 717–736.Google Scholar
  77. 73.
    Sayles, L. P. 1927. Origin of the mesoderm and behavior of the nucleolus in regeneration inLumbriculus. Biol. Bull.52: 278–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 74.
    Schaffner, J. H. 1898. Karyokineses in the root tip ofAllium cepa. Bot. Gaz.26: 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 75.
    Schultz, J. 1941. The evidence of the nucleoprotein nature of the gene. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol.9: 55–65.Google Scholar
  80. 76.
    —. 1943. Physiological aspects of genetics. Ann. Rev. Physiol.5: 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 77.
    Schrader, F. 1944. Mitosis; the movements of chromosomes in cell division.Google Scholar
  82. 78.
    Schustow, L. V. 1913. Über Kernteilungen in der Wurzelspitze vonAllium cepa. Arch. Zellf.43: 15–30.Google Scholar
  83. 79.
    Serra, J. A. andQ. Lopez. 1945. Données pour une cytophysiologie du nucléole: I. L’activité nucléolaire pendant la croissance de l’oocyte chez des Helicidae. Portugaliae Acta Biol. Ser. A, 51–94.Google Scholar
  84. 80.
    Sharp, L. W. 1929. Structure of large somatic chromosomes. Bot. Gaz.88: 349–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 81.
    Stowell, R. E. 1945. Thymonucleic acid in tumors. Cancer Res.5: 283–294.Google Scholar
  86. 82.
    Taylor, W. R. 1925. The chromosome morphology ofVeltheimia, Allium andCyrtanthus. Am. Jour. Bot.12: 104–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 83.
    Tischler, G. 1921–22. Allgemeine Pflanzen-Karyologie. Handb. Pflanzen Anat. 1st ed.Google Scholar
  88. 84.
    Van Camp, G. M. 1924. Le role du nucléole dans la caryokinese somatique. Cellule34: 7–48.Google Scholar
  89. 85.
    Weber, F. 1926. Der Zellkern der Schliesszellen. Planta1: 441–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 86.
    Wilson, E. D. 1925. The cell in development and heredity. 3rd ed.Google Scholar
  91. 87.
    Zeeuw, J. de. 1935–36. Recherches sur les noyaux euchromozentriques et leurs divisions. Cellule44: 389–410.Google Scholar
  92. 88.
    Zirkle, C. 1928. Nucleolus in root tip meristem ofZea mays. Bot. Gaz.86: 402–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 89.
    —. 1931. Nucleoli of the root tip and cambium ofPinus strobus. Cytologia2: 85–105.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1948

Authors and Affiliations

  • Leon Vanderlyn
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological AbstractsUniversity of PennsylvaniaUSA

Personalised recommendations