Production and chemical composition of potatoes related to placement and rate of nitrogen
Experiments with 11 N rates were conducted 3 years with Kennebec potatoes on Bodenburg silt loam in the Matanuska Valley of Alaska. Fertilizer placed in the row was compared with that mixed with the soil in the row for 2 years. Foliage and tuber samples were analyzed for chemical content.
Stand reduction and decreased vigor occurred when row placed N exceeded 120–160 1b per acre. Foliage dry matter decreased 2 years as rate of N increased. Tuber dry matter was decreased one year by N rates exceed ing 100 1b per acre. U. S. No. 1 yield and dry matter with row placement of fertilizers at 40–80 1b N were highest in 2 years. When fertilizer was mixed with soil, both US No. 1 and dry matter yields increased each year with each N increment through 160 1b per acre.
Increasing amounts of N tended to increase the N in foliage and tubers, the Mn in foliage but to decrease the Ca, Mg, Al, Ba, and Sr in foliage. Mixing the fertilizer with the soil as compared to placement in the row increased the Ca, Mg, Al, Ba, Fe, and Sr in foliage, and the tuber uptake of N, K, Mg, and Sr and decreased foliage N.
Alaskan potato growers have doubled or tripled their rate of application of fertilizer over the past 15 years. At digging time potato plants are usually green and some growers have felt these higher fertilizer rates were supplying an excess of N which was delaying tuber maturity and decreasing tuber quality.
KeywordsSpecific Gravity Potato Foliage Fertilizer Placement Kennebec Potato White Rose Potato
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Agerberg, Lars S., and Birger Svensson. 1961. Potatisens kvävegödsling. A. Försök med stigande mängder kvävegödsel. B. Matpotatisens kvalitet. (Nitrogen fertilization of potatoes. A. Increasing amounts of nitrogen fertilizer. B. The quality of table potatoes.) K. Lantbrukshögskolan Statens Jordbruksförsök Medd. 125. 72p. (Biol. Abs. 40: 20771 (1962).Google Scholar
- 2.Brautlecht, C. A., and A. S. Getchell. 1951. The chemical composition of white potatoes. Amer. Potato J. 28: 531–550.Google Scholar
- 3.Chamberland, E., and A. Scott. 1968. N-P-K experiments with potatoes in the lower St. Lawrence region of Quebec. Amer. Potato J. 45: 93–102.Google Scholar
- 4.Christensen, Robert E., Robert M. Beckman, and John J. Birdsall. 1968. Some mineral elements of commercial spices and herbs as determined by direct reading emission spectroscopy. J. Assoc. Off. Agri. Chem. 51: 1003–1010.Google Scholar
- 5.Cooke, G. W., F. V. Widdowson, and J. C. Wilcox. 1957. The value of midseason top-dressings of nitrogen fertilizer for main-crop potatoes. J. Agr. Sci. 49: 81–87.Google Scholar
- 6.De, Rajat, and Raghbir Singh. 1959. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on yield and chemical composition of potato. Indian Potato J. 1: 76–83.Google Scholar
- 9.Hawkins, Arthur. 1956. Response of potatoes to fertilizer nitrogen in the northeast. Amer. Potato J. 33: 226–233.Google Scholar
- 10.Laughlin, Winston M. 1968. Effect of calcium metaphosphate and treblesuperphosphate on yield and chemical composition of Kennebec potatoes. Amer. Potato J. 45: 45–50.Google Scholar
- 11.Laughlin, Winston M. 1966. Effect of soil applications of potassium, magnesium sulfate and magnesium sulfate spray on potato yield, composition and nutrient uptake. Amer. Potato J. 43: 403–411.Google Scholar
- 14.MacKay, D. C., C. R. MacEachern and R. F. Bishop. 1963. The relation of soil test values to fertilizer response by the potato. II. Nitrate production and nitrogenous fertilizer requirements. Can. J. Soil Sci. 43: 242–249.Google Scholar
- 23.Widdowson, F. V., and G. W. Cooke. 1958. Comparisons between placing and broadcastings of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilizers for potatoes, peas, beans, kale, and maize. J. Agr. Sci. 51: 53–61.Google Scholar