The Botanical Review

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 222–234 | Cite as

Statistical ecology. II—A reassessment

  • Eric Ashby


Plant Community Statistical Ecology Botanical Review Percentage Cover Minimal Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ashby, E. Statistical ecology. Bot. Rev.2: 221. 1936.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    — andPidgeon, I. M. A new quantitative method of analysis of plant communities. Austral. Jour. Sci.5: 19. 1942.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bauer, H. L. The statistical analysis of chaparral and other plant communities by means of transect samples. Ecology24: 45. 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Billings, W. D. Quantitative correlations between vegetational changes and soil development. Ecology22 Suppl.: 448. 1941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blackman, G. E. Statistical and ecological studies on the distribution of species in plant communities, (i) Dispersion as a factor in the study of changes in plant populations. Ann. Bot.6: 351. 1942.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cain, S. A. The species area curve. Am. Mid. Nat.19: 573. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    — Sample plot technique applied to alpine vegetation in Wyoming. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 240. 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clapham, A. R. Over-dispersion in grassland communities and the use of statistical methods in plant ecology. Jour. Ecol.24: 232. 1936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cole, L. C. A theory for analysing contagiously distributed populations. Ecology27: 329. 1946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dice, L. R. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology26: 297. 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fisher, R. A. et al. The relation between the number of species and the number of individuals in a random sample of an animal population. Jour. An. Ecol.12: 42. 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hope-Simpson, J. F. On the errors in the ordinary use of subjective frequency estimations in grassland. Jour. Ecol.28: 193. 1940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kittredge, J. Some quantitative relations of foliage in the chaparral. Ecology26: 70. 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lynch, D. W. andSchumacher, F. X. Concerning the dispersion of natural regeneration. Jour. For.39: 49. 1941.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Neyman, J. On a new class of “contagious” distributions, applicable in entomology and bacteriology. Ann. Math. Statis.10: 35. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Palmgren, A. Die Artenzahl als pflanzengeographischer Charakter S. der Zufall und die säkulare Landhebung als pflanzengeographische Faktoren. Act. Bot. Fennica1: 124. 1925.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pechanec, J. F. andStewart, G. Sagebrush-grass range sampling studies: size and structure of sampling unit. Jour. Am. Soc. Agron.32: 669. 1940.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Penfound, W. T. The study of phytosociological relationships by means of aggregations of coloured cards. Ecology26: 38. 1945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pidgeon, I. M. andAshby, E. Studies in applied ecology (i) A statistical analysis of regeneration following protection from grazing. Proc. Linn. Soc. New So. Wales65: 123. 1940.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pólya, G. Sur quelques points de la théorie des probabilités. Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré1: 117. 1931.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ramensky, L. G. Vvedenie v kompleksnoe pochvenno-geobotanicheskoe issledovanie zemel. [Russian] 620 pp. 1938. [Introduction to the complex soil-geobotanical research of land].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Singh, B. N. andChalam, G. V. A quantitative analysis of the weed flora on arable land. Jour. Ecol.25: 213. 1937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    — andDas, K. Distribution of weed species on arable land. Jour. Ecol.26: 455. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    —. Percentage frequency and quadrat size in analytical studies of weed flora. Jour. Ecol.27: 66. 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Smith, A. D. A study of the reliability of range vegetation estimates. Ecology25: 441. 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Vestal, A. G. Unequal scales for rating species in communities. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 305. 1943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    West, O. The significance of percentage area determinations yielded by the percentage area or density list method of pasture analysis. Jour. Ecol.26: 210. 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Williams, C. B. Some applications of the logarithmic series and index of diversity to ecological problems. Jour. Ecol.32: 1. 1944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1948

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eric Ashby
    • 1
  1. 1.Botanical DepartmentThe UniversityManchester

Personalised recommendations