Literature Cited
Abbott, W. S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Jour. Econ. Ent.18: 265–267.
American Phytopathological Society Committee on Standardization of Fungicidal Tests. 1943. Definitions of fungicide terms. The slide-germination method of evaluating protectant fungicides. Phytopath.33: 624–626, 627–632.
Anderson, J. A. 1934. Studies on the nature of rust resistance in wheat. VI. Effect of hydrogen-ion concentration, phenolic compounds, and host extracts on the germination of urediniospores ofPuccinia graminis tritici, form 21. Canad. Jour. Res.11: 667–686.
Bateman, E. 1933. The effect of concentration on the toxicity of chemicals to living organisms. U. S. Dept. Agr., Tech. Bul.346.
Bertolet, E. C. 1943. Observations on soil burial procedures. Symp. Am. Soc. Test. Materials [Mim.].
Bliss, C. I. 1934. The method of probits. Science.79: 38–39.
— andM. Cattell. 1943. Biological assay. Ann. Rev. Physiol.5: 479–539.
— andH. P. Marks. 1939. The biological assay of insulin. II. The estimation of drug potency from a graded response. Quart. Jour. Pharm. & Pharmacol.12: 182–205.
Bobkov, S. D. 1938. A measurement of the electric charge of dust insecticides and its effect upon the efficiency of preparations. Summary of the scientific research work of the Institute of Plant Protection for the year 1936. Part III. Viruses and bacterioses, biological method, chemical method and mechanisation: 88–91. [Russian.] [Abst. Rev. Appl. Ent. A 27: 309–310.1939.]
Brown, W. 1922. On the germination and growth of fungi at various temperatures and in various concentrations of oxygen and of carbon dioxide. Ann. Bot.36: 257–283.
Carleton, M. A. 1893. Studies in the biology of the Uredineae. I. Notes on germination. Bot. Gaz.18: 447–457.
Churchman, J. W. 1923. The mechanism of selective bacteriostasis. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.9: 78–81.
Clayton, E. E.et al. 1943. Fungicidal tests on blue mold (Peronospora tabacina) of tobacco. Jour. Agr. Res.66: 261–276.
Doran, W. L. 1922. The effect of external and internal factors on the germination of fungous spores. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club49: 313–340.
Dimond, A. E. 1942. The reversal effect: why fungicides change in rank in repeated field tests. Phytopath.32: 3.
—et al. 1941. Role of dosage-response curve in the evaluation of fungicides. Conn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul.451: 635–667.
Eidmann, H. andW. Berwig. 1928. Untersuchungen über physikalische Eigenschaften, insbesondere die Haftfähigheit, von Arsenbestäubungsmitteln. Forstwiss. Centralb.1: 529–542, 575–586, [Abst. Rev. Appl. Ent. A 17: 10. 1929.]
Evans, A. C. andH. Martin. 1935. The incorporation of direct with protective insecticides and fungicides. I. The laboratory evaluation of water-soluble wetting agents as constituents of combined washes. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.13: 261–292
Eyre, J. V.et al. 1919. The fungicidal properties of certain sprayfluids. Jour. Agr. Sci.9: 283–307.
Ezekiel, W. N. 1938. Evaluation of some soil fungicides by laboratory tests withPhymatotrichum omnivorum. Jour. Agr. Res.56: 553–578.
Fajans, E. andH. Martin. 1937. The incorporation of direct with protective fungicides and insecticides. II. The effects of spray supplements on the retention and tenacity of protective deposits. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.15: 1–24.
Falck, R. 1907. Wachstumgesetze, Wachstumfaktoren und Temperaturwerte der holzzerstörenden Mycelien. Hausschwammforschungen. (Jena)1: 53–154. [Abst Central. Bakt. Parasit. & Infek. 20: 348. 1908.]
Findlay, W. P. K. 1932. Laboratory methods for testing wood preservatives. Ann. Appl. Biol.19: 271–280.
Finney, D. J. 1944. The application of the probit method to toxicity test data adjusted for mortality in the controls. Ann. Appl. Biol.31: 68–74.
Fitzgibbon, M. 1943. Seed disinfection. The determination of the adhesiveness of seed dressings to cereal seeds. Jour. Soc. Chem. Ind.62: 8–11. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Mycol. 22: 347–348. 1943].
Frear, D. E. H. 1944. Deposition and retention of sprays. III. Apparatus and methods for laboratory spraying. Penn. Agr. Exp. Sta., Bul. 463.
Gaddum, J. H. 1933. Reports on biological standards. III. Methods of biological assay depending on a quantal response. Med. Res. Council (London) Spec. Rep. Series183: 1–46.
Gandhi, R. C. andK. Venkataraman. 1942. Mildew in cotton. I. The routine examination of textile antiseptics. II. Estimation of salicylanilide in textiles. III. Synthetical experiments in antiseptics for textiles. Derivatives of cashew-nut shell oil. Jour. Indian Chem. Soc. Ind. & News Ed.5: 75–84. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Mycol. 22: 322. 1943.]
Gassner, G. 1943. Zur Methodik der laboratoriumsmässigen Prüfung von Beizmitteln. Phytopath. Zeits.14: 303–309. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Mycol. 22:490. 1943.]
Girard, Aimé. 1892. Recherches sur l’adhérence aux feuilles des plantes et notamment aux feuilles de la pomme de terre, des composés cuivriques destinés à combattre leurs maladies. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)114: 234–236.
Goldsworthy, M. C. andE. L. Green. 1938. Effect of low concentrations of copper on germination and growth of conidia ofSclerotinia fructicola andGlomerella cingulata. Jour. Agr. Res.56: 489–505.
Görnitz, K.et al. 1933. Methoden zur Prüfung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln. Beiträge IV-VI. Mitt. Biol. Reichsanst für Land- und Forstwirtsch46: 1–94. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Mycol. 12: 577. 1933.]
Hamilton, J. M. 1931. Studies on the fungicidal action of certain dusts and sprays in the control of apple scab. Phytopath.21: 445–523.
—.et al. 1943. Particle size of sulphur and copper fungicides in relation to apple scab and cedar-apple rust control. Phytopath.33: 533–550.
— andL. O. Weaver. 1940. Methods of determining the effectiveness of fungicides against apple scab and the cedar-rust fungi. Phytopath.30: 7.
——. 1943. Freezing preservation of fungi and fungus spores. Phytograph.33: 612–613.
Heuberger, J. W. 1940. A laboratory biological assay of tenacity of fungicides. Phytopath.30: 840–847.
— andN. Turner. 1942. A laboratory apparatus for studying settling rate and fractionation of dusts. Phytopath.32: 166–171.
Hilgendorff, G. 1928. Über die Bestimmung der Haftfähigkeit von Trockenbeizmitteln. Fortschr. der Landw.3: 725–729. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Mycol. 8:31. 1929.]
Hockenyos, G. L. andG. R. Irwin. 1932. Studies on Bordeaux deposition. Phytopath.22: 857–860.
Horsfall, J. G. 1941. Biological assay of protective fungicides. Chron. Bot.6: 292–294.
— andA. E. Dimond. 1942. Comparing fungicides at dosages for equal control. Phytopath.32: 10.
—et al. 1941. Predicting protective value of fungicides in the laboratory. Phytopath.31: 12.
—et al. 1940. A design for laboratory assay of fungicides. Phytopath.30: 545–563.
— andA. D. McDonnell. 1943. The coverage factor in fungicidal efficiency. Phytopath.33: 1114.
—et al. 1937. Studies upon the copper fungicides. IV. The fungicidal value of the copper oxides. Ann. Appl. Biol.24: 867–882.
Howard, F. L. 1941. Antidoting toxin ofPhytophthora cactorum as a means of plant disease control. Science94: 345.
Ipsen, J. 1941. Contribution to the theory of biological standardization on the basis of experiments with bacterial toxins. Copenhagen. Nyt Nordisk Forlag. Arnold Busck.
Keitt, G. W. and L. K. Jones. 1926. Studies of the epidemiology and control of apple scab. Wis. Agr. Exp. Sta., Res. Bul. 73.
Kotte, W. 1924. Zur Beurteilung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln im Laboratoriumsversuch. Zeits. Angew. Chemie.37: 508–509. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Mycol.3: 593–594. 1924.]
Krauss, J. 1928. Beitrag zur Methodik der Beizmittelprüfung im Laboratorium. Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzdienst8: 71–72. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Mycol.8: 32. 1929.]
—. 1931. Zur Prüfung der Leistung von Trockenbeizgeräten. Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzdienst11: 34–35. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Mycol. 10: 650. 1931.]
Leutritz, J., Jr. 1939. Acceleration of toximetric tests of wood preservatives by the use of soil as a medium. Phytopath.29: 901–903.
Liese, J.et al. 1935. Toximetrische Bestimmung von Holzkonservierungsmitteln. Zusam. Ber. Beih. Ang. Chem.11: 1–18. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Mycol. 14:411. 1935.]
Lin, C. K. 1940. Germination of the conidia ofSclerotinia fructicola with special reference to the toxicity of copper. Cornell Agr. Exp. Sta., Mem.233: 1–33.
McCallan, S. E. A. 1930. Studies on fungicides. II. Testing protective fungicides in the laboratory. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Mem.128: 8–24.
—. 1943. Empirical probit weights for dosage-response curves of greenhouse tomato foliage diseases. Boyce Thomp. Inst., Contr.13: 177–183.
— andR. H. Wellman. 1942. Fungicidal versus fungistatic. Boyce Thomp. Inst., Contr.12: 451–463.
——. 1943. A greenhouse method of evaluating fungicides by means of tomato foliage diseases. Boyce Thomp. Inst., Contr.13: 93–134.
——. 1943. Cumulative error terms for comparing fungicides by established laboratory and greenhouse methods. Boyce Thomp. Inst., Contr.13: 135–141.
—et al. 1941. An analysis of factors causing variation in spore germination tests of fungicides. III. Slope of toxicity curves, replicate tests, and fungi. Boyce Thomp. Inst., Contr.12: 49–77.
— andF. Wilcoxon. 1932. The precision of spore germination tests. Boyce Thomp. Inst., Contr.4: 233–243.
——. 1939. An analysis of factors causing variation in spore germination tests of fungicides. I. Methods of obtaining spores. Boyce Thomp. Inst., Contr.11: 5–20.
——. 1940. An analysis of factors causing variation in spore germination tests of fungicides. II. Methods of spraying. Boyce Thomp. Inst., Contr.11: 309–324.
MacInnes, J. 1925. Quantitative studies on the efficiency of fungicides. Phytopath.15: 203–213.
Magie, R. O. andJ. G. Horsfall. 1936. Relative adherence of cuprous oxide and other copper fungicides. Phytopath.26: 100–101.
Marsh, R. W. 1936. Notes on a technique for the laboratory evaluation of protective fungicides. Brit. Myc. Soc., Trans.20: 304–309.
Martin, H. 1932. The laboratory examination of fungicidal dusts and sprays. Ann. Appl. Biol.19: 263–271.
—. 1942. The significance of the bio-assay in studies of fungicidal action. Ann. Appl. Biol.29: 326–328.
—. 1943. The evaluation of fungicides. A study in quantitative toxicology. Jour. Soc. Chem. Ind., London62: 67–71.
Miller, H. J. 1943. A comparison of laboratory and field retention and protective value of certain copper fungicides. Phytopath.33: 899–909.
—. 1944. Phytopath.34: 1009.
Montgomery, H. B. S. andM. H. Moore. 1938. A laboratory method for testing the toxicity of protective fungicides. Jour. Pom. & Hort. Sci.15: 253–266.
Muskett, A. E. 1938. Biological technique for the evaluation of fungicides. I. The evaluation of seed disinfectants for the control ofHelminthosporium disease of oats. Ann. Bot.2: 699–715.
— andJ. Colhoun. 1942. Biological technique for the evaluation of fungicides II. The evaluation of seed disinfectants for the control of seed-borne diseases of flax. Ann. Bot.6: 219–227.
Myers, R. P. 1929. The germicidal properties of alkaline washing solutions with special reference to the influence of hydroxyl-ion concentration, buffer index, and osmotic pressure. Jour. Agr. Res.38: 521–563.
Nielsen, L. W. 1942. Studies with silver compounds and mixtures as fungicidal sprays. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Mem.248: 1–44.
Nikitin, A. A. 1938. The application of electrodialysis to the study of copper fungicides. Phytopath.28: 17.
Osterhout, W. J. V. 1915. The measurement of toxicity. Jour. Biol. Chem.23: 67–70.
Palmiter, D. H. 1934. Variability in monoconidial cultures ofV. inaequalis. Phytopath.24: 22–47.
Parker-Rhodes, A. F. 1941. Studies on the mechanism of fungicidal action. I. Preliminary investigations of nickel, copper, zinc, stiver, and mercury. Ann. Appl. Biol.28: 389–405.
—. 1942. Studies on the mechanism of fungicidal action. II. Elements of the theory of variability. Ann. Appl. Biol.29: 126–135.
Partansky, A. M. andR. R. McPherson. 1940. Testing mold-resistant properties of oil paints. A laboratory method. Ind. & Eng. Chem. (Anal. Ed.)12: 443–445.
Peterson, P. D. 1941. The spore germination method of evaluating fungicides. Phytopath.31: 1108–1116.
Pinckard, J. A. andR. McLean. 1940. A laboratory method for determining the fungicidal value of vapors and its application to paradichlorobenzene in the control of tobacco downy mildew. Phytopath.30: 19.
—et al. 1940. Toxicity of paradichlorobenzene in relation to control of tobacco downy mildew. Phytopath.30: 485–495.
Potter, C. 1941. A laboratory spraying apparatus and technique for investigating the action of contact insecticides with some notes on suitable test insects. Ann. Appl. Biol.28: 142–169.
Prévost, B. 1807. Mémoire sur la cause immédiate de la carie ou charbon des blés, et de plusieurs autres maladies des plantes, et sur les préservatifs de la carie. Phytopath. Classic6: 1–94. [Trans. by G. W. Keitt, 1939.]
Rangel, J. F. 1942. Toxicologia dos désinfestantes das sementes. Bol. Esc. Nac. Agron., Rio de Janeiro 1941: 185–223. [English Summary] [Abst. Rev. Appl. Myc. 22: 258.1943.]
Reddick, D. andE. Wallace. 1910. On a laboratory method of determining the fungicidal value of a spray mixture or solution. Science31: 798.
Rideal, S. andJ. F. A. Walker. 1903. Determination of the value of a disinfectant in terms of its carbolic coefficient. Jour. Roy. Sanitary Inst.24: 424.
Riehm, E., 1920. Prüfung von Pflanzenschutzmitteln. Mitt Biol. Reichsanst. f. Land-u. Forstwirtsch. H: 18. [Abst. Centralblatt Bakteriologie 56: 171. 1922.]
—. 1923. Zur Chemotherapie der Pflanzenkrankheiten. Zeits. Ang. Chemie36: 3–4. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Myc.2: 552. 1923.]
Ryan, F.J.et al. 1943. The tube method of measuring the growth rate ofNeurospora. Am. Jour. Bot.30: 784–799.
Salvin, S. B. 1942. Factors controlling sporangial type inThraustotheca primoachlya andDictyuchus achlyoides. I. Am. Jour. Bot.29: 97–104.
Schmidt, E. W. 1924. Über die Ausmittelung eines Pflanzenschutzmittels und seine fungizide Bewertung, Zeits. Ang. Chemie37: 267–270. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Myc.3: 592. 1924.]
—. 1924. Eine biologische Methode zum Nachweis der Regenwirkung auf Pflanzenschutzmittel. Zeits. Ang. Chemie37: 981–982. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Myc.4: 230. 1925.]
—. 1924. Ueber die Ausmittelung eines Pflanzenschutzmittels und seine fungizide Bewertung. Zeits. Ang. Chemie37: 903. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Myc.4: 231. 1925.]
—. 1925. Zur Bewertung der Fungiziditat eines Stoffes. Zeits. Ang. Chemie38: 67–70. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Myc.4: 360–361. 1925.]
Schmitz, H.et al. 1930. A suggested toximetric method for wood preservatives. Ind. & Eng. Chem. (Anal. Ed.)2: 361–363. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Myc. 10: 217. 1931.]
Simanton, W. A. andA. C. Miller. 1937Housefly age as a factor in susceptibility to pyrethrum sprays. Jour. Econ. Ent.30: 917–921.
Steinberg, R. A. 1940. Action of some organic compounds on yield, sporulation, and starch formation ofAspergillus niger. Jour. Agr. Res.60: 765–773.
Stoddard, E. M. 1944. Immunization of peach trees to X disease by chemotherapy. Phytopath.34: 1011. 1944.
Swingle, W. T. 1896. Bordeaux mixture, its chemistry, physical properties, and toxic effects on fungi and algae. U. S. Dept. Agr., Div. Veg. Phys. & Path., Bul.9: 1–37.
Tattersfield, F. 1939. Biological methods of testing insecticides. Am. Appl. Biol.26: 365–384.
Thom, C.et al. 1934. Laboratory tests for mildew resistance of outdoor cotton fabrics. American Dyestuffs Reporter.23: 581–586.
Thorburn, A. M. andJ. M. Vincent. 1941. Protection of cloth against microbial deterioration—methods of testing the value of antiseptics. Jour. Aust. Inst. Agr. Sci.,7: 29–31. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Myc 20: 361. 1940.]
Tornow, Elisabeth. 1930. Zur Prüfung von Saatbeizmitteln. Prakt. Blätter f. Pflanzenbau und Pflanzenschutz8: 7–9. [Abst. Rev. Appl. Myc.9: 637. 1930.]
Trevan, J. W. 1927. The error of determination of toxicity. Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) B101: 483–514.
Turner, N. 1943. Reversals in order of effectiveness of insecticides. Jour. Econ. Ent.36: 725–728.
Wadley, F. M. andW. N. Sullivan. 1943. A study of the dosage mortality curve. Jour. Econ. Ent.36: 367–372.
Walker, J. C.et al. 1937. Toxicity of mustard oils and related sulfur compounds to certain fungi. Am. Jour. Bot.24: 536–541.
Wampler, E. L. andW. M. Hoskins. 1939. Factors concerned in the deposit of sprays. VI. The role of electrical charges produced during spraying. Jour. Econ. Ent.32: 61–69.
Waterman, R. E.et al. 1938. Chemical studies of wood preservation. The wood-block method of toxicity assay. Ind. & Eng. Chem. (Anal. Ed.)10: 306–314.
Wellman, R. H. andS. E. A. McCallan. 1942. An analysis of factors causing variation in spore germination tests of fungicides. IV. Time and temperature. Boyce Thomp. Inst., Contr.12: 431–449.
——. 1943. Correlations between slide-germination, greenhouse tomato foliage disease, and wheat smut methods of testing fungicides. Boyce Thomp. Inst., Contr.13: 143–169.
Whetzel, H. H. andS. E. A. McCallan. 1930. Studies on fundicides. I. Concepts and terminology. Cornell Univ. Agr. Exp. Sta., Mem. 128: 1–7.
Whipple, G. C. 1916. The element of chance in sanitation. Jour. Franklin Inst.182: 37–59.
Wilcoxon, F. andS. E. A. McCallan. 1931. The fungicidal action of sulphur. III. Physical factors affecting the efficiency of dusts. Boyce Thomp. Inst., Contr.3: 509–528.
——. 1934. The stimulation of fungous spore germination by aqueous plant extracts. Phytopath.24: 20.
——. 1939. Theoretical principles underlying laboratory toxicity tests of fungicides. Boyce Thomp. Inst., Contr.10: 329–338.
Williams, R. C. 1929. Laboratory method for measuring relative adhesive qualities of fungicidal dusts. Ind. & Eng. Chem. (Anal. Ed.)1: 81–82.
Yarwood, C. E. 1943. The function of lime and host leaves in the action of bordeaux mixture. Phytopath.33: 1146–1156.
Young, H. C. andE. H. Cooper. 1917. A method for determining the fungicidal coefficient of lime sulphur and other common fungicides. Mich. Acad. Sci., Rep.19: 221–236.
Zade, A. 1940. En enkel snabbmetod för prövning av betningsmedlens verkan mot Havreflygsot,Ustilago avenae (Pers.) Jens. Nord. Jordbr Forskn.,22: 244–255. [German Summary.] [Abst. Rev. Appl. Myc. 22:300. 1943.]
Zentmyer, G. A. 1942. Toxin formation and chemotherapy in relation to Dutch elm disease. Phytopath.32: 20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Horsfall, J.G. Quantitative bioassay of fungicides in the laboratory. Bot. Rev 11, 357–397 (1945). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861319
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02861319