Advertisement

Economic Botany

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 344–366 | Cite as

Ethnobotanical observations on the Chocó Indians

  • James A. Duke
Article

Keywords

Bark Economic Botany Colombia Versus Versus Versus Versus Versus Peach Palm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Archer, W. A. 1937. Exploration in the Choco Intendancy of Colombia. Sci. Mon.44: 418–434.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bennett, C. F. 1968. Human influences on the zoogeography of Panama. Ibero-Americana 51. 112 p.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Covich, A. P. & N. H. Nickerson. 1966. Studies of cultivated plants in Choco dwelling clearings, Darien, Panama. Econ. Bot. 285–301.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duke, J. A. 1968. Darien ethnobotanical dictionary. Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus Laboratories, U. S. AEG report BMI-171-004, Columbus, Ohio. 131 P.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ewing, R. A., J. E. Howes, & R. B. Price. 1969. Radionuclide and stable element analyses of environmental samples from Routes 17 and 25. Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus Laboratories, Columbus, Ohio. (In press.)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gamble, J. F., S. C. Snedaker, & Associates. 1969. Bioenvironmental and radiologicalsafety feasibility studies, Atlantic-Pacific Interoceanic Canal. Agricultural ecology. Final report. Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus Laboratories, U.S. AEC report, Columbus, Ohio. (In press.)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kreiger, H. 1926. Material culture of the people of southeastern Panama, based on specimens in the United States National Museum. U.S. Nat. Mus. Bull.134: 1–141.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Loewen, J. A. 1963. Chocó I: Introduction and bibliography. Intern. Jour. Amer. Linguist.29(3): 239–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Murphy, R. C. 1939. Racial succession in the Colombian Chocñ. Geogr. Rev.29: 461–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Patiño, V. M. 1963, 1964, 1968. Plantas cultivadas y animales domésticos en América equinoccial. Vol. I. Frutales. Vol. II Plantas alimenticias. Vol. III. Fibras, medicinas, miscelaneas. Imprenta Departamental, Cali, Colombia. 547, 364, 570 p.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peñaherrera de Costales, Piedad, & A.Costales S. 1968. Cunas y Chocós. Llacta No. 25. 181, 145 p.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pérez-Arbeláez, E. 1956. Plantas útiles de Colombia. 3d ed. Sucesores de Rivadeneyra, Madrid, and Librería Colombiana, Bogotá. 832 p.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reichel-Dolmatoff, G. 1960. Notas etnográficas sobre los indios del Chocó. Rev. Colombiana Antropol. 9: 73–158.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tamayo, J. L., in collaboration with R. C. West. 1964. The hydrography of Middle America. In: Handbook of Middle American Indians. Vol. I. R. Wauchope, ed. University of Texas Press, Austin. pp. 84–121.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Torres de Araúz, Reina C. 1963. Estudio etnológico e histórico de la cultura Chocó. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Buenos Aires. 402 p.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    —. 1969. Demographic and dietary data for human groups inhabiting the eastern region of the Republic of Panama. BioScience19: 331–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wassén, H. 1935. Notes on southern groups of Choco Indians in Colombia. Etnol. Stud.1: 35–182.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    West, R. C. 1957. The Pacific lowlands of Colombia. Louisiana State University Press, Baton Rouge. 278 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • James A. Duke
    • 1
  1. 1.Columbus Laboratories of Battelle Memorial InstituteColumbus

Personalised recommendations