Advertisement

The Botanical Review

, 36:162 | Cite as

The girdled tree

  • A. R. A. Noel
Interpreting Botanical Progress

Keywords

Botanical Review Cambial Activity Sieve Tube Vascular Cambium Strychnos 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Literature Cited

  1. Ahmad, Y. S. 1957. In: “Tropical Silviculture” 2. F.A.O. Forestry and Forest Products Series 13. (Rome) p. 235.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, P. &C. F. Mitchell. 1968. More Macadamias. Farming in S.A. 302: 7–12.Google Scholar
  3. Arnborg, T. 1946. Ett par lyckade resultat av barkringning och strangulering. Skogen33: 84–85.Google Scholar
  4. Asakawa, S. 1966. The effect of girdling on the coning of Larch seed trees as affected by stand density. Jour. Jap. For. Soc.48: 245–9.Google Scholar
  5. Baillaud, L. &Y. Courtot. 1956. Observations sur quelques modes de cicatrisation chez les végétaux vasculaires. Ann. Sci. Univ. Besançon 2e.sér. Bot.8: 63–72.Google Scholar
  6. Baldwin, H. I. 1934. Some physiological effects of girdling northern hardwoods. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club61: 249–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banerji, J. 1957. In: “Tropical Silviculture” 2. F.A.O. Forestry and Forest Products Series13. (Rome).Google Scholar
  8. Banfield, W. M. 1941. Distribution by the sap stream of spores of three fungi that induce vascular wilt disease of Elm. Jour. Agr. Res.62: 637–681.Google Scholar
  9. Barnes, D. L. 1965. The effects of frequency of burning & mattocking on the control of coppice in the Marandellas sandveld. Rhod. Jour. Agr. Res.3: 55–6.Google Scholar
  10. Bormann, F. H. 1966. The structure, function, and ecological significance of root grafts inPinus strobus L. Ecol. Monographs36: 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braconi, L. 1966. Impollinazione artificale e decorticazione anulare nell’ olivo. Ital. Agric.103: 67–77.Google Scholar
  12. Brewster, D. R. &J. A. Larsen. 1925. Girdling as a means of removing undesirable tree species in the Western White Pine type. Jour. Agr. Res.31: 267–274.Google Scholar
  13. Brinkman, K. A. &F. G. Liming. 1961. Oak and pine reproduction responds to overhead release. Jour. For.59: 341–346.Google Scholar
  14. Broun, A. F. 1912. Sylviculture in the Tropics. London.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, A. B. 1936. Cambial activity in the Poplar with particular reference to polarity phenomena. Can. Jour. Res. Sect. C,14: 74–88.Google Scholar
  16. —. 1937. Activity of the vascular cambium in relation to wounding in the Balsam Poplar,Populus balsamifera L. Can. Jour. Res. Sect. C,15: 7–51.Google Scholar
  17. — &R. G. H. Cormack. 1937. Stimulation of cambial activity, locally in the region of application and at a distance in relation to a wound, by means of heteroauxin. Can. Jour. Res. Sect. C,15: 433–441.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, C. L. &K. Sax. 1962. The influence of pressure on the differentiation of secondary tissue. Amer. Jour. Bot.49: 683–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Brown Bast Investigation Committee. 1919. The treatment ofHevea trees affected by brown bast. Kuala Lumpur, F.M.S.Google Scholar
  20. Bull, H. 1945. Increasing the growth of Loblolly Pine by girdling large hardwoods. Jour. For.43: 449–50.Google Scholar
  21. Büsgen, M. &E. Münch, trans.T. Thompson. 1929. The Structure and Life of Forest Trees, (3rd Ed.), London.Google Scholar
  22. Butterwick, A. J. 1919. Girdling of Teak trees in Burma. Indian For.45: 65–67.Google Scholar
  23. Čajlahjan, M. H. &M. M. Sarkisova. 1962. Ringing and treatment with growth substances as a method of vegetative propagation for fruit trees. Doklady Akad. Nauk Arm. S.S.R.35: 227–32 (Hort. Abst.35:5035 1965).Google Scholar
  24. Carrapiett, J. B. 1955. Regeneration of Teak in Burma. Burmese For.5: 45–57.Google Scholar
  25. Casini, E. 1958. Osservazione e ricerche su olivi improduttivi in provincia di Livorno. Ann. Fac. Agrar. Pisa.19: 55–136.Google Scholar
  26. Central States Forestry Experiment Station. 1947. Factors affecting the sprouting of Blackjack Oak. Rep. Cent. St. For. Sta. 1947.Google Scholar
  27. Christopher, E. P. 1954. The Pruning Manual. N.Y.Google Scholar
  28. Church, C. G. 1933. Composition of juice of oranges from girdled and normal trees. California Citrogr.18: 348–349.Google Scholar
  29. Clark, F. B. &F. G. Liming. 1953. Sprouting of Blackjack Oak in the Missouri Ozarks. Cent. St. For. Exp. Sta., Tech. Pap. 137.Google Scholar
  30. Cleghorn, W. B., A. D. McKay, &C. H. Cronin. 1959. The results of preliminary arboricide and herbicide trials on a number of species limiting livestock carrying capacity of veld in Southern Rhodesia. African Weed Control Conference, Proceedings (Saffron Walden), p.35.Google Scholar
  31. Clements, H. F. &C. T. Engard. 1938. Upwards movements of inorganic solutes as affected by a girdle. Plant Physiol.13: 103–122.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cockbill, G. F. 1961. Preliminary investigations on the use of a chemical brushkiller. Rhodesia Agr. Jour.58: 173–177.Google Scholar
  33. Committee of Forestry Terminology. 1950. Forest Terminology, a glossary of technical terms used in forestry. (Revised Edition). Society of American Foresters, Washington. p.39.Google Scholar
  34. Coombes, R. 1909. Production d’anthocyane sous l’influence de la décortication annulaire. Bul. Soc. Bot. Paris56: 227–31.Google Scholar
  35. —. 1912. Formation de pigments anthocyaniques déterminée dans les feuilles par la décortication annulaire des tiges. Ann. Sci. Nat. (Bot.) Paris Sér. 9,16: 1–53.Google Scholar
  36. Cooper, W. C., A. L. Burkett, &A. Herr. 1945. Flowering of Peruvian Cube,Lonchocarpus utilis A. C. Smith, induced by girdling. Amer. Jour. Bot.32: 655–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Craet, A. A. M. 1953. Annélation et empoissonnement des arbres en forêt equat orientale. Bull. Inform. Inst. Nat. Étude. Agron. Congo Belge,2: 310–366.Google Scholar
  38. Crafts, A. S. 1961. Translocation in Plants. Holt, Rinehart & Winston N.Y. p.5–27.Google Scholar
  39. Curtis, O. F. 1920. The upward translocation of foods in woody plants. I. Tissues concerned in translocation. Amer. Jour. Bot.7: 101–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. —. 1925. Studies on the tissues concerned in the transfer of solutes in plants. The effect on the upward transfer of solutes of cutting the xylem as compared with that of cutting the phloem. Ann. Bot. London.39: 573–585.Google Scholar
  41. David, R. 1954. Sur la cicatrisation des cares de pin maritime. Compt. Rend. Soc. Biol.149: 96.Google Scholar
  42. Davis, D. H. S. 1942. Rodent damage in plantations and its prevention. Jour. S.A. For. Ass.8: 64–69.Google Scholar
  43. Dawkins, H. C. 1953. Trials of non-toxic arboricides in tropical forests. Emp. For. Rev.32: 253–256.Google Scholar
  44. Desch, H. E. 1933. The effect of girdling on trees. Malay. Forester.2: 182–186.Google Scholar
  45. De Soissons, M. 1962. The creation of woodland pasture. Shell Farmer5: 1–5.Google Scholar
  46. —. 1961. Ring barking of trees. Shell Farmer4: 25.Google Scholar
  47. Dhillon, A. S. &L. Singh. 1949a. Influence of thinning and ringing on the cropping and quality of grapes and the vigour of grape vines. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.53: 263–268.Google Scholar
  48. —. 1949b. The efficacy of cane and trunk ringing of grapevines. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.53: 259–262.Google Scholar
  49. Dixon, H. H. 1922. The transport of organic substances in plants. British Ass. Report (Hull) 193–203.Google Scholar
  50. Du Sablon, L. 1905. Sur les effets de la décortication annulaire. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)140: 1553–1555.Google Scholar
  51. Eagles, C. F. &P. F. Wareing. 1964. The role of growth substances in the regulation of bud dormancy. Physiol. Plant.17: 697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Eames, A. J. &L. H. MacDaniels. 1947. An Introduction to Plant Anatomy (2nd Ed.) N.Y. & Lond. pp.200–201.Google Scholar
  53. Ehrenreich, J. H. &R. F. Buttery. 1960. Increasing forage on Ozark wooded range. Cent. St. For. Exp. Sta., Tech. Pap. 177.Google Scholar
  54. Elliot, S. B. 1953. Seasoning of some Indian timbers. For. Res. India Burma 1949.50: 68–69.Google Scholar
  55. —. 1914. The problem of food movement in trees. For. Quart.12: 559–561.Google Scholar
  56. Elton, C. 1942. Voles, Mice & Lemmings; Problems in population dynamics. Oxford. p. 176.Google Scholar
  57. Eudes-Deslongchamps, J. A. 1838. Remarques relatives aux effets de la décortication circulaire observée sur un hêtre. Mém. Soc. Linn. Normandie6: 304–306.Google Scholar
  58. Fitzgerald, K. 1762. Experiments on checking the too luxuriant growth of fruit trees, tending to dispose them to produce fruit. Royal Soc. London, Phil. Trans.52: 71–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Fuller, A. S. 1911. The Grape Culturist. Judd Co. N.Y.Google Scholar
  60. Furr, J. R., P. C. Reece, &G. Hrnciar. 1945. Nitrogen absorption of ringed orange trees in sand culture. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.46: 51–54.Google Scholar
  61. Gardner, V. R.,F. C. Bradford, &H. D. Hooker. 1952. The Fundamentals of Fruit Production. (3rd Ed.) N.Y. 586–588.Google Scholar
  62. Garin, G. I. &F. F. Smith. 1954. Suggestions for improving farm woodlots by girdling and poisoning weed trees. Ala. Polytech. Agr. Exp. Sta. Leafl. 44.Google Scholar
  63. Garner, R. J. 1944. Propagation of cuttings and layers. Recent work and its application, with special reference to pome and stone fruits. Commonwealth Bur. Hort. (E. Mailing), Tech. Comm. 14.Google Scholar
  64. Gaskins, M. H. 1964. Girdling mango seedlings for inducing early fruit bearing. Proc. Fla. St. Hort. Soc. 1963.76: 360–363.Google Scholar
  65. Goodwin, W. L. 1889. Ringed trees. Canad. Record. Sci. Montreal 1888–9.3: 227–229.Google Scholar
  66. Graham, B. F. &F. H. Bormann. 1966. Natural root grafts. Bot. Rev.32: 255–292.Google Scholar
  67. Grano, C. X. 1955. Girdle your weed trees in the spring. Forest Farmer14: 16.Google Scholar
  68. Greene, L. 1937. Ringing and fruit setting as related to nitrogen and carbohydrate content of Grimes Golden apples. Jour. Agr. Res.54: 863–875.Google Scholar
  69. Greenidge, K. N. H. 1957. Ascent of sap. Ann. Rev. Plant Phys.8: 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Gregory, L. E. &J. Van Overbeek. 1945. An analysis of the process of root formation on cuttings of a difficult-to-root Hibiscus variety. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.46: 427–433.Google Scholar
  71. Greth, J. W. 1957. Axe girdling kills large cull hardwoods. Cent. St. For. Exp. Sta., Sta. Notes 107. p.2.Google Scholar
  72. Griggs, W. H. &A. L. Schrader. 1941. Effect of branch ringing before and after blossoming on the fruit set of the Delicious apple. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.38: 89–90.Google Scholar
  73. Guinier, E. 1886. Effets de l’annélation de l’écorce. Rev. Eaux For.25: 287–293.Google Scholar
  74. Haig, I. T., M. A. Huberman, &U. A. Din. 1958. In: “Tropical Silviculture”7. F.A.O. Forestry and Forest Products Series. 13, (Rome) 69 & 76.Google Scholar
  75. Hales, S. 1727. Vegetable Staticks. London.Google Scholar
  76. Hall, C. W. 1957. Controlling upland hardwoods in South Carolina. Clemson Agr. Coll. S.C. Ext. Serv., Circ. 385.Google Scholar
  77. Hamilton, R. A. &E. T. Fukunaga. 1959. Growing macadamia nuts in Hawaii. Hawaii Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 121.Google Scholar
  78. Hansborough, T. &R. G. Merrifield. 1963. The influence of partial girdling on cone and seed production of Loblolly Pine. LSU For. Note La. Sch. For. No. 52. p.2.Google Scholar
  79. Hartig, R. 1890a. Ueber die Folgen der Baumringelung. Bot. Zentralbl.41: 251–253.Google Scholar
  80. —. 1890b. Sitzungsberichte des Botanischen Vereins in Müchen. Bot. Zentralb.41: 283–286.Google Scholar
  81. Hartig, T. 1844. Bericht über gelungene Versuche der Reproduktion neuer Holzund Rindenschichten aus dem Holzkörper der Bäume, Verhandlungen, Verein zur Beforderung des Gartenbaus in den koniglich preussischen Staaten, Berlin,17: 329–331.Google Scholar
  82. —. 1859. Über die Bewegung des Saftes in den Holzpflanzen. Bot. Zeit.16: 329–335 & 337–342.Google Scholar
  83. Hartmann, H. T. &D. E. Kester. 1968. Plant Propagation: Principles and Practices. (2nd Ed.) Prentice-Hall. New Jersey. 481–483.Google Scholar
  84. Hawley, R. C. &D. M. Smith. 1954. The Practice of Silviculture. (6th Ed.) John Wiley. N.Y. & Lond.Google Scholar
  85. Heinicke, A. J. 1933. The assimilation of carbon dioxide by apple leaves as affected by ringing the stem. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.29: 225–229.Google Scholar
  86. Hendricks, H. 1892. Girdled elms that would not die. Amer. Gdng.13: 209–210.Google Scholar
  87. Hocker, H. W. 1962. Stimulating conelet production of Eastern White Pine. N.H. Agr. Exp. Sta., Sta. Tech. Bull. 107, p.23.Google Scholar
  88. Hodgson, D. H. 1931-32. Elements of Malayan silviculture. Malay Forester1: 88–89.Google Scholar
  89. Hole, R. S. 1909. A Manual of Botany for Indian Forest Students. Calcutta. pp.168–169.Google Scholar
  90. Hombert, J. 1954. Empoisonnement des abres à l’aide de l’arsénite de soude. Bull. Inform. Nat. Étude Agron. Congo Belge3: 245–260.Google Scholar
  91. Howlett, F. S. 1941. Ringing in relation to fruit-set in the apple. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.39: 212–216.Google Scholar
  92. Huber, B. 1948. Physiologie der Rindenschälung bei Fichte und Eichen. Forst wiss. Centbl.67: 129–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Irving, F. D. 1958. Killing cull black oaks with amanate, 2,4,5-T and mechanical girdling. Minn. Univ. Forest. Note71.Google Scholar
  94. Ivens, G. W. 1958. The effects of arboricides on East African trees and shrubs.I,Acacia species. Trop. Agriculture, Trin.35: 257–271.Google Scholar
  95. Jacobs, W. P. 1952. The role of auxin in differentiation of xylem around a wound. Amer. Jour. Bot.39: 301–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Jakěs, E. &N. Hexnerová. 1939. Über den Einfluss der Wuchsstoffe auf Wundgewebebildung bei Obstbaumen. Gartenbau.13: 83–93.Google Scholar
  97. Jamnicky, J. 1962. Girdling Picea abies during tending operations in young stands. Sborn. Prác. Tatr. Nár. Parku, Tatr. Lomnica No. 5:120–138.Google Scholar
  98. Janse, J. M. 1914. Les sections annulaires de l’écorce et le suc descendant. Ann. Jard. Bot. Buitenz. 2e.Sér13: 1–89.Google Scholar
  99. Jones, W. W. &J. H. Beaumont. 1937. Carbohydrate accumulation in relation to vegetative propagation of the Litchi. Science n.s. 86 p. 313.Google Scholar
  100. Kermode, C. W. D. 1957. In: “Tropical Silviculture” 2. F.A.O. Forestry and Forest Products Series. 13, Rome, p.175.Google Scholar
  101. Knight, T. A. 1820. Physiological observations upon the effects of partial decortication, or ringing the stems or branches of fruit trees. Trans. Hort. Soc. Lond.4: 159–162.Google Scholar
  102. Kobel, F. 1954. Lehrbuch des Obstbaus (zweit. auf.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Göttingen, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  103. Kozlowski, T. T. 1964. Water Metabolism in Plants (Harper & Row, N.Y. & London).Google Scholar
  104. — &C. H. Winget. 1963. Patterns of water movement in forest trees. Bot. Gaz.124: 301–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Kramer, P. J. &T. T. Kozlowski. 1960. Physiology of Trees. N.Y.Google Scholar
  106. Kurtzman, R. H. 1966. Xylem sap flow as affected by metabolic inhibitors and girdling. Plant Physiol.41: 641–646.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Küster, E. 1925. Pathologische Pflanzenanatomie. 3 Aufl. Jena:76–183.Google Scholar
  108. Lea, J. D. 1957. The effect of ring-barking and 2,4,5-T applied as a bark paint onAcacia seyal Del. E. Afr. Agric. Jour.23: 89–90.Google Scholar
  109. Leach, R. 1937. Observations on the parasitism and control ofArmillaria mellea. Royal Soc. London, Proc.121: 561–573.Google Scholar
  110. —. 1939. Biological control and ecology ofArmillaria mellea. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.23: 320–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Ledeboer, M. S. J. 1944. Vegetative propagation of tan wattles. Jour. S.A. For. Assn.12: 29–32.Google Scholar
  112. Lindmark, R. D. 1965. A literature review: removing undesirable trees from hardwood stands. Cent. St. For. Exp. Sta. Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
  113. Loomis, W. E. 1935. Translocation and growth balance in woody plants. Ann. Bot. (Lond.)49:p. 247–272.Google Scholar
  114. Loustalot, A. J. 1943. Effect of ringing the stem on photosynthesis, transpiration, and respiration of pecan leaves. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.42: 127–132.Google Scholar
  115. Lutz, R. J. &A. C. Cline. 1947. Results of the first thirty years of experimentation in silviculture in the Harvard Forest, 1908–1938. Part I-The conversion of stands of old field origin by various methods of cutting and subsequent cultural treatments. Harvard Forest Bull. 23.Google Scholar
  116. Macmillan, H. F. 1949. Tropical Planting and Gardening, (5th Ed.), London, p.53.Google Scholar
  117. Mallik, P. C. 1951. Inducing flowering in mango by ringing the bark. Indian Jour. Hort.8: 1–10.Google Scholar
  118. Malpighi, M. 1686. Opera Omnia, London.Google Scholar
  119. Mason, T. G. &E. J. Maskell. 1928a. Studies on the transport of carbohydrates in the cotton plant. I. A study of diurnal variations in the carbohydrates of leaf, bark and wood, and the effects of ringing. Ann. Bot. (Lond.)42: 189–253.Google Scholar
  120. —. 1928b. Studies on the transport of carbohydrates in the cotton plant.II. The factors determining the rate and the direction of movements of sugars. Ann. Bot. (Lond.)42: 571–636.Google Scholar
  121. Matthews, J. D. 1963. Some applications of genetics and physiology in thinning. Forestry36: 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. McDougal, D. T. 1943. The effects of girdling on pines. Amer. Jour. Bot.30: 715–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. —. 1946. Streaming movements of solutions in plants. Amer. Jour. Bot.33: 318–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Meade, F. M. 1962. Use of mechanical tree girdles for forest stand improvement. Ark. Farm Res.11: 3.Google Scholar
  125. Meyen, F.J. F. 1841. Pflanzenpathologie, Berlin p.14.Google Scholar
  126. Mittler, T. E. 1958. Studies on the feeding and nutrition ofTuberolachnus salignus (Gmelin) (Homoptera, Aphididae).II. The nitrogen and sugar composition of ingested phloem sap and excreted honeydew. Jour. Exp. Biol.35: 74–84.Google Scholar
  127. Mosse, B. 1953. The origin and structure of bridge tissue in ring-grafted apple stems. Jour. Hort. Sci.28: 51–48.Google Scholar
  128. — &M. V. Labern. 1960. The structure and development of vascular nodules in apple bud-unions. Ann. Bot. (London)24: 500–507.Google Scholar
  129. Muntz, H. H. 1951. Converting scrub oak areas to pine plantations. Jour. For.49: 714–715.Google Scholar
  130. Murneek, A. E. 1938. Branch ringing and fruit set of Minkler and Arkansas (Black Twig) varieties of apples. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.35: 24–26.Google Scholar
  131. —. 1939. Further results on the influence of branch ringing on fruit set and size. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.36: 398–400.Google Scholar
  132. —. 1940. Fruit production as affected by branch ringing. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.37: 97–100.Google Scholar
  133. —. 1941. Relative carbohydrate and nitrogen concentration in new tissues produced on ringed branches. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.38: 133–136.Google Scholar
  134. Napier-Bax, S. 1932. Notes on anti-tsetse clearings. Mem. Tsetse Res. Tanganyika,I.Google Scholar
  135. Nichols, J. M. 1957. Control of woody vegetation. Mo. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Bull. 638.Google Scholar
  136. Nikolov, S. &E. Eneev. 1967. Effect of girdling a Beech stem on the moisture content of the green wood. Nauč. Trud. Lesoteh. Inst. Sofia. (Sev. Meh. Tehn. Darv)14: 65–70.Google Scholar
  137. Noel, A. R. A. 1965. The effects of girdling upon some trees in Central Africa. Ph.D. Thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
  138. —. 1968a. The effects of girdling, with special reference to trees in South Central Africa. Kirkia.6: 181–196.Google Scholar
  139. —. 1968b. Callus formation and differentiation at an exposed cambial surface. Ann. Bot. (London) N.S.32: 347–359.Google Scholar
  140. Oldrieve, W. T. 1885. In: “Rattray J. & Mill H. R., Forestry and Forest Products,” Edinburgh pp. 321–405.Google Scholar
  141. Olson, C. E. &W. R. Boggess. 1960. Mortality following mechanical girdling in a mixed hardwood stand in southern Illinois. Univ. Illinois Agr. Exp. Sta., For. Notes 90.Google Scholar
  142. Paddock, W. 1898. Experiments in ringing grape vines. N.Y. Agr. Exp. Sta. Bull. 151.Google Scholar
  143. Painter, J. H. &R. T. Brown. 1940. Effect of different methods of girdling tung branches. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.37: 511–514.Google Scholar
  144. Parkin, E. A. 1938a. The depletion of starch from timber in relation to attack byLyctus beetles. 2, A preliminary experiment upon the effect of girdling standing oak trees. Forestry12: 30–37.Google Scholar
  145. —. 1938b. The depletion of starch from timber in relation to attack byLyctus beetles. 3, A second experiment upon the girdling of standing oak trees. Forestry12: 117–124.Google Scholar
  146. — &E. W. J. Phillips. 1939. The depletion of starch from timber in relation to attack byLyctus beetles. 4, A third experiment on the girdling of standing oak trees. Forestry13: 134–145.Google Scholar
  147. Peevy, F. A. 1956. Methods for controlling hardwoods. Forest. and People6: 22–25.Google Scholar
  148. —. 1963. Killing upland hardwoods with silvicides. Forest Farmer22: 14–16.Google Scholar
  149. Pfeffer, W. 1897. Pflanzenphysiologie (Leipzig).Google Scholar
  150. Phillips, E. W. J. 1938. The depletion of starch from timber in relation to attack by Lyctus beetles. I, Starch, with special reference to its occurrence in timber. Forestry12: 15–29.Google Scholar
  151. Pond, J. D. 1936. Girdling for seed production. Jour. For.34: 78–79.Google Scholar
  152. Popesco, C. 1926. Régénération des fraisceaux conducteurs libéroligneux dans moelle à la suite de la décortication annulaire. Rev. Bret. Bot.21: 1–47.Google Scholar
  153. -. 1936. La similitude des movements ondulatoires de la circulation et de la sédimentation de la matière morte et vivante dans la nature. Mélanges rédiés au Professeur Lucien Daniel, Université de Rennes, p. 187.Google Scholar
  154. Priestley, C. A. 1962. Carbohydrate Resources Within the Perennial Plant. Commonwealth Bur. Hort. (E. Mailing), Tech. Comm. 27.Google Scholar
  155. -, &C. F. Swingle. 1929. Vegetative propagation from the standpoint of plant anatomy. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dept. Agric. 151.Google Scholar
  156. — &L. M. Woffenden. 1922. Physiological studies in plant anatomy. V. Causal factors in cork formation. New Phytol.21: 252–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. Punter, D. 1963. Plantation Diseases, p. 72. In: Annual Report, Forest Entomology and Pathology Branch, Canada Department Forestry, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  158. Redfern, D. B. 1968. The ecology of Armillaria mellea in Britain: Biological control. Ann. Bot. (London) N.S.32: 293–300.Google Scholar
  159. Richardson, A. D. 1896. Stem-ringing experiments on broad-leaved (dicotyledonous) deciduous trees. Trans. Bot. Soc. Edinburgh.20: 337–339.Google Scholar
  160. Roberts, L. W. 1960. Experiments on xylem regeneration in stem wound responses inColeus. Bot. Gaz.121: 201–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. — &D. E. Fosket. 1962. Further experiments on wound-vessel formation in stem wounds ofColeus. Bot. Gaz.123: 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. Romancier, R. M. 1965. 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T and related chemicals for woody plant control in the Southeastern United States. Georgia Forest Res. Council Report. 16.Google Scholar
  163. Roonwal, M. L.,P. N. Chatterjee, &R. S. Thapa. 1957. Results of experiments on basal girdling in four species of timbers in Bihar in relation to anti-insect protection. Indian Forest Leaflet No. 154, For. Res. Inst. Dehra Dun.Google Scholar
  164. Sarajkin, J. D. &A. E. Antipin. 1965. Preparing Larch for loose floating. Lesn. Prom.3: 11–13.Google Scholar
  165. Sass, J. E. 1932. Formation of callus knots in Apple grafts as related to the histology of the graft union. Bot. Gaz.94: 364–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. Schlotthauber, A. F. 1860. Steigen des Saftes im Kernholze und Sinken desselben in Splint und Rinde, nebst Folgen seines durch breite ringsum geführte Entrindung gehemmten Rücklaufs. Bonplandia8: 18–21.Google Scholar
  167. Schneider, H. 1945. Anatomy of buckskin-diseased peach and cherry. Phytopath.35: 610–635.Google Scholar
  168. —. 1954. Effect of trunk girdling on phloem of trunk of sweet orange trees on sour orange rootstock. Hilgardia,22: 593–601.Google Scholar
  169. Scholander, P. F. 1957. The rise of sap in lianas. In: “The Physiology of Forest Trees” ed. by Thiman, K., N.Y. pp. 3–17.Google Scholar
  170. Scott, J. D. 1967. Bush encroachment in South Africa. S.A. Jour. Sci.63: 311–314.Google Scholar
  171. Sharples, A. &H. Gunnery. 1933. Callus formation inHibiscus Rosa-sinensis L. andHevea brasiliensis Mull. Arg. Ann. Bot. (London)47: 827–839.Google Scholar
  172. Shipman, R. D. 1958. Effect of season of treatment on girdling and chemical control of oak and sweetgum. Jour. For.56: 33–35.Google Scholar
  173. Siminovitch, D. &D. R. Briggs. 1953. Studies on the chemistry of the living bark of the Black Locust tree in relation to frost hardiness. 4. Effects of ringing on translocation, protein synthesis and the development of hardiness. Plant Physiol.28: 177–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  174. —,C. M. Wilson, D. R. Briggs. 1953. Studies on the chemistry of the living bark of the black locust in relation to its frost hardiness. 5. Seasonal transformation and variations in the carbohydrates: starch:sucrose inter-conversions. Plant Physiol.28: 383–400.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  175. Singh, R. &K. S. Arora. 1965. Some factors affecting fruit drop in mango (Mangifera indica L.) Indian Jour. Sci.35: 196–205.Google Scholar
  176. Sitton, B. G. 1949. The effects of different methods of girdling bearing and defruited tung branches. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.53: 119–124.Google Scholar
  177. Sledge, W. A. 1930. The rooting of woody cuttings considered from the standpoint of anatomy. Jour. Pomol. & Hort. Sci.8: 1–22.Google Scholar
  178. Sluder, E. R. 1958. Control of cull trees and weed species in hardwood stands. Southeast For. Sta. paper 95.Google Scholar
  179. Soe, K. 1959. Anatomical studies of bark regeneration following scoring. Jour. Arnold Arb.40: 260–267.Google Scholar
  180. Sorauer, P. 1922. Manual of Plant Diseases, (3rd Ed.), Paris.Google Scholar
  181. Starker, T. J. 1942. Will girdling always kill Douglas Fir? Jour. For.40: 658–659.Google Scholar
  182. Steward, F. C. 1964. Plants at Work. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. p. 124.Google Scholar
  183. Stoltz, L. P. 1965. Physiological study of the effect of girdling on rooting. Diss. Abstr.26: 1739–1740.Google Scholar
  184. — &C. E. Hess. 1966a. The effect of girdling upon root initiation: carbohydrates and amino acids. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.89: 734–743.Google Scholar
  185. —. 1966b. The effect of girdling upon root initiation: auxin and rooting cofactors. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci.89: 744–751.Google Scholar
  186. Stransky, J. J. 1959. Concentrated or diluted 2,4,5-T as a supplement to girdling. Jour. For.57: 432–434.Google Scholar
  187. Strasburger, E. 1891. Bau und Verrichtung der Leitungsbahnen in den Pflanzen. Histologische Beiträge (Jena) 3.Google Scholar
  188. Strugnell, E. J. 1934. The girdling of forest trees. Malay. Forester3: 170–176.Google Scholar
  189. Summers, F. 1924. The factors governing bud formation: a chapter of plant physiology. New Phytol.23: 20–49, 78–102, 113–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. Swanson, C. A. 1959. Translocation of organic solutes. In: F. C. Steward “Plant Physiology”2: 481–511.Google Scholar
  191. Swarbrick, T. 1927. The healing of wounds in woody stems II. Contributions to the physiological anatomy of ringed apple shoots. Jour. Pomol. & Hort. Sci.6: 29–46.Google Scholar
  192. —. 1928. Studies in the physiology of fruit trees II: The effects of ringing, double ringing and dis-budding upon the starch content and cambial activity of two-year-old apple shoots. Jour. Pomol. & Hort. Sci.6: 296–312.Google Scholar
  193. Taylor, C. J. 1962. Tropical Forestry, London, p. 78.Google Scholar
  194. Tea Association of Central Africa. 1963. Annual Report of the Tea Research Stations 1962/63., Malawi.Google Scholar
  195. Thomas, H. H. &G. Forsyth. 1954. The popular Encyclopaedia of Gardening I, London, p. 77.Google Scholar
  196. Trécul, M. A. 1855. L’influence des décortications annulaires sur la végétation des arbres dicotylédones. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. (Paris), Ser. 4,3, p. 241.Google Scholar
  197. —. 1852. Reproduction du bois et de l’écorce à la surface de l’aubier décortiqué. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. (Paris)35: 846–849.Google Scholar
  198. Tupper-Carey, R. M. 1930. Observations on the anatomical changes in tissue bridges across rings through the phloem of trees. Proc. Leeds Phil. Soc. (Sci. Sec.)2: 86–95.Google Scholar
  199. Van Overbeek, J. &L. E. Gregory. 1945. A physiological separation of two factors necessary for the formation of roots on cuttings. Amer. Jour. Bot.32: 336–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  200. Vinokur, R. L. 1953. The growth of ringed lemon shoots under the influence of roots receiving no mineral nutrients. Doklady. Akad. Nauk. S.S.R.93: 357–359.Google Scholar
  201. Wabra, A. 1953. Erzwingung der Fruchtbarkeit und Mast an Waldbauman. Wiener Allg. Forst.-u Tagbeitg.53: 52–53.Google Scholar
  202. Walker, L. C. 1956. Controlling undesirable hardwoods. Ca. Exp. Sta. Forest Res. Council Rep. 1956.Google Scholar
  203. Ward, H. K. &W. B. Cleghorn. 1964. The effects of ring-barking trees inBrachystegia woodland on the yield of veld grasses. Rhodesia Agr. Jour.61: 98–107.Google Scholar
  204. Wardrop, A. B. 1957. Phase of lignification in the differention of wood fibres. T.A.P.P.I.40: 225–245.Google Scholar
  205. Wattle Research Institute. 1952. Wattle Research Institute, University of Natal (South Africa). Report for 1951–1952. pp. 23–24.Google Scholar
  206. Weaver, R. J. &S. B. McCune. 1959. Girdling: its relation to carbohydrate nutrition and development of Thompson Seedless, Red Malaga and Ribier grapes. Hilgardia28: 421–456.Google Scholar
  207. Weilandt, T. S. 1942. Ringing of Øverstandere. Dansk Skovforen. Tidssks.27: 444–447.Google Scholar
  208. Westveld, M. 1937. Increasing growth and yield of young Spruce pulpwood stands by girdling hardwoods. U.S. Div. For., Circ. 431.Google Scholar
  209. White, A. R. 1949. In: Hillis, W.E.-“Wood Extractives” (Academic Press.) N.Y. & London. 1962. p. 430.Google Scholar
  210. Wiant, H. V. &L. C. Walker. 1961. Variable response of diffuse and ring-porous species to girdling. Jour. For.59: 676–677.Google Scholar
  211. Wiehe, P. O. 1952. The spread ofArmillaria mellea (Fr.) Quel, in tung orchards. E. Africa Agr. Jour.18: 67–72.Google Scholar
  212. Wilcox, H. 1962. Cambial growth characteristics. In: Kozlowski, T. T. “Tree Growth.” Ronald Press, N.Y. pp. 57–88.Google Scholar
  213. Wilson, B. F. 1968. Effect of girdling on cambial activity. Canad. Jour. Bot.46: 141–146.Google Scholar
  214. Winkler, A. J. 1962. General Viticulture. Univ. California Press, Berkeley & Los Angeles pp. 292–301.Google Scholar
  215. Yocom, H. A. 1958. Deep girdles gives quickest crown kill of oaks. Jour. For.56: 217.Google Scholar
  216. Zimmermann, M. H. 1960. Longitudinal and tangential movement within the sievetube system of white ash (Fraxinus americana L.). In: Festschrift Albert Frey-Wyssling, Beih. Zeit. Schweiz. Forst.30: 289–300.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. A. Noel
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of Natal PietermaritzburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations