Advertisement

The Botanical Review

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 91–161 | Cite as

Current trends in the classification of discomycetes

  • James W. Kimbrough
Interpreting Botanical Progress

Keywords

Ascus Botanical Review North American Species Ectal Excipulum Conidial Stage 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Alexopoulos, C. J. 1962. Introductory Mycology. 613 pp. John Wiley & Sons. New York.Google Scholar
  2. —, andE. E. Butler. 1949. Conidia like structures inPlectania coccinea. Mycologia41: 180–182.Google Scholar
  3. Aragno, M. 1967. Formation et évolution de l’asque chezRhytisma acerinum (Pers.) Fr. Ber. Schweiz. botan. Ges.77: 173–186.Google Scholar
  4. Arnaud, G. 1930. Les Astérinees. V. Étude sur les champignons parasites: Caliciacés, Hemisphaeriacées, etc. Ann. Epiphyt.16: 235–302.Google Scholar
  5. Arpin, N. 1968. Les Caroténoides de Discomycètes: Essai Chimiotaxonomique. Thèses 527. Univ. Lyon. 170 pp. Villeurbanne, France.Google Scholar
  6. Arx, J. A. von, andE. Müller. 1954. Die Gattungen de amerosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beiträge zur Kryptofl. Schwiez11 (1): 1–434.Google Scholar
  7. Barker, P. T. B. 1904. Further observations on the ascocarp ofRhyparobius. Rept. Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Cambridge1904: 825–826.Google Scholar
  8. Batra, L. R. 1960. The species ofCiborinia pathogenic toSalix, Magnolia, andQuercus. Amer. J. Botany47: 819–827.Google Scholar
  9. —. 1961a. New species of discomycetes from India.I. Mycologia52: 524–527.Google Scholar
  10. —. 1961b. New species of discomycetes from India.II. Mycologia52: 665–667.Google Scholar
  11. —, andS. W. T. Batra. 1963. Indian Discomycetes. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.44: 109–256.Google Scholar
  12. —, andR. P. Korf. 1959. The species ofCiborinia pathogenic to herbaceous angiosperms. Amer. J. Botany46: 441–450.Google Scholar
  13. Bayliss-Elliott, J. S. 1927. Studies in Discomycetes. IV. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.12: 290–302.Google Scholar
  14. Bellèmere, A. 1958. Quelques observations sur le dévelopment de l’apothécie d’un discomycète inoperculéCyathicula coronata (Bull.) DeNot. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France74: 70–93.Google Scholar
  15. —. 1960. Sur les asques des Ostropales. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France76: 69–82.Google Scholar
  16. Benedix, E. H. 1962. Zur polyphyletischen Herkunft der Helvellaceen ss. Lat. Zeit. Pilzk.27: 93–102.Google Scholar
  17. Bergman, P., andL. Shanor. 1957. A new species ofStreptotheca. Mycologia49: 879–883.Google Scholar
  18. Berthet, P. 1961. Variation de nombre des noyaux dans les articles mycéliens des Discomycètes, en rapport avec la systématique et la phylogénie. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris252: 3855–3857.Google Scholar
  19. —. 1963. Le nombre des noyaux dans la spore et son intérêt pour la systématique des Discomycètes operculés. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris256: 5185–5186.Google Scholar
  20. —. 1964a. Formes conidiennes de divers Discomycètes. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France80: 125–149.Google Scholar
  21. -. 1964b. Essai biotaxonomique sur les Discomycètes. Thèse, 160 pp., Univ. Lyon.Google Scholar
  22. —. 1966. L’appareil conidien deTrichophaea confusa (Cooke) Berthet, nov. comb. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France82: 473–474.Google Scholar
  23. Bessey, E. A. 1950. Morphology and taxonomy of fungi. 791 pp., Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  24. Biffin, R. H. 1901. On the biology ofBulgaria polymorpha Wett. Ann. Botany15: 119–134.Google Scholar
  25. Bistis, G. N. 1956a. Studies on the genetics ofAscobolus stercorarius (Bull.) Schroet. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club83: 35–61.Google Scholar
  26. —. 1956b. Sexuality inAscobolus stercorarius. I. Morphology of the ascogonium; plasmogamy; evidence for a sexual hormonal mechanism. Amer. J. Botany43: 389–394.Google Scholar
  27. —. 1957. Sexuality inAscobolus stercorarius.II. Preliminary experiments on various aspects of the sexual process. Amer. J. Botany44: 436–443.Google Scholar
  28. —, andJ. R. Raper. 1963. Heterothallism and sexuality inAscobolus stercorarius. Amer. J. Botany50: 880–891.Google Scholar
  29. Blackman, V. H., andH. C. I. Fraser. 1906. On the sexuality and development of the ascocarp ofHumaria granulata. Proc. Royal Soc. Botany, London77: 354–368.Google Scholar
  30. Blodgett, E. C. 1936. The anthracnose of currents and gooseberry caused byPseudopeziza ribis. Phytopathology26: 115–152.Google Scholar
  31. Boedijn, K. B. 1934. Two new Malaysian genera of Discomycetes. Bull. Jard. Botan. Buitenzorg.III. ser.13: 478–483.Google Scholar
  32. —. 1940. The genusPyronema in the Netherlands Indies (Fungi, Ascom.) Bull. Jard. Botan. BuitenzorgIII 16: 272–275.Google Scholar
  33. Boudier, J. L. E. 1869. Mémoire sur les Ascobolés. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. V.10: 191–268.Google Scholar
  34. —. 1879. On the importance that should be attached to the dehiscence of asci in the classification of the Discomycetes. Grevillea8: 45–49.Google Scholar
  35. —. 1885. Nouvelle classification naturelle des Discomycètes charnus connus généralement sous le nom de Pezizes. Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr.1: 91–120.Google Scholar
  36. —. 1907. Histoire et classification des Discomycètes d’Europe.I-VII: 1–223. P. Klincksich, Paris.Google Scholar
  37. Brown, W. H. 1911. The development of the ascocarp ofLachnea scutellata. Botan. Gaz.52: 275–305.Google Scholar
  38. Brummelen, J. van. 1962. Studies on DiscomycetesI. Types of species ofAscobolus andSaccobolus in Spegazzini’s herbarium. Persoonia2: 195–199.Google Scholar
  39. —. 1967. A world-monograph of the generaAscobolus andSaccobolus (Ascomycetes, Pezizales). Persoonia (Suppl.)1: 1–260.Google Scholar
  40. Burdsall, H. H. 1965. Operculate asci and puffing of ascospores inGeopora (Tuberales). Mycologia57: 485–487.Google Scholar
  41. —. 1968. A revision of the genusHydnocystis (Tuberales) and of the hypogeous species ofGeopora (Pezizales). Mycologia60: 496–525.Google Scholar
  42. Cain, R. F., andN. A. Hastings. 1956. Studies of soil fungi.II. A new species ofSphaerospora with a Botrytis-like stage. Canad. J. Botany34: 360–376.Google Scholar
  43. Carroll, G. C. 1969. A study of the fine structure of ascosporogenesis inSaccobolus keruerni. Arch. Mickrobiol.66: 321–339.Google Scholar
  44. Carruthers, D. 1911. Contributions to the cytology ofHelvella crispa. Ann. Botany25: 243–252.Google Scholar
  45. Chadefaud, M. 1940a. Etudes d’asques. I. Les asques et les ascospores deBulgaria inquinans. Rev. Mycol.5: 87–101.Google Scholar
  46. —. 1940b. Le reseau ornemantal de spores et l’appareil apical des asques chezPeziza aurantia. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris211: 659–660.Google Scholar
  47. —. 1942. Etudes d’asques.II. Structure et anatomie comparée de l’appareil apical de asques chez divers Discoet Pyrénomycètes. Rev. Mycol.7: 57–88.Google Scholar
  48. —. 1943. Sur les divers types d’éléments dangeardiens de Ascomycètes, et sur la formation des asques chez la PézizePustularia catinus. La. Rev. Sci.81: 77–80.Google Scholar
  49. —. 1944. Etudes d’asques. IV. L’asques hémiopercule déLeotia lubrica. Rev. Mycol.9: 3–13.Google Scholar
  50. —. 1946a. Les asques para-operculés et la position systématique de la PézizeSarcoscypha coccinea. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris222: 753–755.Google Scholar
  51. —. 1946b. Sur les asques á nasse apicale. Bull. Sci. Bot. de France.93: 128–130.Google Scholar
  52. —. 1949. Observations sur les asques de quelques Morchellaceae. Le Botaniste34: 75–85.Google Scholar
  53. —. 1960. Les végétaux non vasculaires (Cryptogamie). In Chadefaude, M., and L. Emberger. Traité de Botanique. 1018 pp. Librairie Masson, Paris.Google Scholar
  54. —. 1969. Remarques sur les parois, L’appareil apical et les reserves nutritives de asques. Osterr. Bot. Zeit.116: 181–202.Google Scholar
  55. —,M. Letrouit-Galinou, andM. Janex-Favre. 1967. Sur l’origine phylogénétique et l’évolution des Ascomycètes des Lichens. Soc. Bot. France, Colloque sur les Lichens.1967: 79–111.Google Scholar
  56. Chardon, C. E. 1946. Fungi Domingenses novi vel minus cogniti.I. Farlowia2: 455–473.Google Scholar
  57. Christiansen, M. P. 1963. Danish species of the genusCoryne. Friesia7: 75–85.Google Scholar
  58. Claussen, P. 1905. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Ascomyceten.Boudiera. Botan. Ztg.63: 1–28.Google Scholar
  59. —. 1912. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Ascomyceten.Pyronema confluens. Zeit. Bot.4: 1–64.Google Scholar
  60. Clements, F. E. 1909. The genera of fungi. 227 pp. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  61. -, andC. L. Shear. 1931. The genera of fungi. 496 pp. New York.Google Scholar
  62. Cooke, J. C., andM. E. Barr. 1964. The taxonomic position of the genusThelebolus. Mycologia56: 763–769.Google Scholar
  63. Cooke, M. C. 1879. Mycographis, seu icones fungorum. 1. Discomycetes. 267 pp. London.Google Scholar
  64. -. 1892. Handbook of Australian fungi. London.Google Scholar
  65. Corner, E. J. H. 1930a. Studies in the morphology of discomycetes.III. The Clavuleae. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.15: 107–120.Google Scholar
  66. —. 1930b. Study in the morphology of Discomycetes. IV. The evolution of the ascocarp. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.15: 121–134.Google Scholar
  67. Crouan, P. L., andH. M. Crouan. 1857. Note sur quelquesAscobolus nouveaux et sur une èspece nouvelle deVibrissea. Ann. Sci. Nat. (Bot.)IV 7: 173–178.Google Scholar
  68. Cutting, E. M. 1909. On the sexuality and development of the ascocarp inAscophanus carneus Pers. Ann. Botany23: 339–416.Google Scholar
  69. Dangeard, P. A. 1903. Sur le genreAscodesmis. Le Botaniste9: 33–35.Google Scholar
  70. —. 1907. L’origine du périthèce chez les Ascomycètes. Deuxième Partie. Recherches sur le developpement du périthèce chez les Ascomycètes. Le Botaniste10: 1–385.Google Scholar
  71. Darker, G. D. 1932. The Hypodermataceae of conifers. Contr. Arnold Arbor. Harvard Univ.1: 1–131.Google Scholar
  72. —. 1963. A new phragmosporous genus of the Hypodermataceae. Mycologia55: 812–818.Google Scholar
  73. —. 1967. Revision of the genera of the Hypodermataceae. Canad. J. Botany45: 1399–1444.Google Scholar
  74. Davidson, R. W. 1950.Urnula craterium is possibly the perfect stage ofStrumella coryneoideae. Mycologia42: 735–742.Google Scholar
  75. DeBary, A. 1863. Uber die Fruchtenwicklung der Ascomyceten. 38 pp. Englemann, Leipzig.Google Scholar
  76. -. 1866. Morphology und Physiologie der Pilze, Flechten und Myxomyceten. 316 p. Leipzig.Google Scholar
  77. Deutsch, H. 1926. Zur Entwicklungsgeschite der coprophilen Ascomyceten:Lasiobolus pulcherrimus Crouan:Humaria anceps Rehm, var.aurantiaca, n. var.; undSporormia leporina Niessl. Diss. 40 p. Leipzig.Google Scholar
  78. Denison, W. C. 1961. Some species of the genusScutellinia. Mycologia51: 605–635.Google Scholar
  79. —. 1963. A preliminary study of the operculate cup-fungi of Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop.11: 99–129.Google Scholar
  80. —. 1964. The genusCheilymenia in North America. Mycologia56: 718–737.Google Scholar
  81. —. 1965. Central American Pezizales. I. A new genus of the Saccoscyphaceae. Mycologia57: 649–656.Google Scholar
  82. —. 1967. Central American Pezizales. II. The genusCookeina. Mycologia59: 306–317.Google Scholar
  83. —. 1969. Central American Pezizales. III. The genusPhillipsia. Mycologia61: 289–304.Google Scholar
  84. Dennis, R. W. G. 1949. A revision of the British Hyaloscyphaceae with notes on related European species. Commonw. Mycol. Instn., Mycol. Papers32: 1–97. Kew.Google Scholar
  85. —. 1950. Karsten’s species ofMollisia. Kew Bull.1950: 171–178.Google Scholar
  86. —. 1954a.Chloroscypha Seaver in Britain. Kew Bull.1953: 410.Google Scholar
  87. —. 1954b. Some inoperculate Discomycetes of tropical America. Kew Bull.9: 289–348.Google Scholar
  88. —. 1955. A note on the spiny-spored species ofLamprospora. Kew Bull.1955: 571–572.Google Scholar
  89. —. 1956. A revision of the British Helotiaceae in the Herbarium of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, with notes on related European species. Mycol. Papers62: 1–262.Google Scholar
  90. —. 1958. Critical notes on some Australian Helotiales and Ostropales. Kew Bull.1958: 321–358.Google Scholar
  91. —. 1960. British cup fungi and their allies. An introduction to the Ascomycetes. 280 pp. The Ray Soc., London.Google Scholar
  92. —. 1962a. New or interesting British Helotiales. Kew Bull.16: 317–327.Google Scholar
  93. —. 1962b. A reassessment ofBelonidium Mont. & Dur. Persoonia2: 171–191.Google Scholar
  94. —. 1963. A redisposition of some fungi ascribed to the Hyaloscyphaceae. Kew Bull.17: 319–379.Google Scholar
  95. —. 1964. Remarks on the genusHymenoscyphus S. F. Gray, with observations on sundry species referred by Saccardo and others to the generaHelotium, Pezizella, orPhialea. Persoonia3: 29–80.Google Scholar
  96. -. 1968. British Ascomycetes. 455 pp. J. Cramer. Lehre.Google Scholar
  97. —, andR. P. Korf. 1958. A Japanese species ofSphagnicola Velenovsky. Kew Bull.1958: 321–358.Google Scholar
  98. De Notaris, G. 1864. Proposte di alcune rettificazione al profilo dei Discomiceti. Comm. Soc. critt. ital.1: 357–388.Google Scholar
  99. Dharne, C. G. 1965. Taxonomic investigations on the discomycetous genusLachnellula Karst. Phytopath. Zeit.53: 101–144.Google Scholar
  100. Dillenius. J. J. 1719. Catalogus plantarum sponte circa Gissam nascentium. Cum appendice… Francofurti ad Moenum.Google Scholar
  101. Dissing, H. 1964. Studies in artic and subartic Discomycetes I. The genusHelvella. Botan. Tidskr.60: 108–128.Google Scholar
  102. —. 1966a. The genusHelvella in Europe with special emphasis on the species found in Norden. Dansk Botan. Ark.25: 1–172.Google Scholar
  103. —. 1966b. A revision of collections of the genusHelvella L. ex St-Amans emend. Nannf. in the Boudier Herbarium. Rev. Mycol.31: 189–224.Google Scholar
  104. —, andM. Lange. 1967. Notes on the genusHelvella in North America. Mycologia59: 349–360.Google Scholar
  105. —, andJ. A. Nannfeldt. 1966.Helvella cupuliformis sp. nov.,H. villosa (Hedw. ex O. Kuntze) comb. nov.,H. macropus (Pers. ex Fr.) Karst., and their allies. Svensk Botan. Tidskr.60: 325–337.Google Scholar
  106. Dodge, B. O. 1912. Methods of culture and the morphology of the archicarp in certain species of the Ascobolaceae. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club39: 139–197.Google Scholar
  107. —. 1922. ALachnea with a botryose conidial stage. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club49: 301–305.Google Scholar
  108. —. 1936. Facultative and obligate heterothallism in Ascomycetes. Mycologia28: 399–409.Google Scholar
  109. —. 1937. The conidial stage ofPeziza pustulata. Mycologia29: 651–655.Google Scholar
  110. —, andF. J. Seaver. 1946. Species ofAscobolus for genetic study. Mycologia38: 639–651.Google Scholar
  111. Drayton, F. L. 1932. The sexual function of the microconidia in certain discomycetes. Mycologia24: 345–348.Google Scholar
  112. —. 1934. The sexual mechanism ofSclerotinia gladioli. Mycologia26: 46–72.Google Scholar
  113. —, andJ. W. Groves. 1943. A newSclerotinia causing a destructive disease of bulbs and legumes. Mycologia35: 517–528.Google Scholar
  114. ——. 1952.Stromatinia narcissi, a new sexually dimorphic discomycete. Mycologia44: 119–140.Google Scholar
  115. Duff, G. H. 1922. Development of the Geoglossaceae. Botan. Gaz.74: 264–291.Google Scholar
  116. Durand, E. J. 1900. The classification of the fleshy Pezizineae with reference to the structural characters illustrating the bases of their division into families. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club.27: 463–495.Google Scholar
  117. —. 1901. Studies in North American discomycetes. I. The genusHolwaya Sacc. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club28: 349–355.Google Scholar
  118. —. 1908. The Geoglossaceae of North America. Ann. Mycol.6: 387–477.Google Scholar
  119. —. 1921. New or noteworthy Geoglossaceae. Mycologia13: 184–187.Google Scholar
  120. Durand, F. 1968. Sur l’ontogénie du Discomycete operculéAntracobia nitida Boudier. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris267: 2316–2318.Google Scholar
  121. Eckblad, F.-E. 1957. Norges Sarcoscyphaceer. Blyttia15: 2–12.Google Scholar
  122. —. 1963. Contributions to the Geoglossaceae of Norway. Nytt. Mag. Bot.10: 137–158.Google Scholar
  123. —. 1968. The genera of the Operculate Discomycetes. A reevaluation of their taxonomy, phylogeny and nomenclature. Nytt. Mag. Bot.15: 1–191.Google Scholar
  124. Elliott, M. E. 1962.Streptotinia caulophylli sp. nov. produced in culture. Canad. J. Botany40: 1197–1201.Google Scholar
  125. —. 1964a.Sclerotinia artica n. sp. onCarex from Northern Canada. Canad. J. Botany42: 1065–1070.Google Scholar
  126. —. 1964b. Self fertility inBotryotinia pori. Canad. J. Botany42: 1393–1395.Google Scholar
  127. —. 1967.Rutstroemia cuniculi, a coprophilous species of the Sclerotiniaceae. Canad. J. Botany45: 521–524.Google Scholar
  128. Esser, K. 1967. Die Incompatibilität. Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie (W. Rhuland ed.) Vol.18.Google Scholar
  129. —, andR. Kuenen. 1965. Genetik der Pilze. 497 pp. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  130. Fergus, C. L. 1960. A note on the occurrence ofPeziza ostracoderma. Mycologia52: 959–961.Google Scholar
  131. Fink, B. 1915. The ascomycetes of Ohio. I. Ohio Biol. Sur. Bull. 5, Vol.II. 70 pp.Google Scholar
  132. Fischer, E. 1938. Tuberineae,In Engler, A. und K. Prantl., Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien II, 5b(8): 1–42.Google Scholar
  133. Fitzpatrick, H. M. 1918. Sexuality inRhizina undulata. Botan. Gaz.65: 201–226.Google Scholar
  134. —. 1920. Monograph of the Coryneliaceae. Mycologia12: 206–267.Google Scholar
  135. —. 1942. Revisionary studies in the Coryneliaceae. Mycologia34: 464–514.Google Scholar
  136. —, andR. P. Korf. 1959. Lectures on mycology, Ascomycetes. Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. (Mimeo).Google Scholar
  137. Fraser, H. C. I. 1907. On the sexuality and development of the ascocarp inLachnea stercorea. Ann. Botany21: 349–360.Google Scholar
  138. —. 1913. The development of the ascocarp inLachnea cretea. Ann. Botany27: 553–563.Google Scholar
  139. —, andS. W. S. Brooks. 1909. Further studies on the cytology of the ascus. Ann. Botany23: 537–549.Google Scholar
  140. —, andE. J. Welsford. 1908. Further contributions to the cytology of the ascomycetes. Ann. Botany22: 465–477.Google Scholar
  141. Fries, E. M. 1821. Systema mycologicum.I. Lundae.Google Scholar
  142. -. 1822. Systema mycologicum. 2. Lundae.Google Scholar
  143. -. 1849. Summa vegetabilium Scandinaviae. 259–572.Google Scholar
  144. Fuckel, L. 1869. Symbolae mycologicae, Beiträge zur Kenntniss der rheinischen Pilze. Jahrb. Nassauischen Ver. Naturk.23-24: 1–459.Google Scholar
  145. Funk, A. 1963. Studies in the genusCaliciopsis. Canad. J. Botany41: 503–543.Google Scholar
  146. Gamundi, I. J. 1956. El generoScutellinia en Argentina. Contr. cient. Fac. Co. exact. fis. nat. Univ. B. Aires (Bot.)1: 69–88.Google Scholar
  147. —. 1957. El generoCookeina en la Republica Argentina. Boln Soc. argent. Bot.6: 212–222.Google Scholar
  148. —. 1959. Addenda a las especies argentinas deCookeina Kuntze. Boln Soc. argent. Bot.7: 201–204.Google Scholar
  149. —. 1960. Discomycetes operculados de la Argentina, familias Pezizaceae y Humariaceae. Lilloa30: 257–338.Google Scholar
  150. —. 1964. “Discomycetes” operculados del Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi, Argentina. Darwiniana12: 568–606.Google Scholar
  151. —, andM. E. Ranalli. 1964. Estudio sistemàtico y biológico de las Ascoboláceas de Argentina. I. Nova Hedwigia7: 517–533.Google Scholar
  152. ——. 1966. Estudio sistemático y biológico de las Ascoboláceas de Argentina. II. Nova Hedwigia10: 337–366.Google Scholar
  153. Gäumann, E. A. 1926. Vergleichende Morphologie der Pilze. 626 pp. Jena.Google Scholar
  154. —. 1964. Die Pilze, Grundzüge ihrer Entwicklungsgeschichte und Morphologie. 541 pp. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel und Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  155. —, andC. W. Dodge. 1928. Comparative morphology of fungi.I-XIV: 1–701. New York.Google Scholar
  156. Gilkey, H. M. 1939. Tuberales of North America. Oregon State Monogr. (Stud. Botany)1: 1–63.Google Scholar
  157. —. 1954. Tuberales. No. Amer. Flora II,1: 1–29.Google Scholar
  158. Gordon, C. C. 1966. Ascocarp centrum ontogeny of species of Hypodermataceae of conifers. Amer. J. Botany53: 319–327.Google Scholar
  159. —. 1968. Ascocarpic centrum ontogeny of species of Hypodermataceae of conifers. II. Amer. J. Botany55: 45–52.Google Scholar
  160. Graddon, W. D. 1965. A guide to lignicolous species ofApostemidium. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.48: 639–646.Google Scholar
  161. Greis, H. 1940. Befruchtungsarten beiMorchella. Jahrb. Wissen. Botan.89: 245–253.Google Scholar
  162. Grelet, L. J. 1942. Les Discomycètes de France d’apres la Classification de Boudier. Rev. Mycol.7: 3–22.Google Scholar
  163. —. 1943. Ibid.8: 3–25.Google Scholar
  164. —. 1944. Ibid.9: 14–35, 78–99.Google Scholar
  165. —. 1945. Ibid.10: 96–116.Google Scholar
  166. —. 1946. Ibid.11: 89–106.Google Scholar
  167. —. 1947. Ibid.12: 24–36, 45–68.Google Scholar
  168. —. 1948. Ibid.13: 22–24, 105–134.Google Scholar
  169. —. 1949. Ibid.14: 26–57.Google Scholar
  170. —. 1950. Ibid.15: 29–58.Google Scholar
  171. —. 1951. Ibid.16: 11–26, 80–100.Google Scholar
  172. —. 1953. Ibid.18: 24–28, 200–220.Google Scholar
  173. —. 1954. Ibid.19: 138–166.Google Scholar
  174. —. 1956. Ibid.21: 14–39, 146–173.Google Scholar
  175. —. 1957. Ibid.22: 26–52, 166–182.Google Scholar
  176. —. 1959. Ibid.24: 81–92, 234–263.Google Scholar
  177. Gremmen, J. 1949. De imperfecte vorm vanDesmazierella acicola Lib. Fungus (Wagen.)19: 32–35.Google Scholar
  178. —. 1950. Het genusBelonioscypha sensu Rehm en de indentiteit vanB. ciliatospora (Fuckel) Rehm enHelotium scutula (Pers. ex Fr.) Karst. Fungus (Wagen.)20: 7–17.Google Scholar
  179. —. 1952. Het genusPyrenopeziza. Levenswijze en cultuur vanP. plataginis. Fungus (Wagen.)22: 22–24.Google Scholar
  180. —. 1954. Taxonomical notes on Mollisiaceous fungi. I. A study on some Dutch species growing onRubus stems. Fungus (Wagen.)24: 1–4.Google Scholar
  181. —. 1955. Taxonomical notes on Mollisiaceous fungi.II. Some caulicolousMollisia species inhabiting various hosts, mainly Compositae. Fungus (Wagen.)25: 1–12.Google Scholar
  182. —. 1956a. Taxonomical notes on Mollisiaceous fungi.III. The polyphagous speciesMollisia pastinaceae Nannfeldt. Fungus (Wagen.)26: 28–31.Google Scholar
  183. —. 1956b. Taxonomical notes on Mollisiaceous fungi.IV. Species inhabiting prevous year’s stems ofEpilobium andUlmaria. Fungus (Wagen.)26: 32–37.Google Scholar
  184. —. 1957. Taxonomical notes on Mollisiaceous fungi. V. On some species described by Velenovsky. Fungus (Wagen.)27: 30–33.Google Scholar
  185. —. 1958. Taxonomical notes on Mollisiaceous fungi.VI. The genusPyrenopeziza Fuckel. Fungus (Wagen.)28: 37–46.Google Scholar
  186. —. 1963. Preliminary notes onGodronia and association with conidial fungi. Nova Hedwigia6: 15–20.Google Scholar
  187. Griffiths, E. 1959. The cytology ofGloeotinia temulenta (blind seed disease of Ryegrass). Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.42: 132–148.Google Scholar
  188. Groves, J. W. 1939. SomePezicula species and their conidial stages. Canad. J. Res.17: 125–143.Google Scholar
  189. —. 1940. SomeDermatea species and their conidial stages. Mycologia32: 736–751.Google Scholar
  190. —. 1946. North American species ofDermea. Mycologia38: 351–431.Google Scholar
  191. —. 1952. The genusTympanis. Canad. J. Botany30: 571–651.Google Scholar
  192. —. 1954. The genusDurandiella. Canad. J. Botany32: 116–144.Google Scholar
  193. —. 1965. The genusGodronia. Canad. J. Botany43: 1195–1276.Google Scholar
  194. —. 1967. The genusPragmopara. Canad. J. Botany45: 169–181.Google Scholar
  195. —, andC. A. Bowerman. 1955. The species ofCiborinia onPopulus. Canad. J. Botany33: 577–590.Google Scholar
  196. —, andF. L. Drayton. 1939. The perfect stage ofBotrytis cinerea. Mycologia31: 485–489.Google Scholar
  197. —, andM. E. Elliott. 1961. Self-fertility in the Sclerotiniaceae. Canad. J. Botany39: 215–231.Google Scholar
  198. —, andS. C. Hoare. 1953. The Helvellaceae of the Ottawa district. Canad. Fld. Nat.67: 95–102.Google Scholar
  199. —, andC. A. Loveland. 1953. The connection betweenBotryotinia fuckeliana andBotrytis cinerea. Mycologia45: 415–425.Google Scholar
  200. —, andD. E. Wells. 1956. The genusRetinocyclus. Mycologia48: 865–871.Google Scholar
  201. —, andD. E. Wilson. 1967. The nomenclatural status ofCoryne. Taxon16: 35–41.Google Scholar
  202. Grund, D. W., andK. A. Harrison. 1967. Nova Scotian fungi. Geoglossaceae. Canad. J. Botany45: 1625–1641.Google Scholar
  203. Gwynne-Vaughan, H. C. I. 1922. Fungi. 232 pp. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  204. —, andH. S. Williamson. 1931. Contributions to the study ofPyronema confluens. Ann. Botany45: 355–371.Google Scholar
  205. ——. 1932. The cytology and development ofAscobolus magnificus. Ann. Botany46: 653–670.Google Scholar
  206. Hahn, G. G., andT. T. Ayers. 1934. Dasyscyphae on conifers in North America.III.Dasyscypha pini. Mycologia26: 479–501.Google Scholar
  207. Hakelier, N. 1964. Bidrag till Sveriges Svampflora II. Geoglossaceer. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.58: 337–343.Google Scholar
  208. Hanlin, R. T. 1965.Lamprospora planchonis from Georgia. Mycologia57: 131–134.Google Scholar
  209. Harper, R. A. 1900. Sexual reproduction inPyronema confluens and the morphology of the Ascocarp. Ann. Botany14: 321–400.Google Scholar
  210. Heald, F. D., andF. A. Wolf. 1910. The structure and relationship ofUrnula geaster. Botan. Gaz.49: 182–188.Google Scholar
  211. Heim, R. 1966. Quelques ascomycetes remarquables. V. Morilles tropicales (Pacifique sud.). Bull. Trimest. Soc. Mycol. Fr.82: 442–449.Google Scholar
  212. Hennings, P. 1900. Fungi. MonsuniaI: 1–38.Google Scholar
  213. Higgins, B. B. 1914. Contribution to the life history and physiology ofCylindrosporium on stone fruits. Amer. J. Botany1: 145–173.Google Scholar
  214. Hirsch, H. E. 1950. No brachymeiosis inPyronema confluens. Mycologia42: 301–305.Google Scholar
  215. Höhnel, F. von. 1903. Mycologische Fragmente. Ann. Mycol.1: 396–399.Google Scholar
  216. -. 1907. Fragmente zur Mykologie. Sitzb. k. ak. Wissen. Wein.116: 135 pp.Google Scholar
  217. —. 1909. Fragmente zur Mykologie. Sitzb. k. ak. Wissen. Wein.118: 275–352.Google Scholar
  218. —. 1917a. Mycologische Fragmente, CXX-CXC. Ann. Mycol.15: 292–383.Google Scholar
  219. —. 1917b. System der Phacidiales. Ber. Deutsch. Botan. Ges.35: 416–422.Google Scholar
  220. —. 1918. Fragmente zur Mykologie. Sitzb. k. ak. Wissen. Wein, Math.-nat.K1. I.127: 549–634.Google Scholar
  221. —. 1920. UberPseudopeziza, Pyrenopeziza, Ephelina, undSpilopodia. Ber. Deutsch. Botan. Ges.38: 96–101.Google Scholar
  222. Honey, E. E. 1928. The monilioid species ofSclerotinia. Mycologia20: 127–157.Google Scholar
  223. Howarth, W. O., andH. G. Chippindale. 1931. Notes on the biology ofCoryne sarcoides Jacq. andC. urnalis Nyl. Mem. Proc. Manchester Lit. Phil. Soc.75: 47–60.Google Scholar
  224. Hughes, S. J. 1951. Studies on microfungi. IX.Calcarisporium, Verticicladium andHansfordia. C. M. I. Mycol. Pap.43: 1–25.Google Scholar
  225. Hotter, R. 1958. Untersuchungen über die GattungPyrenopeziza Fuckl. Phytopath. Zeit.33: 1–54.Google Scholar
  226. Imai, S. 1940. The Geoglossaceae of Norway. Ann. Mycol.38: 268–278.Google Scholar
  227. —. 1941. Geoglossaceae Japoniae. J. Fac. Agr. Hokkaido Imp. Univ.45: 155–264.Google Scholar
  228. —. 1954. Evellaceae Japoniae. Sci. Rep. Yokohama Nat. Univ.2: 1–35.Google Scholar
  229. —. 1956. Contributions ad studia monographica Geoglossacearum.II. III. Sci. Rep. Yokohama Univ.1955: 1–11,1956: 1–8.Google Scholar
  230. Ito, S., andS. Imai. 1937. Fungi of the Bonin Islands.II. Trans. Sapporo Nat. Hist. Soc.15: 52–59.Google Scholar
  231. Jones, S. G. 1935. The structure ofLophodermium pinastri (Schrader ex Fr.) Chev. Ann. Botany40: 699–728.Google Scholar
  232. Kanouse, B. B. 1949. Studies in the genusOtidea. Mycologia41: 660–677.Google Scholar
  233. Karsten, P. A. 1869. Monographia Pezizarum fennicarum. Notis. Sallsk. Fauna. Fl. fenn Forh.10: 99–206.Google Scholar
  234. -. 1871. Mycologia fennica. I. Discomycetes. 263 pp. Helsingfors.Google Scholar
  235. Kihlman, O. 1883. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Ascomyceten. Acta. Soc. Sci. Fenn.13: 5–43.Google Scholar
  236. Killian, K. 1918. Morphologie, Biologia, und Entwickelungsgeschichte vonCryptomyces pteridis (Rebent.) Rehm. Zeit. Bot.10: 49–126.Google Scholar
  237. Killian, C., andV. Likhite. 1924. Observations sur le genreLophodermium. C. R. Hebdomad. Soc. Biol.2: 574–576.Google Scholar
  238. Kimbrough, J. W. 1966a. The structure and development ofTrichobolus zukalii. Mycologia58: 289–306.Google Scholar
  239. —. 1966b. Studies in the Pseudoascoboleae. Canad. J. Botany44: 685–704.Google Scholar
  240. —. 1969a. North American species ofThecotheus (Pezizeae, Pezizaceae). Mycologia61: 99–114.Google Scholar
  241. —, andR. P. Korf. 1967. A synopsis of the genera and species of the tribeTheleboleae (= Pseudoascoboleae). Amer. J. Botany54: 9–23.Google Scholar
  242. —,E. R. Luck-Allen, andR. F. Cain. 1969b.Iodophanus, the Pezizeae segregate of “Ascophanus” (Pezizaceae). Amer. J. Botany56: 1187–1202.Google Scholar
  243. Knapp, A. 1950. Die europaischen Hypogaeen-Gattungen und ihre Gattungenstypen. Schweiz. Z. Pilzk.28: 101–118.Google Scholar
  244. Kniep, H. 1928. Die Sexualitat der niederen Pflanzen, Differenzierung, Verteilung, Bestimmung und Vererbung des Geschlechts bei den Thallophyten. 544 pp. Jena.Google Scholar
  245. Kobayashi, T. 1965. Taxonomic notes on Chloroscyphae causing needle blight on Japanese conifers. Bull. Gov’t For. Exp. Sta. Mergura176: 55–74.Google Scholar
  246. Kobayasi, Y., N. Hiratsuka, R. P. Korf, K. Tubaki, K. Aoshima, M. Soneda, andJ. Sugiyama. 1967. Mycological studies on the Alaskan Arctic. Ann. Rep. Inst. Ferment., Osaka.3: 1–138.Google Scholar
  247. Korf, R. P. 1951. A monograph of the Arachnopezizeae. Lloydia14: 129–180.Google Scholar
  248. —. 1953. The new rules of typification as they affectSarcoscypha andVelutaria. Mycologia45: 296–301.Google Scholar
  249. —. 1954. A revision of the classification of operculate Discomycetes (Pezizales). VIII Congr. Int. Bot., Rapp. & Comm.18-20: 80.Google Scholar
  250. —. 1956.Daleomyces, Durandiomyces and other sparassoid forms of operculate Discomycetes. Mycologia48: 711–718.Google Scholar
  251. —. 1957a. Nomenclatural notes. II. OnBulgaria, Phaeobulgaria andSarcosoma. Mycologia49: 102–106.Google Scholar
  252. —. 1957b. Two bulgarioid genera:Galiella andPlectania. Mycologia49: 107–111.Google Scholar
  253. —. 1958. Japanese Discomycete notesI-VIII. Sci. Rep. Yokohama Nat. Univ.II, 7: 7–35.Google Scholar
  254. —. 1959. Japanese Discomycete NoteIX-XVI. Bull. Nat. Sci. Mus., Tokoyo.45: 389–400.Google Scholar
  255. —. 1960a. Nomenclatural notes.IV. The generic namePlicaria. Mycologia52: 648–651.Google Scholar
  256. —. 1960b.Jafnea, a new genus of the Pezizaceae. Nagaoa7: 3–8.Google Scholar
  257. —. 1962a. A synopsis of the Hemiphacidiaceae, a family of the Helotiales (Discomycetes) causing needle-blights of conifers. Mycologia54: 12–33.Google Scholar
  258. —. 1962b. A rare North American discomycete, together with some comments on the genusLachnellula. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan3: 47–50.Google Scholar
  259. —. 1963a. Discomycete Flora of Asia, Precursor I: The Scope and Status of Exploration. Lloydia26: 16–20.Google Scholar
  260. —. 1969. On four major discomycete works published in 1968. Mycologia61: 442–446.Google Scholar
  261. —, andJ. K. Rogers. 1967. A new term, the Schizotype, and the concept of implicit typification. Taxon16: 19–23.Google Scholar
  262. Kupfer, E. M. 1902. Studies onUrnula andGeopyxis. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club.29: 137–144.Google Scholar
  263. Langeron, M. 1952. Précis de mycologie, mycologie générale, mycologie humaine et animale, techniques. 2nd Ed. by R. Vanbreuseghem. 703 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
  264. Le Gal, M. 1942. Mode de formation des ornamentations sporales chez quelques Discomycètes operculés. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris.214: 125–128.Google Scholar
  265. —. 1946a. Mode déhiscence de asques chez lesCookeina et lesLeotia et ses conséquences du point de vue phylogenetique. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris.222: 755–757.Google Scholar
  266. —. 1946b. Les Discomycètes suboperculés. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France.62: 218–240.Google Scholar
  267. —. 1947. Recherches sur les Ornamentations sporales des Discomycètes operculés. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. ser.11: 73–297.Google Scholar
  268. —. 1949. Deux Discomycètes mal connu:Ascodesmis nigricans van Tieghem etAscodesmis microscopica (Crouan) Le Gal, non Seaver. Rev. Mycol.14: 85–99.Google Scholar
  269. -. 1953a. Les Discomycètes de Madagascar. 465 pp. Paris.Google Scholar
  270. —. 1953b. Les Discomycètes de l’herbier Crouan. Rev. Mycol.18: 73–132.Google Scholar
  271. —. 1957. Le genreLeucoscypha Boud. Bull. Jar. Bot. Bruxelles.27: 720–728.Google Scholar
  272. —. 1958. Le genreMelastiza Boudier. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France.74: 149–154.Google Scholar
  273. —. 1959. Discomycètes du Congo Belge d’après les récoltes de madame Goossens-Fontana. Bull. Jard. Botan. de l’Etat.29: 73–132.Google Scholar
  274. —. 1961. Les Discomycètes de l’herbier Crouan. Deuxième sćrie. Ann. Sci. Nat. (Bot.)XII.1: 441–467.Google Scholar
  275. —. 1962. Combinaisons nouvelles concernant les genresGalactinia (Cooke) Boud. emend. Le Gal,Scutellinia (Cooke) Lamb, emend Le Gal etSarcosoma Casp. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France78: 204–216.Google Scholar
  276. —. 1963. Valeur taxonomique particulière de certains caractères chez les Discomycètes supérieurs. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France79: 456–470.Google Scholar
  277. —. 1964. Combinaisons nouvelles concernant le genreScutellinia (Cooke) Lamb. emend. Le Gal. Bull. Trimest. Soc. Mycol. France80: 123–124.Google Scholar
  278. —. 1966. Contribution à la connaissance du genreScutellinia (Cooke) Lamb. emend Le Gal. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France82: 310–334.Google Scholar
  279. —, andF. Magenot. 1956. Contributions à l’étude des Mollisioidées. 1. Note preliminaire; les formes conidiennes. Rev. Mycol. Paris21: 3–13.Google Scholar
  280. ——. 1958. Contribution à l’étude Mollisioidées.II Rev. Mycol. Paris23: 28–86.Google Scholar
  281. ——. 1960. Contribution à l’étude des Mollisioidées.III. Rev. Mycol. Paris25: 135–314.Google Scholar
  282. ——. 1961. Contribution à l’étude des Mollisioidées.IV. Rev. Mycol. Paris26: 263–331.Google Scholar
  283. ——. 1966. Contribution à l’étude des Mollisioidées.V. Rev. Mycol. Paris31: 3–44.Google Scholar
  284. Lindau, G. 1897. Pezizineae, Phacidiineae, Hysteriineae. In Engler & Prantl’s Naturl. Pfl-Fam.1(1): 177–272.Google Scholar
  285. Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum. 1200 pp. Holmiae.Google Scholar
  286. Lohwag, H. 1927. Das Oogon als Wesensbestandteil der Geschlechtsorgame im Pilzreich. Biol. Gen.3: 699–772.Google Scholar
  287. Luttrell, E. S. 1951. Taxonomy of the Pyrenomycetes. Univ. Mo. Stud.24: 1–120.Google Scholar
  288. —. 1955. The ascostromatic ascomycetes. Mycologia47: 511–532.Google Scholar
  289. Maas Geesteranus, R. A. 1955. Notes on Dutch fungi. Fungus25: 44–52.Google Scholar
  290. —. 1965. Geoglossaceae of India and adjacent countries. Persoonia4: 19–46.Google Scholar
  291. —. 1967. Studies in cup-fungi. I. Persoonia4: 417–425.Google Scholar
  292. Mains, E. B. 1954. North American species ofGeoglossum andTrichoglossum. Mycologia46: 586–631.Google Scholar
  293. —. 1955. North American hyaline-spored species of Geoglosseae. Mycologia47: 846–877.Google Scholar
  294. —. 1956a. The relationship ofCudoniella andHelotium. Mycologia48: 410–419.Google Scholar
  295. —. 1956b. North American species of the Geoglossaceae. Tribe Cudonieae. Mycologia48: 694–710.Google Scholar
  296. Malençon, G. 1938. Les truffes Europeennes. Rev. Mycol., Mem. Hors-ser.1: 1–92.Google Scholar
  297. Massee, G. E. 1895. British fungus-flora.4: 1–522. London.Google Scholar
  298. McCubbin, W. A. 1910. Development of the Helvellineae I.Helvella elastica. Botan. Gaz.49: 195–206.Google Scholar
  299. McIntosh, D. L. 1954. A cytological study of ascus development inPyronema confluens Tul. Canad. J. Botany32: 440–446.Google Scholar
  300. Moore, E. J. 1963. The ontogeny of the apothecia inPyronema domesticum. Amer. J. Botany50: 37–44.Google Scholar
  301. —. 1965. Ontogeny of gelatinous fungi. Mycologia57: 114–130.Google Scholar
  302. —, andR. P. Korf. 1963. The genusPyronema. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club90: 33–42.Google Scholar
  303. Moravec, J. 1968. Piīspěvek k poznáni operkulátnich discomycetu roduCheilymenia Boud. Česká Mykol.22: 32–41.Google Scholar
  304. Moreau, F., andMme. Moreau. 1930. Le développement du périthèce chez quelques Ascomycètes. Rev. Gén. Bot.42: 65–98.Google Scholar
  305. Moser, M. 1951. Beiträg zur Anatomie der Discomyceten. Das Morchellaproblem. Sydowia5: 56–119.Google Scholar
  306. —. 1963. Ascomyceten. In H. Gams, Kleine Kryptogamenflora 2a,147 pp. Gustav Fischer Verlag. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  307. Munk, A. 1957. Danish Pyrenomycetes. A preliminary flora. Dansk Botan. Ark.17(1): 1–491.Google Scholar
  308. Nannfeldt, J. A. 1932. Studien über die Morphologie und Systematik der nichtlichenisierten inoperculaten Discomyceten. Nov. Act. Reg. Soc. Sci. Uppsala. ser. 4,8: 1–368.Google Scholar
  309. —. 1937. Contributions to the mycoflora of Sweden. 4. On some species ofHelvella, together with a discussion of the natural affinities within Helvellaceae Pezizaceae trib. Acetabuleae. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.31: 47–66.Google Scholar
  310. —. 1942. The Geoglossaceae of Sweden. Arkiv för Botany30A: 1–67.Google Scholar
  311. —. 1949. Contributions to the Mycoflora of Sweden.7. A new winter Discomycete,Urnula hiemalis Nannf. n. sp., and a short account of the Swedish species of Sarcoscyphaceae. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.43: 468–484.Google Scholar
  312. Naumov, N. A. 1964. Flora gribov Leningradskoi oblasti. Vypusk II. Diskcomitsety. 258 pp. Izdatel’stvo Nauka. Moscow & Leningrad.Google Scholar
  313. Nylander, W. 1869. Observationes circa Pezizas Fenniae. Not. Fauna Fl. Fenn.10: 1–97.Google Scholar
  314. Oberwinkler, F., F. Dasacrade, andE. Müller. 1967. ÜberAscocorticium anomalum (Ell. et. Harkn.) Earle. Nova Hedwigia14: 283–289.Google Scholar
  315. Obrist, W. 1961. The genusAscodesmis. Canad. J. Botany39: 943–953.Google Scholar
  316. Olive, L. S. 1950. A cytological study of ascus development inPatella melaloma. Amer. J. Botany37: 757–763.Google Scholar
  317. —. 1954. Sexuality of the Ascomycetes. Rapp. Comm.VIII Congr. Int. Bot., Paris.18-20: 67–71.Google Scholar
  318. Otani, Y. 1967. Note on some cup fungi of the Hyaloscyphaceae collected in Hokkaido, Japan. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan8: 33–42.Google Scholar
  319. Ouellette, G. B., andL. P. Magasi. 1966.Lophomerum a new genus of Hypodermataceae. Mycologia58: 275–280.Google Scholar
  320. Overton, J. B. 1906. The morphology of the ascocarp and spore formation in the many-spored asci ofThecotheus pelletieri. Botan. Gaz.42: 451–492.Google Scholar
  321. Paden, J. W. 1967. The conidial stage ofPeziza brunneoatra. Mycologia59: 932–934.Google Scholar
  322. —, andE. E. Tylutki. 1968. Idaho Discomycetes. I. A new genus of the Sarcoscyphaceae. Mycologia60: 1160–1168.Google Scholar
  323. ——. 1969. Idaho Discomycetes. II. Mycologia61: 683–693.Google Scholar
  324. Palm, B. T. 1932. OnCyttaria Berk, andCyttariella gen. nov. Ann. Mycol. Berl.30: 405–420.Google Scholar
  325. Persoon, C. H. 1801. Synopsis methodica Fungorum. 706 pp. Gottingae.Google Scholar
  326. Peter, J. 1962.Aleuria varia (Hedw.) Boudier, Syn.Peziza varia (Hedw.) Fr.,Plicaria varia Hedw. undPlicaria stevensoma Ellis. Zeit. Pilzk.40: 84–85.Google Scholar
  327. Petrak, F. 1962. Uber die GattungGremmenia Korf. Sydowia16: 350–352.Google Scholar
  328. Phillips, W. 1887. A manual of the British Discomycetes. 1–462. London. Pliny (C. Plinius Secundus). A.D. 22. Historia Naturalis. 37 vols.Google Scholar
  329. Quelet, L. 1886. Enchiridion fungorum in Europa media et praesertim in Gallia vigentium. 352 pp. Lutetiae.Google Scholar
  330. Rahm, E. 1966. Geoglossaceae in Hochtal von Arosa. Schwiez. Z. Pilck.44: 165–179.Google Scholar
  331. Raitviir, A. 1961. A survey of the distribution of the species of Geoglossaceae in Estonia. Flor. Mark.1: 137–145.Google Scholar
  332. Ramamurthi, C. S., R. P. Korf, andL. R. Batra. 1958. A revision of the North American species ofChlorociboria (Sclerotiniaceae). Mycologia49: 854–863.Google Scholar
  333. Ramlow, G. 1906. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte vonThelebolus stercoreus Tode. Botan. Zeit.64: 85–97.Google Scholar
  334. —. 1915. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Ascoboleen. Mycol. Centralblatt5: 177–198.Google Scholar
  335. Ramsbottom, J., andF. L. Balfour-Browne. 1951. List of Discomycetes recorded from the British Isles. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.34: 38–137.Google Scholar
  336. Rawlings, G. B. 1956. Australasian Cyttariaceae. Trans. Royal Soc. N. Z.84: 19–28.Google Scholar
  337. Reeves, F. 1967. The fine structure of ascospore formation inPyronema domesticum. Mycologia59: 1018–1033.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  338. Rehm, H. 1887-1896. Die Pilze Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz. III. Abtheilung: Ascomyceten: Hysteriaceen und Discomyceten. In Rab. Krypt-Fl.1(3): 1–1272.Google Scholar
  339. —. 1912. Zur Kenntnis der Discomyceten Deutschlands, Deutsch-Osterreichs und der Schwiez. I. Ber. Bayerinschen Botan. Ges.13: 102–206.Google Scholar
  340. Reid, J., andR. F. Cain. 1961. The genusTherrya. Canad. J. Botany39: 1117–1129.Google Scholar
  341. ——. 1962a. Studies on the organisms associated with “snow blight” of conifers in North America. I. A new genus of the Helotiales. Mycologia54: 194–200.Google Scholar
  342. ——. 1962b. Studies on the organisms associated with “snow blight” of conifers in North America. Some species of the generaPhacidium, Lophophacidium, Sarcotrichila, andHemiphacidium. Mycologia54: 481–497.Google Scholar
  343. ——. 1963. A new genus of the Hemiphacidiaceae. Mycologia55: 781–785.Google Scholar
  344. —, andA. Funk. 1966. The genusAtropellis and a new genus of the Helotiales associated with branch cankers of Western Hemlock. Mycologia58: 417–439.Google Scholar
  345. —, andK. A. Pirozynski. 1966. Notes on some interesting North American fungi. Canad. J. Botany44: 645–653.Google Scholar
  346. ——. 1968. Critical notes on genera of the Hemiphacidiaceae. I.Gremmenia. Mycologia60: 526–531.Google Scholar
  347. Rifai, M. A. 1968. The Australasian Pezizales in the Herbarium of the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Verh. K. ned. Akad. Wet.II.57: 1–295.Google Scholar
  348. Rimpau, R. H. 1962. Untersuchungen uber die GattungDrepanopeziza (Kleb.) v Höhn. Phytopath. Zeit.43: 257–306.Google Scholar
  349. Rosinski, M. H. 1953. Two types of spore germination inSarcoscypha coccinea (Scop. ex Fr.) Lambotte. Mycologia45: 302–305.Google Scholar
  350. —. 1956. Development of the ascocarp ofAnthracobia melaloma. Mycologia48: 506–533.Google Scholar
  351. Saggardo, P. A. 1884. Conspectus generum Discomycetum hucusque cognitorum. Bot. Cbl.18: 213–220, 247–256.Google Scholar
  352. —. 1889–1931. Sylloge fungorum omnium hucusque cognitorum.8: 1–1143;24: 705–1438.Google Scholar
  353. Sánchez, A. 1967. The sectionsApostemium andMicrostemium of the genusVibrissea (Fungi). J. Agr. Univ. Puerto Rico51: 79–93.Google Scholar
  354. —, andR. P. Korf. 1966. The genusVibrissea and the generic namesLeptosporium, Apostemium, Apostemidium, Gorgoniceps andOphiogloea. Mycologia48: 722–737.Google Scholar
  355. Santesson, R. 1945.Cyttaria, a genus of inoperculate Discomycetes. Svensk Botan. Tidsk.39: 319–345.Google Scholar
  356. Satina, S. 1921. Kistorii razvitiiaPhacidium repandum. Zhyrn. Russk. Botan. Obshchestva.4: 77–94.Google Scholar
  357. Schroeter, J. 1893. Die Pilze Schlesiens. In Cohn’s Krypt.-Fl. Sch1.3(2): 1–256.Google Scholar
  358. -. 1897. Pezizineae,In Engler, A. und K. Prantl, Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien,I,1: 173–243.Google Scholar
  359. Schüepp, H. 1959. Untersuchungen uber Pseudopezizoideae sensu Nannfeldt. Phytopath. Zeit.36: 213–269.Google Scholar
  360. Schultz, E. S. 1927. Nuclear division and spore formation in the ascus ofPeziza domiciliana. Amer. J. Botany 14: 307–322.Google Scholar
  361. Seaver, F. J. 1928. The North American Cup-fungi (Operculates). 284 pp. New York.Google Scholar
  362. -. 1951. The North American Cup-fungi (Inoperculates). 428 pp. New York.Google Scholar
  363. Šebek, S. 1966. Klič k určeni smrzovitych hub (Morchellaceae) rostoucich v CSSR. C. C. H.43: 19–24.Google Scholar
  364. Starbäck, K. 1895. Discomyceten-Studien. Bihang Kongl. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl.III, 21(5): 1–42.Google Scholar
  365. Svrček, M. 1954. Revise Velenovského druhu rudoOrbilia (Discomycetes). Sborn. Přír. Národ. Mus. 10: 1–23.Google Scholar
  366. —, andJ. Kubička. 1961. Operkulátni diskomycety od rybníka Dvořiště v jizních Cechach. Česká Mykol.15: 61–77.Google Scholar
  367. ——. 1963. Druhý přispěvek k operkulátnim diskomycetúm z ololi rybníka Dvořiště v jizních Cechach. Česká Mykol.17: 61–70.Google Scholar
  368. Swingle, D. B. 1934. Fertilization inAscodesmis nigricans van Tieghem. Amer. J. Botany21: 519–545.Google Scholar
  369. Tehon, L. R. 1935. A monographic rearrangement ofLophodermium.I11. Biol. Monogr.13: 1–151.Google Scholar
  370. Terrier, C. A. 1942. Essai sur la systématique des Phacidiaceae (Fr.) sensu Nannfeldt (1932). Beitr. Krypt.fl. Schweiz9: 1–99.Google Scholar
  371. Thind, K. S., andL. R. Batra. 1957a. The Pezizaceae of the Mussoorie Hills. I. J. Indian Bot. Soc.36: 51–60.Google Scholar
  372. ——. 1957b. The Pezizaceae of the Mussoorie Hills.IV. J. Indian Bot. Soc.36: 428–438.Google Scholar
  373. —,E. K. Cash, andJ. S. Sethi. 1958. The Pezizaceae of the Mussoorie Hills. V. Mycologia49: 831–836.Google Scholar
  374. ——, andP. Singh. 1959. The Helotiales of the Mussoorie Hills.II. Mycologia51: 833–839.Google Scholar
  375. —, andS. S. Saini. 1967. The Helotiales of India. VI. Mycologia59: 467–474.Google Scholar
  376. —. andJ. S. Sethi. 1957a. The Pezizaceae of the Mussoorie Hills.II. J. Indian Bot. Soc.36: 192–206.Google Scholar
  377. ——. 1957b. The Pezizaceae of the Mussoorie Hills.III. Indian Phytopath.10: 26–27.Google Scholar
  378. —, andHarnek Singh. 1964. The Helotiales of India.III. J. Indian Bot. Soc.43: 530–542.Google Scholar
  379. ——. 1965. The Helotiales of India.IV. J. Indian Bot. Soc.44: 122–132.Google Scholar
  380. —, andP. Singh. 1958. The Pezizaceae of the Mussoorie Hills.VI. J. Indian Bot. Soc.38: 221–232.Google Scholar
  381. ——. 1961. The Helotiales of Mussoorie Hills. I. J. Indian Bot. Soc.40: 295–307.Google Scholar
  382. —, andK. S. Waraitch. 1964. The Pezizales of India.VIII. J. Indian Bot. Soc.43: 459–475.Google Scholar
  383. ——. 1966. The Pezizales of India.IX. J. Indian Bot. Soc.45: 384–391.Google Scholar
  384. Thompson, G. E. 1939. A canker disease of poplars caused by a new species ofNeofabrae. Mycologia31: 455–465.Google Scholar
  385. Tulasne, L. R., andC. Tulasne. 1865. Selecta fungorum carpologia. The Imperial Press, Paris.3: 1–206.Google Scholar
  386. ——. 1866. Note sur les phénomènes de copulation que présentent quelques champignons. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., V.6: 211–220.Google Scholar
  387. Van Tieghem, P. 1876. Sur de développement du fruit desAscodesmis, genre nouve de l’ordre des Ascomycètes. Bull. Soc. Botan. France23: 271–279.Google Scholar
  388. Voorhees, R. K. 1939. The validity and morphology ofTryblidiella species. Mycologia31: 113–123.Google Scholar
  389. Webster, J., M. A. Rifai, andSamy Sl-Abyad. 1964. Culture observations on some Discomycetes from burnt ground. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.47: 445–454.Google Scholar
  390. Wehmeyer, L. E. 1966. Development of the ascocarp inCryptomycina pteridis. Mycologia58: 752–760.Google Scholar
  391. Weiss, F. 1940.Ovulinia, a new generic segregate fromSclerotinia. Phytopathology30: 236–244.Google Scholar
  392. Whetzel, H. H. 1926. North American species ofSclerotinia. I. Mycologia18: 224–235.Google Scholar
  393. —. 1928. North American species ofSclerotinia.II. Two species onCarex, S. duriaeana (Tul.) Rehm, andS. longisclerotialis n. sp. Mycologia21: 5–32.Google Scholar
  394. —. 1937.Septotinia, a new genus of the Ciborioideae. Mycologia29: 128–146.Google Scholar
  395. —. 1942. A new genus and new species of brown-spored inoperculate Discomycetes from Panama. Mycologia34: 584–591.Google Scholar
  396. —. 1943. A monograph ofLambertella, a genus of brown-spored inoperculate discomycetes. Lloydia6: 18–52.Google Scholar
  397. —. 1944. A new genus of the Sclerotiniaceae. Farlowia1: 483–488.Google Scholar
  398. —. 1945. A synopsis of the genera and species of the Sclerotiniaceae, a family of stromatic inoperculate Discomycetes. Mycologia37: 648–714.Google Scholar
  399. —. 1946. The cypericolous and juncicolous species ofSclerotinia. Farlowia3: 385–437.Google Scholar
  400. White, N. H. 1954. The development of the ascocarp ofCyttaria gunnii Berk. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.37: 431–436.Google Scholar
  401. White, W. L. 1941. A monograph of the genusRutstroemia (Discomycetes). Lloydia4: 153–240.Google Scholar
  402. —. 1942a. Studies in the genusHelotium.I. A review of the species described by Peck. Mycologia34: 154–179.Google Scholar
  403. —. 1942b. Studies in the genusHelotium.II.Lachnum pygmaeum and the status of the genusHelolachnum. Amer. Mid. Nat.28: 512–523.Google Scholar
  404. —. 1943. Studies in the genusHelotium. III. History and diagnosis of certain European and North American foliicolous species. Farlowia1: 135–170.Google Scholar
  405. —. 1944. Studies in the genusHelotium.IV. Some miscellaneous species. Farlowia1: 599–617.Google Scholar
  406. —, andH. H. Whetzel. 1938. Pleomorphic life cycle in a new genus of the Helotiaceae. Mycologia30: 187–203.Google Scholar
  407. Whitehouse, H. L. K. 1949. Heterothallism and sex in the fungi. Biol. Rev.24: 411–447.Google Scholar
  408. Whitney, H. S., andJ. R. Parmeter. 1964. The perfect stage ofRhizoctonia hiemalis. Mycologia56: 114–118.Google Scholar
  409. Wojewoda, W. 1966. Morchellaceae zebrane w poludniowej Polsce w latach 1962–1965. Fragm. flor. geobot.12: 205–208.Google Scholar
  410. Wolf, F. A. 1958. The conidial stage ofLamprospora trachycarpa (Currey) Seaver. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.74: 163–166.Google Scholar
  411. —. 1959. Mechanism of apothecial opening and ascospore expulsion by the cup-fungusUrnula craterium. Mycologia50: 837–843.Google Scholar
  412. —. 1963. The disc fungusSphaerospora hinnulea (Berk. & Br.) Massee and its conidial stage. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.79: 156–159.Google Scholar
  413. -, andF. T. Wolf. 1947. The Fungi. Vol.I, 437 pp., Vol.II, 538 pp. John Wiley and Sons. New York.Google Scholar
  414. Zukal, H. 1886. Mycologische Untersuchungen. Denkschr. k. ak. Wissen. Wien51: 21–36.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The New York Botanical Garden 1970

Authors and Affiliations

  • James W. Kimbrough
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of FloridaGainesville

Personalised recommendations