Economic Botany

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 344–351 | Cite as

Analysis of an archaeological maize kernel cache from Manabi Province, Ecuador

  • Deborah M. Pearsall


A randomly selected sample of 100 kernels from a cache of 644 recovered in a vessel of the Chorrera period was studied to determine what race or races were present. Because 644 kernels could represent 2–3 average-sized ears of Indian maize, more than one type could have been present. Difficulties inherent in analyzing carbonized grain made precise identification to race difficult, but the general shape of the kernels, expressed in width/length and width/thickness ratios, indicates a relationship to a group of races with low row numbers and kernels which are narrow (W/T about 2.0) and very broad (W/L about 1.0). Ecuadorian races such as Morochon, Kcello Ecuatoriano, and Cuzco fit this general configration, but have much larger kernels than the archaeological maize. The cob and ear radii calculated from the archaeological kernels are similar to races such as Andaqui and Kcello (Table 2). These 2 characters are probably the least reliable of the 6 measurements made on the kernels, and have therefore not been emphasized in this study. The race Andaqui of Colombia has grain close to the size of the archaeological maize, but no existing race fits the archaeological maize precisely. The Chorrera maize seems to fall into the same developmental line, or lineage, as the term has been defined by Manglesdorf (1974), as the kernel embedded in the Valdivia vessel from the San Pablo site, identified as Kcello Ecuatoriano (Zevallos et al., 1977).

It is difficult to draw any general conclusions on the development of maize in coastal Ecuador based on the meager data now available. The antecedents of the low row number, broad kernel races are not definitely known, although relationship to the popcorn race Confite Morocho of Peru has been suggested (Manglesdorf, 1974, pp. 113–114). In an examination of the data on all the relic popcorn races of Latin American (Pearsall, 1977/1978), it was proposed that a low row number, round kernel popcorn lineage exists linking the small popcorns of Mesoamerica and northern South America (proto-Nal-tel-Chapalote, Polio group) to those of central Andean South America (Confite Morocho group), and the larger kerneled, low row number flint and flour races evolved from this lineage in many areas, including Ecuador.


Economic Botany Ecuador American Archaeology Phytolith Analysis Kernel Measurement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Cutler, H. C. 1946. Races of maize in South America. Bot. Mus. Leafl. 12: 257–291.Google Scholar
  2. Cutler, H. C.. 1956. Plant Remains.In Higgins Flat Pueblo Western New Mexico. P. S. Martin, J. B. Rinaldo, E. A. Bluhm, and H. C. Cutler. Fieldiana, Anthropol. Ser. 45: 174–183.Google Scholar
  3. Cutler, H. C., and L. W. Blake. 1973. Corn from Cahokia sites.In Explorations into Cahokia, M. Fowler, ed. Archaeolog. Survey, Bulletin 7, Urbana, Illinois.Google Scholar
  4. Dunn, M. E. 1978. Suggestions for evaluating archaeological maize. Amer. Antiquity 43: 97–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dunn, M. E.. 1979. Ceramic depictions of maize: A basis for classification of prehistoric races. Amer. Antiquity 44: 757–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harlan, J. R., and J. M. J. de Wet. 1973. On the quality of evidence for origin and dispersal of cultivated plants. Curr. Anthrop. 14: 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lathrap, D. W. 1975. Ancient Ecuador: Culture, Clay, and Creativity 3000–300B.C. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  8. Manglesdorf, P. C. 1974. Corn, Its Origin, Evolution, and Improvement. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  9. Meggers, B. J. 1966. Ecuador. Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Pearsall, D. M. 1977/1978. Early movements of maize between Mesoamerica and South America. J. Steward Anthropol. Soc. 9: 41–75.Google Scholar
  11. Pearsall, D. M.. 1978. Phytolith analysis of archaeological soils: Evidence for maize cultivation in Formative Ecuador. Science 199: 177–178.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pearsall, D. M.. 1979. The Application of Ethnobotanical Techniques to the Problem of Subsistence in the Ecuadorian Formative. Doct. Thesis. Univ. Microfilm, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
  13. Pickersgill, B. 1972. Cultivated plants as evidence for cultural diffusion. Amer. Antiquity 37: 97–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Roberts, L. M., U. J. Grant, R. Ramirez E., W. H. Hatheway, D. L. Smith, and P. C. Manglesdorf. 1957. Races of Maize in Colombia. Publication 510. Nat. Acad. Sci.-Nat. Res. Council, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. Timothy, D. H., B. Pena V., R. Ramirez E., W. L. Brown, and E. Anderson. 1961. Races of Maize in Chile. NAS-NRC Publication 847, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  16. -, W. H. Hatheway, U. J. Grant, M. Torregoza, D. Sarria, and D. Varela. 1963. Races of Maize in Ecuador. NAS-NRC Publication 925, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  17. Willey, G. R. 1971. An Introduction to American Archaeology. Vol. 2. South America. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  18. Zevallos M., C., W. C. Galinat, D. W. Lathrap, E. R. Lang, J. G. Marcos, and K. M. Klumpp. 1977. The San Pablo corn kernel and its friends. Science 196: 385–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah M. Pearsall
    • 1
  1. 1.American Archaeology Division, Department of AnthropologyUniversity of MissouriColumbia

Personalised recommendations