Advertisement

Dao

, Volume 2, Issue 2, pp 235–260 | Cite as

A new perspective in the history of East Asian Confucianism: Some reflections on Confucian Hermeneutics

  • Junjie Huang
Articles
  • 150 Downloads

Keywords

Chinese Philosophy Material Force Intellectual History Comparative Philosophy Confucian Classic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abe, Yoshio. 1973. “The Characteristics of Japanese Confucianism.”Acta Asiatica 5: 1–21.Google Scholar
  2. -. 1979. “The Influence of Chinese Confucianism upon Japan: The Uniqueness of Japanese Confucianism” Trans. by GONG Nisxin.Chinese and Foreign Literature 8.6: 164–177.Google Scholar
  3. Brandauer, Frederick and Chun-chieh Huang, eds. 1994.Imperial Rulership and Cultural Change in Traditional China. Seatde: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  4. Chan, Wing-tsit. 1962. “The Evolution of the Neo-Confucian Concept ofLi as Principle.”Tsing-hua Journal of Chinese Studies (N.S) 2: 123–148.Google Scholar
  5. —. 1967. “Neo-Confucianism: New Ideas in Old Terminologies.”Philosophy East and West 17: 15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen, Chun. 1979.Mister Beixi’s Detailed Explanation of Philosophical Terms. Taibei: Guangwen Shuju.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, Xinxia. 1986.Introduction to the Cognitive Science. Changsha: Hunan Renmin Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, Zhaoying. 2000.Taiwanese Confucianism: Origin, Development, and Transformation. Taibei: Zhongzheng Shuju.Google Scholar
  9. Chung, Edward Y. J. 1995.The Korean Neo-Confucianism of Yi T’oegye and Yi Yulgok: A Reappraisal of the “Four-Seven Thesis” and Its Practical Implications for Self-Cultivation. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1976. “The Universality of the Hermeneutical Problem.” In hisPhilosophical Hermeneutics. Trans. & ed. by David E. Linge. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Huang, Junjie (Chung-chieh). 1997.A History of Mencian Scholarship, vol. 2. Taibei: Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan Zhongguo Wenzhe Yangjiusuo.Google Scholar
  12. -. 1999a. “On the Historicity of Interpreters of Classics and Other Issues from the Perspective of the History of Confucian Hermeneutics of Classics.”Taiwan University Journal of History (December): 1–28.Google Scholar
  13. —. 1999b. “ITŌ Jinsai’s Interpretation of the Mencian Scholarship: Its Subject, Nature, and Significance.” In his (ed.)Confucian Thought in Contemporary East Asia. Taibei: Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan Zhongguo Wenzhe Yangjiusuo.Google Scholar
  14. —. 2000. “Chinese Hermeneutics as Politics: the Song Debates over theMencius.” InClassics and Interpretations: The Hermeneutic Tradition in Chinese Culture, ed. by Ching-I Tu. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. Huang, Junjie (Chun-chieh), et. al. 1997. “On the Methodology of the Study of Chinese Political Thoughts.”Journal of Humanity (December): 1–43.Google Scholar
  16. Ishida, Ichirō. 1996. “The Periods and Translation of Japanese Intellectual History.”Kikan Nihon shisōshi (July): 134–136.Google Scholar
  17. Itō, Jinsai. 1971.The Meanings of the Analects and the Mencius. Tōkyō: Iwanami shoten.Google Scholar
  18. —. 1973.The Ancient Meaning of the Analects. InA Complete Collection of Important Japanese Commentaries on the Four Books, vol. 3. Edited by SEKI Giichirō. Tōkyō: Hō shuppan.Google Scholar
  19. —. 1988.Childish Questions. InEssays on Modern Intellectual History, vol. 1. Tōkyō: Iwanami Shoden.Google Scholar
  20. Li, Minghui. 2001. “LI Chunsheng’s Understanding of Chinese Cultural Classics.” In his (ed.)The Hermeneutic Tradition of Chinese Classics II: Confucianism. Taibei: Himalaya Foundation.Google Scholar
  21. Liu, Baonan. 1982.Rectified Meanings of the Analects. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
  22. Lunyu. In Liu.Google Scholar
  23. Maruyama, Masao. 1961. “Methodology of Intellectual History: Types, Scopes, and Subject Matter (Shisōshi no kangaekata ni tsuite—ruikei, kan’i, taishō).” InThe Method and Object of Intellectual History: Japan and West Europe. Edited by Takeda Kiyoko. Tōkyō: Söbunsha.Google Scholar
  24. -. 1974.Studies in the Intellectual History of Tokugawa Japan. Trans. by Mikiso Hane. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
  25. Mencius. Trans. by D.C. Lau. London: Penguin Books, 1970.Google Scholar
  26. Mizoguchi, Yūmi. 1980.The Twists and Developments of the Pre-modern Chinese Thoughts. Tōkyō: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar
  27. —. 1989.China as Methodology (Hōhō to shite no Chūgoku). Tōkyō: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai.Google Scholar
  28. —. 1995. “The Public and the Private in China.” In his (ed.)The Public and the Private in China. Tōkyō: Kenbun Shuppan.Google Scholar
  29. Muneshima, Kyokuyū, ed. 1977.Comparative Studies of Eastern and Western Modes of Thinking. Tōkyō: Tōkyō Shoseki Kabushiki Kaisha.Google Scholar
  30. Nakamura, Hajime. 1964.Ways of Thinking of Eastern People: India, China, Tibet, Japan. Edited by Philip P. Wiener. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  31. Polanyi, Michael. 1967.The Tacit Dimension. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  32. Qian, Mu. 1971.New Studies of Master Zhu. Taibei: Sanmin Shuju.Google Scholar
  33. Song, Dexuan, et. al. 1991.Comparative Studies of Chinese and Japanese Ways of Thinking. Shenyang: Shenyang ChubansheGoogle Scholar
  34. Tahara, Shirō. 1995. “The Public and the Private in Japan (Nihon no kō shi).” InThe Public and the Private in China (Chūgoku no kō to shi). Edited by Mizoguchi Yūmi. Tōkyō: Kenbun Shuppan.Google Scholar
  35. Tang, Junyi. 1966–75.Discourses on the Sources of Chinese Philosophy. Hong Kong: Dongfang Renwen Xuehui & Xinya ShuyuanGoogle Scholar
  36. VanZoeren, Steven. 1991.Poetry and Personality: Reading, Exegesis, and Hermeneutics in Traditional China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wu, Kuang-ming. 1997.On Chinese Body Thinking: A Cultural Hermeneutics. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  38. Xu, Fuguan. 1982. “An Examination of a Basic Topic in Chinese Intellectual History: ‘Knowing the Heavenly Command by Fifties’.” In hisA New Collection of Essays on Chinese Intellecutal History. Taibei: Shibao Wenhua Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  39. Yang, Rubin. 1998.Confucian Philosophy of Body. Taibei: Zhongyang Yanjiuyuan Zhongguo Wenzhe YanjiusuoGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang, Rubin & Huang Junjie(Chun-chieh), eds. 1996.Exploring the Ancient Chinese Mode of Thinking. Taibei:Zhongzheng Shuju.Google Scholar
  41. Yu, Yingshi. 1974. “DAI Dongyuan and ITŌ Jinsai.”Shihuo Monthly (New Series) 4. 9: 369–376.Google Scholar
  42. -. 1976. “Qing Dynasty Confucianism and its intellectual tradition” (lecture). August 7. Taibei.Google Scholar
  43. Zhu, Xi. N.D.Inquiries into the Mencius. InThe Posthumous Works of Master Zhu. Vol. 5. Taibei: Yiwen Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
  44. —. 1983.Collected Annotations on the Mencius. In hisCollected Annotations on the Four Books. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
  45. —. 1983a.Collected Annotations on the Zhongyong. In hisCollected Annotations on the Four Books. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
  46. —. 1986.Classified Sayings of Master Zhu. Edited by LI Jingde. Beijing: Zhonghua Shuju.Google Scholar
  47. —. 1994.Collected Annotations on the Analects. In hisCollected Annotations on the Four Books. Taibei: Da’an Chubanshe.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Scholarly Publications 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Chinese Literature and PhilosophyAcademia SinicaTaiwan
  2. 2.National Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations