Skip to main content
Log in

Zen and zen philosophy of language: A soteriological approach

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitken, Robert, trans. 1997.The Gateless Barrier. The Wu-men Kuan. New York: North Point Press.

  • Barthes, Roland. 1970/1982.The Empire of Signs. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blue Cliff Record. Taishō shinshū daizōkyō. 48.2003. 139a–292a.

  • Buswell, Robert E. Jr. 1983.The Korean Approach to Zen: Collected Works of Chinul. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1986. “Chinul’s Systematization of Chinese Meditative Techniques in Korean Son Buddhism.” In Gregory 1986: 199–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1987. “The “Short-cut’ Approach of K’an-hua Meditation: The Evolution of a Practical Subitism in Chinese Zen Buddhism.” In Gregory 1987: 321–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinul.Treatise on Resolving DoubtsAbout Kanhua Meditation. InComplete Works of Korean Buddhism 4. 732c–737c.

  • Clearly, Thomas. 1983/1994.Entry Into the Inconceivable: An Introduction to Hua-yen Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • -, trans. 1997.Unlocking the Zen Koan: A New Translation of the Zen Classic Wumenguan. Berkeley: North Adantic Books.

  • Clearly, Thomas and J. C. Clearly, trans. 1992.The Blue Cliff Record. Boston: Shambhala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Francis. 1991. “Fa-tsang’s Treatise on the Five-Doctrines: An Annotated Translation.” Ph. D. dissertation. University of Wisconsin.

  • DahuiDahui yulu.Taishō 47. 1998. 811b-943a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond Sūtra. Taishō 8.235.748c–752c.

  • Dumoulin, Heinrich. 1992.Zen Buddhism in the 20th Century (1990). Trans. Joseph S. O’Leary. New York: Weatherhill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dushan.Cessation and Contemplation in the Five Teachings of the Huayen.Taisho 45. 1867. 509a-513c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faure, Bernard. 1993.Chan Insights and Oversights: An Epistemological Critique of the Chan Tradition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991.The Rhetoric of Immediacy: A Cultural Critique of Chan /Zen Buddhism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazang.Treatise on the Five Teachings.Taishō 45. 1866. 477a-509a.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulk, Griffith T. 1995. “Myth, Ritual, and Monastic Practice in Sung Ch’an Buddhism.” In Patricia Buckley Ebrey and Peter N. Gregory, eds.,Religion and Society in T’ang and Sung China. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gateless Gates. Taisho 48.2005. 292a–299c.

  • Gregory, Peter N. 1986.Traditions of Meditation in Chinese Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1991.Tsung-mi and the Sinification of Buddhism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, ed. 1987.Sudden and Gradual: Approaches to Enlightenment in Chinese Thought. Studies in East Asian Buddhism 5. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, Peter N. and Daniel A. Getz, Jr., eds. 1999.Buddhism in the Sung. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heine, Steven and Dale S. Wright, eds.. 2000.The Kōan: Texts and Contexts in Zen Buddhism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, Ding-hwa Evelyn. 1993. “A Study of the Evolution of K’an-hua Ch’an in Sung China: Yüan-wu K’o-ch’in (1063–1135) and the Function of Kung-an in Ch’an Pedagogy and Praxis.” Ph.D. dissertation. Univ. of California at Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1994. “Yuan-wu K’o-ch’in’s (1063–1135) Teaching of Zen Kung-an Practice: A Transition from the Literary Study of Ch’an Kung-an to the Practical K’an-hua Ch’an.”Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 17.1 (Summer): 66–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huong. 1579.The Mirror of Zen Teaching. InComplete Works of Korean Buddhism 7. 634c-646c.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koestler, Arthur. 1961.The Lotus and the Robot. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levering, Miriam L. 1978. “Zen Enlightenment for Laymen: Ta-hui and the New Religious Culture of the Sung.” Ph. D. dissertation. Harvard University.

  • Lie, Ming-Wood. 1981. “TheP’an-chiao System of the Hua-yen School in Chinese Buddhism.”T’oung Pao 67. 1–2: 10–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail, Mark Lawrence. 1996.Zen in the Art of Rhetoric: An Inquiry into Coherence. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miura, Isshū, and Ruther Fuller Sasaki. 1965.The Zen Koan: Its History and Uses in Rinzai Zen. New York: Harcourt Brace and Javanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mu Soeng, Sunim. 1991.Thousand Peaks: Korean ZenTradition & Teachers. Cumberland: Primary Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Carl. 2000.Zen and the Art of Postmodern Philosophy: Two Paths of Liberation from the Representational Mode of Thinking. Albany. SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Jin Young. 1998. “Deconstructive Framing: Son Buddhism and Postmodern Thought.” Ph.D. Dissertation. State University of New York at Stony Brook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Sung Bae. 1983.Buddhist Faith and Sudden Enlightenment. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine, Red, trans. 1987.The Zen Teaching of Bodhidharma. New York: North Point Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomhu Chamyong. 1986.Study on Pojo Chinul’s Kanhwa Son. Seoul: Sonhak yon’ guwon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekida, Katsuki, trans. 1977.Two Zen Classics: Mumonkan and Hekiganroku. New York: Weatherhill, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shim, Jae Ryong. 1979. “The Philosophical Foundation of Korean Zen Buddhism: The Integration of Son and Kyo by Chinul (1158–1210).” Ph. D. Dissertation. Honolulu: University of Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Sokku. 1979. “Essay on Pojo’sTreatise on Resolving Doubts about Hwadu meditation.”Tongguk sasang 12:21–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wonyung. 1993.Kanhua Son: The Correct Understanding of the Sudden Teaching of Son Buddhism Hapch’on, Korea: Jangkyonggak.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Dale S. 1992. “Rethinking Transcendence: The Role of Language in Zen Experience,”Philosophy East and West 421: 113–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -. 2000. “Kōan History: Transformative Language in Chinese Buddhist Thought.” In Steve Heine and Dale S. Wright, eds.The Kōan: Texts and Contexts in Zen Buddhism: 200–212.

  • Yü, Chün-fang. 1979. “Ta-hui Tsung-kao and Kung-anZenJournal of Chinese Philosophy 6: 211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Park, J.Y. Zen and zen philosophy of language: A soteriological approach. Dao 1, 209–228 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857096

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857096

Keywords

Navigation