Advertisement

Dao

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 321–340 | Cite as

Eclipse of reading: On the “philosophical turn” in American sinology

  • Eske Møllgaard
Discussion: How to Approach Chinese Classics?

Keywords

Chinese Philosophy Comparative Philosophy Linguistic Community Chinese Thought Continental Philosophy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ames, Roger T. 1998. “Knowing in theZhuangzi: ’‘From Here, on the Bridge, over the River Hao’.” InWandering at Ease in the Zhuangzi. Ed. by Roger T. Ames. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ames, Roger T., & David L. Hall. 2001.Focusing the Familiar A Translation and Philosophical Interpretation of the Zhongyong. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  3. —. 2003.Daodejing: “Making This Life Significant”: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  4. Ames, Roger T., & Henry Rosemont, Jr. 1999.The Analeds of Confucius: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, J. J. 2000.The Tao of the West: Western Transformations of Taoist Thought. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Critchley, Simon. 2001.Continental Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, Gilles, & Félix Guattari. 1994.What Is Philosophy? Trans. by Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Faure, Bernard. 2004.Double Exposure: Cutting Across Buddhist and Western Discourses. Trans. by Janet Lloyd. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2001.Gadamer in Conversation: Reflections and Commentary. Ed. and trans. by Richard E. Palmer. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Graham, A. C., Trans. 1981.Chuang-tzu: The Inner Chapters. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  11. Hall, David L., & Roger T. Ames. 1987.Thinking Through Confucius. Albany: State University of New York.Google Scholar
  12. —. 1995.Anticipating China: Thinking Through the Narratives of Chinese and Western Cultures. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  13. —. 1998.Thinking From the Han. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hallward, Peter. 2003.Badiou:A Subject to Truth. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hansen, Chad. 1992.A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. —. 1993. “Term-Belief in Action: Sentences and Terms in Early Chinese Philosophy.” InEpistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy. Ed. by Hans Lenk and Gregor Paul. Albany: State University Press of New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. —. 2003. “Guru or Skeptic? Relativistic Skepticism in theZhuangzi.” InHiding the World in the World. Ed. by Scott Cook. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  18. Harbsmeier, Christoph. 1998.Language and Logic in Traditional China. In Joseph Needham,Science & Civilization in China. Vol. VII.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Hoffmann, Hans Peter. 2001.Die Welt als Wendung. Zu einer literarischen Lektüre des Wahren Buches vom südlichen Blütenland. Opera Sinologica 13. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
  20. King, Richard. 1999.Orientalism and Religion: Postcolonial Theory, Indiaa and “The Mystic East.” London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Kjellberg, Paul and Philip J. Ivanhoe, eds. 1996.Essays on Skepticism, Relativism, and Ethics in the Zhuangzi. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  22. Mair, Victor H., trans. 1994.Wandering on the Way: Early Tales and Parables of Chuang Tzu. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  23. Parkes, Graham. 1998. “Practicing Philosophy as a Matter of life and Death.” InZen Buddhism Today: The Annual Report of the Kyoto Zen Symposium. No. 15.Google Scholar
  24. Quignard, Pascal. 1997.Rhétorique Spéculative. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  25. Roetz, Heiner. 1993. “Validity in Chou Thought: On Chad Hansen and the Pragmatic Turn in Sinology.” InEpistemological Issues in Classical Chinese Philosophy. Edited by Hans Lenk and Gregor Paul. Albany: State University Press of New York.Google Scholar
  26. Rorty, Richard. 1979.Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Saussy, Haun. 2001a. “No Time Like the Present: The Category of Contemporaneity in Chinese Studies.” InGreat Walls of Discourse and Other Adventures in Cultural China. Harvard East Asian Monographs No. 212. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. —. 2001b. “Outside the Parenthesis (Those People Were a Kind of Solution).” InGreat Walls of Discourse and Other Adventures in Cultural China Harvard East Asian Monographs No. 212. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Schwartz, Benjamin I. 1985.The World of Thought in Ancient China. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wittgenstein, Ludwig. 1984.Philosophische Untersuchungen. InWerkausgabe, Band 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  31. Zhuangzi Yinde 340-01 1947. Harvard-Yenching Institute Sinological Index Series No. 20. Beijing.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Global Scholarly Publications 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophySt. Lawrence UniversityCanton

Personalised recommendations