Advertisement

American Potato Journal

, Volume 34, Issue 11, pp 315–319 | Cite as

The effect of fertilization on the susceptibility of potatoes to late blight

  • Abdul Babi Awan
  • R. A. Struchtemeyer
Article

Summary

Experiments were conducted in the field and the greenhouse to study the effects of N, P and K nutritions on the incidence of late blight in potatoes.

In the N experiments the results of the field and greenhouse were variable. In the field excessive amounts of N fertilizer had a marked tendency to increase the size of the late blight lesions on the potato leaves. In the greenhouse excessive use of N fertilizer did not increase the late blight lesions on the potato leaves.

The amount of P applied in the fertilizer was the most significant factor in determining the size of the late blight lesions. Large applications of P decreased the size of the late blight lesions on the potato leaves, while the progress in the size of the late blight lesions was most rapid in leaves receiving no application of P.

Significant decreases in the size of the late blight lesions resulted from the high applications of K fertilizers, but K was not as efficient as P in decreasing the size of the late blight lesions.

Keywords

Late Blight Greenhouse Experiment Leaf Roll High Application Large Application 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Butler, E. J. 1919. Immunity and disease in plants. Abst. in Bot. Abst. 2: 176.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cook, W. S. 1937. Relationship of nutrition of tomato to disposition to infectivity and virulence ofFusarium lycopersici. Bot. Gaz. 98: 647–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Delacroix, G. 1909. Maladies des plantes cultivees.Maladies parasitaires. p. 91Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gaumann, E. 1950. Principles of plant infection. p. 267Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Heigham, C. 1926. The manuring of potatoes: summary of points arising at the Rothhamstead conference. Jour. Min. Agr. (Gr. Brit.) 22: 903–906.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hoveland, C. S., Berger, K. C. and Darling, H. M. January 1954. The effect of mineral nutrition on the expression of potato leaf roll virus symptoms. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings Vol. 18, No. 1.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Janssen, J. J. 1930. Influence of fertilization on the health of the potato. Abst. in Amer. Potato. Jour. 7: 79–80.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Laurent, E. 1900. Experimental investigations on some diseases of plants. Abst. in Exp. Sta. Rec. 11: 550.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liebig, T. 1876. Die chomie in ihrer anwendung auf agricultur und physiologie. 9th ed.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Miles, H. W. and Brynmor, T. 1925. A preliminary study of the relationship between manuring and susceptibility to diseases in potatoes. Jour. Agr. Sci. 15: 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomas, B. 1926. Fertilizing in relation to the disease resistance of crops. Abst. in Amer. Potato Jour. 3: 186.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1957

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdul Babi Awan
    • 1
  • R. A. Struchtemeyer
    • 2
  1. 1.Pennsylvania State UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Maine Agricultural Experiment StationOrono

Personalised recommendations