Abstract
Potato seedlings and cultivars were successfully subjected to moderate to heavy late blight pressure in field plots to which a race complex of the pathogen was applied. Multiple assessments through the course of the epidemics revealed differences in overall disease susceptibility or resistance. Differences were also demonstrated in disease response patterns among potato lines with similar overall disease ratings. Use of principal component and cluster analyses established discrete groupings of potato lines. This provides a basis for a more objective interpretation of the results in identifying both overall disease response and pattern (slow or fast) of response of potato cultivars and breeding lines.
Resumen
Plántulas y cultivares de papa fueron satisfactoriamente sometidas a una moderada y fuerte presión de tizón tardío en parcelas de campo a las cuales se les aplicó una mezcla de razas. Determinaciones múltiples a través del curso de la epidemia reveló diferencias en cuanto a la resistencia o susceptibilidad total. Diferencias fueron también demostradas en patrones de respuesta a la enfermedad entre líneas de papa con similares grados de infección. El uso de análisis de componentes principales y análisis multivarial (clustar) estableció grupos de líneas de papa. Esto prové una base para una interpretación mas objetiva de los resultados en identificar patrones y respuesta a la enfermedad (lenta o rápida) en la evaluación de cultivares y lineas de mejoramiento de papa.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Black, W. 1970. The nature and inheritance of field resistance to late blight (Phytophthora infestons) in potatoes. Am Potato J 47:279–288.
Chew, V. 1976. Comparing treatment means: a compendium. HortScience 11:348–357.
Cole, J.W.L. and J.E. Grizzle. 1966. Applications of multivariate analysis of variance to repeated measurements experiments. Biometrics 22:810–828.
Eide, C.J. and F.I. Lauer. 1967. Testing potatoes for field resistance to late blight. Am Potato J 44:9–16.
Gates, C.E. and J.D. Bilbro. 1978. Illustration of a cluster analysis method for mean separation. Agron J 70:462–465.
Grizzle, J.E. and D.M. Allen. 1969. Analysis of growth and dose response curves. Biometrics 25:357–381.
Holland, D.A. 1969. Component analysis: an aid to the interpretation of data. Expl Agric 5:151–164.
Keuls, M. and F. Garretsen. 1982. Statistical analysis of growth curves in plant beeding. Euphytica 31:51–64.
Lapwood, D.H. 1963. Potato haulm resistance toPhytophthora infestans. IV. Laboratory and field estimates compared, and further field analyses. Ann Appl Biol 51:17–28.
Malcolmson, J.F. 1976. Assessment of field resistance to blight (Phytophthora infestans) in potatoes. Trans Br Mycol Soc 67:321–325.
Malcolmson, J.F. and R.J. Killick. 1980. The breeding values of potato parents for field resistance to late blight measured by whole seedlings. Euphytica 29:489–495.
Nilsson, B.A. 1981. Component analysis of general resistance toPhytophthora infestans in clones from the Colombian potato collection. Potato Res 24:239–244.
Rowell, J.G. and D.E. Walters. 1976. Analysing data with repeated observations on each experimental unit. J Agric Sci Comb 87:423–432.
Scott, A.J. and M. Knott. 1974. A cluster analysis method for grouping means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 30:507–512.
Tai, G.C.C. and W.A. Hodgson. 1975. Estimating general combining ability of potato parents for field resistance to late blight. Euphytica 24:285–289.
Van der Plank, J.E. 1963. Plant diseases: epidemics and control. Academic Press, New York, 349 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Platt, H.W., Tai, G.C.C. Assessment and analyses for the interpretation of potato late blight response in field studies. American Potato Journal 61, 599–609 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855110
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02855110