American Potato Journal

, Volume 27, Issue 12, pp 445–449 | Cite as

The effect of a mild strain of latent mosaic virus X on yield of some of the new potato varieties in Maine

  • P. M. Lombard


The reduction in yield from potato seed infected with virus X reported by several investigators varies from a very small amount to as high as 30 per cent. The reduction varies with the potato variety and the strain of virus X.

In an experiment with the varieties Chippewa, Sequoia, Sebago, and Teton, seed stock carrying a mild strain of virus X and stock free from virus X were compared with commercial stock for each variety. Both mild-X and commercial seed gave reduced yields in comparison with yields from stock free from virus X. The reduction in yield varied with the variety. Percentage reductions in yield for mild X were: Chippewa, 6.1 per cent, Sequoia, 2.1; Sebago, 4.2; and Teton, 9.5. Percentage reductions in yield for commercial stock were: Chippewa, 6.8 per cent; Sequoia, 0.2; Sebago, 9.8; and Teton, 5.1. In only two cases did the reduction in yield reach or closely approach significance viz., Teton mild-X and Sebago commercial stock. The yield trend for all varieties favored X-free stock.


AMERICAN Potato Journal Potato Variety Pepper Plant Seed Stock Commercial Seed 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Bald, J. G. 1944. Development of differences in yield between FX and virus-X-infected Up-to-Date potatoes. Austral. Council Sci. and Indus. Res. J. 17: 263–273.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Norris, D. O. 1940. The effect of the latent virus (virus X) on the yield of potatoes. Austral. Council Sci. and Indus. Res. J. 13: 252–254.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clinch, P. E. M., and McKay, R. 1947. Effect of mild strains of virus X on the yield of Up-to-Date potato. Roy. Dublin Soc. Sci. Proc. (n.s.) 24: 189–198.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    1949. A further experiment on the effect of mild strains of virus X on the yield of Up-to-Date potato. Roy. Dublin Soc. Proc. (n.s.) 25: 93–99.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schultz, E. S., and Bonde, Reiner. 1944. The effect of latent mosaic (virus X) on yield of potatoes in Maine. Amer. Potato Jour., 21: 278–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scott, R. J. 1941. The effects of mosaic diseases on potatoes. Scottish Jour. Agri. 23: 258–265.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Smith, K. M., and Markham, R. 1945. Importance of potato virus X in the growing of potatoes. Nature (London) 155: 38–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1950

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. M. Lombard
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Fruit and Vegetable Crops and Bureau of Plant Industry, Soils, and Agricultural Engineering, Agricultural Research AdministrationUnited States Department of AgricultureBeltsville

Personalised recommendations