American Journal of Potato Research

, Volume 76, Issue 3, pp 127–136 | Cite as

Suppression of bacterial soft rot in potato tubers by application of kasugamycin

  • Jerry A. Bartz


An immersion in aqueous solutions of Kasumin®, containing kasugamycin at 10 to 320 mg/L (ppm) for 1 to 320 sec delayed or prevented the development of soft rot on inoculated (Erwinia carotovora subsp.carotovora) tuber disks incubated over wet filter paper at 24C for 24 to 72 hr. Treatment efficacy decreased as inoculum level and incubation period increased. Short immersion periods were not as effective as longer ones. When stored tubers were inoculated withE. c. carotovora and incubated up to 5 days in fog chamber at 20 C, immersion treatments in 20 to 400 ppm kasugamycin either had no effect or increased soft rot development. By contrast, when the stored tubers were cut into sections before inoculation and treatment, immersion in 300 ppm reduced soft rot development on the cut surfaces from 83% (inoculated controls) to 3.2%. With non-inoculated sections, treatment with 25 ppm reduced the SAD from 13.3 to 0.6%. Wash or rinse treatment of freshly harvested tubers in 40 to 160 ppm produced a significant reduction in the severity of bacterial soft rot among tubers incubated for 72 to 96-hr. The 160-ppm treatment delayed disease onset by at least 24 hr. Pre-washing freshly harvested tubers with clean or chlorinated water prior to antibiotic treatment did not consistently improve the efficacy of the kasugamycin treatment.

Additional Key Words

Bacterial soft rot Erwinia carotovorasubsp.carotovora kasugamycin postharvest decay seed-piecerot 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Adams, M.J. 1974. Potato tuber lenticels: susceptibility to infection byErwinia carotovora var.atroseptica andPhytophthora infestans. Ann Appl Biol 79:275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bartz, J.A., Blacharski, R. Jr., and Robideaux, R.V. 1997. Surfactants can promote the development of bacterial soft rot in potatoes. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 87:S6-S7.Google Scholar
  3. Bartz, J.A., and Kelman, A. 1984. Inoculation of potato tubers withErwinia carotovora during simulated commercial washing and fluming practices. Am Potato J 61:495–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bartz, J.A., and Kelman, A. 1986. Reducing the potential for bacterial soft rot in potato tubers by chemical treatments and drying. Am Potato J 63:481–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bartz, J.A., Locascio, S.J., and Weingartner, D.P. 1992. Calcium and potassium fertilization of potatoes grown in North Florida. II. Effect on the bacterial soft rot potential in the tubers. Am Potato J 69:39–50.Google Scholar
  6. Bonde, R. 1950. Factors affecting potato blackleg and seed-piece decay. Bulletin 482. Maine Agricultural Experiment Station, Orono.Google Scholar
  7. Bonde, R. 1953. Preliminary studies on the control of bacterial decay of the potato with antibiotics. Am Potato J 30:143–147.Google Scholar
  8. Bonde, R. 1955. Antibiotic treatment of seed potatoes in relation to seedpiece decay, black leg, plant growth and yield rate. Plant Dis Reptr 39:120–123.Google Scholar
  9. Cates, F.B. and Van Blaricom, L.O. 1961. The effect of several compounds on postharvest decay of potatoes. Am Potato J 38:175–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cother, E.J., and Powell, V. 1983. Physiological and pathological characteristics ofErwinia chrysanthemi isolates from potato tubers. J Appl Bact 54:37–43.Google Scholar
  11. Cupples, D. and Kelman, A. 1974. Evaluation of selective media for isolation of soft rot bacteria from soil and plant tissue. Phytopathology 64:468–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goepfert, J.M. 1980. Vegetables, fruits, nuts, and their products. pages 606–642. In: Microbial Ecology of Foods, Vol. II. Food Commodities, J.H. Silliker, R.P. Elliot, A.C. Baird-Parker, F.L. Bryan, J.H.B. Christian, D.S. Clark, J.C. Olson, Jr., and T.A. Roberts, (ed.), International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Graham, D.C. and Volcani, Z. 1961. Experiments on the control of blackleg disease of potato by disinfection of seed tubers with mercury compounds and streptomycin. Eur Potato J 4:129–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horsfall, J.G. and Barratt, R.W. 1945. An improved grading system for measuring plant diseases. (Abstr.) Phytopathology 35:655.Google Scholar
  15. Knowles, N.R., Iritani, W.M., Weller, L.D., and Gross, D.C. 1982. Susceptibilty of potatoes to bacterial soft rot and weight loss as a function of wound-healing interval and temperature. Am Potato J 59:515–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Logan, C. 1964. Bacterial hard rot of potato. Eur Potato J 7:45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lund, B.M. 1979. Bacterial soft-rot of potatoes. pages 19–49.In: Plant Pathogens. D.W. Lovelock and R. Davies (eds), Society of Applied Bacteriology Technical Series No 12. Academic Press, London/New/York.Google Scholar
  18. Lund, B.M., and Kelman, A. 1977. Determination of the potential for development of bacterial soft rot of potatoes. Am Potato J 54::211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nielsen, L.W. 1946. Solar heat in relation to bacterial soft rot of early Irish potatoes. Am Potato J 23:41–57.Google Scholar
  20. Pérombelon, M.C.M. 1971. A quantitative method for assessing virulence ofErwinia carotovora var. carotovora andE. c. varatroseptica and susceptibility to rotting of potato tuber tissue. pages 299–303.In: H. P. Mass Geesteranus (Ed.) Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Plant Pathologenic Bacteria (Wageningen).Google Scholar
  21. Pérombelon, M.C.M. and Lowe, R. 1975. Studies on the initiation of bacterial soft rot in potato tubers. Potato Res 18:64–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ruehle, G.D. 1940. Bacterial soft rot of potatoes in Southern Florida. Fla. Agric Exp Stn Bull 348. 36 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Scholey, J., Marshall, C., and Whitbread, R. 1968. A pathological problem associated with pre-packaging of potato tubers. P1 Path 17:135–139.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, M.A. and Ramsey, G.B. 1947. Bacterial lenticel infection of early potatoes. Phytopathology 37:225–242.Google Scholar
  25. Wyatt, G.M. and Lund, B.M. 1981. The effect of antibacterial products on bacterial soft rot of potatoes. Potato Res 24:315–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant Pathology Dept.University of FloridaGainesville

Personalised recommendations