Advertisement

Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 83–87 | Cite as

Distribution ofUrtica dioica L. andRubus fruticosus L. (+agg.) in relation to edaphic factors in cultivated poplar woods

  • Jan Rijmenams
Brief Communications
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Urtica dioica L. andRubus fruticosus L. (+agg.) are widely distributed in Belgian cultivated poplar woods. Using adjusted standardized residuals as an objective measure of preference of a species for ecoparameters, it seems possible to describe the distribution betweenUrtica andRubus as coincidental as regards ecological considerations. Both plant species behave obviously as antagonists.

Key words

Acidity Adjusted standardized residual Calcium Inorganic phosphates Magnesium Organic-matter Populus Potassium Rubus Urtica 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Barkman J. J. Doing H. etSegal S. (1964): Kritische Bemerkungen und Vorschläge zur quantitativen Vegetations-analyse.—Acta Bot. Neerl., Amsterdam, 13: 394–419.Google Scholar
  2. Haberman S. J. (1973): The analysis of residuals in crossclassified tables.—Biometrics, New Haven, 29/1: 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Holter V. (1979): Distribution ofUrtica dioica L. in relation to edaphic factors.—Plant and Soil, The Hague, 52: 599–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Pigott C. D. (1971): Analysis of response ofUrtica dioica L. to phosphate.—New Phytol., London, 70: 953–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Strahler A. H. (1978): Binary discriminant analysis: A new method for investigating species-environment relationships.—Ecology, Durham, 49/1: 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Tavernier R. (1956): Apercu sur les sols de Belgique et leur classification.—Bull. Soc. Belg. Géol., Brussels, 65.Google Scholar
  7. Walkley A. (1946): A critical examination of a rapid method for determining organic carbon in soils—effects of variations in digestion conditions and of inorganic soil constituents.—Soil Science, New Brunswick, 63: 251–263.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Rijmenams
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratorium voor Beschrijvende Plantkunde, Carnoy-InstituutKatholieke Universiteit te LeuvenHeverleeBelgium

Personalised recommendations