Advertisement

American Potato Journal

, Volume 74, Issue 3, pp 173–182 | Cite as

Enhanced dormancy release and emergence from potato tubers after exposure to a controlled atmosphere

  • Warren K. Coleman
  • Jeff McInerney
Article

Abstract

The North American potato industry requires an effective and environmentally-appropriate, dormancy-release methodology. The present study examined dormancy release and subsequent sprout emergence based on a modified, controlled-atmosphere (CA) approach using such environmentallycompatible gases as nitrogen, carbon dioxide and oxygen with or without trace amounts of ethylene (50 ppm). This paper is the first published report of a semi-automated, controlled-atmosphere system for dormancy release of potato tubers. The system allows computer-controlled gas application and analysis for up to four gas mixtures simultaneously. Low oxygen concentrations (< 10%) for 10 days in the presence of 10 to 60% carbon dioxide or a high carbon dioxide (60%)/oxygen (40%) treatment caused tuber breakdown regardless of cultivar. The most effective mixtures for enhanced dormancy release and sprout emergence were 20% CO2/40% O2 or 60% CO2/18-20% O2 and their effects were further enhanced by 50 ppm C2H4 (ethylene). In the presence of 50 ppm C2H4 the 20% CO2/40% O2 mixture was comparable to bromoethane in effectiveness. Temperature and light exposure affected subsequent Russet Burbank tuber responses to CO2/O2/C2H4 gas mixtures.

Additional Key Words

S. tuberosum carbon dioxide oxygen ethylene 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. Berne, A.M.M. and G.C.D. Taylor. 1981. The use of population parameters in the analysis of germination of lettuce seed. Physiol Plant 51: 229–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burton, W.G. 1958. The effect of the concentrations of carbon dioxide and oxygen in the storage atmosphere upon the sprouting of potatoes at IOC. Eur Potato J 1: 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton, W.G. 1968. The effect of oxygen concentration upon sprout growth on the potato tuber. Eur Potato J 11: 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burton, W.G. and M.J. Wiggington. 1970. The effect of a film of water upon the oxygen status of a potato tuber. Potato Res 13: 180–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, R.K. and F.C. Sorensen. 1979. A new basis for characterizing germination. J Seed Tech 4: 24–34.Google Scholar
  6. Cho, J.L., W.M. Iritani, and W.M. Martin. 1983. Comparison of methods for measuring dormancy of potatoes. Am Potato J 60: 169–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coleman, W.K. 1983. An evaluation of bromoethane for breaking tuber dormancy inSolanum tuberosum L. Am Potato J 60: 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coleman, W.K. 1987. Dormancy release in potato tubers: a review. Am Potato J 64: 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman, W.K., G. Hawkins, J. Mclnerney, and M. Goddard. 1992. Development of a dormancy release technology: a review. Am Potato J 69: 437–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Finney, D.J. 1971. Probit analysis. 3rd ed., Cambridge University Press, New York. 333pp.Google Scholar
  11. Glinski, J. and W. Stepniewski. 1985. Soil aeration and its role for plants. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. 229 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Goodwin, P.B. 1966. The effect of water on dormancy in the potato. Eur Potato J 9: 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kader, A.A. 1985. Modified atmospheres and low-pressure systems during transport and storage.In: Postharvest technology of horticultural crops (eds. A.A. Kader, R.F. Kasmire, F.G. Mitchell, M.S. Reid, N.F. Sommer, and J.F. Thompson). Cooperative Extension, Univ. of California, pp.58–64.Google Scholar
  14. Kidd, F. 1919. Laboratory experiments on the sprouting of potatoes in various gas mixtures. (Nitrogen, oxygen and carbon dioxide). New Phytol 18: 248–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kidd, F. and C. West. 1927. Gas storage of fruit. Spec Rep Fd Invest, DSIR, p.30.Google Scholar
  16. Rakitin, J.V. and N.N. Suvorov. 1935. The effect of temporary anaerobiosis on the sprouting of young potato tubers. Dokl Akad Nauk Bull SSSR 9: 295–297.Google Scholar
  17. Reust, W. and P. Gugerli. 1984. Oxygen and carbon dioxide treatment to break potato tuber dormancy for reliable detection of potato virus Y (PVY) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Potato Res 27: 435–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sawyer, R.L. and O. Smith. 1955. A study of the oxygen-periderm relationship in potato tubers and the effect of oxygen on the normal breaking of the rest period. Am Potato J 32: 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Thornton, N.C. 1933a. Carbon dioxide storage. III. The Influence of carbon dioxide on the oxygen update by fruits and vegetables. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 5: 371–402.Google Scholar
  20. Thornton, N.C. 1933b. Carbon dioxide storage. V. Breaking the dormancy of potato tubers. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 5: 471–481.Google Scholar
  21. Thornton, N.C. 1939a. Carbon dioxide storage. XIII. Relationship of oxygen to carbon dioxide in breaking dormancy of potato tubers. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 10: 201–204.Google Scholar
  22. Thornton, N.C. 1939b. Oxygen regulates the dormancy of the potato. Contrib Boyce Thompson Inst 10: 339–361.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Warren K. Coleman
    • 1
  • Jeff McInerney
    • 2
  1. 1.Potato Research CentreAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaFredericton
  2. 2.Energy Conversion Group, Department of Civil EngineeringUniversity of New BrunswickFredericton

Personalised recommendations