A detached-leaf method to evaluate late blight resistance in potato and tomato
- 522 Downloads
We developed a detached leaf method for evaluating potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) germplasm for reactions toPhytophthora infestans, the causal organism of late blight. Primary leaves from the third to the sixth node of potato plants, and the fourth to sixth node of tomato plants were excised at the stem. Their petioles were inserted into 14 mm × 100 mm floral aqua tubes containing 9 ml of sterilized distilled water. The leaves in the aqua tubes were placed with abaxial sides down on galvanized metal hardware cloth (12.5 × 12.5 mm mesh). A 12.5 mm sensi-disc containing 50μl of 2 × 104 zoospores was placed in the centers of the terminal leaflet and the second leaflet pair of the potato leaf. A single disc was placed on the center of the tomato leaf. The supporting hardware cloth was placed 2.5 cm above distilled water (2.5 cm deep) in 31 cm × 17 cm × 8 cm clear plastic boxes with tight fitting lids. Leaves on intact tomato and potato plants were inoculated in a similar manner and placed in a mist chamber. Lesion growth was determined 4, 5, and 6 days following inoculation. There were no significant differences in reactions to isolates ofP. infestans on detached and intact leaves of potato cultivars Green Mountain and Kennebec and the tomato cultivar Bonnie Best.
Additional Key WordsLycopersicon esculentum Solanum tuberosum late blight disease testing host resistance
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Allard, H.A. 1947. Early reports of destructive attacks of late blight on tomatoes in England. Pl Dis Rptr 31: 232.Google Scholar
- Deahl, K.L., R.W. Goth, R. Young, S.L. Sinden, and M.E. Gallegly. 1991. Occurrence of A2 mating type ofPhytophthora infestans in potato fields in the United States and Canada. Am Potato J 68: 717–726.Google Scholar
- Fry, W.E., S.B. Goodwin, A.T. Dyer, J.M. Matuzak, A. Drenth, P.W. Tooley, L.S. Sujkowski, Y.J. Koh, B.A. Cohen, L.J. Spielman, K.L. Deahl, D.A. Inglis, and K.P. Sandlan. 1993. Historical and recent migrations ofPhytophthora infestans. Chronology, pathways, and implications. Plant Dis 77: 653–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goth, R.W. and J. Keane. 1996. Use of detached leaf assay for evaluating late reactions of potato and tomato. Am Potato J 73: 357Google Scholar
- Hooker, W.J. (Ed.) 1981 Compendium of Potato Diseases. Amer Phytopathol Soc St. Paul, MN.Google Scholar
- Niederhauser, J. S. 1956. The blight, the blighter, and the blighted. Trans N.Y. Academy of Science 19: 55–63.Google Scholar
- Niederhauser, J.S. 1991.Phytophthora infestans: The Mexican connection. Pages 24–25In:Phytophthora. J.A. Lucas, R.C. Shattock, D.S. Shaw, and L.R. Cooke, eds. Cambridge University Press, England.Google Scholar
- Ribiero, O.I. 1978. A Source Book of the GenusPhytophthora infestans. J. Cramer, Germany 417 pp.Google Scholar
- Smoot, A.J., F.J. Gough, H.A. Lamey, J.J. Eichenmuller, and M.E. Gallegly. 1958. Production and germination of oospores ofPhytophthora infestans. Phytopathology 48: 165–171.Google Scholar
- Stevens, N.E. 1933. The dark ages in plant pathology in America: 1830–1870. JWash Acad Sci 23: 435–446.Google Scholar