American Potato Journal

, Volume 51, Issue 7, pp 216–222 | Cite as

The effects of dihydroquercetin on the cut surface of seed potatoes

  • J. Mizicko
  • C. H. Livingston
  • G. Johnson


The purpose of this study was to determine the effects which dihydroquercetin (DHQ) has on the natural healing process of suberization and wound periderm initiation in cut seed potatoes. Dihydroquercetin is a phenolic compound extracted from the bark of Douglas Fir,Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco.

Anatomical studies of treated seed potato tissue showed that treatment with bark-383, the cork-rich fraction of the whole bark containing approximately 2% pure DHQ, increases the thickness of the suberized layer formed below the cut surface. Treatment with 4% bark fraction I, which is blended to that concentration with the inert carrier dust Pyrax and contains approximately the same amount of DHQ as does the bark-383, also promoted the formation of a thicker layer of suberized cells.

The thickness of the wound periderm did not significantly vary as a result of the use of any treatments containing DHQ. The use of Captan (Orthocide 50W) as a cut seed treatment in these studies was found to inhibit the formation of a suberized layer and subsequently the initiation of a wound periderm. The combination of bark-383 and Orthocide 50W in a treatment mixture reversed the inhibitory affect of the Orthocide 50W alone and therefore allowed for the formation of a well suberized layer and a wound periderm.

It was found that wound healing on the cut surface of seed potatoes is largely dependent on the type of tissue present at any given point on that cut surface. Therefore, the response to treatment of the stolon end, center, and blossom end tissues was related to the type of tissue which was present in each of those tuber regions.

The fungal mold growth on treated seed pieces incubated in a controlled environment was adequately retarded when Orthocide 50W was combined with bark-383 in a mixture ratio of 1:9 respectively. The longer the treatment material was allowed to remain on the seed piece, the greater was the protection against mold growth afforded by the mixture.


Chlorogenic Acid Seed Potato Seed Piece Dihydroquercetin Tuber Region 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Artschwager, Ernst. 1927. Wound periderm formation in the potato as affected by temperature and humidity. J. Agr. Res. 35: 995–1000.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bloch, R. 1941. Wound healing in higher plants. Bot. Rev. 7: 110–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Esau, K. 1967. Plant anatomy. John Wiley and Sons, New York. 767 p.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hughes, J. C. and T. Swain. 1960. Scopolin production in potato tubers infected withPhytophthora infestons. Phytopathology. 50: 398–400.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Johansen, D. A. 1940. Plant microtechnique. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. 523 p.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnson, G. 1964. Healing of wounds in plant products. U. S. Pat. 3,124,448.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnson, G. and L. A. Schaal. 1952. Relation of chlorogenic acid to scab resistance in potatoes. Science. 115: 627–629.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Johnson, G. and L. A. Schaal. 1957. Accumulation of phenolic substances and ascorbic acid in potato tuber tissue upon injury and their possible role in disease resistance. Amer. Potato J. 34: 200–209.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson, G. and L. A. Schaal. 1957. Chlorogenic acid and other orthodihydricphenols in scab-resistant Russet Burbank and scab-susceptible Triumph potato tubers of different maturities. Phytopathology. 47: 253–255.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Livingston, C. H. 1962. The effects of various treatments on the cut surface of seed potatoes. Amer. Potato J. 30: 2711–281.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Politis, J. 1948. The role of chlorogenic acid in the formation of suberized membranes. Rev. Cytol. Cytophysiol. Vegetable. 10: 232–233.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Priestley, J. G. and L. M. Woffenden. 1923. The healing of wounds in potato tubers and their propagation by cut sets. Ann. Appl. Biol. 10: 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sanford, G. B. 1951. Effects of various chemicals on the natural healing of freshly cut potato sets. Phytopathology 41: 1077–1082.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sass, H. E. 1958. Botanical microtechnique. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames. 228 p.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schaal, L. A. and G. Johnson. 1955. The inhibitory effect of phenolic compounds on the growth ofStreptomyces scabies as related to the mechanism of scab resistance. Phytopathology. 45: 626–628.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shapavalov, M. and H. A. Edson. 1919. Wound-cork formation in the potato in relation to seed-piece decay. Phytopathology. 9: 438–496.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Simonds, A. O., G. Johnson and L. A. Schaal. 1953. Comparative effects of catechol, some related compounds, and other chemicals on suberization of cut potato tubers. Botanical Gazette. 115: 190–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran. 1967. Statistical methods. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames. 593 p.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tomiyama, K., R. Sakai, T. Sakuma and N. Ishizaka. 1967. The role of polyphenols in the defense reaction in plants induced by infection. p. 165–182.In C. J. Mirocha and I. Uritanif [ed.] The dynamic role of molecular constituents in plant-parasite interactions. Bruce. St. Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Mizicko
    • 1
  • C. H. Livingston
    • 1
  • G. Johnson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Botany and Plant PathologyColorado State UniversityFort Collins
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryColorado State UniversityFort Collins

Personalised recommendations