Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of the antihypertensive efficacy of various doses of delapril by office and ambulatory blood pressure measurement: The DEFIND study

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study was undertaken to compare and verify the antihypertensive effects of various delapril doses versus placebo on office and ambulatory blood pressure (BP). After a 2-wk placebo period, 303 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were randomized in a double-blind study to 8 wk of treatment with placebo, or delapril 7.5 mg twice daily, delapril 15 mg twice daily, delapril 30 mg twice daily, or delapril 30 mg once daily. BP changes versus baseline and rates of normalized office systolic blood pressure (SBP) > 140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > 90 mm Hg, as well as responder office SBP > 140 mm Hg or reduction ≥20 mm Hg and office DBP > 90 mm Hg or reduction ≥10 mm Hg, were calculated. In the intention-to-treat population (n=296), office SBP and DBP reductions were more notable with 30 mg twice daily (15.6/11.5 mm Hg) and 15 mg twice daily (14.8/12.5 mm Hg) than with other delapril regimens (30 mg once daily: 11.8/10.5 mm Hg; 7.5 mg twice daily: 12.9/10.1 mm Hg) and placebo (P< .05 for DBP;P< .01 for SBP). The same was true for frequency of responders (63.8% and 60.3%; P≤.05 vs placebo) and normalized patients (58.6% and 53.4%;P< .05 vs placebo). Analysis of ambulatory BPs confirmed the accuracy of office BPs. Drug-related adverse events occurred in 3.4% to 6.7% of patients given delapril and in 6.5% of those given placebo. The lowest effective dose of delapril, 15 mg twice daily, may be recommended as the initial dose for patients who begin treatment with this agent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Onoyama K, Nanishi F, Okuda S, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a new angiotensin I converting enzyme inhibitor (delapril) in patients with deteriorated kidney function and in normal control subjects.Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988;43:242–249.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. The GLANT Study Group. A 12-month comparison of ACE inhibitor and Ca antagonist therapy in mild to moderate essential hypertension—The GLANT study.Hypertens Res. 1995;18:235–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ogihara T. Practitioner’s trial on the efficacy of antihypertensive treatment in the elderly with hypertension (the PATE-Hypertension Study) in Japan.Am J Hypertens. 2000;13:461–467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ogihara T, Kaneko Y, Ikeda M, et al. Clinical evaluation of delapril in Japan. Report from the Japan study group on delapril.Am J Hypertens. 1991;4:42S-45S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rahn KH. Comparison of the antihypertensive effects of delapril and enalapril.Am J Hypertens. 1991;4:38S-41S.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Arakawa K. Clinical effect of delapril hydrochloride (CV-3317) monotherapy in the treatment of essential hypertension.J Clin Ther Med. 1987;3:307.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dalla-Volta S. Safety and efficacy study of delapril versus enalapril in patients with congestive heart failure.Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:44F-49F.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Circo A, Platania F, Mangiameli S, Putignano E. Multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of the safety and efficacy of oral delapril in patients with congestive heart failure.Am J Cardiol. 1995;75:18F-24F.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Omboni S, Fogari R, Mancia G. A smooth blood pressure control is obtained over 24 h by delapril in mild to moderate essential hypertensives.Blood Press. 2001;10:170–175.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fogari R, Zoppi A, Mugellini A, Vanasia A, Poletti L, Corradi L. Efficacy of delapril in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.Adv Ther. 1997;14:254–261.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosiello G, et al. Antihypertensive efficacy of delapril administered according to a twice daily and UID dosage scheme. Assessment by out-patient pressure monitoring.La Presse Medicale. 1995;9:240.

    Google Scholar 

  12. The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA).CPMP Guidelines. London, United Kingdom: EMEA; 1994:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guidelines Subcommittee, 1999 World Health Organisation. International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension.J Hypertens. 1999;17:151–183.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee. Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.Hypertension. 2003;42:1206–1252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Otero, M.L., Parisi, G., Maffei, A. et al. Assessment of the antihypertensive efficacy of various doses of delapril by office and ambulatory blood pressure measurement: The DEFIND study. Adv Therapy 23, 421–432 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850163

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850163

Keywords

Navigation