Skip to main content
Log in

Safety awareness among laboratory workers

  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess safety awareness among laboratory personnel. The research group, which consisted of 84 subjects (88.4% of 95 persons contacted), completed a questionnaire. Of the study population, 55.9% were male and 44.1 % were female. On the subject of how to receive samples, 70.2% of the study group knew the correct answer. In all, 90.5% and 79.8%, respectively, knew what procedures should be followed after injuries or accidents occurred in the laboratory. The lowest number of correct responses on the questionnaire was associated with the topic of waste disposal. Results of this study show that laboratory personnel would benefit greatly from educational initiatives designed to promote laboratory safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Koneman EW, Allen SD, Janda WM, Schreckenberger PC, Winn WC, eds.Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology. 5th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott Co; 1997:109–120.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bermes EW, Young DS. General laboratory techniques and procedures. In: Burtis CA, Ashwood ER, eds.Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: WB Saunders Co; 1994:46–57.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sewell DL. Laboratory-associated infections and biosafety.Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995;8:389–405.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kolavic SA, Kimura A, Simons SL, Slutsker L, Barth S, Haley CE. Outbreak ofShigella dysenteriae type 2 among laboratory workers due to intentional food contamination.JAMA. 1997;278:396–398.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Centers for Disease Control (CDC). Surveillance for occupationally acquired HIV infection-United States, 1981–1992.MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1992;41:823–825.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richmond JY, Nesby-O’Dell SL. Laboratory security and emergency response guidance for laboratories working with select agents. Centers for Disease Control.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2002;51:1–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. International Organization for Standardization.Medical Laboratories: Requirements for Safety. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO/FDIS; 2003(E):15190.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Centers for Disease Control. Workplace safety and health. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov. Accessed September 9, 2004.

  9. World Health Organization.Laboratory Biosafety Manual. 2nd ed. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Keil CB, Akbar-Khanzadeh F, Konencny KA. Characterizing formaldehyde emission rates in a gross anatomy laboratory.Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 2001;16:976–972.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Denys G. Safety in the microbiology laboratory. In: Isenberg HD, eds.Essential Procedures for Clinical Microbiology. Washington, DC: ASM Press; 1998:751–803.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Löfstedt R. Good and bad examples of siting and building biosafety level 4 laboratories: a study of Winnipeg, Galveston and Etobicoke.J Haz Mat. 2002;93:47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Özsahin, A., Demir, M., Zencir, M. et al. Safety awareness among laboratory workers. Adv Therapy 23, 414–420 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850162

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02850162

Keywords

Navigation