Advances in Therapy

, Volume 20, Issue 4, pp 220–229 | Cite as

Essential oils and low-intensity electromagnetic pulses in the treatment of androgen-dependent alopecia

  • J. P. Bureau
  • P. Ginouves
  • J. Guilbaud
  • M. E. Roux


This double-blind randomized study vs placebo in healthy male and female volunteers demonstrates the positive biologic effect on hair loss and hair regrowth of a pulsed electromagnetic field in combination with essential oils administered according to a regular treatment schedule of 26 weeks. Mean hair count comparisons within the groups significantly favor the treatment group, which exhibited a decrease in hair loss in 83% of the volunteers and a more than 20% hair count increase over baseline in 53% of patients. The process exhibited no side effects or untoward reactions. The histologic examination correlated with the clinical study. A parallel immunohistochemical examination showed an increase in the proliferation index, and when the expression of Ki67 (a cell proliferation marker) is increased, the mitoses are barely visible in the histologic examination. The rationale of this phenomenon is considered to be due to an electrophysiologic effect on the quiescent hair follicle.


alopecia hair loss hair regrowth pulsed electromagnetic field essential oils 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Van Neste DJJ, de Brouwer B, de Coster W. The phototrichogram: analysis of some technical factors of variation.Skin Pharmacol. 1994;7:67–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rushton DH. Comparative evaluation of scalp hair by phototrichogram and unit area trichogram analysis within the same subjects.Acta Derm Venerol. 1993;73:150–153.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Spyratos F, Ferrero-Pous M, Trassard M, et al. Correlation between MIB-1 and other proliferation markers: clinical implications of the MIB-1 cutoff value.Cancer. 2002;94:2151–2159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kruze AJ, Baak JP, de Bruin PC, van de Goot FR, Kurten N. Relationship between the presence of oncogenic HPV DNA assessed by polymerase chain reaction and Ki-67 immunoquantitative features in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.J Pathology. 2001;195:557–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Linares-Cruz G, Lequeux Hornsy C, Simony J, Soussaline F. Morpho-histochemical analysis of hair growth in human scalp tissues: effect of a new proposed therapy on hair loss.Eur J Cell Anal Path. In press.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Andrew C, Basset L. The development and applications of pulsed magnetic fields for ununited fractures and arthrodeses.Clin Plast Surg. 1985;12:259–277.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biedebach MC. Accelerated healing of skin ulcers by electrical stimulation and the intracellular physiological mechanisms involved.Acupunct Electrother Res. 1989;14:43–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alvarez OM, Mertz PM, et al. The healing of superficial skin wounds is stimulated by external electrical current.J Invest Dermatol. 1983;81:144–148.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robinson KR. The responses of cells to electrical fields: a review.J Cell Biol. 1985;101:2023–2027.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bourguignon GJ, Wenche JY, et al. Electric stimulation of human fibroblasts causes an increase in Ca++ influx and the exposure of additional insulin receptors.J Cell Physiol. 1989;140:379–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Parkinson WC. Electromagnetic fields in biological studies.Ann Biomed Eng. 1985;13:491–514.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maddin WS, Amara I, Sollecito W. Electrotrichogenesis: further evidence of efficacy and safety on extended use.Int J Dermatol. 1992;31:878–880.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maddin WS. The biological effects of a pulsed electrostatic field with specific reference to hair.Int J Dermatol. 1990;29:446–450.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Price VH, et al. Changes in hair weight and hair count in men with androgenetic alopecia after treatment with finasteride, 1mg, daily.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:517–523.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olsen EA, Dunlap FE, et al. A randomized clinical trial of 5% topical minoxidil vs 2% minoxidil and placebo in the treatment of AGA in men.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;47:377–385.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rushton DH, Ramsay ID, Morris MD, Gilkes JJ. Natural progression of male pattern baldness in young men.Clin Exper Dermatol. 1991;16:188–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Health Communications Inc 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. P. Bureau
    • 1
  • P. Ginouves
    • 2
  • J. Guilbaud
    • 3
  • M. E. Roux
    • 4
  1. 1.University of MedicineMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.AvignonFrance
  3. 3.ParisFrance
  4. 4.Saint Louis HospitalParisFrance

Personalised recommendations