Advertisement

Advances in Therapy

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 419–423 | Cite as

The resistance ofEscherichia coli strains isolated from community-acquired urinary tract infections

  • Zeynep Sümer
  • Figen Coskunkan
  • Haluk Vahaboglu
  • Mehmet Bakir
Article
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are the most common infections caused byEscherichia coli. Most recent research demonstrates that antibiotic resistance has reached a critical point throughout the world, as increased use of antibiotics among nonhospitalized patients encourages the growth of drug-resistant pathogens among that population. The goal of this study was to determine the antimicrobial drug resistance ofE coli strains isolated from community-acquired UTIs in 5 different regions in Turkey. The minimum inhibitory concentrations of ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and ampicillin and forE coli were determined with the agar dilution method. Among the 480 strains isolated, 8.3% were resistant to ciprofloxacin, 3.3% to gentamicin, 35.4% to sulfamethoxazole, 33.3% to trimethoprim, 27.9% to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and 40.8% to ampicillin. These results show that the antibiotics currently most effective againstE coli are ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. Local epidemiologic trends should be considered when prescribing antibacterial therapy. More research in bacterial gene mapping will be necessary to elucidate the influence of regional antimicrobial drug use and resistance in epidemiologic trends among the general population.

Keywords

antimicrobial resistance Escherichia coli minimum inhibitory concentration urinary tract infections 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rubin HR, Bean TR, Stamm WE. An approach to evaluating antibacterial agents in the treatment of urinary tract infection.Clin Infect Dis. 1992;14:246–251.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stamm WE, Hooton TM. Management of urinary tract infections in adults.N Engl J Med. 1993; 28:1328–1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kunin CM. Urinary tract infections in females.Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18:1–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ackermann RJ, Monroe PW. Bacteremic tract infections in older people.J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996; 44:927–933.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hooton TM, Stamm WE. Management of acute uncomplicated urinary tract infection in adults.Med Clin North Am. 1991;2:339–355.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testings; NCCLS document M100-S9 (ISBN 1-56238-358-2). Wayne, Pa: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards; 1999:20–40.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sümbüloglu K, Sümbüloglu V.Biyoistatistik. Ankara: Özdemir Yayıncılık; 1993:156–159.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ronald A, Sanche ES. Antimicrobial management of urinary tract infections.Curr Opin Infect Dis. 1995;8:420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kahlmeter G. The ECO-SENS Project: a prospective, multinational, multicentre epidemiological survey of the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of urinary tract pathogens. Interim report.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2000;46(suppl 1):15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barrett SP, Savage MA, Rebec MP, Guyot A, Andrews N, Shrimpton SB. Antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria associated with community-acquired urinary tract infection in Britain.J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999;44:359–365.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kurutepe S, Sürücüoglu S, Degerli K, Özbilgin A, Özbakkaloglu B. Susceptibility to various antibiotics of gram negative bacteria isolated from urinary tract infections.Turk J Infect. 1998; 12:371–374.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Elçi S, Özerdem N, Gül K. Susceptibility toE coli strains isolated from urine specimens to some quinolones.Ankem Derg. 1998;12:86–87.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Er H, Coskun M, Senol G, Türker M. Gram negatif bakterilerde çesitli antibiyotiklere direnç.Ankem Derg. 1997;11:107.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aktepe OC, Öncül Ö, Gözalan A, Gencer B, Güvener E. Üriner sistemden izole edilenE coli suslarının Ko-trimaksazole duyarlılıgı.Ankem Derg. 1995;9:118.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ergin M, Yılmaz O. In vitro antibiotic susceptibility of Ecoli strains isolated from urine.Ankem Derg. 1997;11:70–73.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tekeroglu MS, Durmaz B, Sönmez E, Köroglu M, Sahin K. In vitro resistance against antibiotics used for treatment of urinary tract infections.Turk J Infect. 1998;12:375–379.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Health Communications Inc 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zeynep Sümer
    • 1
  • Figen Coskunkan
    • 2
  • Haluk Vahaboglu
    • 2
  • Mehmet Bakir
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyCumhuriyet UniversitySivasTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Infectious DiseasesKocaeli UniversityKocaeliTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Infectious DiseasesCumhuriyet UniversitySivasTurkey

Personalised recommendations