Skip to main content
Log in

Field performance of transgenic Russet Burbank and Lemhi Russet potatoes

  • Published:
American Potato Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transformed Russet Burbank and Lemhi Russet clones which contained three different transgene constructs were evaluated for performance under field conditions in Idaho. The transgenic lines were characterized over two growing seasons, using plants grown from both greenhouse produced minitubers (first year) and field grown seed (second year). Individual clones were evaluated for a variety of agronomic and quality properties. Many of the transformed clones showed reduced yield and increases in percent malformed and undersized tubers. Other characteristics, such as specific gravity and fry color, showed less variability. The variation observed in non-transgenic clones regenerated from tissue culture was less than that of the transformed lines. Out of an original population of 57 transgenic lines in tissue culture, maintenance of key agronomic and quality properties of the parental material was observed in only four clones. These results suggest that experiments designed to generate transgenic lines for the marketplace should be initiated with a large number of transgenic clones.

Compendio

Clones transformados de Russet Burbank y Lemhi Russet, que contenían tres diferentes prototipos de transgenes fueron evaluados para comportamiento bajo condiciones de campo en Idaho. Las líneas transgénicas se caracterizaron en dos temporadas de cultivo, utilizando plantas obtenidas tanto de minituberculos producidos en invernadero (primer año) como semilla producida en el campo (segundo año). Se evaluaron clones individuales para diversas propiedades agronomicas y de calidad. Muchos de los clones transformados mostraron rendimientos reducidos y un incremento en el porcentaje de tubérculos deformesy de pequeño tamaño. Otras características, tales como la gravedad específica y el color a la fritura, mostraron una menor variabilidad. La variacíon observada en los clones no transgénicos regenerados de cultivo de tejidos fue menor que aquella de las líneas transformadas. De una población original de 57 líneas transgénicas en cultivo de tejidos, se observó que sólo cuatro de ellas mantenían las principales propiedades agronómicas y de calidad del material progenitor. Estos resultados sugieren que los experimentos diseñados para generar líneas transgenicas para el mercado deberán iniciarse con un gran número de clones transgenicos.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. An, G., B.D. Watson, S. Satchel, M.P. Gordon and E.W. Nester. 1985. New cloning vehicles for transformation of higher plants. EMBO J 4:277–284.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bevan, M., R. Barker, A. Goldsbrough, M. Jarvis, T. Kavanagh and G. Iturriaga. 1986. The structure and transcription start site of a major tuber protein gene. Nucl Acids Res 14:4625–4638.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bevan, M., W.M. Barnes and M.D. Chilton. 1983. Structure and transcription of the nopaline synthase gene region of T-DNA. Nucl Acids Res 11: 369–385.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bourque, J.E., J.C. Miller and W.D. Park. 1987. Use of anin vitro tuberization system to study tuber protein gene expression. Cell Dev Biol 23: 381–386.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dale, P.J. and H.C. MacPartlan. 1992. Field performance of transgenic potato plants compared with controls regenerated from tuber discs and shoot cuttings. Theor Appl Genet 84:585–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Destefano-Beltran, L., P.G. Nagpala, S.M. Cetiner, J.H. Dodds and J.M. Jaynes. 1990. Enhancing bacterial and fungal disease resistance in plants: application to potato.In: M.E. Vayda and W.D. Park (Eds). Molecular Biology of the Potato, Chapter 15, C.A.B. Internat Publ UK. pp. 89–95.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dorel, C., T.A. Voelker, E.M. Herman and M.J. Chrispeels. 1989. Transport of proteins to the plant vacuole is not by bulk flow through the secretory system, and requires positive sorting information. J Cell Biol 108: 327–337.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Draper, J. and R. Scott. 1988. The isolation of plant nucleic acids.In: J. Draper, R. Scott, P. Armitage, and R. Waiden (Eds). Plant Genetic Transformation and Gene Expression: A Laboratory Manual. Blackstone Scientific Publications, Oxford. pp. 199–236.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Draper, J., R. Scott, and J. Hamil. 1988 Transformation of dicotyledonous plant cells using the Ti Plasmid ofAgrobacterium tumefaciens and the Ri plasmid of A.rhizogenes.In: Draper, R. Scott, P. Armitage and R. Waiden (Eds). Plant Genetic Transformation and Gene Expression: A Laboratory Manual. J. Blackstone Scientific Publications, Oxford. pp. 161–198.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Feldman, K.A. 1991. T-DNA insertion mutagenesis inAmbidopsis mutational spectrum. Plant J 1:71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoekema, A., P.R. Hirsch, P.J.J. Hooykaas and R.A. Schilperoort. 1983. A binary plant vector strategy based on separation of the vir- and T-region ofAgrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid. Nature 303:179–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jefferson, R.A., T.A. Kavanagh and M.W. Bevan. 1987. GUS fusions: β-glucuronidase as a sensitive and versatile gene fusion marker in higher plants. EMBO J 6:3901–3907.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Karp, A., M.J.K. Jones, D. Foulger, N. Fish and S.W.J. Bright. 1989. Variability in potato tissue culture. Am Potato J 66: 669–684.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lawson, C., W. Kaniewski, L. Haley, R. Rozman, C. Newell, P. Sanders and N.E. Turner. 1990. Engineering resistance to mixed virus infection in a commercial potato cultivar: resistance to potato virus X and potato virus Yin transgenic Russet Burbank. Bio/Technol 8:127–134.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McBride, K.E. and K. Summerfelt. 1990. Improved binary vectors forAgrobacterium-mediated plant transformation. Plant Mol Biol 14:269–276.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Murashige, T. and F. Skoog. 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Plant Physiol 15: 473–497.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Odell, J.T., F. Nagy F and N. H. Chua. 1987. Variability in 35S promoter expression between independent transformants.In: JL Key and L McIntosh (Eds). Plant Gene Systems and Their Biology. Alan R. Liss, New York, NY, pp 321–330.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ottaviani, M-P., T. Smits and C.H. Hanisch ten Cate. 1993. Differential methylation and expression of the β-glucuronidase and neomycin phosphotransferase genes in transgenic plants of potato cv, Bintje. Plant Sci 88: 73–81

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pavek, J.J., D.L. Corsini, J.G. Gamer, S. Michener, W.C. Sparks, G.F.Cranahan, C.E. Stanger, A.R. Mosley, M.J. Johnson, G.E. Carter, R.E. Voss, M.W. Martin and R.H. Johansen. 1981. Lemhi Russet: a new high yielding potato variety with wide adaptation, attractive tubers, and high internal quality. Am Potato J 58: 619–625.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ray, A., N.A. Memmel, R.P. Orchekowski and K.A. Kumaran. 1987. Isolation of two cDNA clones coding for larval hemolymph proteins ofGalleria mellonella. Insect Biochem 17:603–617.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rickey, T.M. and W.R. Belknap. 1991. Comparison of the expression of severals tress-responsive genes in potato tubers. Plant Mol Biol 16: 1009–1018.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sambrook, J., E.F. Fritsch, T. Maniatis: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2nd ed). 1989. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rietveld, R.C., P.M. Hasegawa and R.A. Bressan. 1991. Somaclonal variation in tuber discderived populations of potato. I. Evidence of genetic stability across tuber generations and diverse locations. Theor Appl Genet 82: 430–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Secor, G.A. and J.F. Shephard. 1981. Variability of protoplast derived potato clones. Crop Sci 21: 102–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Snyder, G.W. and W.R. Belknap. 1993. An improved method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation ofin vitro-grown potato microtubers. Plant Cell Reports. In Press.

  26. Tefler, W.H., S.P. Keim and J.H. Law. 1983. Arylphorin, a new protein fromHyalophora cecropia. comparisons with calliphorin and manducin. Insect Biochem 13: 601–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vayda, M.E. and W.R. Belknap. 1992. The Emergence of transgenic potatoes as commercial products and tools for basic science. Transgenic Research 1: 149–163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Verwoerd, T.C., B.M.M. Dekker and A. Hoekema. 1989. A small-scale procedure for the rapid isolation of plant RNAs. Nucl Acids Res 17: 2362.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Belknap, W.R., Corsini, D., Pavek, J.J. et al. Field performance of transgenic Russet Burbank and Lemhi Russet potatoes. American Potato Journal 71, 285–296 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849055

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02849055

Additional Key Words

Navigation