Advertisement

Pramana

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 173–189 | Cite as

Measurement and analysis of the excitation function and isomeric cross section ratios forα-induced reaction on Ir, Au, Re and Ta nuclei

  • M Ismail
Article

Abstract

Excitation functions and a few isomeric cross-section ratios for production of (1)192Au,193Au,194Au,195Au and192Ir nuclides inα-induced reactions on191,193Ir, (2)197Tl,197m Hg,198m,g Tl,199Tl and200Tl nuclides inα-induced reaction in197Au and (3)183Re and184m,g Re nuclides inα-induced reaction in181Ta and185Re are obtained from the measurements of the residual activities by the conventional stacked-foils technique from threshold to 50MeV. The excitation function and isomeric cross-section ratios for nuclear reaction181Ta(α,n)184m,g Re are compared with the theoretical calculation using the code Stapre which is based on exciton model for pre-equilibrium phase and Hauser-Feshbach formalism taking angular momentum and parity into account for the equilibrium phase of the nuclear reaction. All other experimental excitation functions are compared with the calculations considering equilibrium as well as pre-equilibrium reaction mechanism according to the geometry dependent hybrid (GDH) model and hybrid model of Blann using the code Alice/91. The high energy part of the excitation functions are dominated by pre-equilibrium reaction mechanism whereas the low energy parts are dominated by equilibrium evaporation with its characteristic peak. The GDH model provides a potentially better description of the physical process (i.e., a higher probability for peripheral collisions to undergo precompound decay than for central collisions) compared to hybrid model. However in the energy range of present measurement most of the excitation functions are fitted reasonably well by both GDH model and hybrid model with initial exciton numberN 0=4(N n=2,N p=2,N h=0). Barring a few reactions we have found the overall agreement between theory and experiment is reasonably good taking the limitations of the theory into account.

Keywords

α-induced reactions on Ir, Au, Re and Ta stacked foil technique isotope production equilibrium and pre-equilibrium decays Stapre and Alice/91 codes 

PACS No.

25.60 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    M Blann,Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 337 (1971)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    M Blann,Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 757 (1972)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    J J Griffin,Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 478 (1966)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    D G Harp, J M Miller and J B Berne,Phys. Rev. 165, 1166 (1968)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    G D Harp and J M Miller,Phys. Rev. C3, 1847 (1971)ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M Blann,Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 25, 123 (1975)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    S A Hjorth, H Ryde, K A Hagemann, G Lovhoiden and J C WaddingtonNucl. Phys. A144, 513 (1970)ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    M Ismail and A S Divatia,Pramana — J. Phys. 30, 193 (1988); B.A.R.C./1366 (1987)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [8a]
    M Ismail,Pramana — J. Phys. 32, 605 (1989) and B.A.R.C/1407 (1988)ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [9]
    M Ismail,Phys. Rev. C41, 87 (1990)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [10]
    J Ernst, R Ibowski, H Klampil, H Machner, T Mayer-Kuckuk and R Shanz,Z. Phys. A306, 301 (1982)Google Scholar
  12. [11]
    C Kaltach,Phys. Rev. C23, 124 (1981)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [12]
    M L Goldberger,Phys. Rev. 74, 1268 (1948)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [13]
    C J Mathews, B G Glagola, R A Moyle and V E Voila Jr.,Phys. Rev. C25, 2181 (1982)ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [14]
    I Dostrovsky, Z Frankel and G Friedlander,Phys. Rev. 116, 683 (1959);118, 781 (1960);118, 791 (1960)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [15]
    F Puhlhofer,Nucl. Phys. A280, 267 (1977)ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [16]
    Y Nagame, K Sueki, S Baba and H NakaharaPhys. Rev. C41, 889 (1990)ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [16a]
    O A Capurro, M de la Vega Vedoya, C Wasilevsky and S J Nassiff,J. Radioanalytical Nucl. Chem. 89/2, 519 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. [16b]
    A Colboreanu, P Constanin and O Salageon,Nucl. Phys. A383, 251 (1982)ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [16c]
    F Hermes, E W Jasper, H E Kurz, T Mayer-Kuchuk, P F A Goudsmit and H Arnold,Nucl. Phys. A228, 175 (1974)ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [16d]
    F M Lanzafame and M Blann,Nucl. Phys. A142, 545 (1970)ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. [17]
    M Blann, Alice/85/300A Evaporation Code, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, University of California Livermore UCID-20169 (1985)Google Scholar
  23. [18]
    M Uhl and B Stromaier,Computer code for particle-induced activation cross-section and related quantities, Institut fur Radiumforchung und Kernphysik Report 76/01, 1976 and Addendum to this report. See also B Stromaier and M Uhl, International Atomic Energy Agency Report IAEA-SMR43, 313 (1980)Google Scholar
  24. [19]
    C F Williamson, J P Boujot and J Picard, CEA-R 3042 (1966)Google Scholar
  25. [20]
    J Kern,Isabelle: A fortran non-linear least-square fit code for nuclear spectra (University of Fribourg, Switzerland, 1970) (unpublished)Google Scholar
  26. [21]
    J Kern,Nucl. Inst. Method. 79, 233 (1970)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  27. [22]
    C M Lederer and V S Shirley,Table of Isotopes, 7th edition (New York, John Wiley, 1978)Google Scholar
  28. [23]
    A H Wapstra and G Audi,Nucl. Phys. A432, 1 (1985)ADSGoogle Scholar
  29. [24]
    V F Weisskopf and D H Ewing,Phys. Rev. 57, 472 (1940)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. [25]
    W Hauser and H Feshbach,Phys. Rev. 87, 336 (1952)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  31. [26]
    E Gadioli, E Gadioli-Erba, L Sajo-Bohus and G Tagliaferri,Rev. Nuovo Cimento 6, 1 (1976)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  32. [27]
    E Gadioli, E Gadioli-Erba and J J Hogan,Phys. Rev. C16, 1404 (1977)ADSGoogle Scholar
  33. [28]
    W D Mayers and W J Swiatecki,Nucl. Phys. 81, 1 (1966)Google Scholar
  34. [28a]
    W D Mayers and W J Swiatecki,Ark. Fys. 36, 343 (1967)Google Scholar
  35. [29]
    M Blann and H K Vonach,Phys. Rev. C28, 1475 (1983)ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. [30]
    F D Becchetti and F D Greenlees,Phys. Rev. 182, 1190 (1969)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  37. [31]
    M Blann,Nucl. Phys. A213, 570 (1973)ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. [32]
    G A Bartholomewet al Adv. Nucl. Phys. (Plenum Press, N.Y., 1973) vol. 7, ch. 4Google Scholar
  39. [33]
    J M Blatt and V F Weisskopf,Theoretical Nuclear Physics (Wiley, New York, 1952) p. 627MATHGoogle Scholar
  40. [34]
    D W Lang,Nucl. Phys. 77, 545 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. [35]
    C K Cline,Nucl. Phys. A195, 353 (1972)ADSGoogle Scholar
  42. [36]
    C Kalbach-Cline,Nucl. Phys. A210, 590 (1973)ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© the Indian Academy of Sciences 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M Ismail
    • 1
  1. 1.Variable Energy Cyclotron CentreCalcuttaIndia

Personalised recommendations