Advertisement

Pramana

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 997–1004 | Cite as

Meson spectroscopy with confined one gluon exchange potential

  • K B Vijaya Kumar
  • A K Rath
  • S B Khadkikar
Article

Abstract

Confined gluons-exchange among relativistically confined quarks is used to calculate the ground state masses and the radially excited states of pseudo scalar and vector mesons. A good agreement is obtained with the experimental masses. The limitation of the perturbative treatment of estimating theN−Δ andπρ splitting using one-gluon-exchange potential is pointed out.

Keywords

Quark model harmonic model confined gluon current confinement 

PACS No.

13.76 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Particle Data Group, Review of Particle Properties,Phys. Rev. D50, part 1 (1994)Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A De Rujula, H Georgi and S L Glasow,Phys. Rev. D12, 147 (1975)ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    O W Greenberg,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Phys. 28, 327 (1978)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    R K Bhaduri, L E Cohler and Y Nogami,Nuovo Cimento A65, 376 (1981)ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    D B Lichtenberg,Int. J. Mod. Phys. A2, 1669 (1987)ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    M Narodetskii, R Ceuleneer and C Semay,J. Phys. G18, 1901 (1992)ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    N Isgur, D Scora, B Grinstein and M B Wise,Phys. Rev. D39, 799 (1989)ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D Scora and N Isgur,Phys. Rev. D52, 2783 (1995)ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M G Olsson, S Veseli and K Williams,Phys. Rev. D51, 5079 (1995);Phys. Rev. D52, 5041 (1995)ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    R F Labed,Phys. Rev. D47, 1134 (1993)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    P L Ferreira and N Zagury,Nuovo Cimento A20, 511 (1977)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    P L Ferreira, J A Helayel and N Zagury,Nuovo Cimento A55, 215 (1980)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    M Bander, D Silverman, B Klima and U Maor,Phys. Rev. D29, 2038 (1984)ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    S Godfrey and N Isgur,Phys. Rev. D32, 189 (1985)ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    S Capstick and N Isgur,Phys. Rev. D34, 2809 (1986)ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    A Le Yaouanc, L Oliver, O Pene and J C Raynal,Phys. Rev. D9, 2636 (1974)ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    C Hayne and N Isgur,Phys. Rev. D25, 1944 (1982)ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    S B Khadkikar and S K Gupta,Phys. Lett. B124, 523 (1983)ADSGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    S B Khadkikar,Pramana-J. Phys. 24, 63 (1985)ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    S B Khadkikar and P C Vinod Kumar,Pramana-J. Phys. 29, 39 (1987)ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    P C Vinod Kumar, K B Vijaya Kumar and S B Khadkikar,Pramana-J. Phys. 39, 47 (1992)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    S B Khadkikar and K B Vijaya Kumar,Phys. Lett. B254, 320 (1991)ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    K B Vijaya Kumar and S B Khadkikar,Nucl. Phys. A556, 396 (1993)ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    G Gartenhaus and C Schwartz,Phys. Rev. 108, 482 (1957)MATHCrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    M Moshinsky,Nucl. Phys. 13, 104 (1959)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© the Indian Academy of Sciences 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • K B Vijaya Kumar
    • 1
  • A K Rath
    • 1
    • 2
  • S B Khadkikar
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsMangalore UniversityMangalagangotri, MangaloreIndia
  2. 2.P.G. Department of PhysicsSambalpur UniversitySambalpurIndia
  3. 3.Physical Research LaboratoryNavrangpura, AhmedabadIndia

Personalised recommendations