, Volume 12, Issue 6, pp 665–678 | Cite as

Elastic scattering of 1.17 and 1.33 MeV gamma rays by molybdenum, tantalum and lead

  • G Basavaraju
  • P P Kane
  • K M Varier
Nuclear And Particle Physics


Elastic scattering cross-sections of lead, tantalum and molybdenum were determined with the help of a Ge (Li) detector for 1.17 and 1.33 MeV rays between 30° and 115°. Theoretical evaluations of the cross-sections are based on a coherent addition of the well-known nuclear Thomson scattering amplitudes, the Rayleigh amplitudes calculated by Kissel and Pratt and the Delbrück amplitudes given by Papatzacos and Mork. The fairly good agreement between experiment and theory reveals the importance of the real Delbrück amplitudes. However, the experimental results in the 30–60° range tend to lie slightly but systematically below the calculated cross-sections.


Gamma ray scattering elastic scattering lead tantalum molybdenum 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bar-Noy T and Kahane S 1977Nucl. Phys. A288 132ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. Basavaraju G and Kane P P 1970Nucl. Phys. A149 49ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown G E and Mayers D F 1957Proc. R. Soc. (London)A242 89 and references mentioned thereinADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Dixon W R and Storey R S 1968Can. J. Phys. 46 1153Google Scholar
  5. Ehlotzky F and Sheppey G C 1964Nuovo Cimento 33 1185CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. Hardie G, Merrow W J and Schwandt D R 1970Phys. Rev. C1 714ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Hardie G, De Vries J S and Chiang C K 1971Phys. Rev. C3 1287ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Kane P P and Baba Prasad P N 1977Phys. Rev. A15 1976ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Kane P P, Basavaraju G and Varier K M 1977Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 147 507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kane P P, Basavaraju G, Mahajani J and Priyadarsini A K 1978Nucl. Instrum. Meth. 155 467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kissel L and Pratt R H 1978Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 387 and private communicationCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Maximon L C 1977 NBS Technical Note 955 8Google Scholar
  13. Papatzacos P and Mork K 1975Phys. Rev. D12 206, and private communicationADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Schumacher M 1971Z. Phys. 242 444CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Schumacher M, Smend F and Borchert I 1973aNucl. Phys. A206 531ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Smend F, Schumacher M and Borchert I 1973bNucl. Phys. A213 309ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Smend F and Schumacher M 1974aNucl. Phys. A223 423ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Smend F and Schumacher M 1974bComp. Phys. Commun. 7 389CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. Schumacher M, Borchert I, Smend F and Rulhusen P 1975Phys. Lett. B59 134ADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Schumacher M, Smend F and Borchert I 1976Phys. Rev. C13 2318ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. Standing K G and Jovanovich J V 1962Can. J. Phys. 40 622ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Strauss M G, Sifter L L, Lenkszus F R and Bremer R 1968 IEEETrans. Nucl. Sci. NS-15 578Google Scholar
  23. Varier K M 1978Elastic scattering of 1.17 and 1.33MeV gamma rays Ph.D. thesis submitted to Indian Institute of Technology, BombayGoogle Scholar
  24. Vyssiere A, Beil H, Bergere R, Carlos P and Lepretre A 1970Nucl. Phys. A159 561Google Scholar

Copyright information

© the Indian Academy of Sciences 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • G Basavaraju
    • 1
  • P P Kane
    • 1
  • K M Varier
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsIndian Institute of TechnologyBombay

Personalised recommendations