Abstract
Ever since it was proposed more than three decades ago, the nuclear optical model has been very successful in interpreting a large body of nucleon-induced nuclear reaction data in terms of a complex nucleon-nucleus potential. Rapid progress both in the experimental measurements and the theoretical developments in the last two decades has led to a better understanding of this nucleon-nucleus optical potential. From the parameter-fitting phenomenological stage, the optical model has come a long way and it is now possible to calculate the nucleon-nucleus optical potential in a reasonable way starting from the fundamental nucleon-nucleon interaction. Excellent reviews on various aspects of the optical model exist in the literature for proton energies above 10 MeV. The present article is an attempt to review comprehensively the status of the proton-nucleus optical potential at low proton energies, below the Coulomb-barrier, for target nuclei with mass numbers lying between 40 and 130. The sets of phenomenological optical potential derived mostly from (p, n) reaction data are reviewed and their applicabilities discussed. The neutron-nucleus optical model is referred to wherever it is relevant. Microscopic calculations for one case is carried out and compared with the corresponding phenomenological values.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Avrigeanu M, Ivascu M and Avrigeanu V 1986 Specialist’ meeting on the use of the optical model for the calculation of neutron cross sections below 20 MeV, Paris, NEANDC222 279
Bauer M, Hernandez Saldana E, Hodgson P E and Quintanilla J 1982J. Phys. G8 525
Becchetti F D and Greenlees G W 1969Phys. Rev. 182 1190
Bhattacharya S ad Kailas S 1983Z. Phys. A312 99
Bilpuch E G, Lane A M, Mitchell G E and Moses J D 1976Phys. Rep. C28 145
Careda E, Pignanelli M, Micheletti S, Von Geramb H V, Harakeh M N, De Leo R, D’Erasmo G and Pantaleo A 1982Phys. Rev. C26 1941
Drenckhahn W, Feigel A, Finckh E, Gademann G, Ruskamp K, Wangler M and Zemlo L 1980Nucl. Phys. A339 13
Eck J S and Thompson W J 1975Nucl. Phys. A237 83
Esat M J, Spear R H, Zyskind J L, Shapiro M H, Fowler W A and Davidson J M 1981Phys. Rev. C23 1822
Feshbach H, Porter C E and Weisskopf V F 1954Phys. Rev. 96 448
Feigel A, Finckh E, Ruskamp K and Weise U 1980Phys. Rev. C21 2666
Finckh E 1980Nukleonika 25 1971
Finlay R W, Annand J R M, Pelter J S and Dietrich F S 1985Phys. Lett. B155 313
Flynn D S 1983Phys. Rev. C27 2381
Flynn D S, Hershberger R L and Gabbard F 1979Phys. Rev. C20 1700
Flynn D S, Hershberger R L and Gabbard F 1982Phys. Rev. C26 1744
Flynn D S, Hershberger R L and Gabbard F 1985Phys. Rev. C31 87
Gabbard F 1977 National Bureau of Standards Spl. Publication 493
Giannini M M and Ricco G 1976Ann. Phys. 102 458
Grimes S M 1980Phys. Rev. C22 436
Gulzar Singh, Kailas S, Saini S, Chatterjee A, Balakrishnan M and Mehta M K 1982Pramana (J. Phys.) 19 565
Gupta S K and Kerekatte S S 1971 BARC Report No. 579
Gyarmati B, Vertae T, Zolnai L, Baryshnikov A I, Gurbich A F, Titarenko N N and Yadrovsky E L 1979J. Phys. G5 1225
Gyarmati B, Lovas R G, Vertse T and Hodgson P E 1981J. Phys. G7 L209
Hauser W and Geshbach H 1952Phys. Rev. 87 366
Hershberger R L, Flynn D S, Gabbard F and Johnson C H 1980Phys. Rev. C21 896
Hjorth S A, Lin E K and Johnson A 1968Nucl. Phys. A116 1
Hodgson P E 1971Nuclear reactions and nuclear structure (Oxford: Clarendon Press) Ch. 5–10.
Hodgson P E 1984Rep. Prog. Phys. 47 613
Hodgson P E 1985 American Institute of Physics Conf. Proc. No. 124, p. 1
Iyengar K V K 1967Nucl. Phys. A96 521
Jeukenne J P, Lejeune A and Mahaux C 1977Phys. Rev. C16 639
Johnson C H and Kernell R L 1970Phys. Rev. C2 639
Johnson C H, Galonsky A and Inskeep C N 1960 ORNL 2910
Johnson C H, Kernell R L and Ramavataram S 1968Nucl. Phys. A107 21
Johnson C H, Bair J K, Jones C M, Penny S K and Smith D W 1977aPhys. Rev. C15 196
Johnson C H, Galonsky A and Kernell R L 1977bPhys. Rev. Lett. 39 1604
Johnson C H, Galonsky A and Kernell R L 1979Phys. Rev. C20 2052
Kailas S, Gupta S K, Mehta M K, Kerekette S S, Namjoshi L V, Ganguly N K and Chintalapudi S 1975Phys. Rev. C12 1789
Kailas Set al 1979Nucl. Phys. A315 157
Kailas S, Gupta S K, Kerekatte S S and Fernandes C V 1985Pramana J. Phys. 24 629
Kailas S, Mehta M K, Gupta S K, Viyogi Y P and Ganguly N K 1979Phys. Rev. C20 1272
Kailas S and Mehta M K 1982Proc. of the second Indo-US symposium (ed.) onNucl. Phys. at cyclotron and Intermediate energy B Sinha p. 505
Kailas S, Gupta S K, Mehta M K and Gulzar Singh 1982bPhys. Rev. C26 830
Kennett S R 1980aNucl. Phys. A344 351
Kennett S Ret al 1980bNucl. Phys. A346 523
Lejeune A and Hodgson P E 1978Nucl. Phys. A295 301
Lejeune A 1980Phys. Rev. C21 1107
Macklin R L 1957Nucl. Instrum. Methods 1 335
Macklin R L, Glass F M, Halperin J, Roseberry R T, Schmitt H W, Stoughton R W and Tobias M 1972Nucl. Instrum. Methods 102 181
Mahaux C and Ngo H 1981Phys. Lett. B100 285
Mahaux C and Nago H 1982Nucl. Phys. A378 205
Mahaux C and Ngo H 1983Phys. Lett. B126 1
Mahaux C, Ngo H and Satchler G R 1986Nucl. Phys. A449 354
Mahaux C and Sartor R 1986Nucl. Phys. A451 441
Matsuzaki T and Arai E 1983Z. Phys. A313 293
Menet J J H, Gross E E, Malanify J J and Zucker A 1971Phys. Rev. C4 1114
Perey F G 1963Phys. Rev. 131 745
Preston M A 1965Physics of the nucleus (New York: Addison-Wesley) p. 519
Rapaport J 1982Phys. Rep. C87 25
Sargood D G 1982Phys. Rep. C93 61
Saini Set al 1983Nucl. Phys. A405 55
Satchler G R and Love W G 1979Phys. Rep. C55 184
Schiffer J P and Lee L L 1958Phys. Rev. 109 2098
Schrils R, Flynn D S, Hershberger R L and Gabbard F 1979Phys. Rev. C20 1706
Schwandt P 1983 American Institute of Physics Conf. Proc. No. 97 p. 89
Sekharan K K 1966 M.Sc. (Thesis) Bombay University
Sekharan K K, Laumer H, Kern B D and Gabbard F 1976Nucl. Instrum. Methods 133 253
Sinha B, Srivastava D K and Ganguly N K 1973Phys. Lett. B43 113
Smith A B, Guenther P T and Whalen J F 1984Nucl. Phys. A415 1
Smith A B, Lewson R D and Guenther P T 1986 Specialists meeting on the use of the optical model for the calculation of neutron cross sections below 20 MeV, Paris, NEANDC222 p. 183
Srivastava D K, Basu D N and Ganguly N K 1983Phys. Lett. B124 6
Viyogi Y Pet al 1978Phys. Rev. C18 1178
Viyogi Y P 1983 Ph.D. (Thesis) Calcutta University
Von Geramb H V 1979 Microscopic optical potentials;Lecture notes in physics (Berlin: Springer) Vol. 89
Von Geramb H V 1985 American Institute of Physics Conf. Proc.124 p. 14
Walter R L and Guss P P 1985Proc. Int. Conf. Data for basic and applied science, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA
Zyskind J L, Barnes C A, Davidson J M, Fowler W A, Marrs R E and Shapiro M H 1980Nucl. Phys. A343 295
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mehta, M.K., Kailas, S. Proton-nucleus optical model potential at low energies—a review. Pramana - J Phys 27, 139–160 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02846335
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02846335
Keywords
- Low energy proton + nucleus optical model potential
- phenomenological analysis
- real and imaginary potential parameters