, Volume 27, Issue 1–2, pp 139–160 | Cite as

Proton-nucleus optical model potential at low energies—a review

  • M K Mehta
  • S Kailas
Nuclear Physics


Ever since it was proposed more than three decades ago, the nuclear optical model has been very successful in interpreting a large body of nucleon-induced nuclear reaction data in terms of a complex nucleon-nucleus potential. Rapid progress both in the experimental measurements and the theoretical developments in the last two decades has led to a better understanding of this nucleon-nucleus optical potential. From the parameter-fitting phenomenological stage, the optical model has come a long way and it is now possible to calculate the nucleon-nucleus optical potential in a reasonable way starting from the fundamental nucleon-nucleon interaction. Excellent reviews on various aspects of the optical model exist in the literature for proton energies above 10 MeV. The present article is an attempt to review comprehensively the status of the proton-nucleus optical potential at low proton energies, below the Coulomb-barrier, for target nuclei with mass numbers lying between 40 and 130. The sets of phenomenological optical potential derived mostly from (p, n) reaction data are reviewed and their applicabilities discussed. The neutron-nucleus optical model is referred to wherever it is relevant. Microscopic calculations for one case is carried out and compared with the corresponding phenomenological values.


Low energy proton + nucleus optical model potential phenomenological analysis real and imaginary potential parameters 


24.10 25.40 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Avrigeanu M, Ivascu M and Avrigeanu V 1986 Specialist’ meeting on the use of the optical model for the calculation of neutron cross sections below 20 MeV, Paris, NEANDC222 279Google Scholar
  2. Bauer M, Hernandez Saldana E, Hodgson P E and Quintanilla J 1982J. Phys. G8 525ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. Becchetti F D and Greenlees G W 1969Phys. Rev. 182 1190CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya S ad Kailas S 1983Z. Phys. A312 99Google Scholar
  5. Bilpuch E G, Lane A M, Mitchell G E and Moses J D 1976Phys. Rep. C28 145CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. Careda E, Pignanelli M, Micheletti S, Von Geramb H V, Harakeh M N, De Leo R, D’Erasmo G and Pantaleo A 1982Phys. Rev. C26 1941ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. Drenckhahn W, Feigel A, Finckh E, Gademann G, Ruskamp K, Wangler M and Zemlo L 1980Nucl. Phys. A339 13ADSGoogle Scholar
  8. Eck J S and Thompson W J 1975Nucl. Phys. A237 83ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. Esat M J, Spear R H, Zyskind J L, Shapiro M H, Fowler W A and Davidson J M 1981Phys. Rev. C23 1822ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. Feshbach H, Porter C E and Weisskopf V F 1954Phys. Rev. 96 448MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. Feigel A, Finckh E, Ruskamp K and Weise U 1980Phys. Rev. C21 2666ADSGoogle Scholar
  12. Finckh E 1980Nukleonika 25 1971Google Scholar
  13. Finlay R W, Annand J R M, Pelter J S and Dietrich F S 1985Phys. Lett. B155 313ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. Flynn D S 1983Phys. Rev. C27 2381ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. Flynn D S, Hershberger R L and Gabbard F 1979Phys. Rev. C20 1700ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. Flynn D S, Hershberger R L and Gabbard F 1982Phys. Rev. C26 1744ADSGoogle Scholar
  17. Flynn D S, Hershberger R L and Gabbard F 1985Phys. Rev. C31 87ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. Gabbard F 1977 National Bureau of Standards Spl. Publication 493Google Scholar
  19. Giannini M M and Ricco G 1976Ann. Phys. 102 458CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  20. Grimes S M 1980Phys. Rev. C22 436ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. Gulzar Singh, Kailas S, Saini S, Chatterjee A, Balakrishnan M and Mehta M K 1982Pramana (J. Phys.) 19 565ADSGoogle Scholar
  22. Gupta S K and Kerekatte S S 1971 BARC Report No. 579Google Scholar
  23. Gyarmati B, Vertae T, Zolnai L, Baryshnikov A I, Gurbich A F, Titarenko N N and Yadrovsky E L 1979J. Phys. G5 1225ADSGoogle Scholar
  24. Gyarmati B, Lovas R G, Vertse T and Hodgson P E 1981J. Phys. G7 L209Google Scholar
  25. Hauser W and Geshbach H 1952Phys. Rev. 87 366MATHCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  26. Hershberger R L, Flynn D S, Gabbard F and Johnson C H 1980Phys. Rev. C21 896ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. Hjorth S A, Lin E K and Johnson A 1968Nucl. Phys. A116 1ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Hodgson P E 1971Nuclear reactions and nuclear structure (Oxford: Clarendon Press) Ch. 5–10.Google Scholar
  29. Hodgson P E 1984Rep. Prog. Phys. 47 613CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  30. Hodgson P E 1985 American Institute of Physics Conf. Proc. No. 124, p. 1Google Scholar
  31. Iyengar K V K 1967Nucl. Phys. A96 521ADSGoogle Scholar
  32. Jeukenne J P, Lejeune A and Mahaux C 1977Phys. Rev. C16 639Google Scholar
  33. Johnson C H and Kernell R L 1970Phys. Rev. C2 639ADSGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson C H, Galonsky A and Inskeep C N 1960 ORNL 2910Google Scholar
  35. Johnson C H, Kernell R L and Ramavataram S 1968Nucl. Phys. A107 21ADSGoogle Scholar
  36. Johnson C H, Bair J K, Jones C M, Penny S K and Smith D W 1977aPhys. Rev. C15 196ADSGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnson C H, Galonsky A and Kernell R L 1977bPhys. Rev. Lett. 39 1604CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  38. Johnson C H, Galonsky A and Kernell R L 1979Phys. Rev. C20 2052ADSGoogle Scholar
  39. Kailas S, Gupta S K, Mehta M K, Kerekette S S, Namjoshi L V, Ganguly N K and Chintalapudi S 1975Phys. Rev. C12 1789ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. Kailas Set al 1979Nucl. Phys. A315 157ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. Kailas S, Gupta S K, Kerekatte S S and Fernandes C V 1985Pramana J. Phys. 24 629ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kailas S, Mehta M K, Gupta S K, Viyogi Y P and Ganguly N K 1979Phys. Rev. C20 1272ADSGoogle Scholar
  43. Kailas S and Mehta M K 1982Proc. of the second Indo-US symposium (ed.) onNucl. Phys. at cyclotron and Intermediate energy B Sinha p. 505Google Scholar
  44. Kailas S, Gupta S K, Mehta M K and Gulzar Singh 1982bPhys. Rev. C26 830ADSGoogle Scholar
  45. Kennett S R 1980aNucl. Phys. A344 351ADSGoogle Scholar
  46. Kennett S Ret al 1980bNucl. Phys. A346 523ADSGoogle Scholar
  47. Lejeune A and Hodgson P E 1978Nucl. Phys. A295 301ADSGoogle Scholar
  48. Lejeune A 1980Phys. Rev. C21 1107ADSGoogle Scholar
  49. Macklin R L 1957Nucl. Instrum. Methods 1 335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Macklin R L, Glass F M, Halperin J, Roseberry R T, Schmitt H W, Stoughton R W and Tobias M 1972Nucl. Instrum. Methods 102 181CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  51. Mahaux C and Ngo H 1981Phys. Lett. B100 285ADSGoogle Scholar
  52. Mahaux C and Nago H 1982Nucl. Phys. A378 205ADSGoogle Scholar
  53. Mahaux C and Ngo H 1983Phys. Lett. B126 1ADSGoogle Scholar
  54. Mahaux C, Ngo H and Satchler G R 1986Nucl. Phys. A449 354ADSGoogle Scholar
  55. Mahaux C and Sartor R 1986Nucl. Phys. A451 441ADSGoogle Scholar
  56. Matsuzaki T and Arai E 1983Z. Phys. A313 293Google Scholar
  57. Menet J J H, Gross E E, Malanify J J and Zucker A 1971Phys. Rev. C4 1114ADSGoogle Scholar
  58. Perey F G 1963Phys. Rev. 131 745CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  59. Preston M A 1965Physics of the nucleus (New York: Addison-Wesley) p. 519Google Scholar
  60. Rapaport J 1982Phys. Rep. C87 25CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  61. Sargood D G 1982Phys. Rep. C93 61CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  62. Saini Set al 1983Nucl. Phys. A405 55ADSGoogle Scholar
  63. Satchler G R and Love W G 1979Phys. Rep. C55 184ADSGoogle Scholar
  64. Schiffer J P and Lee L L 1958Phys. Rev. 109 2098CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  65. Schrils R, Flynn D S, Hershberger R L and Gabbard F 1979Phys. Rev. C20 1706ADSGoogle Scholar
  66. Schwandt P 1983 American Institute of Physics Conf. Proc. No. 97 p. 89Google Scholar
  67. Sekharan K K 1966 M.Sc. (Thesis) Bombay UniversityGoogle Scholar
  68. Sekharan K K, Laumer H, Kern B D and Gabbard F 1976Nucl. Instrum. Methods 133 253CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  69. Sinha B, Srivastava D K and Ganguly N K 1973Phys. Lett. B43 113ADSGoogle Scholar
  70. Smith A B, Guenther P T and Whalen J F 1984Nucl. Phys. A415 1ADSGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith A B, Lewson R D and Guenther P T 1986 Specialists meeting on the use of the optical model for the calculation of neutron cross sections below 20 MeV, Paris, NEANDC222 p. 183Google Scholar
  72. Srivastava D K, Basu D N and Ganguly N K 1983Phys. Lett. B124 6ADSGoogle Scholar
  73. Viyogi Y Pet al 1978Phys. Rev. C18 1178ADSGoogle Scholar
  74. Viyogi Y P 1983 Ph.D. (Thesis) Calcutta UniversityGoogle Scholar
  75. Von Geramb H V 1979 Microscopic optical potentials;Lecture notes in physics (Berlin: Springer) Vol. 89Google Scholar
  76. Von Geramb H V 1985 American Institute of Physics Conf. Proc.124 p. 14Google Scholar
  77. Walter R L and Guss P P 1985Proc. Int. Conf. Data for basic and applied science, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USAGoogle Scholar
  78. Zyskind J L, Barnes C A, Davidson J M, Fowler W A, Marrs R E and Shapiro M H 1980Nucl. Phys. A343 295ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© the Indian Academy of Sciences 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • M K Mehta
    • 1
  • S Kailas
    • 1
  1. 1.Nuclear Physics DivisionBhabha Atomic Research CentreBombayIndia

Personalised recommendations