Spin state and exchange in the quasi-one-dimensional antiferromagnet KFeS2
- 72 Downloads
We report the optical spectra and single crystal magnetic susceptibility of the one-dimensional antiferromagnet KFeS2. Measurements have been carried out to ascertain the spin state of Fe3+ and the nature of the magnetic interactions in this compound. The optical spectra and magnetic susceptibility could be consistently interpreted using aS=1/2 spin ground state for the Fe3+ ion. The features in the optical spectra have been assigned to transitions within thed-electron manifold of the Fe3+ ion, and analysed in the strong field limit of the ligand field theory. The high temperature isotropic magnetic susceptibility is typical of a low-dimensional system and exhibits a broad maximum at ∼565K. The susceptibility shows a well defined transition to a three dimensionally ordered antiferromagnetic state atT N=250 K. The intra and interchain exchange constants,J andJ′, have been evaluated from the experimental susceptibilities using the relationship between these quantities, andχ max,T max, andT N for a spin 1/2 one-dimensional chain. The values areJ=−440.71 K, andJ′=53.94 K. Using these values ofJ andJ′, the susceptibility of a spin 1/2 Heisenberg chain was calculated. A non-interacting spin wave model was used belowT N. The susceptibility in the paramagnetic region was calculated from the theoretical curves for an infiniteS=1/2 chain. The calculated susceptibility compares well with the experimental data of KFeS2. Further support for a one-dimensional spin 1/2 model comes from the fact that the calculated perpendicular susceptibility at 0K (2.75×10−4 emu/mol) evaluated considering the zero point reduction in magnetization from spin wave theory is close to the projected value (2.7×10−4 emu/mol) obtained from the experimental data.
KeywordsLow-dimensional materials magnetic ordering and exchange spin-waves
PACS Nos75.10 75.30 78.40
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- C A Taft, D Raj and J Danon,J. Phys. 35, C6–241 (1974)Google Scholar
- C A Taft,J. Phys. 38, 1161 (1977)Google Scholar
- R B Scorzelli, C A Taft, J Danon and V K Garg,J. Phys. C11, 1397 (1978)Google Scholar
- Z Tomkowicz, A Szytula and H Bak-Ptasiewicz,Phys. Status Solidi 57, K25 (1980)Google Scholar
- F Keffer, inHandbuch der Physik edited by S Flügge (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1966) vol. XVIII/2, pp. 1–273, and references thereinGoogle Scholar
- D A Cruse and M Gerloch,J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. (1977) 152Google Scholar
- W V Sweeney and R E Coffman,Biochim. Biophys. Acta 286, 26 (1972)Google Scholar
- J C Bonner and M E Fisher,Phys. Rev. 135, A640 (1964)Google Scholar
- T Oguchi,Phys. Rev. 133, A1098 (1964)Google Scholar
- J S Smart,Effective field theories of magnetism (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1986)Google Scholar