# Asymmetry of mass and charge division in spontaneous fission

- 18 Downloads

## Abstract

The order-disorder model has been used to explain asymmetry of mass and charge division and related phenomena in fission. According to this model the fission process involves two steps consisting of charge polarisation into two ‘impending fragment clusters’ with beta stable neutron numbers and subsequent distribution of the balance neutrons between the two. Mode of elemental division of the fissioning nuclei is attributed to the charge polarisation in the first step. Theory of reaction rate has been applied to the system.

The frequency term is obtained by applying the conditional stochastic process under charge polarisation constraint and the energy-dependent term is given by the condition of minimum in free energy of the system. Using this, the relative probability of polarisation into given charge pair is arrived at.

The model uses stable neutron numbers for the charges as the only input. No explicit assumption or quantification on the preference of formation of shell closure species in fission is necessary. The statistics developed on the principle of equal*a priori* probability of all charge polarisation is used. The shell effects come into play only in deciding a stable neutron number for the charges. The total isotopic yield distribution for a number of fission reactions shows asymmetry in the actinide region which reduces with increasing mass/charge of the fissioning nuclide and bunching of the higher*z* peaks. Although the mass yields obtained therefrom for a number of fission reactions agree with experimental results, the peaks of the distributions are slightly shifted away from the symmetric point and the distributions are somewhat narrower. Charge distribution parameters obtained from these results are also presented.

## Keywords

Spontaneous fission order-disorder model charge polarisation stable neutron number total isotopic yield asymmetry of mass and charge division charge distribution## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- Bemis C E, Ferguson R L, Plasil F, Silva R J, O’Kelly G D, Kiefer M L, Hahn R L, Hensley D C, Hulet E K and Lougheed R W 1977
*Phys. Rev. Lett.***39**1246CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar - Bohr A 1956 in
*Proc. I UN Int. Conf. on peaceful uses of atomic energy*(New York: United Nations) Vol. 2, p. 151Google Scholar - Burnside W 1959
*Theory of probability*(New York: Dover) p. 19MATHGoogle Scholar - Chakraborty P P 1977
*Asymmetry of mass and charge distribution in low energy fission and fissile material identification technique*, Ph.D. Thesis, Gujarat UniversityGoogle Scholar - Deruytter A J and Wegener-Penning G 1973 in
*Proc. III Int. Symp. on physics and chemistry of fission*(Vienna: IAEA Vol 2. p 51Google Scholar - Frenkel J 1946
*Kinetic theory of liquids*(New York: Dover)MATHGoogle Scholar - Glasstone S 1952
*Theoretical chemistry*(New Yrok: Van Noatrand)Google Scholar - Howard W M and Nix J R 1973 in
*Proc. III Int. Symp. on physics and chemistry of fission*(Vienna: IAEA) Vol**1**p. 145Google Scholar - Hyde E K 1962 A review of nuclear fission, fission phenomena at low energy Report UCRL-90 36-Rev.Google Scholar
- Iyer M R 1971
*Charge and energy distribution on fission fragments in low energy fission and their neutron evaporation and beta decay characteristics*, Ph.D. Thesis, Gujarat UniversityGoogle Scholar - Jensen A S and Dossing T 1973 in
*Proc. III Int. Symp. on physics and chemistry of fission*(Vienna: IAEA) Vol 1 p. 409Google Scholar - Maruhn J, Greiner W, Lichtner P and Dreschsel D 1973 in
*Proc. III Int. Symp. on physics and chemistry of fission*, (Vienna: IAEA) Vol 1, p 569Google Scholar - Meek M E and Rider B F 1974 Report NEDO-12154-1Google Scholar
- Norenberg W 1969 in
*Proc. II Int. Symp. on physics and chemistry of fission*, (Vienna: IAEA) p. 845Google Scholar - Pappas A C, Alstad J and Hagebo E 1969 in
*Proc. II Int. Symp. on physics and chemistry of fission*, (Vienna: IAEA) p. 669Google Scholar - Pauli H C and Ledergerber T 1973 in
*Proc. III Int. Symp. on physics and chemistry of Fission*, (Vienna: IAEA) vol 1 p. 463Google Scholar - Ramamurthy V S and Ramanna R 1969 in
*Proc. II Int. Symp. on physics and chemistry of fission*, (Vienna: IAEA) p. 41Google Scholar - Schmitt H W 1970 Private communication, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USAGoogle Scholar
- Schultheis H, Schultheis R, Wildermuth K, Faessler A and Grummer F 1978 in
*Proc. III Int. Conf. on clustering aspects of nuclear structure and nuclear reactions, Manitoba*C3Google Scholar - Sharma D N 1975
*Charge distribution, neutron evaporation and energy distribution in fast binary fission*, M.Sc. thesis, Bombay UniversityGoogle Scholar - Thind K S, Tracy B L, Thode R G and Tomlinson R H 1969 in
*Proc. II Int. Symp. on physics and chemistry of fission*(Vienna: IAEA) p. 845Google Scholar - Unik J P, Grindler J E, Glendenin L E, Flynn K F, Gorsky A and Sjoblom R K 1973 in
*Proc. III Int. Symp. on physics and chemistry of fission*(Vienna: IAEA)*Rochester*, Vol. 2 p. 19Google Scholar - Wahl A C, Norris A E, Rouse R A and Williams J C 1969 in
*Proc. II Int. Symp. on physics and chemistry of fission*, (Vienna: IAEA) Vol., p. 813Google Scholar