Advertisement

Journal of Forestry Research

, Volume 11, Issue 4, pp 245–248 | Cite as

A comparison of several indices for assessing body condition of Mongolian gazelle

  • Li Jun-sheng
  • Zhou Hong-li
  • Yuan Li
  • Zhang Dong-mei
Article

Abstract

Riney kidney fat index (RKFI), whole kidney fat index (WKFI), femur marrow fat index (FMFI), and tibia marrow fat index (TMFI) of 51 Mongolian gazelles (Procapra gutturosa), collected in Hulunbeier grassland, Inner Mongolian, China, were measured during spring, autumn and winter in 1997–98. These different indexes were compared for using them in assessing the body condition. There was a linear relationship (y=0.9444x−20.139; r=0.9454; p<0.01) between RKFI and KMFI. A linear relationship (y=0.9348x+1.1843; r=0.9875; P<0.01) between TMFI and FMFI also occurred for gazelles. There was a curvilinear relationship (y=31.44Ln(x)−44.403; r=0.8643; P<0.01) between FMFI and RKFI. FMFI remained high, while RKFI decreased to a certain extent. After most of the kidney fat was used, the femur marrow fat abruptly decreased. The results showed that the kidney fat index is more adequate for evaluating the population nutrition in good condition, but marrow fat index was more useful for assessing in poorer nutritional condition.

Key words

Procapra gutturosa fat indexes nutritional condition assessment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cederlund, G.N., Bergstrom, R.L and Danell, K. 1989. Seasonal variation in mandible marrow fat in moose [J]. J. Wildl. Magane.,53: 587–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Jiang Zhaowen, Xu Li and Zheng Hong. 1991. The comparative analyses on age identification indexes of Mongolian gazelle [J]. Chinese Wildlife,3: 25–28Google Scholar
  3. Johns, P.E., Smith, M.H. and Chesser, R. K. 1980. Effect of sex, age, habitat, and body weight on kidney weight in white-tailed deer [J]. Growth,44: 46–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mech, L.D. and Delgiudice, G.D. 1985. Limitations of the marrow-fat technique as an indicator of body condition [J]. Wildl. Soc. Bull.,13: 204–206.Google Scholar
  5. Ratcliffe, P.R. 1980. Bone marrow fat as an indicator of condition in roe deer [J]. Acta Theriol.,25: 333–340.Google Scholar
  6. Riney, T. 1955. Evaluating condition of free-ranging red deer (Cervus elaphus), with special reference to New Zealand [J]. New Zealand J. Sci. & Tech. Sect. B,36:429–463.Google Scholar
  7. Riney, T. 1982. Study and Management of Large Mammals [M]. New Zealand Sci. Press. WileyGoogle Scholar
  8. Robbins, C.T. 1983. Wildlife feeding and nutrition [M]. Acad. Press, New York, N. Y. 343pp.Google Scholar
  9. Sinclair, A.R.E. and Duncan, O. 1972. Indexes of condition in tropical ruminants [J]. J. E. Afr. Wildl.10:143–149Google Scholar
  10. Torbit, S.C., Carpenter, L.H., Bartmann, R.M., Alldredge, A.W., White, G.C. 1988. Calibration of carcass fat indices in wintering mule deer [J]. J. Wildl. Manage.,52: 582–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Van Vuren, D. and B.E. Coblentz. 1985. Kidney weight variation and the kidney fat index: an evaluation [J]. J. Wildl. Manage., 49: 177–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Northeast Forestry University 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Li Jun-sheng
    • 1
  • Zhou Hong-li
    • 1
  • Yuan Li
    • 1
  • Zhang Dong-mei
    • 1
  1. 1.Northeastern Forestry UniversityHarbinP. R. China

Personalised recommendations