Advertisement

Sports Engineering

, Volume 7, Issue 3, pp 121–129 | Cite as

An examination of the Clegg impact hammer test with regard to the playing performance of synthetic sports surfaces

  • M. J. Carré
  • S. J. Haake
Article

Abstract

One of the tests used to evaluate the performance of sports surfaces measures the peak deceleration of a rigid mass during contact with the surface, after being dropped from a set height. It is widely used and is included in a number of international standards.

The test was carried out using two drop heights on four different designs of artificial cricket pitch, with a full set of acceleration data being collected over the duration of impact. These data were then integrated twice with respect to time to produce velocity and displacement information. Oblique impacts of cricket balls were also carried out and analysed using a high-speed video system to evaluate the playing performance of each pitch design.

It was found that, although the pitches gave quite different readings of peak deceleration, they produced similar values for coefficient of restitution and were therefore considered to ‘play’ in a very similar way. This was due to a high peak deceleration reading being accompanied by a short contact time and low peak deceleration being accompanied by a long contact time, meaning that the change in momentum was similar in both cases. It was concluded that for accelerometer tests to be useful, all the acceleration-time data should be analysed, rather than the peak value alone.

Keywords

testing accelerometer synthetic sports surfaces 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM F355-86). Standard test method for shock-absorbing properties of playing surface systems and materials.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, S.W., Cook, A., Binns, D.J., Carré, M.J. & Haake, S. J. (1998) The effect of soil type and profile construction on the performance of cricket pitches. II. Playing quality during the first season of use.J. Turfgrass Sci.,74, 93–107.Google Scholar
  3. British Standards Institution (BS 7044) Artificial Sports Surfaces. Section 2.2: Methods for determination of person/surface interaction.Google Scholar
  4. British Standards Institution (BS 812) Testing aggregates. Part 3: Methods for determination of mechanical properties.Google Scholar
  5. Carré, M. J., Baker, S. W., Newell, A. J. & Haake, S. J. (1999) The dynamic behaviour of cricket balls during impact and variations due to grass and soil type.Sports Engineering,2(3).Google Scholar
  6. Carré, M. J., Dodd, D., Senior, T. & Haake, S.J. (2004) A system for predicting the impact between a ball and a sports surface. In:Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on the Engineering of Sport (in press).Google Scholar
  7. Carré, M. J., Haake, S. J., Baker, S. W. & Newell, A. (1998) The measurement of spinning ball impacts on cricket pitches. Joint Symposium on Sports Engineering & Human Dynamics Ashiya, Japan. 22–24 October, 1998. No. 98-31, pp. 153–157.Google Scholar
  8. Carré, M. J., Haake, S. J., Baker, S. W. & Newell, A. J. (2000) Predicting the dynamic behaviour of cricket balls after impact with a deformable pitch. In:The Engineering of Sport, Research, Development and Innovation: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on the Engineering of Sport (eds A.J. Subic & S.J. Haake), pp. 177–184. Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Clegg, B. (1976) An impact testing device for in situ base course evaluation.Australian Road Res. Bur. Proc.,8, 1–6.Google Scholar
  10. Daish, C. (1972).The Physics of Ball Games. English Universities Press.Google Scholar
  11. Lush, W.M. (1985) Objective assessment of turf cricket pitches using an impact hammer.J. Sports Turf Res. Inst.,61, 71–79.Google Scholar
  12. Nigg, B.M. (1990) The validity and relevance of tests used for the assessment of sports surfaces.Med. and Sci. in Sports and Exercise,22(1), 131–139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© isea 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sports Engineering Research GroupThe University of SheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations