Sports Engineering

, Volume 7, Issue 1, pp 41–52 | Cite as

Analysis of ankle protection in Association football



Football ankle protectors were evaluated against a kick from a studded boot. An anatomically correct test rig was used to evaluate materials and designs. Sensors were used to determine peak pressures on the bony protuberances, and load spreading. Finite element analysis (FEA), varying the material parameters and component dimensions, were used to explore pressure distributions and shell buckling. Current designs, with thin ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) foam and low-density polyethylene (LDPE) shells, cannot prevent some football kicks causing bruising of the ankle. The protection level could be improved by using thicker foams of higher modulus, and domed shells of higher stiffness.


ankle impact Association football protection 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ankrah, S. (2002) Protective materials for sporting applications — football shin guards. (PhD thesis, University of Birmingham)Google Scholar
  2. Ankrah, S. (2003) report for Football Association, in preparation.Google Scholar
  3. Ankrah, S. & Mills, N.J. (2003) Performance of football shin guards, accepted bySports Engineering.Google Scholar
  4. Ankrah, S., Verdejo, R. and Mills, N.J. (2002) The mechanical properties of ESI/LDPE foam blends and sport applications.Cellular Polymers,21, 237–264.Google Scholar
  5. British Standards (2001) BSEN 13061:2001 Protective clothing — shin guards for association football players. British Standards, London.Google Scholar
  6. Clarys, J.P. & Marfell-Jones, M.J. (1994) Soft tissue segmentation of the body and fractionation of the upper and lower limbs.Ergonomics,37, 217–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Damask, A.C. & Damask, J.N. (1990)Injury Causation Analyses: Case Studies and Data Sources. Michie Co., Charlottesville, VA, USA.Google Scholar
  8. Ekstrand, J., Gillquist, J. & Liljedahl, S.O. (1983) Prevention of football injuries — supervision by doctor and physiotherapist.American Journal of Sports Medicine,11, 116–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hawkins, R.D. & Fuller, C.W. (1999) A prospective study of injuries in four professional football clubs.British Journal of Sports Medicine,33, 196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mills, N.J. (1996) The Biomechanics of Hip protectors, Proceedings Institute of Mechanical Engineers part H,Journal of Engineering in Medicine,210, 259–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Schmidt-Olsen, S., Jorgensen, U., Kaalund, S. & Sorensen, J. (1991) Injuries among young football players.American Journal of Sports Medicine,19, 273–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Shorten, M. (2000) Finite element modelling of football shoe soles. Available at Scholar
  13. Sitler, M., Ryan, J. Wheeler, B., McBride, J., Arciero, R. & Horodyski, M. (1994) The efficacy of a semi rigid ankle stabilizer to reduce acute ankle injuries in basketball.American Journal of Sports Medicine,22, 454–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Surve, I., Schwellnus, M.P., Noakes, T. & Lombard, C. (1994) A fivefold reduction in the incidence of recurrent ankle sprains in football players using sport-stirrup orthosis.American Journal of Sports Medicine,22, 601–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Verdejo, R. & Mills, N.J. (2002) Performance of EVA foams in running shoes. In: S. Ujihashi & S.J. Haake (Eds),The Engineering of Sport 4, pp. 580–587, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© isea 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Engineering, Metallurgy and MaterialsThe University of BirminghamEdgbaston

Personalised recommendations