Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison among sea surface roughness schemes

  • Physics
  • Published:
Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Based on the measurements from the US National Data Buoy Center 3-m discus buoy site No. 44004 (38.5°N, 70.47°W) from January 1 to March 31 of 2003, with the COARE algorithm (Version 3.0), the results from four parameterization schemes developed recently for sea surface aerodynamic roughness length were compared with each other. Calculations of frictional speedu*, drag coefficientC d and wind stress τ indicate that the calculated frictional velocities from the four schemes (8.50%–16.20%, the normalized standard error estimate, or NSEE), the computed drag coefficients and wind stress (respectively 15.08%–28.67% and 17.26%–50.59% NSEE) are reasonable. Schemes YT96 and GW03 are consistent. The O02 scheme gives over-estimated values foru* andC d. Schemes TY01 and GW03 display discontinuous characteristics in handling young wave data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Charnock, H., 1955. Wind stress on water surface.J. Roy Meterol. Soc. 81: 639–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donelan, M., F. W. Dobson, S. D. Smith and R. J. Anderson, 1993. On the dependence of sea surface roughness on wave development.J. Phys. Oceanog. 23: 2143–2149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairall, C. W., E. F. Bradley, D. P. Rogers, J. B. Edson and G. S. Young, 1996. Bulk parameterization of air-sea fluxes for TOGA COARE.J. Geophys. Res. 101: 3747–3764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, Z. Q. and Q. Wang, 2005. Dependence of sea surface aerodynamic roughness on wave parameters, submitted toQuarterly Journal of Applied Meterology (in press)

  • Oncley, S. P. and J. Dudhia, 1995. Evaluation of surface fluxes from MM5 using observations.Mon. Wea. Rev. 123: 3344–3357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oost, W. A., G. J. Komen, C. M. J. Jacobs and C. van Oort, 2002. New evidence for a relation between wind stress and wave age from measurements during ASGAMAGE.Bound-Layer Meteor. 103: 409–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. D., 1988. Coefficients for sea surface wind stress, heat flux, and wind profiles as a function of wind speed and temperature.J. Geophys. Res. 93: 15467–15472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. K. and M. J. Yelland, 2001. The dependence of sea surface roughness on the height and steepness of the waves.J. Phys. Oceanog. 31: 572–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yelland, M. and P. K. Taylor, 1996. Wind stress measurements from the open ocean.J. Phys. Oceanogr. 26: 541–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pan Yuping.

Additional information

This work is supported by Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Meterological Disaster Program (KLME 050210).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wenyu, S., Qijun, G., Yuping, P. et al. Comparison among sea surface roughness schemes. Chin. J. Ocean. Limnol. 23, 376–382 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02842680

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02842680

Key words

Navigation