Advertisement

Journal of Zhejiang University Science B

, Volume 6, Issue 8, pp 731–735 | Cite as

Magnetic properties and heavy metal contents of automobile emission particulates

  • Lu Sheng-gao
  • Bai Shi-qiang
  • Cai Jing-bo
  • Xu Chuang
Chemical and Environmental Engineering
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

Measurements of the magnetic properties and total contents of Cu, Cd, Pb and Fe in 30 automobile emission particulate samples indicated the presence of magnetic particles in them. The values of frequency dependent susceptibility {ie731-1} showed the absence of superparamagnetic (SP) graiss in the samples. The IRM20mT (isothermal remanent magnetization at 20 mT) being linearly proportional to SIRM (saturation isothermal remanent magnetization)(R 2=0.901), suggested that ferrimagnetic minerals were responsible for the magnetic properties of automobile emission particulates. The average contents of Cu, Cd, Pb and Fe in automobile emission particulates were 95.83, 22.14, 30.58 and 34727.31 mg/kg, respectively. Significant positive correlations exist between the magnetic parameters and the contents of Pb, Cu and Fe. The magnetic parameters of automobile emission particulates reflecting concentration of magnetic particles increased linearly with increase of Pb and Cu content, showed that the magnetic measurment could be used as a preliminary index for detection of Pb and Cu pollution.

Key words

Automobile emission particulates Magnetic properties Heavy metal Environmental magnetism 

Document code

CLC number

X5 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chan, L.S., Ng, S.L., Davis, A.M., Yim, W.W.S., Yeung, C.H., 2001. Magnetic properties and heavy-metal contents of contaminated seabed sediments of Penny's Bay, Hong Kong.Marine Pollution Bulletin,42: 569–583.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen, T.B., Wong, J.W.C., Zhou, H.Y., Wong, H.Y., 1997. Assessment of trace metal distribution and contamination in surface soils of Hong Kong.Environmental Pollution,96: 61–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dunlop, D.J., Ozdemir, O., 1997. Rock Magnetism: Fundamentals and Frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  4. Hanesch, M., Scholger, R., Rey, D., 2003. Mapping dust distribution around an industrial site by measuring magnetic parameters of tree leaves.Atmospheric Environment,37: 5125–5133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hoffmann, V., Knab, M., Appel, E., 1999. Magnetic susceptibility mapping of roadside pollution.J. Geochemical Exploration,66: 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hunt, A., Jones, J., Oldfeild, F., 1984. Magnetic measurement and heavy metal in atmospheric particulates on anthropogenic origin.The Science of the Total Environment,33: 129–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Imperato, M., Adamo, P., Naimo, D., Arienzo, M., Stanzione, D., Violante, P., 2003. Spatial distribution of heavy metals in urban soils of Naples city (Italy).Environmental Pollution,124: 247–256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kapicka, A., Jordanova, N., Petrovsky, E., Podrazsky, X., 2003. Magnetic study of weakly contaminated forest soils.Water, Air, and Soil Pollution,148: 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lecoanet, H., Leveque, F., Ambrosi, J.P., 2003. Combination of magnetic parameters: An efficient: way to discriminate soil-contamination sources (south France).Environmental Pollution,122: 229–234.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lu, S.G., 2003. Chinese Soil Magnetism and Environment. Higher Education Press, Beijing China (in Chinese).Google Scholar
  11. Matzka, J., Maher, A., 1999. Magnetic biomonitoring of roadside tree leaves: Identification of spatial and temporal variations in vehicle-derived particles.Atmospheric Environment,33: 4565–4569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moreno, E., Sagnotti, L., Dinares-Turell, J., Legzdins, A.E., Cascella, A., 2003. Biomonitoring of traffic air pollution in Rome using magnetic properties of tree leaves.Atmospheric Environment,37: 2967–2977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Morris, W.A., Versteeg, J.K., Bryant, D.W., Legzdins, A.E., McCarry, B.E., Marvin, C.H., 1995. Preliminary comparisons between mutagenicity and magnetic susceptibility of respirable airborne particle.Atmospheric Environment,29: 3441–3450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Petrovsky, E., Kapicka, A., Zapletal, K., Sebestova, E., Spanila, T., Dekkers, M.J., Rochette, P., 1998. Correlation between magnetic parameters and chemical composition of lake sediments from northern Bohemia-preliminary study.Phys. Chem. Earth.,23: 1123–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Petrovsky, E., Kapicka, A., Jordanova, N., Knab, M., Hoffmann, V., 2000. Low-field magnetic susceptibility: A proxy method of estimating increased pollution of different environment systems.Environmental Geology,39: 312–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shu, J., Dearing, J.A., Morse, A.P., Yu, L.Z., Yuan, N., 2001. Determining the sources of atmospheric particles in Shanghai, China, from magnetic and geochemical properties.Atmospheric Environment,35: 2615–2625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thompson, R., Oldfield, F., 1986. Environmental Magnetism. George Allen & Unwin, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Zhejiang University Press 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lu Sheng-gao
    • 1
  • Bai Shi-qiang
    • 1
  • Cai Jing-bo
    • 1
  • Xu Chuang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environmental and Resource SciencesZhejiang UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations