Advertisement

KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering

, Volume 7, Issue 5, pp 499–506 | Cite as

Application of enhanced electrokinetic extraction for lead spiked kaolin

  • Sang Jae Han
  • Soo Sam Kim
Geotechnical Engineering

Abstract

In this study, an electrokinetic technique applied for the purpose of extracting lead from contaminated soil was investigated. To do this, the laboratory test for the kaolin clay contaminated by lead was performed and pH distribution, transport of contaminants in soil sample was studied. Moreover, injecting citric acid and SDS solution, anionic surfactant, and the reversal of the electrode were carried out in order to remove accumulated heavy metal in the cathode region. Under 1V/cm voltage gradient, lead was transported to the cathode and the removal rate reduced about at 75% in 80% region between electrodes. In spite of this removal rate, most of the transported lead was precipitated in the cathode region and finally the amount of lead drained into the cathode reservoir was found to be small. However, it was found that injection of citric acid and SDS into the contaminated soil was effective to remove lead three times or more than the unenhanced method.

Keywords

enhanced electrokinetic remediation kaolin lead surfactant 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acar, Y.B., and Alshawabkeh, A.N. (1993) “Principles of electrokinetic remediation.” Environ Sci Technol, Vol. 27, No. 13, pp. 2638–2647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alshawabkeh, A.N. and Acar, Y.B. (1995) “Principles of species transport in saturated soils under an electric field.”Proceedings of the Simposium GREEN '93-Geotechnics Related to The Environment, Balkema, Rotterrdam.Google Scholar
  3. Alshawabkeh, A.N., Yeung, A.T. and Brika, M.R (1999) “Practical aspects of in-situ electrokinetic extraction.”J. of Environ Eng., Vol. 125, No. 1, pp. 27–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eykholt, G.R. and Daniel, D.E. (1994) “Impact of system chemistry on eletroosmosis in contaminated soil.”J. of Geotech Eng., Vol. 120, No. 5, pp. 797–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gray, D.H. and Somogyi, F. (1977) “Electro-osmotic dewatering with polarity reversals”J. of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Eng., Vol. 103, No. 1, pp. 51–54.Google Scholar
  6. Han, S.J. (2000)Characteristics of electroosmosis and heavy metal migration in contaminated soil by electrokinetic technique. Ph. D. Dissertation, Dept. of Civil & Environ. Eng., Chung-Ang Univ., Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar
  7. Kim, S.S., Han, S.J., and Jeong, S.Y. (1999) “The study on electrical and chemical variation in electro kinetics drainage system.”J. of KSCE, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 767–774.Google Scholar
  8. Phadungchewit, H.B. (1990)The role of pH and soil buffer capacity in heavy metal retention in clay soils, Ph. D. Dissertation, McGill Univ, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.Google Scholar
  9. Shapiro, A.P. and Probstein, R.F. (1999) “Removal of contaminants from saturated clay by eletro-osmosis.”Environ Sci Technol., Vol. 27, No. 2, pp.283–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Taha, M. R., Acar, Y.B., Gale, R.J., and Zappi, M.E. (1994) “Surfactant enhanced electrokinetic remediation of NAPLs in soils.”1st International Congress on Environmental Geotechnics, Edmonton Alberta Canada, pp. 373–377.Google Scholar
  11. Yeung, A.T., Hsu, C.H., and Menon R.M. (1996) “EDTA-enhanced electrokinetic extraction of lead.”J. of Geotech Eng, Vol. 122, No. 8, pp.666–673.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© KSCE and Springer jointly 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sang Jae Han
    • 1
  • Soo Sam Kim
    • 1
  1. 1.Hanyang UniversityKorea

Personalised recommendations