Advertisement

Journal of Coastal Conservation

, Volume 1, Issue 1, pp 87–96 | Cite as

Decision making in dune management: theory and practice

  • Davies P. 
  • Williams A. T. 
  • Curr R. H. F. 
Article

Abstract

Effective decision making depends upon the availability of quality information. Procedures involved in assessing dune vulnerability and protection require monitoring of sporadic processes and information must be collected from many discipline sources. In particular, a significant challenge to strategic management is recognition of subtle discontinuities which could undermine the long term stability of the dune system. These changes may be irregular and/or non linear requiring managers to be aware of existing parameters, patterns and emerging discontinuities. A range of components within the system should be measured on a systematic, temporal and spatial basis. An environmentalchecklist is a useful management technique which systematises information, so that strategic objectives can be made operational and achievable. Problems can be identified and solved with this methodology particularly if it is incorporated into aW problem solving model. The checklist procedure proposed in this paper has been developed and tested in field conditions for a range of north-west and south-European dune systems. Whereas a universalchecklist applicable to all systems is utopian in aim, intra and extra-regional comparisons can be undertaken with only minor modifications of some components. Parameters covering site and dune morphology, beach condition; surface character of the seaward 200 m of the dunes; pressure of use and recent protection measures are the basis for calculating vulnerability and protection indices. The balance between these indices can be determined, analysed and form the foundation for future informed management decisions.

Keywords

Checklist Dune Management practice Management theory W-model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anon. 1994.Open business school, B882, Creative management techniques. Group 4: Mapping and structure: the KJ Method, pp. 112–115. Open University.Google Scholar
  2. Alveirinho-Dias, J.M., Curr, R.H.F., Davies, P., Pereira, A.R., & William, A.T. 1994. Dune management vulnerability assessment: Portugal and North West Europe. In: Soares de Carvalho, G. & Veloso Gomes, F. (eds.)Littoral ‘94’, pp. 837–848. Instituto de Hidráulica e Recursos Hidricos, Universidade do Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  3. Asch, D. 1989. Strategic control: An overview of the issues. In: Asch, D. & Bowman, C. (eds.)Readings in strategic management, pp. 397–408. Macmillan, London, in association with the Open University.Google Scholar
  4. Bodéré, J.Cl., Cribb, R., Curr, R.H.F., Davies, P., Hallégouët, B., Meur, C., Pirou, N., Williams, A.T. & Yoni, C. 1994. Vulnerabilité des dunes littorales: Mise au point d'une méthode d'évaluation. In: Miossec, A. (ed.)Défense des côtes ou protection de l'espace littoral'. Cahiers Nantais, No 41–42, 197–201, URA 904, CNRS, Commission sur l'Environment côtier de l'UGI.Google Scholar
  5. Boehmer-Christiansen, S. 1994. Politics and Environmental Management.J. Envir. Planning Mgt. 37: 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Boorman, L.A. 1989. The influence of grazing on British sand dunes. In: van der Meulen, F., Jungerius, P.D. & Visser, J.H. (eds.),Perspectives in coastal dune management, pp. 121–124. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  7. Bowman, C. & Asch, D. 1987.Strategic management. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  8. Cherrett, J.M. 1989. Key Concepts: the results of a survey of our members opinions. In: Cherrett, J.M. (ed.)Ecological Concepts: the Contribution of Ecology to an Understanding of the Natural World, pp. 1–16. Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
  9. Cooke, R. & Doornkamp, J. 1989.Geomorphology in Environmental Management. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. Davies, P., Curr, R.H.F., Williams, A.T., Hallégouët, B., Bodéré J.-Cl. & Koh, A. 1995. Dune management strategies; a Semi-quantitative assessment of the inter-relationship between coastal dune vulnerability and protection measures. In: Salman, A.P.H.M., Berends, A. & Bonazountes, M. (eds.)Coastal Management and Habitat Conservation, pp. 313–331, EUCC, Leiden.Google Scholar
  11. Dolan, R. 1972. Barrier Islands: Natural and Controlled. In: Coates, E.R. (ed.)Coastal Geomorphology, pp. 262–278. SUNY, Binghampton, NY.Google Scholar
  12. Donaldson, G. & Lorsch, J.W. 1983.Decision making at the top. Basic Books, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  13. Doody, P. 1989. Conservation and Development of Dunes in Great Britain. In: van der Meulen, F. Jungerius, P.D. & Visser, J.H. (eds.)Perspectives in coastal dune management, pp. 53–67 (SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  14. Funtowicz, S. & Raveltz, J. 1990.Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  15. Hagstrom, W.O. 1965.The Scientific community. Basic Books, London.Google Scholar
  16. Hallégouët, B., Bodéré, J.-Cl. & Pirou, N. 1984.Elements pour une politique depârtmentale de protection du littoral contre la mer. DDE du Finistère, 27 dossiers, 1982–84.Google Scholar
  17. Hogart, R.M. & Makridakis, S. 1981. Forecasting and Planning: an Evaluation.Management Science, Vol. 27: 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Johnson, G. 1989. Rethinking incrementalism. In: Asch, D. & Bowman, C. (eds.)Readings in strategic management, pp. 37–56. Macmillan, London, in association with the Open University.Google Scholar
  19. Johnson, G. & Scholes, K. 1988.Exploring corporate strategy. Prentice Hall, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
  20. Kepner, C.N. & Tregoe, B.B. 1976.The rational manager. Kepner-Tregoe Inc., Princetown, NJ.Google Scholar
  21. Lenz, R.T. & Lyles, M.A. 1989. Paralysis by analysis: is your planning system becoming too rational? In: Asch, D. & Bowman, C. (eds.)Readings in Strategic Management, pp. 57–70. Macmillan, London, in association with the Open University.Google Scholar
  22. Leopold, L.B. 1969.Quantitative comparison of some aesthetic factors among rivers. U.S. Geol. Survey Circular 620.Google Scholar
  23. Levin, S.A. 1989. Challenges in the development of a theory of community and ecosystem structure and function. In: Roughgarden, J., May, J.R.M. & Levin, S.A. (eds.)Perspectives in ecological theory, pp. 272–255. Princetown Univ. Press, Princetown, NJ.Google Scholar
  24. Louisse, C.J. & van der Meulen, F. 1991. Future coastal defence in the Netherlands: Strategies for protection and sustainable development.J. Coast. Res. 7 (4): 1027–1041.Google Scholar
  25. Meur, C. 1993.Geomorphologie, protection et gestion des dunes de Bretagne, septentrionale, elements de comparaison avec d'autres regions de la manche occidentale: Cotentin, Devon et Cornwall (R-U.). Unpubl. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest.Google Scholar
  26. Mintzberg, H. & Waters, J.A. 1989. Of strategies deliberate and emergent. In: Asch, D. & Bowman, C. (eds.)Readings in strategic management, pp. 37–56. Macmillan, London, in association with the Open University.Google Scholar
  27. Quinn, J.B. 1980.Strategies for change. Irwin, Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
  28. Taylor, J.W. 1961.How to create ideas. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
  29. van Zoest, J. 1992. Gambling with Nature? A New Paradigm of Nature and its Consequences for Nature Management Strategy. In: Carter, B., Curtis, T. & Sheehy-Skeffington, A. (eds.)Coastal dunes, pp.503–515. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  30. Wanders, E. 1989. Perspectives in Dune Management, towards a dynamic approach. In van der Meulen, F., Jungerius, P.D. & Visser, J.H. (eds.),Perspectives in Coastal Dune Management, pp. 141–148, SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  31. Westhoff, V. 1989. Dunes and dune management along the North Sea Coast. In: van der Meulen, F., Jungerius, P.D. & Visser, J.H. (eds.)Perspectives in coastal dune management, pp. 41–51. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague.Google Scholar
  32. Williams, A.T., Davies, P., Curr, R.H.F., Koh, A., Bodéré, J.-Cl., Hallégouët, B., Meur, C. & Yoni, C. 1993a. A checklist assessment of dune vulnerability and protection in Devon and Cornwall, UK. In: Magoon, O. (ed.)Proc. Coastal Zone '93, pp. 3395–3408. Amer. Soc. Civ. Eng. New York, NY.Google Scholar
  33. Williams, A.T. Davies, P., Curr, R.H.F. & Bodéré, J.-Cl. 1993b. An Approach to Coastal Dune Management: the North and West Coastline of France. In: Ozhän, E. (ed.)MedCoast '93, pp. 186–197. METU, Ankara.Google Scholar
  34. Williams, A.T., Davies, P., Alveirinho-Dias, J.M., Pereira, A.R., Garcia Mora, M.R. & Tejada, M. 1994. A re-evaluation of dune vulnerability checklist parameters.Gaia 8: 179–182.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© EUCC 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Davies P. 
    • 1
  • Williams A. T. 
    • 1
  • Curr R. H. F. 
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Environmental and Technological Research, School of Applied SciencesUniversity of GlamorganPontypriddWales, UK
  2. 2.Faculty of Applied SciencesCollege of Higher EducationBathUK

Personalised recommendations