Journal of Materials Engineering

, Volume 11, Issue 3, pp 201–207 | Cite as

Thermal and ion induced interfacial reactions between metal and graphite at elevated temperatures

  • Y. Hasebe
  • K. Morita


Thermal and ion bombardment induced reactions at the interface between the chromium layer and graphite substrate have been studied, by means of Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy (RBS), auger electron spectroscopy (AES), and reflection of high energy electron diffraction (RHEED) techniques, under an ultra high vacuum (UHV) condition at temperatures between 400 and 750° C. It is found that thermal annealing at temperatures above 650° C for ∼ 15 hr forms the polycrystalline chromium carbide layer of a single Cr7C3 phase on graphite. On ion bombardment of category I, where the linear range of ions is smaller than the thickness of the chromium carbide layer, it is found that the chromium carbide layer is transformed into an amorphous phase but the carbon concentration in the chromium carbide layer is unchanged. On the other hand, on ion bombardment of category II, where the peak of range distribution is located at the interface, it is found that the Cr7C3 phase is tranformed into a Cr3C2 phase, and moreover the normalized sputtering yields of Cr are more reduced than those in the category I, for the same removal rate of carbon atoms at the surface. The experimental results are discussed in terms of grain boundary diffusion, ion induced segregation, atomic mixing, and metastable carbide formation.


Carbon Concentration Auger Electron Spectroscopy Chromium Carbide Chromium Layer Graphite Substrate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. Miyahara and T. Tanabe,J. Nucl. Mater. 155/157 (1988) p. 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. Taglauer,J. Nucl. Mater. 128/129 (1984) p. 41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    K. Monta, H. Nakamura, N. Itoh, and S. Miyagawa, Proc. Symp. on Sputtering, Ed. by P. Varga et al., Vienna (1980) p. 469.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    K. Morita, H. Ohno, M. Takami, and N. Itoh,J. Nucl. Mater. 128/129 (1984) p. 260.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Sukenobu, Y. Gomay, H. Ohno, and K. Morita,J. Nucl. Mater. 148 (1987) p. 66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    K. Morita and H. Ohno,J. Mater. Eng. 9 (1987) p. 303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Santaniello, J. Appelt, J. Bohdansky, and J. Roth,Nucl. Instr. Meth. B19/20 (1987) p. 80.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    A. Santaniello, W. Möller, and J. Roth,J. Nucl. Mater. (in press).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y. Hasebe and K. Morita, to be published.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Hasebe, K. Kondoh, and K. Morita,J. Nucl. Mater. 162-164 (1989) p. 945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag New York Inc 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Y. Hasebe
    • 1
  • K. Morita
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Crystalline Materials Science, Faculty of EngineeringNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations