Skip to main content
Log in

Wear mechanisms that dominate tool-life in machining

  • Published:
Journal of Applied Metalworking

Abstract

The broad concern of the research described in this paper is to identify which of a number of possible tool wear mechanisms have the dominant influence on tool performance for a given toolwork combination. It is proposed that the commercially relevant measure of tool performance is the volume of material worn away from the noseradius region of the tool. A general equation is presented stating that this is affected by adhesion, abrasion, oxidation/adhesion wear, diffusion and plastic deformation of the edge. Micrographs are presented showing these main forms of wear, and the cutting conditions at which they dominate are discussed. The magnitude of the normal stress acting on the cutting edge and the elevated temperature compressive strength of the tool material are shown to limit the maximum rate of metal removal for a particular toolwork combination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. E. M.Trent:Metal Cutting, Butterworths, London/Boston, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Tabor:J. Lubrication Technol., ASME, 1977, vol. 99, pp. 387–95.

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. H. Cook:J. Engineering for Industry, ASME, 1973, vol. 193, pp. 931–38.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Ramalingam and J. D. Watson:J. Engineering for Industry, ASME, 1978, vol. 100, pp. 201–07.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. I. Ham and N. Narutaki:J. Engineering for Industry, ASME, 1973, vol. 95, pp. 951–59.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. K. Wright, J. G. Horne and D. Tabor:Wear, 1979, vol. 54, pp. 371–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. J. F. Archard:Wear, 1958, vol. 2, pp. 438–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P. W. Wallace and G. Boothroyd:J. Mechanical Engineering Science, 1964, vol. 6, pp. 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. N. N. Zorev:International Research in Production Engineering, ASME, New York, 1973, p. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  10. F. A. McClintock and A. S. Argon:Mechanical Behavior of Materials, Addison-Wesley, Cambridge, MA, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Ramalingam and P. K. Wright: to be published inJ. Engineering Materials Technology, 1981.

  12. E. D. Doyle, J. G. Horne and D. Tabor:Proc. of the Royal Society of London, 1979, vol. A366, pp. 173–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. E. M. Trent:J. of the Iron and Steel Inst., 1963, vol. 201, pp. 1001–15. E. M. Trent: “Three Wear Processes Which Control Performance of Cemented Carbide Cutting Tools”,SME Technical Paper, No. MR71-913, Dearborn, MI, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. K. Wright and E. M. Trent,J. of the Iron and Steel Inst., 1973, vol. 211, pp. 364–68.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. P. K. Wright and A. Bagchi,Proc. of the 8th North American Manufacturing Research Conf., 1980, vol. 8, pp. 277–84.

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Gandhi and M. F. Ashby:Acta Metallurgica, 1979, vol. 27, pp. 1565–602.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, P.K., Bagchi, A. Wear mechanisms that dominate tool-life in machining. J. Applied Metalworking 1, 15–23 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02834342

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02834342

Keywords

Navigation